New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Pages
- Home
- Voyez la ligne pointillée / See the dotted line?
- Fatima - Bad News and Good News - the latter provi...
- Panthéisme ? Non. Trinité ? Oui.
- Do not support World Childhood Foundation!
- Hans-Georg Gadamer was of the "Frankfurter Schule"? - get Inklings for me please!
- A Relevant Quote from J. R. R. Tolkien
- Sur le concept de l'ésotérique et sur les sociétés secrètes
- In Case Someone Thinks I am Preaching ...
- Would Gay Marriage Allow them an Authentic Life?
- Malfaisance de "Sécurité"
- Have I Done Ill Speaking Against the Real Pope a F...
- Drodzy Polacy - i Rosjanie itd.
- Vatican in Exile : Calendar and Marian Anthems
- Distinguons
- Code ASCII et James Bond
- Presentation
Friday, 21 August 2026
A Story of St. Patrick Says ...
... he prayed for Ireland to sink 7 years before Judgement Day. And he took God as having answered the prayer.
If it does, and Europe has to receive Irish refugees, let's learn Irish, as many of us who can!
Amhrán na nGael - Bláth na hÓige | TG4
TradTG4 | 21 Bealtaine, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek8e-OKm30E
Prayers for a Girl Named Lillian
She contracted an amoeba and* asked Knowles for prayers, Anthony Stine shared, so do I.
Rosaries if you can./HGL
* Sorry, her dad did. Not she. That's how serious it is.
Trent Horn Said a Few Things
On a topic I'm not linking to. Mainly.
But he brought up, in doing so, the concepts of "rash judgement, detraction, calumny" (item I), of "nonsense arguments that would take months to research" (item II) and of giving certain positions "a legitimacy they don't deserve" (item III).
Here is how I think it applies to what he and a few others in Catholic Answers have been doing in my case.
- "rash judgement, detraction, calumny" (item I)
- You know ... that paragraph reminds me of what some did about my interventions on other subjects.
Galileo cited a high Church man as saying "the Bible tells us how to go to Heaven, not how the heavens go".
[a high Church man, not necessarily Baronius in the official text]
You could have retracted at my challenge.
You could have said you don't know where it's from.
You could have provided "a margin note by Galileo here adds Baronius" and given a source.
You could in either of these cases have admitted, Baronius was not able to have said this on earth and so Galileo could hear it or hear of it during the Galileo controversy where Geo vs Helio was the main issue. Because at this point, unlike the Giordano Bruno case, Baronius had died. Which I mentioned.
Instead, I had to wait a year to hear about the margin note through a friend of mine, after Jimmy Akin repeat offended, try to look it up, and when I sent what I had found to Catholic Answers, you do not respond.
How is all of this not an example of what must have begun with some calumny or detraction about me, since this is not how you would otherwise treat people?
And yes, whether Baronius said it under the Galileo controversy actually does matter.
The act of the Holy Office publicised over the sees and universities of the Church had magisterial authority then as the condemnation of Feeney did under Pius XII. The Dimond brothers, who unlike me are Feeneyites, make a point of making this comparison. Pope Michael I may have been alerted to the question by this exact meme, since he also was an Anti-Feeneyite (unlike Iglesia Catolica Rimanente in Argentina, with the later claimant Alexander IX, who seem to have quietly dropped the papal claim since).
So there are two moves to make Heliocentrism licit despite this. One is to say Holy Office and publication world wide is still short of infallible authority. The other is to remove the possibility of "ordinary infallible magisterium" by showing at least one contemporary disagreed on this precise question when it was a major one which is what attributing the quote to Baronius would do.
Therefore, I think some people should be way more open on where exactly the margin note by Galileo was, when it was found and by whom, on what example of the Letter (the manuscript or what edition if any) and how sure we are it was Galileo's.
Because, in the meantime:
- Heliocentrism has via Newtonian-Paleyan quasi Deist to Deist positions promoted Atheism and Agnosticism, removing a proof for God
- Heliocentrism has been promoted by Freemasonry since Desaguyliers (who had for his father a grievance against Catholicism) and been (since accepted) a hook and bait to Freemasonry
- Heliocentrism has been used to promote and has been promoted by belief or hypotheses on aliens
- Heliocentrism has been used to prove creation more ancient than the Bible says (denying Genesis)
- Heliocentrism has been used to prove Ascension and Assumption impossible
- Heliocentrism is now promoted by confusing Geocentrics with Flat Earthers.
And at least one of the men you are in communion with has said that directly to me, inviting me to enjoy the life of a vagabond, but by implication have nothing to do with writing and getting read.
That man is Sébastien Antoni, Assumptionist or supposed such, and in Pèlerin promoted "Adam and Eve were not actual individuals" which goes against Trent Session V.
Detraction and calumny do offend against the virtues of justice as well as charity. And a certain attitude visible in prolonged silence actually does speak of a very presumable precisely calumny.
- "nonsense arguments that would take months to research" (item II)
- Since when is it a nonsense argument to research:
- we all can see Sun, Moon, other planets and Fix Stars move around Earth each day
- and this could perhaps be overturned but only if there is a stronger argument for Earth moving
Or:
- if "place" is not a matter of empty space coordinates, but an actual substance as Einstein thought, then Coriolis and related effects can be understood as the "fabric of space time" or "aether" moving around Earth
Or:
- propo A) Geocentrism as observed is too complex to result from only masses and their inertia and gravitation, but would need voluntary movers on a very powerful scale
- Thus either:
- propo A + Geocentrism is observed therefore voluntary movers on a very powerful scale exist (including one moving universe around Earth each day since forever), which we call God
- or:
- propo A + such movers don't exist (as per Atheism and Anangelism) therefore Geocentrism is the kind of illusion it's presented as
Or:
- Joe Heschmeyer learned in school that Geocentrism became more complex and more complex and unwieldy in theory / Mark Shea considers Geocentrism led to absurd spirograph patterns
- Hans Georg Lundahl replies that no, that's just true of Ptolemaic Geocentrism and as to the complexities of a geometric type in the "spirograph patterns" that is just an illustration of propo A, Geocentrism needs a divine mover of day and night and angelic movers of individual celestial bodies.
Fringe positions do not involve months of absurd research automatically, some are fringe because they do, some are fringe because as fringe they are supposed to do, and no one does honest research of a few hours going through the logical options, if even that much.*
- "a legitimacy they don't deserve" (item III)
- Ah, "gives that topic a legitimacy it doesn't deserve"
Sure, Young Earth Creationism can deserve no legitimacy if CCC § 283 overrides Trent Session V and therefore individual existence of Adam (and Eve).
But the rule in Trent Session IV doesn't bind you to a position the magisterium now holds even if no one held it anywhere 300 years ago. It binds to a position that the Church (as in the magisterium at least on parts of the occasions considered or as per expositions by magisterially positioned or endorsed men, like Church Fathers) hath held and still holds
I actually googled "tenuit et adhuc tenet" and found an AI response:
Uttrycket används ofta i medeltida rättsliga dokument, egendomslängder och urkunder. Det beskriver en situation eller ett juridiskt innehav som inleddes i det förflutna och som obruten fortsätter i nuet (till exempel en person som ägt eller brukat en viss jordlapp eller ett gods sedan tidigare år och fortfarande gör det).
The expression is often used in Medieval juridical documents or inventories and deeds. It describes a situation or a juridical possession which was initiated in the past and which unbrokenly continues to the present (for instance a person who has owned or used a certain patch of land or a manor since earlier years and still does so).
That means, CCC § 283 can't override Trent Session V or St. Augustine's City of God.
So, perhaps after all, Young Earth Creationism does deserve legitimacy, and refusing to give it that is participating in a conspiracy of silence:
A third powerful factor in the diffusion of Communism is the conspiracy of silence on the part of a large section of the non-Catholic press of the world. We say conspiracy, because it is impossible otherwise to explain how a press usually so eager to exploit even the little daily incidents of life has been able to remain silent for so long about the horrors perpetrated in Russia, in Mexico and even in a great part of Spain; and that it should have relatively so little to say concerning a world organization as vast as Russian Communism. This silence is due in part to shortsighted political policy, and is favored by various occult forces which for a long time have been working for the overthrow of the Christian Social Order.
(Divini Redemptoris).
and an earlier Pope:
When an adversary rises up against them with an erudition and force that render him redoubtable, they try to make a conspiracy of silence around him to nullify the effects of his attack,
(Pascendi Dominici Gregis)
Since some have noted, I have been short of sleep, well, some actually do deprive me of sleep, but the things I say here are things I have said even when no one was doing that and my sleep was lots better. It would be perfidy to bring that up in order to marginalise what I wrote here.*
But Trent Horn actually does have a point about oral debates. That's why I prefer written ones.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Joan Frances Fremiot de Chantal
21.VIII.2026
Sanctae Joannae Franciscae Fremiot de Chantal, Ordinis Sanctimonialium Visitationis sanctae Mariae Institutricis, cujus natalis dies Idibus Decembris memoratur.
PS, item IV:
While I, 100 %, believe the dinosaurs are real, and in some cases good evidence for the Flood, I cannot identify with any kind of duty to believe this.
That dinosaurs existed, in other places but same time as the men drowned in the Flood, is correct, like it is correct that Göbekli Tepe is Babel. It is not "sound doctrine" like Catholic truth, doctrine or dogma in either of these cases, it's technical fact, like there are Hebrew texts for Genesis 3:15 with the dot elsewhere so "hi" rather than "hu" is read. It's supporting evidence, not the main thing like "ipsa conteret" in St. Jerome's text. And apparently Vetus Latina before it too, but that also is less important.
Our duty is to the Bible, Tradition and Magisterium, not to the experts. Trying to discredit someone over that is simply stupid. It's the kind of Commie move that made Trump trump Rubio who had better policies, but wouldn't sign down on earth being billions of years.
PPS, item V:
"not someone whose reasoning should be trusted"
Generally speaking, we should not overly trust people's reasoning if we can't replicate it.
A reasoning should be analysed and accepted or rejected, not "trusted" because of who's making it. Whether Candace or Lemaître, whether Galileo or Settele, Hannam or Keating.
The cult of science gets this wrong. It borrows from Jews the idea that ordinary people don't debate, they only follow debates. It's "for rabbis" to actually question someone else's "teaching" ... we have no duty to trust someone else's reasoning if we cannot follow it. Trent Horn is pandering to the Jews who tell their own not to trust anyone who takes Isaias 53 as about Jesus.
* An example of what my sleep lag will actually do is this. I wrote "and no one does honest research of a few hours going through the logical options, if even that much" and could have written instead "and no one does honest research of a few hours going through the logical options, if even that much had been needed" ... that's not a substantial difference in what I'm saying. Some might even say my sleep lag improved my stile.
Semaine au 19 août 2026
Brésil
1 + 108 + 802 + 116 + 16 + 32 + 306 + 325 + 13 + 10 + 401 + 138 + 298 + 14 + 1 + 4 + 1 + 30 + 4 + 17 + 100 + 104 + 15 + 4 + 388 + 209 + 1 + 23 + 205 + 119 + 17 + 2 + 5 + 200 + 3 = 4032 = 4,03 k
4,03 k + 7,82 k + 41,1 k + 1,05 k + 1,8 k = 55,8 k
États-Unis
201 + 6 + 9 + 8 + 3 + 379 + 13 + 63 + 3 + 42 + 225 + 5 + 4 + 132 + 564 + 6 + 2 + 652 + 157 + 8 + 50 + 670 + 8 + 32 + 351 + 3 + 9 + 3 + 9 + 119 + 1 + 24 + 4 = 3765 = 3,77 k
3,77 k + 18,8 k + 8,23 k + 1,81 k + 3,46 k + 2,16 k + 1,09 k + 1,26 k + 3,12 k + 3,26 k + 8,62 k = 55,58 k
Inde
268 + 1 + 234 + 24 + 131 + 5 + 202 + 7 + 2 + 19 + 3 + 37 + 56 + 240 + 25 + 20 + 917 + 1 + 15 + 196 + 158 + 2 + 2 + 14 + 13 = 2592 = 2,59 k
2,59 k + 15,8 k + 2,18 k = 20,57 k
Bangladesh
322 + 2 + 2 + 19 + 13 + 65 + 17 + 76 + 6 + 3 + 20 + 2 + 83 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 6 + 2 + 3 + 50 + 42 + 1 + 19 + 5 + 18 + 29 + 6 + 67 + 68 + 106 + 1 = 1061 = 1,06 k
1,06 k + 17,2 k = 18,26 k
Seychelles
2 + 411 + 279 + 41 + 590 + 1 + 1 + 3 + 11 + 1 + 3 + 35 + 65 + 129 + 194 + 1 = 1767 = 1,77 k
1,77 k + 2,75 k + 11,9 k = 16,42 k
Pakistan
421 + 1 + 3 + 25 + 13 + 12 + 6 + 81 + 66 + 82 + 31 + 40 + 2 + 99 + 1 + 5 + 7 + 39 + 2 + 64 + 42 + 1 + 20 + 4 + 17 + 5 = 1089 = 1,09 k
1,09 k + 9,66 k + 1,34 k = 12,09 k
Argentine
148 + 2 + 6 + 16 + 34 + 1 + 1 + 26 + 54 + 34 + 1 + 92 + 1 + 5 + 9 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 58 + 141 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 100 + 67 + 1 + 41 + 3 + 93 + 84 + 29 + 35 + 2 + 472 = 1568 = 1,57 k
1,57 k + 8,2 k + 1,97 k = 11,74 k
Allemagne
147 + 2 + 2 + 5 + 12 + 20 + 17 + 33 + 41 + 547 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 62 + 6 + 262 + 9 + 3 + 13 + 225 + 3 + 2 + 178 + 540 + 28 + 4 + 339 + 304 = 2813 = 2,81 k
2,81 k + 5,9 k + 2,62 k = 11,33 k
Ukraine
49 + 277 + 1 + 21 + 7 + 2 + 4 + 14 + 75 + 84 + 5 + 8 + 2 + 11 + 33 + 23 + 23 = 639 = 0,64 k
0,64 k + 8,93 k = 9,57 k
Philippines
365 + 55 + 84 + 23 = 527 = 0,53 k
0,53 k + 8,46 k = 8,99 k
France
772 + 2 + 160 + 7 + 40 + 1 + 12 + 3 + 1 + 4 + 16 + 34 + 460 + 14 + 149 + 245 + 474 = 2394 = 2,39 k
2,39 k + 1,63 k + 4,43 k = 8,45 k
Arabie saoudite
44 + 5 + 25 = 74 = 0,07 k
0,07 k + 6,76 k + 1,34 k = 8,17 k
Mexique
339 + 14 + 125 + 10 + 2 + 40 + 71 + 26 + 3 + 31 + 2 + 1 + 5 + 3 + 2 + 69 + 2 + 119 + 4 + 59 + 47 + 3 + 28 + 17 + 36 = 1058 = 1,06 k
1,06 k + 4,94 k + 1,48 k = 7,48 k
Venezuela
1 + 21 + 59 + 2 + 33 + 2 + 11 + 36 + 80 + 7 + 7 + 11 + 15 + 30 + 4 + 6 + 4 + 13 = 342 = 0,34 k
0,34 k + 5,95 k + 1,21 k = 7,5 k
Singapour
107 + 1 + 17 + 327 + 16 + 2 + 16 + 1 + 1 + 699 + 2 + 93 + 264 + 276 + 3 + 64 + 728 + 666 + 987 + 183 + 42 + 10 = 4505 = 4,5 k
4,5 k + 1,01 k + 1,77 k = 7,28 k
Chili
1 + 26 + 56 + 3 + 43 + 34 + 1 + 55 + 39 + 1 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 11 + 13 + 5 + 28 + 20 + 1 + 16 + 1 + 8 + 11 = 383 = 0,38 k
0,38 k + 6,67 k = 7,05 k
Colombie
283 + 1 + 14 + 49 + 61 + 63 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 21 + 1 + 18 + 2 + 39 + 62 + 30 + 18 + 95 + 35 + 3 + 31 + 21 + 4 + 106 + 32 = 1002 = 1 k
1 k + 1,23 k + 4,32 k = 6,55 k
Irak
1 = 0,00 k
6,28 k = 6,28 k
Turquie
36 + 4 + 1 = 41 = 0,04 k
0,04 k + 5,92 k = 5,96 k
Indonésie
78 + 1 + 44 + 1 + 68 + 1 + 1 + 291 = 485 = 0,48 k
0,48 k + 1,09 k + 4,37 k = 5,94 k
Ouzbékistan
1 + 17 + 2 + 2 = 22 = 0,02 k
0,02 k + 5,55 k = 5,57 k
Viêt Nam
631 + 74 + 4 + 12 = 721 (plus davantage, car j'ai essayé de récupérer une info et perdu celle pour Viêt Nam) = 2753 = 2,75 k
2,75 k + 2,33 k = 5,08 k
Royaume-Uni
718 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 4 + 159 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 10 + 519 + 218 + 1 + 4 + 553 + 71 + 2 + 96 = 2384 = 2,38 k
2,38 k + 1,48 k = 3,86 k
Kenya
6 + 2 + 2 + 1 = 11 = 0,01 k
0,01 k + 3,67 k = 3,68 k
Russie
377 + 6 + 2 + 44 + 97 + 65 + 44 + 31 + 20 + 1 + 21 + 2 + 53 = 763 = 0,76 k
0,76 k + 1,53 k = 2,29 k
Afrique du Sud
2 + 13 + 24 + 14 + 19 + 41 + 1 + 14 + 44 + 2 + 13 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 195 = 0,2 k
0,2 k + 1,19 k = 1,39 k
Inconnu
1,31 k (l'info que j'ai essayé de récupérer à propos de Viêt Nam)
Sous-total A
55,8 k + 55,58 k + 20,57 k + 18,26 k + 16,42 k + 12,09 k + 11,74 k + 11,33 k + 9,57 k + 8,99 k + 8,45 k + 8,17 k + 7,48 k + 7,5 k + 7,28 k + 7,05 k + 6,55 k + 6,28 k + 5,96 k + 5,94 k + 5,57 k + 5,08 k + 3,86 k + 3,68 k + 2,29 k + 1,39 k + 1,31 k = 314,19 k
Hong Kong
361 + 4 + 2 + 147 + 5 + 5 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 74 + 38 + 13 + 58 + 9 + 3 + 38 + 11 + 6 + 5 + 44 + 2 + 59 + 2 + 33 + 83 + 23 + 9 + 377 + 4 + 8 + 249 + 12 = 1690
Japon
270 + 257 + 65 + 32 + 99 + 261 + 120 = 1104
Pays-Bas
257 + 82 + 2 + 6 = 347
Espagne
1 + 1 + 76 + 3 + 2 + 12 + 6 + 97 + 37 = 235
Canada
28 + 12 + 9 + 48 + 58 + 3 + 1 = 159
Équateur
1 + 16 + 6 + 9 + 1 + 1 + 3 + 17 + 2 + 1 + 5 + 2 + 3 + 26 + 8 + 52 = 153
Chine
1 + 79 + 29 = 109
Iran = 50
Maroc
1 + 2 + 1 + 32 + 5 = 41
Jordanie
15 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 19
Suède
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 16
Pérou
7 + 2 + 7 + 2 = 14
Nigeria
2 + 2 + 8 + 1 = 13
Syrie
3 + 2 + 8 = 13
Italie
2 + 1 + 1 + 6 = 10
Bolivie
1 + 1 + 5 = 7
Azerbaïdjan
1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 7
Égypte
1 + 1 + 1 + 2 = 5
Émirats arabes unis
1 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 5
Liban
1 + 1 + 3 = 5
Pays de quatre vues Algérie, Éthiopie, Paraguay, Biélorussie = 16
Pays de trois vues Congo-Brazzaville = 3
Pays de deux vues Serbie, Tunisie, Népal, Qatar = 8
Pays d'une vue Autriche, Suisse, Arménie, Finlande, Croatie, Myanmar (Birmanie), Bosnie-Herzégovine, Israël, Slovénie, Uruguay, Koweït, Palestine, Roumanie, Jamaïque, Albanie, Costa Rica = 16
Sous-total B 1690 + 1104 + 347 + 235 + 159 + 153 + 109 + 50 + 41 + 19 + 16 + 14 + 13 + 13 + 10 + 7 + 7 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 16 + 3 + 8 + 16 = 4045 = 4,05 k
Autre
20 + 411 + 1 + 406 + 536 + 192 + 11 + 185 + 87 + 26 + 4 + 47 + 27 + 4 + 1 + 1 + 5 + 718 + 137 + 842 + 108 + 6 + 648 + 770 + 16 + 15 + 105 + 108 + 162 = 5599 = 5,6 k
5,6 k + 5,38 k + 23,2 k + 1,03 k + 91,6 k + 1,41 k = 128,22 k
Total
314,19 k + 4,05 k + 128,22 k = 446,46 k
Semaine au 12 août 2026
Semaine au 5 (et 6) août 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)