Je ne suis, comme dit, pas un Protestant évangélique

J'apprécie par contre parfois leur apologétique, notemment j'étais en train de regarder cette vidéo :

Muslim & Jewish Women Say Jesus Is Not God… Then THIS Happens
Jaiden Forrest | 5 May 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj09taCdlA8

... et un Musulman, à côté de moi, commence sa prière. Non, pas fort, je pouvais ne pas entendre à condition de me boucher l'oreille gauche, vraiment pas fort. Mais ça durait.

J'appelais la Bibliothécaire. Aussi pas fort, j'expliquais sans trop acreté, et le Musulman s'est arrêté quand elle est venue avec moi.

Je ne dis pas ceci par rapport à ce seul Musulman, mais hier, une Musulmane venait de me dire :

"Bonjour ! Vous êtes de quel pays ?"
"Pourquoi ?"
"Bien, je vous pose simplement une question."
"Et je vous en pose une autre en retour."
"Vous êtes Allemand."
"J'aurais préféré si vous aviez dit Autrichien."*
"On voit, vous êtes un Globetrotter.** Vous parcourez tous les pays du monde."
"Non."

Une fois la Bibliothèque ici, un Musulman me qualifie d'alcoolique. Une fois la Laverie quelques rues en bas, un autre semble parler de moi, puisqu'il se retire de moi, et il dit à haute voix "hachîîîche"*** ...

Est-ce que ces gens, qui d'ailleurs ont raison qu'un Globetrotter est moins infamant qu'un perpétuel drogué et bourré du matin au soir, trouve que les deux formes de qualificatif seraient moins infamant que de trouver bien une apologétique pour la Divinité du Christ, si celle-ci est par un Évangéliste ?

Parce que, au moins les premières sept minutes, je les trouve bien.

Je pense qu'un Évangéliste est un Chrétien incomplet, mais, il l'est tellement, que parfois les données manquent qui le rendraient antichrétien comme un Luthérien (état, même s'il a tort, devant conscience religieuse) ou comme un Calviniste (double prédestination). Ils ont globalement une tendance à être plus ou moins Sionistes, hélas, fautes de savoir que les Palestiniens sont Israëlites, je ne suis pas d'accord. Mais pour pas mal de de Musulmans, ils sont automatiquement Sionistes, un peu comme le Nationnaliste français est (aussi pour eux) automatiquement en première ligne un Anti-Immigrés. Et en fait, pas mal des Évangélistes sont d'un Sionisme assez mitigé, et pas mal de Nationnalistes sont tout d'abord pro-vie./HGL

* Je portais les culottes d'Autriche, la part de l'Allemagne où ça se porte serait Bavière, limitrophe de l'Autriche, à mon avis d'amateur. Je suis un Suédois, né en Autriche, et je porte en moi peut-être autant d'Autriche que de la Suède (la France est d'une culture intermédiaire entre les deux).
** Mon baluchon pour le linge était balonné environ comme sur les publicités de Globetrotter.
*** Combien ont renouvelé ça depuis Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial? je me demande. Dedans j'argumente que la mère de Preston n'aurait pas dû être définitivement déclarée inepte juste pour l'avoir exposé à drogues.

J'ai été vu avec des gens hospitables d'une secte de type protestant

J'utilise le mot secte dans le sens catholique, comme communauté religieuse ou philosophique incompatible avec le Catholicisme.

Je tiens à souligner, religieusement, j'ai davantage en commun avec les Transalpine Redemptorists qu'avec eux. N'empêche, ils étaient très hospitables.

Head of Transalpine Redemptorists says bishop is investigating him for ‘heresy and schism’
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/head-of-transalpine-redemptorists-says-bishop-is-investigating-him-for-heresy-and-schism/

Fr. Mary informed Kokx that he does not consider any potential forthcoming excommunication or other punishment as valid since he does not consider the hierarchy to be Catholic. Citing Scripture, the Council of Trent, and papal documents issued by Pope Leo XIII and Gregory XVI, the group previously said that we “consider there to be a new, modern Church” and that “the old Faith is not compatible with it.”

Le premier recontre n'était pas dans leur local d'assemblée. Le second, j'ai un mauvais sentiment par rapport à leur pasteur.

Pour le contredire, sur un point essentiel, oui, Dieu demande qu'on croit certaines choses et qu'on ne croit pas certaines d'autres choses, et l'Amour de Dieu peut être perdu dans cette vie, on peut passer de l'état de grâce, aussi pour des raison de conduite que pour des raisons de position doctrinale, à un état de péché mortel. On peut perdre le Salut.

La plupart des citation que font certains protestants qu'on ne pourrait pas perdre le Salut, c'est l'Église qui ne peut pas perdre le Salut. L'état de grâce est aussi une vie éternelle, de son essence, parce que c'est la vie de Dieu en nous, mais jusqu'à mourir, elle n'est pas encore inamissible. Une vie qui peut se perdre n'est pas éternelle ? Oui, si c'est pas la propre vie qui est amissible pour la raison d'être d'essence mortelle, depuis la chute d'Adam. Et celle-ci nous à valu, à tous sauf La Sainte Vierge et Notre Seigneur, d'être depuis engendrés infectés avec la mort éternelle ... heureusement amissible, jusqu'à mourir.

Et la vrai foi est une condition du Salut :

Or, sans la foi, il est impossible de plaire à Dieu ; car il faut que celui qui s’approche de Dieu croie qu’il existe, et qu’il est le rémunérateur de ceux qui le cherchent. C’est par la foi que Noé, ...

Les gens qui imaginent que Noé soit un mythe (dans le sens moderne, une fiction, pas ou peu basé sur des faits), ont souvent aussi mal à comprendre que la Foi est nécessaire. Par contre, ici on peut dire, que ces deux croyances là (l'existence et la bienveillance sous certaines conditions) sont des minima proche de ce qui était déjà révélé au temps de Noé, et que depuis, dans la période du Nouveau Testament, au minimum celui qui est informé, doit être Catholique.

Encore une chose. Le quatrième mandement m'ordonne une révérence limitée à mon père, malgré le fait qu'il ait tort, il ne m'ordonne pas de piété filiale envers tous et chacun qui prétendent m'offrir de la bienveillance paternelle ou paternaliste. Il y a des sectes, qui se trompent là-dessus, qui imaginent par exemple que si ma piété filiale envers mon père est limitée, je dois absolument trouver un autre envers qui avoir une piété, en occurrence illimité.

De cette bibliothèque, je ne peux pas répondre directement aux propos de Marie-Christine, dans deux commentaires. À une autre fois, une autre bibliothèque.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Le miracle de St. Jean à la Porte Latine
6.V.2026

Romae sancti Joannis, Apostoli et Evangelistae, ante Portam Latinam; qui, ab Epheso, jussu Domitiani, vinctus Romam est perductus, et, judicante Senatu, ante eamdem portam in olei ferventis dolium missus, exivit inde purior et vegetior quam intravit.

Pour ceux qui savent que j'aime la thèse du Père Jean Colson, dire qu'il était d'un autre rang d'apôtres que les Douze, et non le fils de Zébédée, ne nie pas ce miracle. Ni celui qu'on dit sur sa sépulture (27.XII)./HGL

Sign Against Abortion Pills, Please!

John Horvat sent me this, which I signed after 30,961 others:

CLICK THE LINK BELOW to sign our petition against CVS & Walgreens for their distribution of abortion pills
https://www.returntoorder.org/petition/petition-against-abortion-pills-at-cvs-and-walgreens/ *

* Omitting the personal code.

Bonum Festum Papae Sancti Pii V

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

[1 Maji] Romae natalis sancti Pii Quinti, ex Ordine Praedicatorum, Papae et Confessoris; qui, ecclesiasticae disciplinae restituendae, haeresibus exstirpandis et Christiani nominis hostibus conterendis strenue ac feliciter incumbens, vitae ac legum sanctitate catholicam Ecclesiam gubernavit. Ipsius autem festivitas tertio Nonas mensis hujus celebratur.
[5 Maji] Sancti Pii Quinti, ex Ordine Praedicatorum, Papae et Confessoris, qui Kalendis mensis hujus obdormivit in Domino.

Bonam Memoriam Inventionis Crucis

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto. Aliis annis, festum est, hodie est memoria, quia maior est IV:a Dominica post Pascham./HGL

Hierosolymis Inventio sacrosanctae Crucis Dominicae, sub Constantino Imperatore.

Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial?

Preston's Death · Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial?

I wondered why, and I still wonder why, Preston Davey was adopted to anyone in the first place.

Jurors then heard from witness Amy Shepherdson, a family-finding social worker with Oldham Local Authority who was Preston's adoption social worker. Once care proceedings were completed she became the allocated social worker for Preston, the court is told.

Oldham Council social workers oversaw adoption of baby Preston Davey before his murder, jurors told
By Rachel Smith Court reporter and Greta Simpson Senior Reporter | 22 Apr 2026
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/oldham-council-social-workers-oversaw-33816706

The other day, I remarked that, whatever Medievals may have thought about same sex attraction not expressed in sodomy, they regarded sodomy as a very odious crime. It was very heavily punished.

I made a remark about "pen on pen and paper on paper doesn't write" ... I could have added "noun to noun or verb to verb does not a sentence make" ... I got a comment on the fact, that I'm probably a benighted breeder (not yet, alas!) who doesn't get that not everyone is trying to make babies. I replied that non-breeders also get old, and people without children and grandchildren tend to be lonely when old.

But, if we note that the normal state is, you have sex in manners that allow for the making of a baby, then you have people who have diverse ways of allowing for non-making of babies, homosexuality being more radical than rubbers, insofar as not using a rubber is less of a relational disturbance than finding a different partner because you realise you want to make babies. But, over and above sex allowing for non-making of babies, apparently sometimes it now allows for undoing of babies.

So, I'm not letting homoliberalism and homosexuality off the hook for the way these guys practised it, leading to a death. But there is another factor here, the boy was not with any one of his parents. Neither Jamie Varley nor John McGowan-Fazakerley had made young Preston.

None of them was his father any more than his mother. Why were these absent from his life?

It is a question no article seems to be dealing with. On a Reddit ...

Preston Davey Case
https://www.reddit.com/r/Adoption/comments/1stwyfl/preston_davey_case/

... I find this remark:

And yet he was using the fact that Preston was (allegedly) drug exposed as some kind of explanation. And she goes along with this conversation.

OK. The mother was not clean. If this is the correct explanation. Not sure if it means hashish fumes in the atmosphere or sth injected, but mother and possibly, not improbably, also father were doing drugs. (Father could simply have been absent).

From here we get an escalation, they are not just temporarily pushed off the care, the child is not temporarily placed with a grandparent until dad or mum or both are clean. No. The child is put with a stranger, who will allow the mother no contact, apart from what social workers agreed on, and the mother is presumably pushed to sign agreement to adopt the baby, and then adoptive parents are found.

Being sober is valued more than IV Commandment:

Honour thy father and thy mother, that thou mayest be longlived upon the land which the Lord thy God will give thee
[Exodus 20:12]

God values this more than abstaining from murder. The UK values this less than abstaining from drugs.

That is the ultimate reason why Preston Davey died, and the decent journalists I read about the case in, Swedish National Socialists, are not Christian and did not deal with this side of the story.

The same reddit has another comment about how this kind of "authority" deals with people (it's also valid about shrinks, by the way), here:

That is inevitable in a system that, despite the complex realities, views adoption as the optimum outcome for children in care. It is a system that treats potential adoptive parents’ experiences differently to those of birth parents: anecdotally, an adoptive parent who has experienced some form of childhood adversity is likely to be described as resilient and empathic to the needs of the children they may adopt. The same experience in a birth parent’s childhood is likely to be seen as the opposite – a risk factor and an area of vulnerability.

The reddit also notes the death of another adopted child, Leiland Corkill:

We had another case back in 2021, 13 month old Leiland James Corkhill, who was murdered by his adoptive mother.
What about Leiland Corkhill then? He was murdered by heterosexual adoptive parents. Any gender and sexuality is capable of abuse.

However, Elsie Scully-Hicks seems to have been shaken to death by a "Matthew" who had a "husband" ...

Now, all three of these were taken away from their actual parents because there was something which someone considered "wrong" in the actual parents. And part of the task of teaching the English public the difference between right and wrong was confided to a certain Jamie Varley and his colleagues, since he was a teacher in a "public school" (normal sense, like in the US, a school run by public authorities for everyone, not a British "Public School" like in Eton), and so were obviously his colleagues. I think this says what needs to be said about England and Northern Europe. Will Tommy Robinson (if or when free) make an article comparing Amy Shepherdson to a grooming gang? She's worse in more than one way.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IV LD after Easter
3.V.2026

Did C. S. Lewis Publically Attack Catholicism?

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: On CSL and Mike Schmitz · New blog on the kid: Did C. S. Lewis Publically Attack Catholicism?

A now public piece of writing of his, the essay "On Christian Reunion" contains this passage:

To you the real vice of Protestantism is the formless drift which seems unable to retain the Catholic truths, which loses them one by one and ends in a “modernism” which cannot be classified as Christian by any tolerable stretch of the word. To us the terrible thing about Rome is the recklessness (as we hold) with which she has added to the depositum fidei [the deposit of faith] – the tropical fertility, the proliferation, of credenda. You see in Protestantism the Faith dying out in a desert: we see in Rome the Faith smothered in a jungle.

Where I find this,* I find the intro:

Subtitled “An Anglican speaks to Roman Catholics,” the essay first published in 1990 as “Christian Reunion” is one of the hardest C.S. Lewis short pieces to get your hands on.

It may be a confusion on part of my memory, it may be it was included in an earlier collection that Brenton Dickieson was unaware of. Or in which he had overlooked it. Or the 1990 collection is an extension or otherwise revised edition of an earlier collection.

But I did read it in my youth. It can not have been much later than 1990, since in 1991 I became a Trad (other story), which led to me reading less Lewis and Tolkien for some while and more contemporary Trad controversialists, like Dom Gérard, Revd. Bryan Houghton or Mgr Lefebvre. It can as I have suggested been earlier. Or, 1990.

My conclusion was, and still is, the Protestants, on this issue, were wrong, the Catholics were right.

However, before we accuse him of attacking Catholicism, next paragraph is:

I know no way of bridging this gulf. Nor do I think it the business of the private layman to offer much advice on bridge-building to his betters. My only function as a Christian writer is to preach “mere Christianity” not ad clerum but ad populum [not to the clergy but to the people]. Any success that has been given me has, I believe, been due to my strict observance of those limits. By attempting to do otherwise I should only add one more recruit (and a very ill qualified recruit) to the ranks of the controversialists. After that I should be no more use to anyone.

By "mere Christianity" he here means "whatever Catholics, Calvinists and Anglicans traditionally agree on" ... in other words, what he attempted to write was a Catholic catechesis minus the parts Protestants disagree on, a Westminister catechesis minus the parts Catholics and Anglicans disagree on, a 39 Articles catechesis minus the parts Catholics and Calvinists agree on, first and foremost. All three in one. And on all three sides to be supplemented by more catechesis from, for instance, Baltimore, Heidelberg, 1662.

He also made it an overwhelmingly antimodernist catechesis. Yes, he had modernist heresies, and the idea of "mere Christianity" could have been one of them. It's possible the cosmological setup in the Narniad is based on things Giordano Bruno was burned for.** It is certain that for long he was an Evolutionist, and that he even fell foul of Trent Session V (where the Catechism of the Book of Common Prayer, 1662, and the Heidelberg Catechism would have not done so) in regards to the individual existence and sin of Adam. But on moral issues, he was antimodernist, even if he believed contraception to be licit, he was silent on that, and in a novel he allowed Merlinus Ambrosius to most definitely not believe it was licit, on Christology, He was antimodernist, except he imagined Christ could have shared ignorance and factual falsehoods about Genesis with Jews of His time. He was staunchly against an even just moral, let alone Genetic or Surgic, Transhumanism, and this even in regards to condemned criminals (as son of a lawyer and friend of one, he was well aware of them).

So, what about him writing above? At all? His very first words are:

I have been asked to write on Christian reunion: but I am afraid that what I have to say will amount to little more than a rough analysis of the actual disunity and a suggestion as to how most of us ought to behave while our tragic and sinful divisions continue. ...

He's not saying which side is sinning, maybe suggesting it could be both / all three*** sides. Probably suggesting, though not directly saying, that all three belong to Body of Christ, a position that Pope Pius XI has condemned (and if he refrained from saying it here, it was probably because he was aware of Mortalium Animos).

As a theological guide to consult when I am in doubt, he would be inadequate, since any Catholic from Chesterton to St. Thomas Aquinas is better than he. But there was a time when I did not in the least know this, and there was a time when I had already read in his texts the mentions of both these Catholics ... and then there was a time when I passed on from him to them.

He didn't prepare me for Cardinal Newman, of whom I read "Apologia" ... the exceedingly small space Newman has explicitly in Lewis basically alludes to "Essay on the Development" preparing the way for very different attitudes, like that of Loisy. Lewis was not a fan of Loisy, and rightly so.

Lewis says in this essay a thing also true of me:

• having a background in a pretty archaic Protestantism
• not sharing its Anticatholicism.

In his case, it was:

I have been well placed for noticing this because I grew up in a very archaic society – that of Northern Ireland – amidst conditions which had even then long since passed away in England.

In my case it was a mother who went to a Bible school and on an Operation Mobilisation missionary journey to convert Italian Catholics to Christianity. On that journey, she found out they already were Christians. Hope George Werver converts, I kind of indirectly owe him my conversion.°

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IV. LD after Easter
3.V.2026

* C.S. Lewis on “Christian Reunion”
Posted on February 6, 2017 by Brenton Dickieson
https://apilgriminnarnia.com/2017/02/06/c-s-lewis-on-christian-reunion/

** Multiplicity of worlds, multiplicity of Christs, however, it is not clear that to Bruno the Christ on Earth and the one on a planet around Sirius would have been even the same person, while to CSL, Jesus and Aslan are supposed to be the same person.

*** When he heard two clergymen speaking of "uncreated energies" and asked them and was giving a supercilious smile, he didn't know or get to know that this was not modernism in any historically modern sense, as post-Enlightenment, it was actually Palamist doctrine, a theory held by many, perhaps all, Eastern Orthodox. Since what some of them call "Vth Council of Constantinople" in the palace of Vlakhernai. When I say "three" I mean Catholic, Calvinist, Anglican, the Lutherans were assimilated to Anglicans, the Orthodox and the Evangelicals were pretty much outside his perspective as far as theological familiarity was concerned. Congregationalists, a UK version of Evangelicals, not too unlike Calvinists in his view ... but he's relying on reports, about them.

° Or that his children do. I looked him up, and he died in April 2023.

Tovia Singer thinks Israel is the nation ruled from Knesset

I mean, he thinks this of the Israel in Ezechiel 38 and 39.

I'd like to warn him, this might not be the case.

The forgiveness after exile of which they speak may (38 verse 12) refer to the ones who returned from Babylon, more than 2000 years ago.

And from these descend, not just Jews and Samaritans, but also Christian Palestinians and even Muslim Palestinians.

The Magogian connection may cover Ashkenaz who are of Jewish confession. Because, while Y chromosomes are Abrahamic or at worst Canaanean, mitochondriae are European:

The origins of Ashkenazi Jews remain highly controversial. Like Judaism, mitochondrial DNA is passed along the maternal line. Its variation in the Ashkenazim is highly distinctive, with four major and numerous minor founders. However, due to their rarity in the general population, these founders have been difficult to trace to a source. Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe. These results point to a significant role for the conversion of women in the formation of Ashkenazi communities, and provide the foundation for a detailed reconstruction of Ashkenazi genealogical history.

Nature: A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
Published: 08 October 2013 | Marta D. Costa et al.
Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2543 (2013)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3543

Just a thought./HGL

St. Athanasius Prayed for This Video on the Real Effects of the Deformation

I'm Not Smart Enough to be Protestant
Brian Holdsworth | 2 May 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41ThafmLINk

Imagine the Nun was Heretical

Since she was on École Biblique, which has pushed Framework Theory, it is not impossible.

But even a heretical nun should not be treated like that.

Here is the news story:

Nun Viciously Attacked In Jerusalem
Return To Tradition | 2.V.2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIDaZPrjI7Y

Preston's Death

Preston's Death · Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial?

BBC: Teacher said baby was 'dead meat', jury hears
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyv2p8ldzlyo

BBC: Teacher had 'harmful thoughts' towards baby, trial told
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx214422272o

BBC: Neighbour wondered why baby 'cried so much', trial hears
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq6p4zlerg4o

The Guardian: Baby was sexually abused before being killed by man adopting him, court told
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/apr/20/baby-sexually-abused-killed-by-man-adopting-him-preston-court

itv: Foster mother of baby allegedly murdered by adopted parents felt something was wrong, trial hears
Granada | Wednesday 22 April 2026 at 6:14pm
https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2026-04-22/foster-mother-of-baby-felt-something-was-wrong-murder-trial-hears

Daily Record: Teacher 'filmed adopted baby as he lay dying of injuries he inflicted', court hears
Carrington Walker, Fionnula Hainey and Rachel Smith | 18:42, 20 Apr 2026
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/teacher-filmed-adopted-baby-lay-37044718

In Russia, homo adoption is illegal and impossible. In Ukraine it is also illegal, hope it's kept that way, but alas not impossible.

Première historique en Ukraine : un tribunal reconnaît un couple homosexuel comme famille
https://www.stophomophobie.com/premiere-historique-en-ukraine-un-tribunal-reconnait-un-couple-homosexuel-comme-famille/

It may be noted that one of that "couple" is a Diplomat to "IL" ... Ukraine might have a better President than Zelensky.

And UK, after Preston died, might ask itself some questions whether the idea of gay adoption was all that good. I know. It takes some thinking. A haaaard job for the fifth most Atheist country in the world.

I felt Blackpool somehow made an allusion to a Marvel Comics villain. But that villain's name was Deadpool.

Hat tip to some decent journalists!/HGL

Qui dit pas que la soupe est chaude, s'il se brûle la bouche, il est malhonnête (dicton "Yugoslave", pays qui n'existe plus)

Je viens de dire que les Musulmans qui m'avaient offert des pommes et oignons pendant le Ramadan, ils étaient gentils. Un sac auparavant de riz, ensuite dedans il y avait des pommes et oignons. Et ça au-dessus un plateau avec le texte qui souhaite en Arabe Ramadan béni.

Reste vrai. Comme dit, je les ai remerciés avec un panneau disant "Merci aux Musulmans qui, pendant le Ramadan, ont aidé un Chrétien" ... après quelques jours, le panneau et le plateau ont été pas à côté de mon bagage, mais à côté d'une poubelle pas loin d'où j'ai mes affaires. Je ne les ai pas remis, je ne les avait pas mis. J'aurais préféré si la famille avait pris les deux.

Un merci à la famille musulmane qui m'a donné des pommes et d'oignons le Ramadan passé

Je cite: J'espère en connaissance de cause ... qu'il y a d'autres Musulmans que j'aime beaucoup moins.

Hier, dernier avril, j'ai eu un accueil un peu particulier dans la BU de Nanterre. J'ai demandé à cinq, peut-être pas dix personnes si elles avaient de la monnaie.

Enfin, un Musulman (ou de toute manière Beur) m'a payé le café dans l'autre bâtiment, on a eu à passer un gardien de sécurité, les machines à café ne fonctionnaient pas dans la BU.

Je trouve ça un peu élaboré. Pour certains sentiments d'honneur, le fait que j'ai pris un bienfait de lui, en sachant qu'il était probablement Musulman, m'obligerait à dire que l'Islam, c'est merveilleux. Je ne le trouve pas.

Je dois souligner, je n'ai jamais dans ma vie été Musulman. J'ai rencontré un Musulman, que c'était à Hambourg ou Hanovre, à la sortie de la ville, je pense à Hambourg, qui était très généreux. Après le poulet, on a parlé un peu. Sur d'autres sujets que ses dépenses envers un pauvre, il était moins généreux. Par exemple, je lui avais dit que j'allais sur un pèlerinage à St. Jacques, il avait trouvé que c'était plutôt un truc de Catho, et n'étais-je pas Suédois ? Oui, mais je me suis converti à l'Église catholique. Il trouvait ça mauvais.

De manière générale, ça ne lui regarde pas. Mais, selon sa religion, "changer sa religion est mauvais" .... il faisait référence, sans doute, à Sunan an Nasa'i livre 37 hadith 99. Je ne connais pas la référence exacte qu'à partir d'une vidéo par Raymond Ibrahim.

The Islamic Reformation Is Here—and You Won't Like It
Raymond Ibrahim | 31 Jan. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX1wqmB0RG0

J'en ai fait un post de commentaires, sur ce sujet et d'autres vers la vidéo, ici :

Is Islam a Threat to Converts?
https://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2025/02/is-islam-threat-to-converts.html

Pendant le temps (depuis Premier Confinément) que je suis dans un endroit précis à Paris, je n'ai jamais promis de devenir Musulman. Y compris quand des Musulmans m'ont donné des choses, et y compris quand ils ont donné trop à manger ou des vêtements que je n'avais pas envie de porter.

Il me semble assez probable que des Musulmans, abusant de leur qualité de gardiens de sécurité (et d'autres positions de confiance) et suivant le hadith noté, ont organisé une méfiance collective envers moi, y compris par les non-musulmans du quartier. Et ce matin, les figures qui appréciaient moins que je fasse la manche avec un panneau vers mon blog, c'étaient des Musulmans. Et encore un homme que je crois Catholique (Novus Ordo) et employé dans un service d'accueil pour les sans-abris ou quelque autre raison qu'il pouvait avoir de me noter.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Joseph Artisan
1.V.2026

Solemnitas sancti Joseph Opificis, Sponsi beatae Mariae Virginis, Confessoris, opificum Patroni.

PS, il est notable que le vocable "fondamentaliste" s'utilise à la fois en connexion avec "Musulman fondamentaliste" (p ex Salafiste, Frères Musulmans) et en connexion avec "Fondamentaliste biblique" (souvent Protestant, parfois encore Catholique ou Orthodoxe) et bâtissent une idée de menace terroriste sur ce vocable. Le mot ne veut pas dire exactement la même chose en connexion avec des religions différentes. Et en Scandinavie, il y a des Sécularistes qui, eux aussi, aimeraient maintenir les Confusions sur l'idéologie ...../HGL