New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Pages
- Home
- Voyez la ligne pointillée / See the dotted line?
- Fatima - Bad News and Good News - the latter provi...
- Panthéisme ? Non. Trinité ? Oui.
- Do not support World Childhood Foundation!
- Hans-Georg Gadamer was of the "Frankfurter Schule"? - get Inklings for me please!
- A Relevant Quote from J. R. R. Tolkien
- Sur le concept de l'ésotérique et sur les sociétés secrètes
- In Case Someone Thinks I am Preaching ...
- Would Gay Marriage Allow them an Authentic Life?
- Malfaisance de "Sécurité"
- Have I Done Ill Speaking Against the Real Pope a F...
- Drodzy Polacy - i Rosjanie itd.
- Vatican in Exile : Calendar and Marian Anthems
- Distinguons
- Code ASCII et James Bond
- Presentation
Tuesday, 14 July 2026
Yes, She Was Targetted
Ann Widdecombe · Yes, She Was Targetted
Counter Terrorism Police confirm Ann Widdecombe's murder 'WAS TARGETED' as force TAKE OVER case
The Mirror | 14 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5oKVJNwBNg
Monday, 13 July 2026
Isaias 66:8
The Cult Around Israel No One Wants to Talk About
Olivia Swing | 12 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCuDLkfzXjc
ISAIAS - Chapter 66
https://johnblood.gitlab.io/haydock/id1286.html
8 Who hath ever heard such a thing? and who hath seen the like to this? shall the earth bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be brought forth at once, because Sion hath been in labour, and hath brought forth her children?
Ver. 8. Day. Shall a whole nation be born at once? Twelve fishermen effect the most surprising change in the manners of the world.
"On September 18th, 2025, a different FARA document was filed on behalf of Israel. Brad Parcell, chief strategy officer at Salem Media Group, the company that distributes the Charlie Kirk show"
That is, 8 days after Charlie Kirk was shot./HGL
Sunday, 12 July 2026
Ann Widdecombe
Ann Widdecombe · Yes, She Was Targetted
Did Ann Widdicombe die a martyr? Will her death spark an uprising?
Dr Gavin Ashenden | 12 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-vn5ORL860
Ann Widdecombe Final Text Messages Reveal Disturbing TRUTH 😱
Wax Unfiltered | 12 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqVoCNDuZ74
RIP or OPN.
Une professeure catholique virée, parce que pro-vie
My pupils asked me about abortion. I was sacked for my response
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotland/article/my-pupils-asked-me-about-abortion-i-was-sacked-for-my-response-mbfm2fqmk
Sarah Morse, a Catholic who grew up in the US, is suing her former school for discrimination after giving her honest opinion cost her the career she loved
Je traduis :
Titre : mes élèves m'ont demandé sur l'avortement. J'ai été virée pour ma réponse.
Châpo: Sarah Morse, une Catholique ayant grandi dans les États-Unis, fait procés à l'école qui était la sienne pour discrimination, après que son opinion sincère donnée lui coûtait la carrière qu'elle aimait.
Si quelqu'un aurait la témérité idiote de me vouloir revaloriser comme prof, ceci n'est pas la carrière que j'ai aimée, au contraire, et j'aurais peur que des choses encore pires se passaient dans le cas. En Suède, les écoles n'existent pas en tant que "catholiques hors contrat" ...
Genre, une élève en grossesse et des profs qui s'arrangent pour qu'elle ne me parle pas et qui la poussent à avorter. Ce serait le dégoût absolu./HGL
To Some People "SSPX is in Schism" Means "Traditional Positions are Schismatic"
I agree SSPX is in schism or heresy, for Pope-sifting.
I agree that classic Sedevacantism in the sense of "we haven't had a Pope since 1958, we can't get one either" is also wrong, but at least it avoids Pope-sifting or partial obedience. In the version known as "Sedeprivationism" it doesn't avoid Pope-splitting in the sense of saying "so and so is materially Pope" (and that's why we can't get one) "but not formally Pope" (and that's why we can't obey him).
But I don't agree either of them has discredited the positions that were undermined and sometimes even directly contradicted.
For my part, so far, I obey Pope Michael II. That's one solution that avoids both.
Robert Sungenis thinks one can obey "Leo XIV" via his bishop, but if his bishop is OK with his traditional positions, the one who would be mine over here if "Leo XIV" were Pope, seemingly isn't.
CCC § 283 is heresy on any reading I can understand so far.
If "Leo XIV" or his men here want to say it's not contradicting Geocentrism or Young Earth Creationism, fine, let them show how it's compatible. But instead of even trying, some seem to want to pretend I'm a Flat-Earther, just because their favourite Secularist dope in "Science" (meaning Evolutionism) has come out with "Young Earth is like Flat Earth" when it isn't, or because their Ecumenic partners among Muslims are telling them I oppose Galileo because I'm a Flat Earther, because some Muslims here are that bad at the history of Christendom.
Meanwhile, one hardliner present in Écône, Fr. Paul Robinson, a man who defended not even making a pause for hearing what pretendedly "his Pope" had to say, is equally opposed to Young Earth and suggests that this belief somehow smacks of Protestantism, when it is that of St. Augustine, as you can see from City of God.
Or some will say "Pius XII allowed the belief that Adam's body developed from non-human life-forms" when he actually allowed a discussion behind closed doors. And as far as the Roman Curia was concerned, thank you Christine Pedotti, for the info if not the view point, the discussion was about a decade later mature to close into dogmatising Creationism. Which is not what the council did.
So, trying to push back on SSPX or appeal to Pius XII, is not how one can reasonably convince me. But some over here don't care about "reasonable" in relation to me.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
VIIth Lord's Day after Pentecost
12.VII.2026
Thursday, 9 July 2026
En lisant le latin, ça vous est arrivé de penser que le paradigme est trop long ?
Pour les substantifs, coup de bol.
Au pluriel, chaque Vocatif coïncide avec le Nominatif, chaque Ablatif avec le Datif. Aucun substantif a douze formes, au maximum dix :
Declinatio substantivalis et pronominalis
Le conspectus en soi est peu lisible, mais il renvoie à cinq liens ... pas exactement un pour les cinq déclinaisons.
Car première et cinquième sont très apparentés, surtout si on tient compte des mobilia en première (filiabus, pour les filles, animabus, pour les âmes, pas à confondre avec filiis, pour les fils, animis, pour les esprits, les courages).
Item deuxième et quatrième. La troisième est son propre truc. Par contre, les deux groupes sont nettement différenciés entre non neutres et neutres. (Pour les substantifs, aucune déclinaison est en soi suffisante pour distinguer entre masculin et féminin : bonus nauta malam malum secat ... le bon marin coupe le mauvais pommier, en français les arbres sont devenus masculins).
Et les verbes.
En grec, on apprend les formes des temps qui sont d'une même forme de théma. Mais pour chaque verbe, au lieu d'apprendre la conjugaison "première, deuxième, troisième, quatrième" et ça suffit, on apprend toujours les formes de théma.
De cette manière, on se libère de répéter la même formation d'un temps pour les divers conjugaisons.
Amo, amas, amavi, amavisti. Frico, fricas, fricui, fricuisti.
Moneo, mones, monui, monuisti. Iubeo, iubes, iussi, iussisti. Deleo, deles, delevi, delevisti.
Et le perfait comme fricui, monui, aussi en volui, soit de volo, soit de volvo.
On apprend amo, amavi comme la déclinaison, frico, fricui comme exception. On apprend moneo, monui comme la déclinaison, mais iubeo, iussi, deleo, delevi, comme des exceptions. Et si on faisait comme en grec ? Alors, chaque temps hormis l'indicatif du présent se limite à trois versions à apprendre. L'indicatif du présent en a quatre, mais j'ai triché en faisant de "audeo, j'ose, adeo, je visite, audio, j'entends" une même version. En fait, le pluriel de la troisième (ou la sixième, comme on dit en français) est "-ent" pour "audent" mais un "unt" précédé de voyelle pour "adeunt, audiunt". En revanche, je donne la forme sans voyelle comme une seule variante (tous les verbes l'ayant comptent comme "irréguliers").
Index morphologiae uerbalis
Finalement, si ces simplification de l'apprentissage ne font pas saliver, je donne aussi des traductions de chants populaires (dont "au clair de la lune") en latin.
Exercitia simplicissima de casuum et temporum utilitate
Notons que j'ai nommé ce blog Latinitatis morphologia simplificata. Je ne rêve même pas de priver le latin de ses formes, juste de les présenter en manière plus brève, d'où le sous-titre vel potius simpliciter exposita.
Ioannes Georgius Lundahl
Lutetiae Parisiorum
die martyrorum Gorcumensium
9 Julii AD MMo XXo VIo.
Brilae, in Hollandia, passio novemdecim Martyrum, Gorcomiensium nuncupatorum; quorum ex numero novem Sacerdotes ac duo Laici erant Fratres Minores, quatuor Presbyteri saeculares, duo Praemonstratenses, unus Regularis Canonicus sancti Augustini, et unus Dominicanus. Hi omnes, ob tuendam Ecclesiae Romanae auctoritatem et realem Christi in Eucharistia praesentiam, a Calvinianis haereticis varia ludibria et tormenta perpessi, tandem, in trabem acti, agonem suum, adstrictis laqueo faucibus, consummarunt; et a Pio Nono, Pontifice Maximo, inter sanctos Martyres relati sunt.
"Birthright lottery"
It seems, some have argued I had a 20 % chance of being born in India.
My parents each had 2*23 chromosomes.
I also have 2*23 chromosomes.
For each gamete, the sperm and the ovum, the 23 chromosomes assembled in a chance that's 2^23, or 8 388 608. The combination of that is the square of this number, so : 70 368 744 177 664.
I had one chance in 70 368 744 177 664 to be born to my two parents. I had exactly zero chances in anything to be born to two Indian parents. If I had any chance of being born in India, it would have been the chance of mum and dad both being so fond of Bhagavadgita they had gone to India. I would still have been born to two Swedes.
I was in fact born in Vienna. Not far from Karl Lueger-Platz, 4 km with the roads bending. Because, each of them went to the Med school there.
Education is also part of my heritage. My dad neither stayed with that Med school nor with my mother. My mother stayed with the Med school each time she studied (up to ninth term, not sure if she completed a tenth in Sweden), and not with my dad.
I feel no regrets at the birthright lottery./HGL
PS, historic reenactment was already a thing in 1876, see the picture of Karl Lueger by Hermann Nigg:
![]()
Von Hermann Nigg - http://www.dorotheum.com/, Gemeinfrei, Link
Would Conservative Protestants Like a Protestant Civilisation?
HGL's F.B. writings: A Serb is Anti-Austrian (Who's Surprised?) · New blog on the kid: Would Conservative Protestants Like a Protestant Civilisation?
They want to persuade themselves they would.
Doug Wilson dreams of a hypothetic future Protestant Republic. In it, Catholic Churches would be denied the right to Marian processions. But apart from that, Catholics could remain openly Catholics, apparently?
His rationale for opposing the Marian procession is, it's "public idolatry" ... but part of the rationale for the Deformation (he would spell it with an R, not a D) is that Eucharistic adoration is idolatry and Sacrifice of the Mass either idolatry or at least blasphemy.
So, I have a hard time seeing how his future Protestant Republic would not also oppose what's going on inside a Catholic Church to which the doors are usually open, daytime. Perhaps he would change access to the Catholic Church, allowing the public access only for Mass hours, and showing a card to the ussher. Or perhaps he would pretend Catholic Mass is just a version of the Sunday service. The one road is restriction, the other misrepresentation.
Either way, early Protestant civilisation items like England in the days of Charles II (despite his being personally convinced of Catholicism at a time when his brother, the future James VII and II was still a convinced Protestant) would kill priests for celebrating mass and kill laymen for hosting a priest to celebrate Mass or for hiding a priest from detection.
Now, he is against female pastors, rightly so, against the theory of Evolution, rightly so, against full Church acceptance of, not same sex attracted persons, perhaps, but certainly homosexual couples, and rightly so (I'm for acceptance of a ssa person if he or she is into celibacy or into actual Christian marriage, ie makes an exception for one of the opposed sex).
But a late Protestant civilisation has produced, in order of appearance, some from earlier on but more important later:
- Proposals to push Antisemitism to destruction of Synagogues (Luther)
- Masonic type indifferentism, starting with early Rosicrucians (around the beginning of the Thirty Years War)
- Deep Space (Newton, Kant)
- Deep Time (Hutton, Lyell)
- Evolution, including human evolution (Wallace, Darwin)
- Neopagan attacks on "God of the gaps" (Nietzsche was from Röcken, near Lützen)
- acceptance of Evolution in the Church with "Christian" attacks on "God of the gaps" (Henry Drummond, Free Church of Scotland)
- National Socialism (Václav Klofáč and Rudolf Jung took inspiration from the Hussite commander John Zizka of Trocnov and the Chalice; c. 1360 – 11 October 1424)
- Female Pastors
- Persecution of Creationists in Church
- acceptance of gay couples in Church, with "blessings" of partnerships or downright gay weddings.
I suppose Doug Wilson is against all of these, and rightly so. Oh, perhaps excluding Deep Space, but if so he hasn't paid attention to the "Distant Starlight" argument against Young Earth Creationism.
Another item is lying. Doug Wilson might be in denial about this one.
It was a Serb who showed above photo as an exhibit of "Catholic clergy", all of above are in fact Protestant clergy. As he didn't answer my words, I couldn't correct his possible denial, but am doing so here. The two central figures are:
Von Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-H25547 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, Link
Ludwig Müller, here shown with Nazi salute at the National Synod of Wittenberg (he was federal bishop or Reichsbischoff) and ...
Friedrich Coch, "von 1933 bis 1945 Landesbischof der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Landeskirche Sachsens." (country bishop of Saxony) with the previous words designating him as a "leading proponent of the German Christians movement (Deutsche Christen in the German original term). He was from Eisenach, near Wartburg.
But this confusion has been entertained by Protestants as well, like his thesis, Stepinac being, on orders of the Vatican, complicit in Jasenovac atrocities of genocidal type against Serbs, has been promoted by Avro Manhattan at Chick Tracts.
I have also seen a photo of Hitler signing a cheque for a Protestant Deaconess presented as Hitler adulated by a "Catholic nun" which clearly she was not.
More often, National Socialism is presented as specially indebted to Catholicism in Austria and Bavaria, because it's clearly in the century leading up to it, Antisemitic. Right, it is Antisemitic on a religious level, and it has promoted what some would call "the Blood Libel" ... I'm not into calling it a libel, but I am against pushing it against all Jews, just as I'm against pushing National Socialism against all Catholic Antisemites. There was a tract about Sts Simon of Trent, Andrew of Rinn and two more child martyrs, I'd exonerate Jews on St. Andrew while leaving him martyrdom status (Chesterton would have probably surmised the "Jews" that that uncle met were actually witches and I'm suspicious of the uncle). It was pushing against "Orthodox" Jews because of similiarities between these and the Medieval Jews, perhaps superficial such. I'd hope those killers were as untypical of Medieval Jews as the Rotschilds are of modern ones.
But it never went beyond religious propaganda. Austro-Fascism, the pure expression of this Catholicism, the direct heir of Karl Lüeger, never persecuted Jews or any ethnic group as such. Oh, people from Czechoslovakia were expelled from factories and deported back over the border.
The huge difference between Austro-Fascism and NSDAP was that NSDAP was pro-medicine and pro-science, in a sense that divorced ethics from Catholicism or even from Protestant Christian ethics (Protestantism has an inherent tendency this direction, in the idea of "simul justus et peccator" and it was accentuated by Deutsche Christen). Austro-Fascism never divorced political ethics from Catholic ethics. That's why Jews, Roma, Sinti were safe, as far as the government was concerned, in Austria prior to 1938. And so were handicapped people. That's why they could face unjust hardships in Germany as early as 1933 (confiscated property, for Jews, socially motivated slave hunting, "tramp camps" for among others Gipsies, while handicapped people could be "mercy killed" from September 1939, including in former and future Austria, by then "Ostmark", and sterilised since February 1934, as in Protestant countries of Scandinavia up to the 1970's). But this, the Protestants prefer to gloss over, and Doug Wilson has unjustly gone after Nick Fuentes.
I may like some National Socialists today (notably Nordfront in Sweden). But I'm not into all of their politics, and this is partly because I'm Catholic and Fredrik and Paulina (I hope they become Catholics one day, they are currently Neo-Pagans) are indirect heirs to a Protestant culture, one which when it could no longer persecute Catholics after Gustaf III or converts to Catholicism after 1860, chose to obfuscate Catholicism. The other day, an article showed the difference. In England, there was a directive to make fewer forced hospitalisations of Black people for psychosis. To Nordfront redactors the prior state was not racist, but simply reflected these people having a higher degree of genetic fragility to psychosis. To me, I'm happy the directive points to racist or racist adjacent motivations (also known as hyper civilisation) in the diagnosis criteria. Obviously I'd hope it leads to fewer White Brits being hospitalised as well. Including, perhaps, if that's the case, the mother of Preston Davies.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
Martyrs of Gorkum
9.VII.2026
Brilae, in Hollandia, passio novemdecim Martyrum, Gorcomiensium nuncupatorum; quorum ex numero novem Sacerdotes ac duo Laici erant Fratres Minores, quatuor Presbyteri saeculares, duo Praemonstratenses, unus Regularis Canonicus sancti Augustini, et unus Dominicanus. Hi omnes, ob tuendam Ecclesiae Romanae auctoritatem et realem Christi in Eucharistia praesentiam, a Calvinianis haereticis varia ludibria et tormenta perpessi, tandem, in trabem acti, agonem suum, adstrictis laqueo faucibus, consummarunt; et a Pio Nono, Pontifice Maximo, inter sanctos Martyres relati sunt.
Wednesday, 8 July 2026
Bonum Festum Sanctae Elisabeth
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
4 Julii | Stremotii, in Lusitania, natalis sanctae Elisabeth Viduae, Lusitanorum Reginae, quam, virtutibus et miraculis claram, Urbanus Octavus, Pontifex Maximus, in Sanctorum numerum retulit. Ejus tamen celebritas octavo Idus mensis hujus recolitur, ex dispositione Innocentii Papae Duodecimi.
8 Julii | Sanctae Elisabeth Viduae, Lusitanorum Reginae, quae ad regnum caeleste quarto Nonas hujus mensis transivit.
Elle ne parle donc pas ?
Monaco, Ukraine, Cryptomonnaies : L’incroyable traque d’Anastasia Berezovska
RTL | 8 juil. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9mkpe4DzT8
Pâques et jours entourants, 2022. Je suis en train de faire ce les commentaires sur ce post en cyber, mais pas 24 sur 24 :
Listes de Rois Pictes
Or, Vendredi saint, soir, j'ai pris une petite bière pour "le seul repas complet autorisé". Quand plus tard un homme m'offre un repas, délicieux, sans doute, je n'ai pas le droit d'en prendre et je dis non merci.
Le lendemain petit matin. J'avais dormis sur le parvis de Georges Pompidou. Je note un homme qui fait quelque chose avec mon bagage, je suis très fatigué et pas diplomatique.
Je me lève, je le pousse, il n'est pas l'homme un peu trop bourré de la veille. Il me terrasse, et commence à me donner des coups de pieds à ma tête. Pas le plus brutal possible, sinon je serais mort, mais quand même trop pénible. Quand les gens commencent à passer, il quitte.
Et quand je le décris devant la police, je pensais que ça pourrait être un proche de Zélenski. Le cas n'est jamais résolu.
Un peu plus tard, je retrouve Zélenski en personne sur une vidéo avec son soutien international Orlando Bloom. Les deux hommes sont de taille différente, je vois que Zélenski est autant court que mon aggresseur. Une autre vidéo, il crie en colère ... la même voix que j'avais entendu ce matin.
Je soutiens l'Ukraine, en principe, mais je ne suis pas un inconditionnel de son président actuel. Pour héro national qu'il soit./HGL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

