Leo XIV (if such) Refers to Leo XIII ... and Leo XII?

New blog on the kid: Leo XIV (if such) Refers to Leo XIII ... and Leo XII? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: An interview with Pope Michael by Christian Wagner .... Second Part of Video · Ulysses Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman, Theologians?

I think specifically of Leo XII on 26 of July 1826.

He cracked down on The Little Church. In this case, there was some clarity that the opposition to Pius VII came over his policy in one specific country (accepting Napoleon as Emperor of France and condemning opposition to him), and they eventually lost Apostolic Succession, those remaining are "reading the mass" without the sacrament because they have no actual priests.

Those facing Leo XIV (if such) have a somewhat stronger case, about items around Vatican II and New Liturgy and CCC (my favourite is §283*). And Palmarians, Conclavists, Sedevacantists have Apostolic Succession.

So, one idea would be to treat at least Conclavists and possibly Palmarians as what happened in 1400 .../HGL

* For reference, while Rob Skiba II was wrong on Lake Michigan with Flat Earth views, this is not the case with all Geocentrics. Riccioli was not a Flat Earther, nor was Pope Michael I, nor am I. And Young Earth Creationism is not Megachurches.