Youtube Deletes Links?

Did Hovind Get His Account Closed For Saying What He Thought About the Earthquake? · Youtube Deletes Links? · An enemy of Kent Hovind exposes youtube's evil dealing

Only if you block them.

Sample 1, deletion was instantaneous, I immediately tried to comment under it.

Sample 2, no deletion several months later.

A link on the channel of Creation Myths is likely to attract the kind of readers who will not print me for money, but will give patronising comments.

A link on the channel "Candace Owens Podcast" would be likely to attract readers who would actually appreciate what I have to say. But, as said, that is blocked, see picture evidence above./HGL

PS, it could be ...

... an attempt of Jewish Gatekeeping.

Apart from the fact that Rabbis have done that with Isaiah 53 for centuries, why would I call this "Jewish"?

But after sin, man believed explicitly in Christ, not only as to the Incarnation, but also as to the Passion and Resurrection, whereby the human race is delivered from sin and death: for they would not, else, have foreshadowed Christ's Passion by certain sacrifices both before and after the Law, the meaning of which sacrifices was known by the learned explicitly, while the simple folk, under the veil of those sacrifices, believed them to be ordained by God in reference to Christ's coming, and thus their knowledge was covered with a veil, so to speak. And, as stated above (II-II:1:7), the nearer they were to Christ, the more distinct was their knowledge of Christ's mysteries.

What St. Thomas outlines - I am quoting

Second part of the second part
Q 2 The act of faith
A 7 Is explicit faith in Christ always necessary for salvation?
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3002.htm#article7

- means that in the Old Testament, during the Jewish Church, learned men were giving only indirect information about Jesus Christ to the others.

Contrast the Christian way:

After grace had been revealed, both learned and simple folk are bound to explicit faith in the mysteries of Christ, chiefly as regards those which are observed throughout the Church, and publicly proclaimed, such as the articles which refer to the Incarnation, of which we have spoken above (II-II:1:8). As to other minute points in reference to the articles of the Incarnation, men have been bound to believe them more or less explicitly according to each one's state and office.

Since it is a duty to adher to the true Pope, the question whether someone could have lost papal office, or for that matter been invalidly elected, due to faults in his belief system, revealed after his election, or even before, is actually not one which only the learned can deal with. Not in a situation where we already had more than one papal claimants, as the one I adhered to died on Aug. 2 last year./HGL

PPS, the first screenshit is actually about Lisa Haven's channel./HGL