New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Pages
- Home
- Voyez la ligne pointillée / See the dotted line?
- Fatima - Bad News and Good News - the latter provi...
- Panthéisme ? Non. Trinité ? Oui.
- Do not support World Childhood Foundation!
- Hans-Georg Gadamer was of the "Frankfurter Schule"? - get Inklings for me please!
- A Relevant Quote from J. R. R. Tolkien
- Sur le concept de l'ésotérique et sur les sociétés secrètes
- In Case Someone Thinks I am Preaching ...
- Would Gay Marriage Allow them an Authentic Life?
- Malfaisance de "Sécurité"
- Have I Done Ill Speaking Against the Real Pope a F...
- Drodzy Polacy - i Rosjanie itd.
- Vatican in Exile : Calendar and Marian Anthems
- Distinguons
- Code ASCII et James Bond
- Presentation
Wednesday, 12 August 2026
Bonum Festum Sanctae Radegondis Reginae
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
Pictavis, in Gallia, sanctae Radegundis Reginae, cujus vita miraculis et virtutibus claruit.
Fake History Can in Principle Be Traced
Fiction is something else, but once something from the start makes a claim of being history, it can be traced, and a fake history can be traced to a fake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj_vwtWt06o
Did Quintus write a letter to Marcus (the brothers both being named Tullius Cicero) saying Romans were at that time building Stone Henge?
No.
How did this source come to be taken for that?
A) A man named Sir Thomas Brown in 1684 writes a list of among other things Latin works we don't have.
B) David Erskine Earl Buchan in the end of the XIXth C first writes it presenting it as a translation, then when discovering it has been quoted as a serious source republishes under his own name what was a satire.
C) Not all were reached by Buchan's decision to own he had written "Quintus Tullius Cicero's" Letter himself. So, continued to quote it as an actual historic source.
What is very important to note is, Britain just after the time of the Roman conquest was NOT the immediate origin of the society that Brown and Earl Erskine inhabited. Rather, it was its far off past.
What is also very important to note is, it's not just the book of Mormon, but also modern scholarly speculation about the past that's in the same boat.
BUT, given the Gospels and Acts are immediate origin story of a Church claiming them as such, we don't have that wiggle room to speculate that it could have been a misunderstood work later taken as fact. The Church was not likely to forget the actual immediate origin in AD 50 or even AD 150. Just as Thomas Brown was not forgetting the Restoration after Cromwell and David Erskine was not forgetting the Acts of Union 1707. And by 150, the Church would already have such an ossified view of its immediate origin that it would have been impossible for a new source to gain traction with a new idea about it./HGL
Bonum Festum Sanctae Clarae Virginis
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
Sanctae Clarae Virginis, primae plantae Pauperum Dominarum Ordinis Minorum; quae ad aeternas Agni nuptias evocata est pridie hujus diei.
Tuesday, 11 August 2026
Nephelim Before the Flood? Found? (Homo Longi = Denisovan, as per Genetics)
| D 68 | DQ 81 | |
| E 69 120 17 | ER 82 160 03 | |
| N 78 190 25 | NA 65 220 08 | |
| I 73 260 28 | IV 86 300 14 | |
| S 83 340 31 | SF 70 370 14 | |
| O 79 410 40 | OB 66 430 20 | |
| V 86 490 46 | VI 73 500 23 | |
| A 65 550 51 | AN 78 570 31 | |
| N 78 620 59 | NA 65 630 36 | |
| ABCDEFGHIJKLM | ||
| NOPQRSTUVWXYZ | ||
| H 72 | HU 85 | |
| O 79 140 11 | OB 66 140 11 | |
| M 77 210 18 | MZ 90 230 11 | |
| O 79 280 27 | OB 66 290 17 | |
| L 76 350 33 | LY 89 370 26 | |
| O 79 420 42 | OB 66 430 32 | |
| N 78 490 50 | NA 65 490 37 | |
| G 71 560 51 | GT 84 570 41 | |
| I 73 630 54 | IV 86 650 47 | |
| H 72 | ||
| O 79 140 11 | ||
| M 77 210 18 | ||
| O 79 280 27 | ||
| D 68 340 35 | ||
| R 82 420 37 | ||
| A 65 480 42 | ||
| C 67 540 49 | ||
| O 79 610 58 | ||
Monday, 10 August 2026
Bonum Festum Sancti Laurentii
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
Romae, via Tiburtina, natalis beati Laurentii Archidiaconi, qui, in persecutione Valeriani, post plurima tormenta carceris, verberum diversorum, fustium, ac plumbatarum et laminarum ardentium, ad ultimum, in craticula ferrea assatus, martyrium complevit; ejusque corpus a beato Hippolyto et Justino Presbytero sepultum fuit in coemeterio Cyriacae, in agro Verano.
To Honour Lost in Space
- 20 000 days after it started:
Thursday, 18 June 2020 - J'ai lu en LeParisien, que la mortalité dans les EHPAD ... (FR) · "Deducant te angeli" - où ça? (FR) · Anglican Progressives Get Him Wrong · Clément Reinaud en La galerie Sabine Bayasli (FR)
- 20 000 days after it ended:
Thursday, 8 December 2022 - Bonum Festum Immaculatae Conceptionis BMV (LAT) · Index XL FR : de l'Assomption à l'Immaculée Conception de la TSVM, AD 2022 (FR) · Index XL ENG : Assumption to Immaculate Conception of Our Lady, AD 2022 · If you are asked to put Alla / Allah on your clothes
Wretched - 25 (such) "reasons Peter was not the first Pope" · Mariology · Emma Thorne took on Calvin Smith ... · Der schlimmste "Hypermoralismus" ist Hyperresponsabilität (DE) · Writing to an ex-JW
- Death of June Lockart
Monday, 23 October 2023 - Peace from Gaza to Golan, from Nahariyya to Elat? · Agar ou Sarah? (FR) · Glacial Maximum and Younger Dryas?
Sunday, 9 August 2026
Christianisme en France
Situation moins que brillante :
Caroline Pilastre : «C'est devenu une honte d'être chrétien dans un pays aux racines chrétiennes»
CNEWS | 7 août 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux0Y9m6Gtds
Un peu la situation quand approcha le Païen Clovis du Nord, non ?/HGL
Saturday, 8 August 2026
Friday, 7 August 2026
Gilbert Keith Chesterton vs Clintons
We already know that the Clinton Foundation is supportive of Malthusianism and GKC certainly wasn't.
Does this reflect an even older quarrel?
Gilbert Keith Chesterton was named for St. Gilbert of Sempringham, who was, of course, from Sempringham.*
This is the seal of Sempringham. It features St. Gilbert.
Gilbert was born at Sempringham, near Bourne in Lincolnshire, the son of Jocelin, an Anglo-Norman lord of the manor, and an unnamed Anglo-Saxon mother. He had a brother, Roger, and a sister, Agnes.
Unusually for that period, his father actively prevented his son from becoming a knight, instead sending him to France, probably the University of Paris but possibly under Anselm of Laon, to study theology. Some physical deformity may have made him unfit for military service, making an ecclesiastical career the best option. When he returned in 1120 he became a clerk in the household of Robert Bloet, Bishop of Lincoln, started a school for boys and girls (the existing primary school at Pointon is still named after him) and was ordained by Robert's successor, Alexander.[4] Offered the archdeaconry of Lincoln, he refused, saying that he knew no surer way to perdition.
Now, that's the connection between St. Gilbert, whose unwillingness to become a higher clergy member was noted by Gilbert Keith Chesterton, and Sempringham.
Where do the Clinton's come in?
At the Dissolution of the Monasteries, Sempringham Priory** came to the Clintons***, who demolished it and reused the stone to build their residence on the site. Today little remains of priory or residence.
Which Barons might be distant relatives to Bill Clinton's stepfather, whose name he bears./HGL
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilbert_of_Sempringham
** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sempringham
*** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Clinton
Answering Maxine Harrison on the Timeline
Is the Church pressuring women to marry too young? Why we need to rethink the timeline
By Maxine Harrison | 6 August 2026
https://www.womanalive.co.uk/opinion/-is-the-church-pressuring-women-to-marry-too-young-why-we-need-to-rethink-the-timeline/21954.article
Historically, women have often married at a younger age, but this has frequently been shaped by patriarchal systems and economic or social necessity rather than, I believe, God’s best. God’s design for marriage is rooted in love, mutual commitment and glorifying him through that partnership. Although we now live in an era where many women marry later in life, the pressure for women to marry by a certain age - especially within some church communities - still exists.
God's design for marriage is rooted in fertility.
And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth
[Genesis 1:27-28]
And Adam said: This now is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man 24 Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh
[Genesis 2:23-24]
But from the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife And they two shall be in one flesh. Therefore now they are not two, but one flesh What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder
[Mark 10:6-9]
Jesus in the passage (which incidentally features Young Earth Creationism, even to the exclusion of Gap Theory and Day-Age Theory, let alone Evolutionism) is summarising God's design by intentionally conflating two Bible quotes from Genesis 1 and 2. The first of these actually features fertility.
Maxine Harrison is a paragraph or two later featuring two women who divorced, one of whom married at 25 and the other at 26.
The one who married at 25 seems to have had a child with her husband only at 29. I didn't get around to see the other's pregnancy story or otherwise.
The thing is, getting children becomes harder for a woman if she waits to 30. Not just fertility problems, but also more painful childbirths. And this can lead to conflict, if one (as reasonably) isn't willing to use contraceptives. Late marriages and first childbirths lead to fewer children and sometimes less stable marriages.
Meanwhile, both of the influencers seem to have believed divorce was an actual option. That's not what Jesus said in Mark.
In her YouTube series, Chanel bravely shares the domestic abuse she experienced and admits she married too quickly.
Let's be clear, "too quickly" does not equal "too early". As in "too early in life" ... it may have been too early in the relationship, though.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Cajetan
7.VIII.2026
Neapoli, in Campania, sancti Cajetani Thienaei Confessoris, Clericorum Regularium Fundatoris, qui, singulari in Deum fiducia, pristinam Apostolicam vivendi formam suis colendam tradidit, et, miraculis clarus, a Clemente Papa Decimo inter Sanctos relatus est.
PS, she also said:
Some concerns about women marrying later undoubtedly come from a place of genuine care, particularly regarding fertility and the biological realities of having children. But today there are more options available, like adoption and egg freezing.
Well, that's fairly marginal compared to the loss, and egg freezing is on top of that illicit.
Adoption should be an option for few who have genuinely tried to get children./HGL
Thursday, 6 August 2026
Bonum Festum Transfigurationis Domini
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
In monte Thabor Transfiguratio Domini nostri Jesu Christi.
Introit for the Transfiguration of the Lord: Tibi dixit cor meum
Floriani Sacred Music | 18 Aug. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NWcnncSKd0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
