Monday, 23 December 2024

Can the Magdeburg Attack Have Been a Two-Pronged False Flag?


New blog on the kid: Psychiatry isn't it ... · Can the Magdeburg Attack Have Been a Two-Pronged False Flag? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Responding to a Muslim · Are Muslims Persecuting Christmas among Christian Palestinians?

Can the man have decided to act, not finally decided after some hesitation, but really made the first decision to act under the influence of drugs?

No. He was certainly under the influence of drugs, but that state was not propitious to finding a way to get past the road blocks.

He must have known the one road not blocked by a road block of heavy concrete in order to get into the Christmas market and kill and wound. So, his act was planned.

Was he an Islamist?

If so, he was for all the time since he came to Germany in 2006 very good at hiding it. He may or may not have been an ex-Muslim, he was certainly critical of Islam as it was, and he was certainly critical of Islamism to the point of stating he and AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) had the same enemy.

So, if he was an Islamist, we would have to get very cautious with people of Muslim background, from Muslim countries, even if they purport to not be Islamists. But in the view of the possibility he actually meant what he said these years, that could be a third (or part of first) "prong" of the possible false flag.

Now what are the two prongs? Each will presume that he was actually what he seemed to be for these years, an enemy of Islamism and a Psychiatrist.

  • Prong A

    An attack on a Christmas market gives vibes about Islamist terrorism. So, he could have calculated on getting German people riled up about the Islamist danger and therefore get things more opppressive against Islam at least against Radical Islam. I don't mean a Radical Muslim deserves no oppression if he preaches direct hate or even encourages or perpetrates terrorist acts. I do mean there are lots of other ways of being a Radical Muslim that simple aren't harmful to the rest of us.

    • Like wearing the veil.
    • Like having their own schools.
    • Like wearing the djellaba.
    • Like refusing the ideology of Evolution.


    Two of the concerns are pretty closely parallel to concerns Christian Fundamentalists and especially Catholic Traditionalists could have. The veil and the djellaba, the two other ones, are obviously linked to the history and extra-European present of Islam, but Christians could clearly make parallel choices.

    Hence, I would deplore attacking Radical Islam in ways other than Security services doing their duty to prevent terrorism from that or any other quarter. And perhaps limiting Muslim immigration, and perhaps enclavising Muslim immigrants already here.

    But if he is first and foremost an opponent of Radical Islam whatever it actually does, he might, as such, welcome the idea of Germans and other Westerners rallying against Islam in all its forms or especially Radical Islam in all its forms. And be willing to kill in a false flag to achieve that.

  • Prong B

    A senseless attack (any direction) by someone who may have been radicalised "on line" ... could rile up, especially shrinks, policemen, schools etc. against the online free speech and the free access to it.

    I would deplore an attack against my freedom to write, against my freedom to read what other people wrote, and other peoples' freedom to read what I wrote.

    But if he is mostly a Psychiatrist, he may, again, welcome an idea of shutting down liberties.


Lots of people who turned to terror or violence may have been "radicalised online" but none I have heard of (except perhaps Breivik and Tarrant) didn't also have his life destroyed by mainstream culture. Including its preference for shrinks and mistrust of "online radicalisation" ...

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Victoria of Rome
23.XII.2024

Romae sanctae Victoriae, Virginis et Martyris, quae, in persecutione Decii Imperatoris, cum esset desponsata Eugenio pagano et nec nubere vellet neque sacrificare, ideo, post multa facta miracula, quibus plurimas Deo Virgines aggregaverat, a carnifice percussa est gladio in corde, rogatu sui sponsi.

No comments:

Post a Comment