Bonum Festum Sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

And Suppose It's NOT a Gift on the Altar?

If therefore thou offer thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother hath any thing against thee Leave there thy offering before the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming thou shalt offer thy gift
[Matthew 5:23-24]

I got this cited in an email. The main adressee was "undisclosed recipients" and then there was a BCC to myself. I don't know how many others.

I don't know how realistic or unrealistic it is to suspect I was a target of the remark.

Now, some would say, and this I'm statistically pretty certain of after a few years, that I would still be a very apt target for this.

He wants to offer up his blogs to God, but takes petty revenge on CPS? He wants to offer up his blogs to God and condones a racist remark? (Religious equivalent of WTF)

In a sense, I have certainly offered up my blogs to God and Mary, and for one it means the online content as online is for free. A printed version is an extra, welcome to me, as it would generate income for myself and for others.

But it is still not the kind of Korban where I say and look at only holy things. Or where the reverence takes away the curiosity or the social justice ambition.

Second, I'm not taking petty revenge on either CPS nor on Muslim second and third generation immigrants, as well as some non-Muslim Black Africans. I'm civically warning of an actual danger. This is not an unchristian thing, and if these instances have hurt myself, it is not a question of forgiving not to write what I write, but to be lame as a journalist and ignore first hand evidence of evil-doing. I don't have the right not to take sides against such people in some cases.

Third, lots of what I do is a very goodnatured revenge. I don't go after Science as a bunch of enemies I want to insult as deeply as possible by being Young Earth Creationist or Geocentric. I go after bad evidence as bad evidence. And anyone pretending the contrary is calumniating me. I'll cite one more thing from that letter:

The Baltimore Catechism backs this up plainly. The Fifth Commandment forbids not just murder, but fighting, quarreling, and injuring our neighbor. It commands us to live in peace and union with one another. And the teaching of the Council of Trent extends this even further — sins against the Fifth Commandment include the interior movements of unjust anger, hatred, and contempt. The commandment doesn't stop at your hands. It reaches into your chest.

Now, one form of quarrelling* is looking for occasions to correct someone. Not on theory.

I actually relish exchanges when people try to find a fault in my argument.

But on my actions and inactions.

So, I'm presumed to be neglecting my work. I'm working every day, including Lord's Days and today a feast day of Sts Peter and Paul in a non-menial or non-servile** work, of writing. This writing is supposed to be on my part intended as a "gift on the altar" or a korban. This "korban" is supposed to be impure because I'm not living in peace with my enemies. Hence it's worthless, and I'm not doing any work, etc.

What if my enemies are the people who have stopped me from living in peace? I was sewing on Friday evening, after dark. So, when the Jews have their Sabbath. When 7DA pretend all Christians should have theirs. And I lost the needle, whether someone's hypnosis or an actual supernatural act, I lost it. I had lost two miraculous medallions before, found one again, and then lost it again. Such events, however you explain them, are disruptive to my peace.

Someone was giving a bag of food, pretty fat and sugary such, and I found also a grasshopper. Like as if someone wanted to allude to La Fontaine's The Ant and the Grasshopper. And that someone was probably not*** French, because in the French, it's not a grasshopper (sauterelle) but a cigale (a true cicada). La cigale et la fourmi. I ate some, I left much uneaten to somewhere else where anyone could pick it up. Both having to stand up instead of resting after the return from my actual work and finding a reference to La cigale et la fourmi by this very famous poet of both poems and of jokes as is, not La Fontaine, but "Anon." (as usual) is obviously also disruptive to my peace.

Dito for people who are walking by loudly late in the evening, early in the morning (before 5 AM today), or sometimes even verifying I'm alive in the middle of the night.

Dito for people who make toilet lamps unusable, lest I should overdose. My wounds on the legs are from lice, not from syringes.

Dito for people who make it harder to get rid of lice in any way other than eating fat food, which has already provoked gout.

I don't pretend to be a monk, and I think I'm not the one to take a first step after all the steps I've already taken to resolve this peacefully, whether by writing or by trying the police. Some people seem to like saying I do nothing, and if my blog, at least my blog has no readers, and the morning after I published evidence to the contrary° I find the park where I go to the toilet (which is open) also visited by an Arab who is insulting an absent person ... or me, while not looking my way. The police have no problem with people going after me for Austro-Bavarian cultural traits°° but if I give an indication that such and such a community could be the one they should look into, hey, I'm told that I can't go after a community. If I don't know who did it, they refuse to look even into long term bullying.

Some rejoice at my gout, because it took away one of my uses of alcohol. Now, nycturia is an ally against gout ... but it's still not ideal for a good night's sleep. Before gout, I fought it with 3 + cl. pure alcohol, alias a pint of beer, one hour before bed, or so, as a diuretic.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts. Peter and Paul
29.VI.2026

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

* My correspondent uses US spelling, me more like British. The school book standard in both Sweden and Austria. ** Menial or servile works are forbidden on Lord's Days and Feasts of obligation, unless necessary. Writing isn't. *** The English language is not the only one that replaces the cicada with a grasshopper, consider Semut dan Belalang in Indonesian. Ukrainean nominally has a cicada (Мурашка і Цикада) but wiki illustrations on the fable show a grasshopper. Same ones as for Finnish, where heinäsirkka actually means grasshopper. As German Heuschrecke. Swedish "syrsa" refers to a related animal that's somewhat dissimilar in looks, a cricket. But illustrations would tend to be borrowed from German, Heuschrecke. Other possibility, that someone knew I was not French and didn't know if I would recognise a true cicada. I wouldn't have. ° Derniers trois mois aux 15—18.VI.2026 : Les Pays · 1—18 vues · 19—24 vues · 25—29 vues · 30—34 vues · 35—42 vues · 43—57 vues · 58—4310 vues · en général °° Not adding up to integral Austro-Bavarian culture, I presume, I left Vienna too early.

"and nobody knows that he assumes it." (Application, Galileo)

First, this may seem irrelevant, but this is statistics from yesterday:

France
131 + 20 + 151 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 39 + 6 + 4 + 6 + 22 + 1 + 23 + 10 + 39 = 459 (14:36, 27—28.VI)

Second, to the topic:

Galileo and the Bible
https://www.museumofthebible.org/book-minute/galileo-and-the-bible

The End of the Galileo Affair: Galileo's Theological Contributions
by Cory Hayes | February 15, 2024
https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/the-end-of-galileo-affair-galileos-theological-contributions/

Galileo and the Interpretation of the Bible
Published: March 1999 | William E. Carroll
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008657104961

More than one of above cite the famed quote that Galileo put into the mouth of Eminence or Monsignor Anon. : "the Bible doesn't tell us how the heavens go, but how to go to heaven" ... that on Springer even repeats a usual misattribution to Cardinal Baronius. Now, this made me think somewhat of a certain essay collection by Chesterton: The Thing. Or rather, I thought of the connection when on FB I saw a part of below quote:

Curiously enough, I find this sort of thing rather specially widespread in our age, which claims to possess a popular culture or enlightenment. There is everywhere the habit of assuming certain things, in the sense of not even imagining the opposite things. For instance, as history is taught, nearly everybody assumes that in all important past conflicts, it was the right side that won. Everybody assumes it; and nobody knows that he assumes it.

For instance, everyone assumes that if scientists settled on the world being older than 6000 to 7500 years, as different Biblical chronologies would indicate, it's because it's "good science" ...

A curious and amusing instance comes from America; in connection with Mr. Clarence Darrow, the somewhat simple-minded sceptic of that land of simplicity. ... And one of his arguments for that is that if they did believe in certain happiness beyond the grave, they would all kill themselves. He says that nobody would endure the martyrdom of cancer, for instance, if he really believed (as he apparently assumes all Christians to believe) that in any case the mere fact of death would instantly introduce the soul to perfect felicity and the society of all its best friends. A Catholic will certainly know what answer he has to give. But Mr. Clarence Darrow does not really in the least know what question he has asked.

Mr. Darrow is the lawyer of Scopes, in the famous State of Tennessee v. Scopes trial. Note, Chesterton doesn't mention State of Tennessee as simpleminded. What Clarence Darrow seems to have recommended, Chesterton may have heard of as rumoured that Germany was going to apply it and later applied it to the "simple-minded" in T4.

But first mention of "assumes" in The Thing:

Every leader-writer who thunders "Galileo" at us assumes that we know even less about Galileo than he does. Every preacher of popular science who throws a long word at us thinks we shall have to look it up in the dictionary and hopes we shall not study it seriously even in the encyclopaedia. Their use of science is rather like the use made of it by the heroes of certain adventure stories, in which the white men terrify the savages by predicting an eclipse or producing an electric shock.

OK, Chesterton read Tintin adventure Prisoners of the Sun ... or Hergé imitated the topos from other adventure stories, earlier than this album. But anyway, he had read some people Gish Gallopping against Catholicism with Galileo as a probable third to fifth word in an early sentence. Maybe even the first one.

Yesterday also, I came across someone speaking on a certain patristic position arguing that Israel would have been impossible, but he also mentioned the opposite position, of Israel coming back right in the end times. Anyway, he said ... (beginning after 10:22 and ending before 10:48) this little thing:

... we have become ideologically captured rather than formed by the unbending sturdiness of reality. Okay? We used to believe that the earth was the center of the solar system. Then upon new data, we realized it was in fact the sun. So when our presuppositions toward reality are falsified, the least we can do is be honest enough to admit it.

I commented on it and the comment was taken away, not sure if by him or on the cyber.

Now, he assumes people before ... Copernicus? Galileo? Newton? ... believed that the Sun was the centre of ... the solar system. Not of the universe, as correctly representing their belief (on most issues also mine), but of the solar system. Because what goes around us each night from East to West is absolutely only the Moon and Jupiter and Venus and things, while Sirius and Orion totally stay in the same place? In fact, the position he, and presumably his history teacher attributed to pre-Copernicans would have been refuted by me simply when I measured that Orion had moved 30° (or twice the 15° of using my outstretched arm and dispersed thumb and fingers as measure) during the two hours I had been away from S. to D. in a certain city scarce and village dense part of Sweden.* Because 2 * 12 hours = 24 hours. And 30° * 12 = 360° Orion, which no one ever took as "part of the solar system" moves 360° (or full circle) in 24 hours (or actually a few minutes less than that). No, no one ever believed a theory which would be such easy to refute, if he was a learned man.

Also, he assumes that we got "new data" and that becoming Heliocentric was the honest and only adequate adjustment to new data.

He didn't say which ones, not sure if his history teacher or even science class ever taught him that. Or if he retained what they tried to teach him.

Like, for Earth being round we have Magellan and modern flight routes. Do you propose Luke Starwalker and the maps Han Solo uses for Heliocentrism? Will you be very, very, very disappointed if I tell you that shots "on Tatooine" are actually from North Africa, like Mos Eisley on Tatooine is Ajim, Tunisia for outdoor and Elstree Studios on Shenley Road, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire for indoor shots of the Cantina. The 1977 film no more proves Heliocentrism than the Ganges' East bank reminding someone of Gibraltar actually proved Round Earth, in Aristotle's time. Try again.

But those who won't try are the guys who assume that in every important armed or intellectual conflict "the right side won" ... and who assume it so hard, they don't even know they assume it.

Like pretty many of the 459 page views I had from France in 24 hours, and also the videast Christopher Kuehl. As to Church Fathers who very early on gave some kind of mitigated support for some kind of Zionism, that would also involve Jews converting to Christianity. I support Jeff Morgan, not Netanyahu. Also not a fan of Hamas reducing Christians in Gaza (with soft bullying involving alcohol band but not limited to them, no doubt).

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts. Peter and Paul
29.VI.2026

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

* Some old lady, who had helped the Norwegian resistance, back in her youth, may have taken my gesture as a NS salute, as Orion was c. 45° above the horizon ... it wasn't one. I'm pro-Franco and pro-Dollfuss. As to pro-Hitler, that's for art schools, not politics.

Music of the Words, Tolkien (English)

Ep 19: Tolkien’s Forgotten Song Cycle, “The Road Goes Ever On”
James B Partridge | 28 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD9x-FkKFCQ

Thaïs even said the correct thing

"d'origine immigrée"

Most of these things aren't by people who are now entering France, but sons or grandsons who want to feel as adventurous, but don't have a Mediterranean (or a French administration) to cross before being allowed to stay.

A Victim Of Migrant Crime Tells Her Story. They Tried To Jail HER?
Amala Ekpunobi | 21 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcA6rsA6f9U

Obviously this commenter in the US, Amala Ekpunobi, isn't a white supremacist.

What exactly was Loi Pleven saying in 1972?

"Ceux qui, par l'un des moyens énoncés à l'article 23, auront provoqué à la discrimination, à la haine ou à la violence à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes à raison de leur origine ou de leur appartenance ou de leur non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée, seront punis ..."

They who, by one of the means enounced in article 23 will have provoked to the discrimination, to the hatred or to violence regarding a person or a group of persons by reason of their origin or their belonging or not belonging to a determined ethnicity, nation, race or religion, will be punished. Etc. The currency in the fines is outdated. Prison was between a month and a year.

I am a person. If you want to call out against me for my moral (not ancestral nor civic) belonging to Austro-Bavarian culture, that would qualify. Or me and ma, both very fond of Austria, back when we were a team. Like in my early teens. That would be a group of persons.

She didn't want the Tunisian to go to gaol because he was Tunisian. She wanted him in gaol for what he had done.

I think "discrimination" is a very broad term, and in some of its meanings over the top, but Dilcrah didn't even represent a North African or African claiming "we missed a housing opportunity because of what Thaïs said", Dilcrah just pretended the whole races or the whole of their representatives in France are "a group of persons" and claimed that an observation about the ethnic category's actual behaviour constitutes incitation to discrimination.

There may be jurisprudence for this approach, there is neither justice nor reasonable exegesis of the law text from 1972.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
V L. D. after Pentecost
28.VI.2026

Devait-on mettre un toit sur les revenus ? Pas tous. Et pas en forme d'une somme spécifique

Je pense qu'on peut très bien mettre un toit sur par exemple le "revenu de travail salarié" en tant que salaire par heure ou quelle que soit l'unité.

Et qu'il pourrait se situer entre 20 et 200 fois le SMIC.

Item, je pense que le mètre carré pourrait bien avoir un maximum, par exemple entre 20 et 200 fois le mètre carré dans un HML. Par ville ou par arrondissement. Mais même entre les arrondissements.

Et ainsi pour d'autres denrés.

Les plus grandes inégalités ne sont pas créées par prix exorbitants pour certains par rapport au même service ou la même marchandise. Elles sont créées par le type d'affaires.

Je suis par exemple contre la prise d'intérêt. Sauf un intérêt très modéré pour que le Mont de Piété communal puisse payer les gens qui nettoyent et les clercs qui enrégistrent, décemment, mais pas de manière exoprbitante. Et combien plus saint et juste si même ces dépenses ne relèvent pas de l'intérêt mais du fisc municipal, dont dépend le Mont de Piété.

Ou un intérêt qui suit la production comme la côte d'une action. Je prète 100 € à une entreprise, pour qu'elle puisse faire d'achats en vue de produire. L'entreprise double en valeur. Elle me doit 200 €. Elle fait faillite, elle me doit rien.

Je ne crois pas dans un toit sur les cadeaux ou les héritages. Bonté des hommes, bonté de Dieu. Et un toit sur l'exemplaire de livres vendus, serait inviter des abus contre la liberté d'expression. Celle-ci n'est pas un absolu, mais les censures doivent pas venir sur "il a déjà trop gagné, ce mec" ...

Par contre, si un homme hérite davantage d'entreprises qu'il peut gérer, il pourrait être cité de vendre une des entreprises qu'il ne gère pas au gérant, dans un délai qui ne le débile pas pendant le procès d'héritage. Par exemple dix ans.

Et donc, je crois qu'on peut aussi interdire les acquisition cumulatives sur cette mesure. Je ne vise pas Paul, il semble qu'il s'agit d'un franchise, mais si par contre Paul avait simplement acheté et donné à des gérants salariés, chaque boulangerie-café Paul, là on pourrait se faire des réflexions. J'ai une grande préférence pour les petites boulangeries, même sans place d'assise. Mais comme dit, les Paul ont des propriétaires réels. Ce n'est pas un homme qui achète et qui confie à des gérants salariés.

Obviement, la grandeur d'une entreprise pourrait être limité à un certain multiple du minimum qui est nécessaire pour qu'elle fonctionne. Notons, ce ne serait pas fonctionnel de diviser SNCF en plusieurs petites entreprises locales. Déjà, une ligne ferroviaire, pour relier deux points doit ne pas dépendre de l'un ou de l'autre. Et item pour la Poste.

Un certain Lyndon LaRouche parlait d'une forme d'affaires qui ne contribue en soi rien à l'économie physique (les industries ou ateliers, les fermes ou bateaux de pêche) mais qui, au contraire, la sape. Et Louis Even notait que, si tout se paie en argent, si chaque dette se paie uniquement en argent, si l'argent est produite par les banques en forme de dette, et si chaque dette a un taux d'intérêt, le système ne tourne pas rond, il va toujour clopiner quelque part.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ve dim. après Pentecôte
28.VI.2026

"Don't Worship a Person" (Said a Jew)

Not sure how the religion now called Judaism defines "person" or "God" if they think they can worship God without worshipping at least ONE person ...

I answer that, "Person" signifies what is most perfect in all nature—that is, a subsistent individual of a rational nature. Hence, since everything that is perfect must be attributed to God, forasmuch as His essence contains every perfection, this name "person" is fittingly applied to God; not, however, as it is applied to creatures, but in a more excellent way; as other names also, which, while giving them to creatures, we attribute to God; as we showed above when treating of the names of God (I:13:2.

Question 29. The divine persons | Article 3. Whether the word "person" should be said of God?
Summa Theologiae | First Part
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1029.htm#article3

I'd answer, we are told several times not to worship a non-person ... like stone or wood. Like a passage in Jeremias that some misuse when they want to speak about Christmas trees.

I beheld till thrones were placed, and the Ancient of days sat: his garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like clean wool: his throne like flames of fire: the wheels of it like a burning fire
[Daniel 7:9]

If the Ancient of Days has a head, He's presumably a person. Here is another one:

I beheld therefore in the vision of the night, and lo, one like the son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and he came even to the Ancient of days: and they presented him before him And he gave him power, and glory, and a kingdom: and all peoples, tribes and tongues shall serve him: his power is an everlasting power that shall not be taken away: and his kingdom that shall not be destroyed
[Daniel 7:13-14]

Serve sounds quite a bit like worship, and receiving worships sounds quite a bit like power and glory.

It's the same thing in Aramaic. "Son of man" (Bar'nash) is how you say "human being" in Aramaic. That's all it means. It's just a way to say "person." The verse in Daniel is in reference to a series of visions of various allegorical beasts. The last vision is "one like a bar'nash, meaning "one like a human." It's just a way of saying the last vision looked like a man as opposed to a beast. This figure was interpreted Messianically, but "son of man" did not mean "Messiah." The normal usage was just for a person. It might denote the Messiah in a high context way (like calling him "the Man"), but the meaning of bar'nash is still "human being."

Quoting a reddit.

So, that second person clearly is even called "a person" ... but how is he spoken of back before the schism of AD 33? Here is another view:

In a branch of Jewish belief around the time of Jesus, called "apocalyptic" thought, thought that the world was ruled by wickedness and that God would soon send someone to sweep all of it away and establish a new kingdom of righteousness or whatnot. At the time, they believed the one who would bring this change was the "Son of Man" as foretold in Daniel. ... Jews who did believe in the coming of the Son of Man thought that this would be an impressive, divine figure of untold greatness, knowledge, and power.

An impressive divine figure ... who should perhaps even be worshipped?

Well, Caiaphas didn't see that, or didn't want to see that. However, it was soon upcoming at Resurrection, and will be upcoming in even more public display when He arrives at the battle of Armageddon and as judge in the Valley of Josaphat. The second quote is from someone calling Jesus "a bum" ... not sure about the exact connotation, dynastically Jesus would have had the qualifications and miracles He had worked. A week before, Caiaphas was worried because a crowd had shouted Hosanna, and within that week, Jesus was no more devoid of authority, no more unimpressive than to be able to make a second cleansing of the temple. I think that Jew was retroprojecting his own prejudices about Jesus, rather than dealing with what Caiaphas was facing.

Or what a more recent Jewish photographer faced, when examining a Shroud.

Barrie Schwortz’s FINAL INTERVIEW: Shroud of Turin SECRETS REVEALED
Adrian Milag TV | 6 April 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFyQVlSSo04

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
V L. D. after Pentecost
28.VI.2026

Loi Pleven, peut-on l'invoquer en cas de racisme anti-bavaro-autrichien ?

L'Heure Cinéma
https://shows.acast.com/heurecinema

J'écoute :

40. Loïc Corbery: la passion du métier*
18:45 | samedi 27 juin 2026 | Saison 4, Ep. 40

Je pense que ce soit un racisme anti-bavaro-autrichien d'évoquer Hitler (y compris contre un Autrichien de cœur et Austro-Fasciste, puisque Hitler a décoré posthumément les meurtriers de Dollfuss) quand on entend que quelqu'un soit d'origine ou d'éducation en partie de ce coin du monde.

Notons, le professeur d'histoire de l'homme qui aurait dû rester peintre admirait davantage les Hohenzollern que les Habsburg, et son disciple avec.

Notons, le national-socialisme n'était pas surtout une dictature austro-bavaroise, mais une dictature médicale. Les sympathies pour les médecins progressistes à l'époque, les adhérents de "solutions" comme stérilisation et euthanasie, d'un Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sont davantage derrière ce régime que les origines purement ethnique d'un ... bon peintre./HGL

* On évoque que de Gaulle a évité une occupation américaine, brittanique, soviétique. Plan A, France comme état vaincu : France, Autriche, Allemagne, Paris, Vienne, Berlin, occupés divisés en trois, entre les Américains, Britanniques et Russes. Plan B, retenu, France comme état vainqueur, deux pays et leurs capitales, divisés entre quatre : Français, Américains, Britanniques et Russes.

"On a tous le droit au bonheur" ... C. S. Lewis avait des choses à redire

J'y vais ajouter quelques réflexions personnelles aussi.

Tout d'abord, une certaine phrase de la constitution des États-Unis ne dit pas que les droits naturels et égaux comportent "le bonheur". Mais bien "la recherche du bonheur".

Ensuite, il explique pourquoi la distinction est importante, et pourquoi les Pères Fondateurs ayent mis la phrase dans leur constitution.

D'abord, ils ont voulu contredire les privilèges. En France royale, pas mal de chemins vers le bonheur n'étaient ouverts qu'à certains. Non, ils ont voulu dire, il ne doit pas y avoir d'obstacle légal avant que vous puissiez faire d'affaires, vous engager en politique et ainsi de suite. Si on voudrait défendre les privilèges, on pourrait dire que la carrière politique comme les affaires existent pour les autres, pas pour le bonheur personnel du concerné. Mais ceci ne change pas le propos. Il y a d'autres choses où la recherche du bonheur est ou doit être égale pour tout le monde, qui sont effectivement recherche du bonheur.

Revenons à C. S. Lewis qui n'était pas d'Action française et ne défendait pas les privilèges. Pourquoi a-t-on juste le droit à la recherche du bonheur, pas au bonheur lui-même ?

Parce que "j'ai le droit" implique "tu me dois" ... et on ne peut pas devoir quelque chose à quelqu'un qu'on n'a pas sous son contrôle.

Ce qu'on a certainement sous son contrôle par contre est de ne pas poser des obstacles abusives au bonheur d'autrui. Ou à ses démarches pas interdites pour l'avoir. On a le droit de m'empêcher de voler des vêtements, pas de m'empêcher de les coudre. Si une fille prétend que mon art de couture est trop mauvais, elle a le droit de me proposer de les coudre. Merci d'ailleurs à une fille de la paroisse St. Nicolas du Chardonnet qui avait cousu un sac de couchage dégradé par un passant (ou l'homme du nettoyage, un Musulman ?) quand on m'avait interdit d'entrer à Georges Pompidou avec.

Bon, alors quelques exemples pourquoi le bonheur lui-même d'autrui n'est pas sous votre contrôle.

Vous ne pouvez pas lui fournir des décimètres en plus (évidemment CSL n'avait pas prévu certaines opérations, et il n'en aurait pas approuvé), vous ne pouvez pas lui fournir la chance de gagner la loterie (l'écriture est un métier et non comparable à la loterie, bien entendu, et vous pouvez, certains d'entre vous, me fournir vous-même ou un pote comme début d'une maison d'édition). Un époux et une épouse peuvent avoir le devoir conjugal, mais pas de garantir la satisfaction de l'autre.

Bien entendu, certaines choses ne sont pas des droits, y compris dans la recherche du bonheur, parce que ça donne malheur à autrui ou à un-même en retard, ou au moins à la société. Mais notons, cette distinction est à prendre par voie de loi, pas sur mesure pour quelqu'un déterminé en des buts "curatives" envers un homme qui n'a pas mérité d'être soumis à des cures sans son consentiment.

En France, certains métiers sont soumis à une autorisation. Si je voudrais acheter une boulangerie, je n'aurais pas le droit, parce que je ne suis pas boulanger. Si je voudrais ouvrir une clinique, je n'aurais pas le droit, parce que je ne suis pas médecin. Je trouve ça très bien. Écrivain n'est pas de ces métiers, et bien entendu, je trouve ça très bien aussi.

Un Musulman pourra dire "t'es clochard, t'as pas le droit d'être écrivain" ... cette loi n'existe pas en France. Un Protestant d'un certain type pourrait dire "t'es pas mûr spitituellement, t'as pas le droit d'écrire sur Dieu" ... d'abord, là aussi, la loi n'existe pas en France, mais ensuite, ce que j'écris ne dépasse pas ce qu'un laïc a le droit d'écrire sans être prêtre. La loi n'existe pas dans l'Église catholique non plus. La Protestant a le droit de me taxer d'hérétique, dans la France (pas dans l'Église catholique). Le curé a le droit de me dire "nous n'allons pas donner nihil obstat" (et déjà pas mal de ce que j'écris ne tombe pas traditionnellement sous cette discipline, Chesterton publiait sans nihil obstat). Le Juif a le droit de me dire (mais pas de me faire croire ça en mon cas) "nous n'allons grand jamais lire ce qu'écrit un pauvre" (remonte à leurs idées sur les devoirs d'indépendance financière préalable des étudiants de la loi). L'Hindou a le droit de me dire "t'es pas en train d'aquerir moksha comme ça" ...

Même mon père, même s'il croyait que mon écriture me livre au diable, n'a pas le droit légal, ni devant mes yeux moral, de m'empêcher de mon écriture ou de mes efforts de trouver des gens pour une édition. Y compris micro-éditions et y compris des petites nouvelles maisons d'édition.

Sur les journaux d'Elsevier ou les livres du groupe Hachette, je ne compte pas. Avec les petits éditeurs proches de la droite nationale, j'ai déjà essayé. Peut-être qu'une certaine culture communiste ayant collé à Doriot même après la fondation de PPF rend la droite dite nationale trop proche des Russes sur certains thématiques.

Genre de prendre l'auteur de la Tactique du Diable pour "proche de Lewis Carroll" ou prétendre la suggestion que des adolescents et adolescentes devraient retrouver le droit de se marier qu'ils avaient eu serait un propos contre nature. Ou qu'un créationniste jeune terre devrait être soupçonné de Sionisme ou comparé au Platisme.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts Jean et Paul, frères, martyrs
26.VI.2026

Romae, in monte Caelio, sanctorum Martyrum Joannis et Pauli fratrum, quorum primus erat praepositus domus, secundus primicerius Constantiae Virginis, filiae Constantini Imperatoris, et ambo postea, sub Juliano Apostata, martyrii palmam, caedente gladio, perceperunt.

St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

Spielberg Wants Me to Second Guess My Religion, or So I Have Been Told on FB · St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

When it comes to "aliens", for a long time, psychiatry has held the forefront. Hallucination plus delusion. Needs treatment.

Recently, there is a pushback. Doubly.

UFO-logists are saying "you weren't ill, you met a person from an exo-planet." Christians are saying "you weren't ill, you saw a demon having taken visible form."

Psychiatry obviously is not happy with either approach.

And it seems they have now support from McElroy.

How so? Here is an intro to a video by Anthony Stine:

And then the Cardinal McElroy* in Washington basically said he violated the church's teaching on exorcisms and demonic
0:54 possessions or anything, but then he didn't exactly explain how.

My hunch on how is the rule:

According to the Vatican's guidelines issued in 1999, "the person who claims to be possessed must be evaluated by doctors to rule out a mental or physical illness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism_in_the_Catholic_Church

In other words, McElroy wants people already bothered by (not possessed by) demonic "aliens" to be further bothered by shrinks before they can get an exorcist to pray for them even just for protection.

Washington Diocese would be again an example of "get out of her" ...
/HGL

* Had to restore the correct name, which AI didn't transscribe correctly.

Thanks to Nordfront, I Hear Preston's "adoptive dads" will do gaol

New blog on the kid: Preston's Death · Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial? · Preston Davey Case · Thanks to Nordfront, I Hear Preston's "adoptive dads" will do gaol · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Quora Prevents Questions About the Mother of Preston Davey

Brittiska bögparet dömda för sexmordet på adoptivsonen
Redaktionen Nordfront | 2026-06-23 08:00
https://nordfront.se/brittiska-bogparet-domda-for-sexmordet-pa-adoptivsonen

Varley, till he dies. His boyfriend, 25 years.

That's good.

But what's even better is:

och man ska nu utreda alla myndigheter som var inblandade i adoptionen.

One will now investigate all the authorities that were involved in the adoption.

Just a question, will that include investigating the guys who took him from his actual mother? It should.

I'd love for more people than just these two to go to gaol. Not the least complaining that these go there, except a slight regret that death penalty was abolished.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St. William of Montevergine
25.VI.2026

In territorio Guleti, prope Nuscum, sancti Gulielmi Confessoris, Patris Eremitarum Montis Virginis.

Bonum Festum Sancti Ioannis Baptistae

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Nativitas sancti Joannis Baptistae, Praecursoris Domini, ac sanctorum Zachariae et Elisabeth filii, qui Spiritu Sancto repletus est adhuc in utero matris suae.