New blog on the kid: January 2026

Saturday, 31 January 2026

Christine Niles News

Miracle Monk Strikes Again; Epstein Bombshells; DOJ Protects Abortion Pill | CATHOLIC NEWS ROUNDUP
Christine Niles | 31.I.2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ674sKRPnA

The Scandalous Silence of Catholics
Christine Niles | 31 Jan. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8InsjQHS-s

Production January 2026

Production January 2026
Back to Previous		On to Next

Production December 2025		Production February 2026

1.I.2026: Bonum Festum Circumcisionis Domini (LAT) · Gâteau sandwich en seigle, j'apprécie ! (FR) · If Someone Wonders, Hoods as I Wear were Male in the Middle Ages
2.I.2026: So, Greta Was Arrested for Supporting Terrorist ... Prisoners? · Who Started the Flat Earth Nonsense (I Have My Theory) · Sharing: "Male Distress is Medicalised" · She's So Eager to Laugh at Jesus, She Destroys the OT and Second Temple Judaism · Oui, j'ai vu les deux poulets et les clémentines (FR) · Nope, the Divine Name is Not Tahreef · Bible in a Year Plan (73 Books)
3.I.2026: Bonum Festum Sanctae Genovefae (LAT) · 134th Birthday of Tolkien · Could a Bolzmann Brain Understand Logic? · Predictions of YEC, One from CMI, One from Me
4.I.2026: Fame Doesn't Automatically Equal Fame · Durupınar Pottery is Arguably Post-Babel · Did Josephus Believe Hercules Was Historic? · A 12 Year Old Mother Should be Able to be a 12 Year Old Bride
5.I.2026: Can People Know What Good Is, Without Being Christian? · Does Catholicism Have Secret Doctrines? · A Muslim Perhaps Made a Mistake in Quoting St. Thomas Aquinas via a Modern Work, the Summa is However Available (in Translation)
6.I.2026: Bonum Festum Epiphaniae (LAT) · How did Henry Drummond Explain Human Language? · Did Henry Drummond Have Any Other Hunch on Language? · Christmas Explained with Apocalypse 12 · Crucifix and the Swiss Nightclub Crans-Montana
7.I.2026: Aïeule ? (FR) · Michael Lofton Just Got Ugly. · It would seem, my views on things seem to be relevant to some
8.I.2026: Focussed Attention, Rosary, Hrushiv · Crans-Montana (FR) · Les coupables semblent être les Colons, pas les Musulmans (FR) · Inaccurate Reasoning in CMI · Did Everyone Catch What I Said? · Renee Nicole Good
9.I.2026: Lofton Struggles to Understand the Essence of AI · Are You In A Cult For Being Christian or Close? For Believing Actual Christian Tenets? · Christmas Story in Bethlehem
10.I.2026: Some People Hate My P O V. One Subterfuge is Pretending I Overshare · Both Videos (Except the Guy's Own) · A Veteran Analysing
11.I.2026: A Catholic Conversion Story (from Baptism and Methodism and Non-Denominational) · Liste noire Exe ... (FR)
12.I.2026: Can One Be a National Socialist and a Bona Fide Catholic? · Il y a des gens qui évaluent la capacité de certains à la discipline (FR)
13.I.2026: Bonam Octavam Epiphaniae (LAT) · Est-ce que Gaudium et Spes 22, 2, enseigne que la grâce n'ait pas été perdue ? (FR) · L'acceptation pacifique universelle et thèse de Cassiciacum (FR) · Prayer to the Saints in the Time of Jesus
14.I.2026: Josephus on Numbers 5:12—31 · A Self Proclaimed Poet? · Deux semaines (FR) · Did Sean Hiller Give a Reason Why Wojtyla Was Not Pope? · Saint Ratzinger? Nope.
15.I.2026: Première cause de mort en 2025 : l'avortement (FR) · "Clearly Hit"
16.I.2026: Le Chat du Rabbin avait avalé un perroquet ? Explique pourquoi il répète des conneries (FR) · Other gods? Well, not real gods, but sometimes real people or things · Partageons (FR)
17.I.2026: Was Peter on the Tiber or the Euphrates?
18.I.2026: Prayers for the March for Life / Prières pour la Marche pour la Vie (FR/ENG) · Can One be Austro-Fascist and Bona Fide Catholic? · Why did Noah Curse Canaan? · I'm Not Part of the Ones he's Calling Out · L'Antéchrist selon Paul Adrien, le Catéchon selon moi (FR)
19.I.2026: May and November Also Counted · Gráfico 136.- ¿Quién es el agresor? (ESP)
20.I.2026: Exegesis, a Protestant and My Response
21.I.2026: Bonum Festum Sanctae Agnetis (LAT) · A US American Who Thinks the Greenland Threat is Not So Fun · Vous avez entendu parler de l'argument Spider-Man ? (FR) · Russell, Kant et Épicure refutés (FR) · Best Documentation to Us is Not About Who was Best Documented Back Then, But Whose Documentation Survives Best
22.I.2026: Fin de vie, ça vient par elle-même (FR) · Hinduism is False (as Most Commonly Understood)
23.I.2026: Did St. Luke make a mistake in Chapter 2 of his Gospel? Answered in the Negative · What Words did Job Repent Of?
24.I.2026: —
25.I.2026: Bonum Festum Conversionis Sancti Pauli (LAT) · Trump, I think this has gone far enough or too far ... · Non, l'Austrofascisme n'a pas stérilisé des gens de force (FR) · Ktzi'ot in the States?
26.I.2026: Somalian Fraud?
27.I.2026: Can a Christian Be a Nationalist? · Sharing on Duckweed / Phum · Metatron weighed in
28.I.2026: Two Sides Are Escalating
29.I.2026: Bonum Festum Sancti Francisci Salesii (LAT) · On this very day, Joe Heschmeyer tries to sell Catholicism as "Christianity Compatible with Evolution" · Third Bullet Killed Her, It Seems · Has Trump / ICE ~ Venezuela ... Contributed to Apostasy?
30.I.2026: Sharing on Lourdes
31.I.2026: "La loi reflète l'évolution des mentalités" (FR) · "Why Bother About Creation Science, the Flood was a Miracle, and Miracles are Miracles, Right?" · Is Jesus Still Coming in the Flesh? Yes. · Rieckert Defends Prevost Wrong · Production January 2026 · Christine Niles News

"La loi reflète l'évolution des mentalités"

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Non, l'Austrofascisme n'a pas stérilisé des gens de force · New blog on the kid : "La loi reflète l'évolution des mentalités"

Vous pouvez demander à S.Guérin en quelle législation récente il utilisait ces mots. Notons, l'Église catholique n'a pas fait le même changement. 1 Corinthiens 7:4 vaut toujours.

Mais il y avait un temps, la loi civile comme la tradition de l'Église étaient conçues comme étant là, pas pour suivre, pas pour refléter, mais plutôt pour arrêter, empêcher ou au moins enfreindre, l'évolution des mentalités.

Car, le Seigneur, tant des consciences, que des États, de tous les États, des États chrétiens de droit et de fait, des États non-chrétiens au moins de droit, ce n'est pas la somme des mentalités qui un moment donné sont vivantes et entre la minorité et le troisième ou quatrième âge. C'est Jésus-Christ.

En Suède, notre roi Oscar II était le dernier oint et couronné par la cérémonie ancestrale. Il recommandait que son fils et héritier, Gustave V, accesse sans les cérémonies religieuses. Pour respecter l'évolution des mentalités. Ceci eut lieu (sur cette recommendation) en 1907, avant que la Suède sombrât avec deux lois, 1934 et 1941, dans l'eugénisme par stérilisations forcées, jusqu'à son abolition dans les années 1970'* — peut-être parce que l'on avait déjà en 1907 décidé de suivre l'évolution des mentalités.

Pour un Chrétien, l'évolution des mentalités a un autre nom. La grande apostasie.

Que personne ne vous égare d’aucune manière ; car auparavant viendra l’apostasie, et se manifestera l’homme de péché, le fils de la perdition, l’adversaire qui s’élève contre tout ce qui est appelé Dieu ou honoré d’un culte, jusqu’à s’asseoir dans le sanctuaire de Dieu, et à se présenter comme s’il était Dieu. ... Dans son apparition cet impie sera, par la puissance de Satan, accompagné de toutes sortes de miracles, de signes et de prodiges mensongers, avec toutes les séductions de l’iniquité, pour ceux qui se perdent, parce qu’ils n’ont pas ouvert leur cœur à l’amour de la vérité qui les eût sauvés. C’est pourquoi Dieu leur envoie des illusions puissantes qui les feront croire au mensonge, en sorte qu’ils tombent sous son jugement tous ceux qui ont refusé leur foi à la vérité, et ont au contraire pris plaisir à l’injustice.
DEUXIÈME ÉPÎTRE AUX THESSALONICIENS, Chap. ii

La loi néfaste sur stérilisation forcée étant retirée en Suède, peut-on parler de grande apostasie ? Oui, car à peu près le même temps, on introduit l'avortement sur demande. On avait déjà eu l'avortement "sur indication médicale" et ceci bien au-delà de simplement sortir un bébé pas encore viable pour sauver la vie même de la mère. On introduit l'avortement sur demande. En 1975 on abolit la stérilisation forcée — sauf pour la catégorie qui change du sexe légal, ceci à partir de 1972 jusqu'en 2013 — et déjà en 1974 on avait l'avortement sur demande.

Bien entendu, les médecins qui avaient en des cliniques psychiatriques appliqué la stérilisation forcée, ils devaient changer de la routine, mais n'étaient pas obligés de quitter le travail, ni de changer leur mentalité en profondeur.

En 2010, environ 80 % des grossesses d'adolescentes étaient interrompues. C'est à dire, en Suède, on dit "une adolescente peut pas être mère" (et pas femme non plus, évidemment), "elle est encore un enfant et doit donc pas avoir un enfant, qu'elle avorte !" Si on parle de grossesses d'adolescentes, suivie de tuerie de l'enfant à naître, entre 1975 et 2005, le chiffre dépassait souvent 20 sur 1000 femmes de la population, âgées 15–44 ans. Depuis 2010, quand ça dépassait légèrement 20 sur les 1000, ça a baissé. Entretemps, en 2016, luf, la filiale suédoise du LYMEC, votait pour proposer "avortement juridique" ... un père ayant le même délai de se défaire de la paternité que la mère d'avorter.

Non, l'évolution des mentalités n'est pas une bonne chose, ni un critère pour la législation. Pas telle qu'elle est ce dernier siècle, sauf les réactions (y compris contre la stérilisation forcée).

Or, la mentalité des temps de stérilisation forcée a des côtés à faire attention. L'alcoolisme figurait parmi les problèmes qui, selon certains, dans la presse qui soutenait la nouvelle législation en 1934, pourrait motiver cette mesure saugrenue :

The** analyzed articles illustrate how influential figures, such as high-ranking doctors and professors, played a crucial role in shaping the discourse around sterilization. This discourse interconnects sterilization with broader societal concerns, including crime, alcoholism, overcrowding, abortion and contraceptive use. ... Terms such as “mentally deficient”, “mentally ill”, “mentally abnormal”, and “antisocial” are highlighted as examples of the descriptors used to categorize and stigmatize individuals in the discourse surrounding sterilization.

Je traduis :

Les articles analysés montrent comment les personnages à influence, comme docteurs et professeurs hauts de gamme, jouaient un rôle crucial dans la formation du discours autour de la stérilisation. Ce discours fait la connection entre stérilisation et d'inquiétudes sociétales plus vastes, y compris crime, alcoolisme, congestion [à domicile], avortement et usage de contraceptifs. Des termes commes "déficient mental", "malade mental", "abnorme mental" et "antisocial" sont soulignés comme exemples des épithètes en usage pour la catégorisation et la stigmatisation d'individus, dans le discours autour de la stérilisation.

Bien évidemment, les attitudes vis-à-vis alcooliques, criminels, domiciles en congestion, la capacité de stigmatiser les individus pour ce genre de raisons, ça n'a pas disparu en 1975. Des années plus tard, en 1972, l'Église suédoise avait 95,4 % des Suédois. Si ce "clergé" (dans le sens social, pas sacremental !) n'a rien ou trop peu fait pour empêcher cette mesure, c'est que le Luthéranisme était un truc d'identité, pas une foi chrétienne. En plus, dans les années 1930, pas sûr que les "évangélistes" (dont la Suède avait son maximum les années 1930') auraient défendu la fertilité humaine. En 1931, le 7 mars, le journal Tidevarvet a un journaliste ou freelance probablement en partie d'origine italienne, Pier Gudro (nom de plum dès par une œuvre de Pirandello), qui dans un article nommé "Vad påven menade" (ce qu'a voulu dire le pape) se trouve obligé d'expliquer pourquoi les Italiens ont accepté que le pape, en Casti connubii se mêlait en des "affaires privées" autant que des "affaires publiques" sans de se borner à des affaires purement ecclésiastiques. Si les Méthodistes ou la Mission d'Örebro*** qui venait de se former avaient eu l'attitude des Catholiques, peut-être le crime d'état aurait pu être évité. Au moins pour les Méthodistes, ce n'était pas le cas.

Soyons honnêtes. La réforme luthérienne et la réforme anglicane° n'ont pas augmenté (au moins pas durablement) la piété, ils l'ont repoussée dans la sphère privée de manière de libérer le champs sociétal pour le sécularisme. Et ça fait mal. Ça promeut les préjugés, un peu comme le Jansénisme.°° Que d'autres formes de Protestantisme rendent compte de leur positions historiques, ici il s'agit de la première secte d'avoir envahi un royaume (Luthéranisme en Suède, 1527) et la première secte d'avoir été unie à un pouvoir suffisent pour protéger les Protestants du Continent (Anglicanisme en Angleterre, en 1534, l'Angleterre possédait encore Calais, pas loin des Pays-Bas Espagnols). Ce n'est pas pour rien qu'on rapproche de côté catholique tradi les années 1517 (Luther), 1717 (Désaguiliers fonde la Maçonnerie) et 1917 (la Révolution russe).

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Jean Bosco
31.I.2026

Augustae Taurinorum sancti Joannis Bosco, Confessoris, Societatis Salesianae ac Instituti Filiarum Mariae Auxiliatricis Fundatoris, animarum zelo et fidei propagandae conspicui, quem Pius Papa Undecimus Sanctorum fastis adscripsit.

PS, avec ce genre de préjugés, pas limités aux Protestants Luthériens (il y a des Musulmans pas trop différents), mon échec à me connecter sur l'un de mes comptes FB pourrait figurer comme "symptomatique", mais voici la vraie raison, vu que je ne possède pas d'ordinateur et qu'un ordinateur que j'ai déjà utilisé ne va pas être reconnaissable comme tel dans les cookies d'un ordinateur emprunté :

Si vous n’avez plus accès à un autre appareil déjà utilisé pour vous connecter à ce compte, nous ne pouvons pas vous permettre de vous connecter, et ce à des fins de sécurité.

PPS, le dimanche, deux fois:

Vérifiez vos notifications sur un autre appareil
Accédez à votre compte Facebook sur un autre appareil et ouvrez la notification que nous vous avons envoyée pour approuver cette connexion.

J'étais déjà sur "un autre appareil" la deuxième fois, et je ne peux pas deviner quel appareil ils ont désigné comme "mon" autre./HGL

* En Allemagne et Autriche, la limite était 1945. L'Autriche était libérée de l'Allemagne, l'Allemagne était dénazifiée. Je remercie Patton, pas Joukov.

** Voir :
Sterilisering som samhällslösning
Erika Cataldo Brånstad, essai en Histoire de niveau C
Södertörns högskola, automne de 2023
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1939387/FULLTEXT01.pdf

*** À prononcer Œûrébroû, avec deux longues voyelles.

° Peut-être plutôt D- que R- au début, non ?

°° Quand j'ai adhéré dans le passé à la FSSPX, je pensais que l'accusation du Jansénisme à leur égard était une de ces confusions entre la vertu de la foi et les vertus naturelles qu'on voit trop souvent dans la Secte de Vatican II. Genre vouloir du magistère croyant tous les dogmes équivaudrait à vouloir obéir uniquement à des papes personnellement saints. Depuis, j'ai vu un peu leur surévaluation de la vie reglée, qui rappelle la thèse condamné n° 1 de la bulle Unigenitus, citée de leur propre site : 1. Que reste-t-il à une âme, qui a perdu Dieu et sa grâce, sinon le péché et ses suites, une orgueilleuse pauvreté et une indigence paresseuse, c’est-à-dire, une impuissance générale au travail, à la prière, et à tout bien ? Luc 16, 3 (éditions 1693, 1699) Il y a une confusion entre péché mortel et la vie bohême.

Friday, 30 January 2026

Sharing on Lourdes

Science Cannot Explain Mary's Most Recent Miracle
Cameron Riecker | 26 Jan. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_8kZAXLYZw

Thursday, 29 January 2026

Bonum Festum Sancti Francisci Salesii

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

(28.XII) Lugduni, in Gallia, item natalis sancti Francisci Salesii, Episcopi Gebennensis et Confessoris; quem, doctrina et flagrantissimo in convertendis haereticis zelo praeclarum, Alexander Papa Septimus in Sanctorum numerum retulit, et ipsius festivitatem quarto Kalendas Februarii, quo die sacrum illius corpus Lugduno Annesium, in Sabaudia, fuit translatum, agendam esse constituit. Eum Pius Nonus, Pontifex Maximus, Doctorem universalis Ecclesiae declaravit; et Pius Papa Undecimus omnibus Scriptoribus catholicis, qui diariis aliisve scriptis in vulgus edendis Christianam sapientiam illustrant ac provehunt et tuentur, caelestem Patronum dedit seu confirmavit.
(29.I) Sancti Francisci Salesii, Episcopi Gebennensis, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris, omnium Scriptorum catholicorum, diariis aliisve scriptis in vulgus edendis sapientiam Christianam illustrantium ac provehentium et tutantium, peculiaris apud Deum Patroni; qui migravit in caelum quinto Kalendas Januarii, sed hac die, ob Translationem corporis ejus, potissimum colitur.

On this very day, Joe Heschmeyer tries to sell Catholicism as "Christianity Compatible with Evolution"

He cited a meeting that Antipope Ratzinger had in 2007* with the clergy of Belluno-Feltre and Treviso (Italian dioceses). Instead of commenting on Heschmeyer's video (many of them are good arguments for standard Catholic teaching, like Mariology), I feel like going to this question in this "apostolic" visit:

Fr Alberto: Holy Father, young people are our future and our hope: but they sometimes see life as a difficulty rather than an opportunity; not as a gift for themselves and for others but as something to be consumed on the spot; not as a future to be built but as aimless wandering. The contemporary mindset demands that young people be happy and perfect all of the time. The result is that every tiny failure and the least difficulty are no longer seen as causes for growth but as a defeat. All this often leads to irreversible acts such as suicide, which wound the hearts of those who love them and of society as a whole. What can you tell us educators who feel all too often that our hands are tied and that we have no answers? Thank you.

Benedict XVI: I think you have just given us a precise description of a life in which God does not figure. At first sight, it seems as if we do not need God or indeed, that without God we would be freer and the world would be grander. But after a certain time, we see in our young people what happens when God disappears. As Nietzsche said: "The great light has been extinguished, the sun has been put out". Life is then a chance event. It becomes a thing that I must seek to do the best I can with and use life as though it were a thing that serves my own immediate, tangible and achievable happiness. But the big problem is that were God not to exist and were he not also the Creator of my life, life would actually be a mere cog in evolution, nothing more; it would have no meaning in itself. Instead, I must seek to give meaning to this component of being.

So far, nothing problematic. Ken Ham would agree with the diagnosis, and so would pretty much Pope Michael II, I think.

Currently, I see in Germany, but also in the United States, a somewhat fierce debate raging between so-called "creationism" and evolutionism, presented as though they were mutually exclusive alternatives: those who believe in the Creator would not be able to conceive of evolution, and those who instead support evolution would have to exclude God.

Uh-oh ... a few misrepresentations here.

There are, and arguably were even in 2007, Christian Evolutionists who tried to "counterbalance" this. However, he may have meant these were pushed outside the debate.
But worse, to him, a Christian who is Young Earth Creationist is represented as one who is not "able to conceive of evolution" ...
... and a debate which is lively and which doesn't focus on what he considers the golden middle is "fierce" and "raging" ...

This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such.

Come on. No one can see the process by which a creature with ape hyoid (bearing air sacks that would distort and amplify the outcome of the voice box), with no human FOXP2, with no Broca's area and presumably no Wernicke's area, with ears so thick they could not hear consonants (they are shrill), and the likes of which or other descendants of which make calls that involve only injunctions and encouragement, no statements about interesting but not immediately urgent facts, these calls being one sound or one alternation of sounds, very usually, for one full and complete meaning (injunction, emotional communication), how creatures with this constitution of anatomy, genes, brain and communication system could evolve into creatures with human hyoid (no air sacks, so no distortion and also no amplification), with human FOXP2, with Broca's and Wernicke's area, with ears so thin they can hear consonants, and whose communication system typically involves statements, not always of urgency, and these are divided into morphemes (not always words) which are divided into phonemes, these being sounds with no meaning of their own. No one can see it, and what's more, Evolutionists cannot explain it.** Young Earth Creationists don't deny that peppered moth example.

But on the other, the doctrine of evolution does not answer every query, especially the great philosophical question: where does everything come from? And how did everything start which ultimately led to man? I believe this is of the utmost importance. This is what I wanted to say in my lecture at Regensburg: that reason should be more open, that it should indeed perceive these facts but also realize that they are not enough to explain all of reality. They are insufficient.

Everything, which ultimately led to man ... in other words he is affirming the Evolutionary process as our actual origin.

Our reason is broader and can also see that our reason is not basically something irrational, a product of irrationality, but that reason, creative reason, precedes everything and we are truly the reflection of creative reason. We were thought of and desired; thus, there is an idea that preceded me, a feeling that preceded me, that I must discover, that I must follow, because it will at last give meaning to my life. This seems to me to be the first point: to discover that my being is truly reasonable, it was thought of, it has meaning.

Good point, but that excludes the existance for instance of a being with human ears and hyoid, but no Broca's area, or a communication system where calls can be words in statements ... because one-sound calls are too few, even with a human inventory of possible speech sounds, to waste on adding a few words to the inventory of injunctions and emotion conveyance, since words are usually interesting but not pragmatically important, and sentences are so too.

And my important mission is to discover this meaning, to live it and thereby contribute a new element to the great cosmic harmony conceived of by the Creator.

Discover? He basically said natural law is not apparent other than to a Theist. I would say, if you are not very stupid, you don't want to avoid old age by committing suicide, you don't want to be taken care of more than half of the time by robots and you might even at least squirm at being taken care of by younger people from very different countries, with a very different education, who will be too eager to get you diagnosed with Alzheimer because they'll find things childish that you find open minded or poetic or kind.

In other words, banning abortion and contraception make plenty of sense on simply secular grounds. I have other evidence, from hearsay, on his extending too much of an excuse to Atheists on the Natural Law.

If this is true, then difficulties also become moments of growth, of the process and progress of my very being, which has meaning from conception until the very last moment of life. We can get to know this reality of meaning that precedes all of us, we can also rediscover the meaning of pain and suffering; there is of course one form of suffering that we must avoid and must distance from the world: all the pointless suffering caused by dictatorships and erroneous systems, by hatred and by violence.

Will. Not. Happen.

We can't say "we must" of a thing which will not take place. Also, I'm not sure that dictatorships are what cause suffering, or even have a hunch, they aren't, if non-parliamentarian rule is the only issue.

However, in suffering there is also a profound meaning, and only if we can give meaning to pain and suffering can our life mature. I would say, above all, that there can be no love without suffering, because love always implies renouncement of myself, letting myself go and accepting the other in his otherness; it implies a gift of myself and therefore, emerging from myself. All this is pain and suffering, but precisely in this suffering caused by the losing of myself for the sake of the other, for the loved one and hence, for God, I become great and my life finds love, and in love finds its meaning. The inseparability of love and suffering, of love and God, are elements that must enter into the modern conscience to help us live.

I'm not sure married couples agree all that much.

In this regard, I would say that it is important to help the young discover God, to help them discover the true love that precisely in renunciation becomes great and so also enables them to discover the inner benefit of suffering, which makes me freer and greater. Of course, to help young people find these elements, companionship and guidance are always essential, whether through the parish, Catholic Action or a Movement. It is only in the company of others that we can also reveal this great dimension of our being to the new generations.

Suffering doesn't automatically make one freer and greater. It can do so, if carried in union with the Cross of Christ, though I think St. Therèse in her tuberculosis would have thought of herself as smaller rather than greater. But to tons of people who do not carry it like that, either suffering in the amounts they do or given particular sufferings imposing losses, are more like hampering sanctification and even staying justified. I read one page, it seems to have gone down, on Jesus healing someone because the suffering had stifled charity in that person, who could no longer love God or neighbour.

Let's recall that pointless suffering of beings that could never get sanctified and never go to Heaven is how Evolution explains ... the origin of Man, and of every vertebrate, since at least vertebrates seem capable of true suffering. A vertebrate that suffers now, like a hamster dying in cancer, suffers because Adam sinned.

I don't see how Ratzinger could be too opaque to see that. But I do see that this opacity comes with a benighted naiveté about how well the Theory of Evolution is "proven" or even "seen", and I do see it involves an overevaluation of suffering, as a kind of sanctifier, whatever you do with it. That a suffering man is a saint or at least wiser is possible, but it depends on how he responds. And lack of suffering is not damnation.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Francis of Sales
29.I.2026

* MEETING OF THE HOLY FATHER BENEDICT XVI WITH THE CLERGY OF THE DIOCESES OF BELLUNO-FELTRE AND TREVISO
Church of St Justin Martyr, Auronzo di Cadore | Tuesday, 24 July 2007
https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2007/july/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20070724_clero-cadore.html

I obviously don't agree on calling Ratzinger "Holy Father" or "Benedict XVI" in the title, but this is how the document is named.

** I've double-checked on at least the item of communication system:

Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl: Tomasello Not Answering
Thursday, 28 September 2023 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 03:50
https://correspondentia-ioannis-georgii.blogspot.com/2023/09/tomasello-not-answering.html

Tuesday, 27 January 2026

Can a Christian Be a Nationalist?

I have taken two takes on specifically German speaking Nationalisms combined with régimes divorcing from popular vote and illegalising opposition.

Can a Christian, specifically a Catholic, be a National Socialist in the strict historic sense? No. Can he be an Austro-Fascist in the strict historical sense? Yes.

Now, let's broaden the picture.

Can a Christian be a Nationalist. We are not limited to 20th C specifically first half or second quarter, we are not limited to even post-1789.

By the way, are there Nationalisms in which a Christian cannot participate without reservation? I just mentioned 1789, so, yes, the French Revolution initiated one. If the "French nation" (or its representatives in Paris) cracks down on regional dissent from the war mongering, no, you cannot be a Blue Coat and kill Vendeans without hurt to your soul. In Italy, if in 1870 the king, formerly of Sardinia, invades the Papal States and starts deporting Neapolitans to concentration camps, no, you cannot enroll and especially you cannot rejoice in such doings. If this were the root of all Nationalism, then Nationalism would be evil.

However, there was a Spanish nationalism against the Moors (and some would add, "against the Jews too"). There was a nationalism in Sweden against Danes (pretty close to the one in the 13 Colonies against London). There was a nationalism in France against the English.

And this French nationalism against the English features Saint Joan of Arc.

There was an Irish nationalism against the English, that partly ignored Catholicism, but partly pushed its adherents back onto it, by making Anglicanism and Calvinism a kind of national treason on top of being heresies.

There was a Polish nationalism during the partitions, which in the Prussian and Russian ones helped to keep Catholicism alive. Though, Pope Pius IX mentioned, they were using partly the wrong means. And before that, there was a Polish anti-German nationalism that helped preserve Poland from the Reformation.

I think a case can be made for moderate and non-obligatory nationalism within Christianity.

Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost
Matthew 28:19

A nation doesn't have a soul, or a human body, so cannot be baptised, what does a "baptised nation" even mean?

And when she was baptized, and her household, she besought us, saying: If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide there. And she constrained us.
Acts of Apostles 16:15

So, a baptised household is one, where the head of the household is baptised and enjoins on the other members to be baptised. When all members of a household are baptised the household is said to be baptised. This solves the question what a baptised nation is: when the head of the nation is baptised and all or the vast majority of households are baptised, that nation is referred to as baptised. Christendom was not a mistake, it was a feature.

Let every soul be subject to higher powers: for there is no power but from God: and those that are, are ordained of God Therefore he that resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God. And they that resist, purchase to themselves damnation For princes are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? Do that which is good: and thou shalt have praise from the same For he is God's minister to thee, for good. But if thou do that which is evil, fear: for he beareth not the sword in vain. For he is God's minister: an avenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil Wherefore be subject of necessity, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake.

For therefore also you pay tribute. For they are the ministers of God, serving unto this purpose.
[Romans 13:1-6]

This is not about whether some people recently killed were obeying the due authority of Minnesota or resisting the due authority of the US. This is about a much broader picture, namely on whether a Christian can be a Nationalist. A state need not coincide with a nation. But the example of Israel and the wording of "baptised nations" suggests that it can coincide with a nation. A nation is baptised when the head of it and most households in it are baptised. So, a nation has a head that is a head of state, if it has a single one. The German nation exists in several states, Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Switzerland and France. The Swiss state and the Belgian state and the French and Spanish states have more than one nation. But it also happens that a nation and a state coincide, like for instance before Strongbow, the Irish nation was under one High King (Ard Righ or Ard Rí, depending on spelling). Then the state and the nation to some extent coincide. To a much larger extent, they overlap.

Being loyal to one's household is not a fault and being loyal to one's state and one's nation is not a fault. Nationalism as such is not idolatry, any more than a woman being faithful to spouse and children is service to Juno or the intercourse with her husband is service to Venus. Heating a house with a fireplace is not service to Vesta and defending it against agressors is not service to Mars.

However, some places it happens that nations become idols. I would say this happens when you think "what is done here" trumps what is right in and of itself according to the commandments of God as interpreted by the Church of Rome, mother and teacher of the churches. But a very similar idolatry (at least on the surface) has nothing to do with the nation. It's when "what we know now" trumps what Christians have always known. Scientism is idolatry as much as Nation worship. And last time the Church spoke up in a major way against Nation worship, it was one which was highly tied to Scientism.

Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community - however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things - whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.*

The concrete depositories of power in the Germany that Pope Pius XI was adressing were not just judges and policemen, but also medical doctors. One Nazi insurgent who tried to overthrow Austrian independence in July of 1934, who was killed while carrying arms and wielding them against Austrian police or military, had his grave stone decorated with a swastika, and this recently caused a controversy in the cemetary of Graz. I thanked the cemetary for keeping the documentation:

Thanks to this, it may at last be known outside Austria too that this man, who has a Swastika and not any Cross on his grave, whose headstone features no Cross even for the date of his death (and no star for the date of his birth, just "24.3.1897 - 27.7.1934", no star and no cross), who died in the July Putsch of 1934, who was a comrade thus with the other Nazi who killed Dollfuss, who was an SA Sturmbannführer, and who was called Hans Tita Probst, was a Medical Doctor and thus likely to have been in life an Atheist or Pantheist, but at least no Catholic Christian. Unless there was a cross above the piece shown in the picture. Even so, it is likely as with Georges Lemaître he was getting more of his worldview from non-Christian, non-Catholic sources than from orthodoxly Catholic ones.**

Hans Tita Probst could wear Lederhosen or Kniehosen (leather shorts or breeches), he could yodel, he could listen to Wagner, he could enjoy archaeology celebrating the passage of Burgundians from Worms to Attila across the Danube, he could celebrate German folk music, he could have his wife and daughters wear Dirndl, quite as much in independent Austria as he could in Germany. He could also despise (but not hurt or molest) Jews as much. The one thing he could not do in independent Austria was dominate as a medical doctor as much as he could in NSDAP ruled Germany. The maternal grandfather of the Swedish king, Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, was the first in German nobility to support NSDAP, and he did so because he was impressed with the excessive powers they would be giving to medical doctors. So, while in 1933 to 1945, in Germany, the worship of Science was tied to the worship of Germany as a progressive state, and of the German races*** as having produced the progressive state, the same worship of Science has of late been tied to "the International Community" and WHO. It was already internationalist in Lenin's Russia.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. John Chrysostom
27.I.2026

(14.IX) Apud Comanam, in Ponto, natalis sancti Joannis, Episcopi Constantinopolitani, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris, propter aureum eloquentiae flumen cognomento Chrysostomi; qui, ab inimicorum factione in exsilium ejectus, et, cum e sancti Innocentii Primi, Summi Pontificis, decreto inde revocaretur, in itinere, a custodientibus militibus multa mala perpessus, animam Deo reddidit. Ejus autem festivitas sexto Kalendas Februarii celebratur, quo die sacrum ipsius corpus a Theodosio juniore Constantinopolim fuit translatum. Hunc vero praeclarissimum divini verbi prasconem Pius Papa Decimus caelestem Oratorum sacrornm Patronum declaravit atque constituit.
(27.I) Sancti Joannis Chrysostomi, Episcopi Constantinopolitani, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris, caelestis Oratorum sacrorum Patroni; qui decimo octavo Kalendas Octobris obdormivit in Domino. Ejus sacrum corpus, sub Theodosio juniore, hac die Constantinopolim, inde postea Romam translatum fuit, et in Basilica Principis Apostolorum conditum.

* MIT BRENNENDER SORGE
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI ON THE CHURCH AND THE GERMAN REICH
Given at the Vatican on Passion Sunday, March 14, 1937
https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html

** New blog on the kid: I thank the Cemetery of Graz
Saturday, 25 January 2014 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 15:26
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2014/01/i-thank-cemetery-of-graz.html

*** Nordic, Westic, Alpine, East Baltic and Dinaric. There was a booklet on these that a certain man loved, and it's a booklet more useful to a painter than to a politician.

Monday, 26 January 2026

Somalian Fraud?

Quick resumé of the facts.

An independent reporter, perhaps just an angry man with a phone and another guy with a phone filming him, get to Somalian day care centres or at least one of them, sees no children, lots of closed doors and men telling them to stop filming. This is, in many right wing media, and by the federal government, treated as proof positive that the day care centre doesn't exist, it's empty rooms and some angry men keeping watch. Meanwhile, left wing media are pointing to security cameras showing parents leaving off their children.

For me, neither of these is sufficient evidence of either thesis. Here is a little discussion.

On the fraud theory, the security cameras showing parents leaving children can have been arranged. Parents come, leave off children, five minutes later take the children out by a back door, which isn't shown.

On the non-fraud theory, some leftwing person whom the Somalis respect can have warned them of the right wing "maniac" coming and they can have believed that he was a real threat, hid the children from him, as they would, and as any American would, against a killer like Breivik or someone trying to catch children's faces and make proposals to a sex trafficker. The clip from the "this is a fraud video" wasn't so long that children behind closed doors definitely would have ended up making some noice. Or if he was really out to get them, they could have made a noise, he could have recognised that there were children there, but decided to not show that part, or perhaps it happened (providentially in his view) after the men had actually succeeded in persuading him to stop filming.

I think really getting to the bottom of this needs some law enforcement, if it's desired, and that law enforcement not ICE. As it is, we have two pieces of circumstantial evidence, pointing in opposite direction, neither of it really conclusive.

However, let's suppose what was going on was what a man on the right and unfavourable to immigrants would have labelled "fraud" ... must we conclude the Somalis are some kind of monsters just deluding everyone and sponging off the system? I think there is a distinct possibility of this fraud, if technically such, being understandable.

I try to google "day care in somalia" ... all I get on page one is the Minnesota story. By contrast "day care in kenya" gives "Olivia's Nest - International Daycare & Preschool" for Nairobi. "Mama Bear", "Babies and Beyond" ... "day care in dubai" gives "Marinelys Babysitting Center & Home Care Services- Dubai" and a few more. I'll try to get back to Somalia now ... wait, "ZAIRA Daycare Center" exists.

And here is another thing:

"I was chained every day like an animal" — Parents send children from Finland to disciplinary camps in Somalia, Kenya
https://yle.fi/a/74-20206484

Yle journalist Wali Hashi gained access to disciplinary institutions by posing as a father looking for a place for his son. He then obtained video footage of how the young people are treated.

Pretty gruesomely. I think I might just have given Democrats in Minnesota a reason on their part to look into it more carefully ... Wali Hashi is not a Finnish name, so he's presumably ethnically African, even if hred by a Finnish news-outlet.

But let's return to my hypothesis. It's not quite the scenario that Yle uncovered. Day care as such is not a very Somalian concept. To a Somalian, American women are being sponsored to be bad mothers, who leave their offspring at daycare instead of staying at home with their children. Then the immigration process asks Somalian women to do similar stuff, like leave children at day care while learning English and looking for jobs, and Somalis aren't very eager. They set up schemes where women elude this and actually do stay at home. And, cherry on the cake, are being payed for being good mothers.

The problem from a patriotic pov is, even so, why should Somali women who stay at home with their children be paid when so many American women do it for free? Or why should Somali women be hampered in learning English and become the reason why their families get stuck in a very ghettoised situation, interacting very little with Americans, and if at all, beyond authority figures they can't avoid, then at least one who took the trouble to learn the Somali language.

I'm far from demonising immigrants from certain places, this kind of thing is precisely what European authorities are up against when dealing with them. And in some cases, I don't blame them. The immigrants, that is.

So, on this hypothesis, a Somali mother who just can't avoid going to the English lesson or doing groceries (assignment for an English lesson) is giving her children up at the day care, but then, as soon as possible, picking them up again.

But obviously, I can't get the Finnish news story quite out of my mind either. It could be darker.

Or, as said, the Somalis thought they had a good reason to hide their children from Nick and Brooke Shirley. That poses another question: do we want people in sensitive situations, as immigrants are, to become paranoid resonance chambers for outing right wingers of our own? I don't.

My own attitude when getting started in Paris was, I don't dislike immigrants as such, but I definitely don't dislike right wingers either, being one myself. Not MAGA, more like Austro-Fascist. Some immigrants who have realised that some of the things I write are right wing, perhaps having been misled about actual content, have started taking "measures" to discourage me. My attitude to extra-European immigrants (not meaning Latin America) is not quite as friendly as it used to be, due to this.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St. Polycarp
26.I.2026

(23.II) Smyrnae natalis sancti Polycarpi, qui, beati Joannis Apostoli discipulus, et ab eo ejusdem civitatis Episcopus ordinatus, totius Asiae Princeps fuit. Postea, sub Marco Antonino et Lucio Aurelio Commodo, sedente Proconsule et universo populo in theatro adversus eum personante, igni traditus est; et, cum ab igne minime laederetur, martyrii coronam, gladio confossus, accepit. Cum illo etiam alii duodecim, qui ex Philadelphia venerant, in eadem Smyrnensi urbe, martyrio consummati sunt. Ipsius tamen Polycarpi festum septimo Kalendas Februarii celebratur.
(26.I) Sancti Polycarpi, Episcopi Smyrnensis et Martyris, qui martyrii coronam septimo Kalendas Martii consecutus est.

Saturday, 24 January 2026

Bonum Festum Conversionis Sancti Pauli

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Conversio sancti Pauli Apostoli, quae fuit anno secundo ab Ascensione Domini.

Apud Damascum natalis sancti Ananiae, qui fuit discipulus Domini, et eumdem Paulum Apostolum baptizavit. Ipse autem, cum Damasci, et Eleutheropoli, alibique Evangelium praedicasset, tandem, sub Licinio Judice, nervis caesus et laniatus, ac lapidibus oppressus, martyrium consummavit.

Trump, I think this has gone far enough or too far ...

Minneapolis was recalling a tranny who shot two children, and them himself.

It's now thinking of ICE who have shot two adults.

Tranny : ICE = 3:2.

You recall how Fidel Castro came to power?

To quell the growing discontent amongst the populace—which was subsequently displayed through frequent student riots and demonstrations—Batista established tighter censorship of the media, while also utilizing his Bureau for the Repression of Communist Activities secret police to carry out wide-scale violence, torture and public executions. These murders mounted in 1957, as socialist ideas became more influential. While exact numbers are unclear, estimates of the death toll attributed to Batista range from hundreds to up to 20,000 victims.

Batista's efforts to quell the unrest proved not only ineffective, but his tactics were the catalyst to even wider resistance against his regime.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulgencio_Batista

An Evolution believing Atheist has described the scene in these words:

Six of 1:01 them had the guy pinned to the ground. 1:03 One of them was punching him in the head 1:05 in the face repeatedly and then they 1:07 shot him and he's dead.

Now, some say he was armed. After getting punched, was he able to pull out his arm? If so, why didn't the guys priorise disarming him instead of punching him?

The next words of the guy are:

The only word 1:09 for that is murder.

Wish he were as lucid about abortion. Mr. President. During the campaign, I ignored the even existence of Peter Sonski. That's one reason why I supported you over Harris. Oh, not in urns, I have no right to participate in US elections, but on my blogs. I said sth about deportations on the scale you promised probably not being feasible. And especially not with due process, and therefore without disrupting the peace.

The problem is, to quite a lot of people who still ignore the existence of Peter Sonski, this is not a publicity for Peter Sonski, but for lack of better people they know of, for Kamala. Was your goal to make trannies and Kamala look good?

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Conersion of St. Paul
24—25.I.2026

Conversio sancti Pauli Apostoli, quae fuit anno secundo ab Ascensione Domini.

Confirming the lack of actual self defense:

@reasonandtheology
New Video Raises Questions in Border Patrol Shooting
New Footage Shows Unarmed American Shot by ...
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AbPJMnL74UQ

Here is a Veteran giving more detail:

Don't Believe the Government, This Was Murder
Combat Veteran News | 25 Jan. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjN73-gn90Q

Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Bonum Festum Sanctae Agnetis

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Romae passio sanctae Agnetis, Virginis et Martyris; quae, sub Praefecto Urbis Symphronio, ignibus injecta, sed iis per orationem ejus exstinctis, gladio percussa est. De ea beatus Hieronymus haec scribit: "Omnium gentium litteris atque linguis, praecipue in Ecclesiis, Agnetis vita laudata est; quae et aetatem vicit et tyrannum, et titulum castitatis martyrio consecravit."

A US American Who Thinks the Greenland Threat is Not So Fun

If We Invade Greenland: WARNING To All Americans Abroad
Large Man Abroad | 18 Jan. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJ5nY6jfcAU

Vous avez entendu parler de l'argument Spider-Man ?

Genre, "la Bible prouve Dieu comme Marvel Comics prouve l'existence de Spider-Man" ?

Or, personne ne croit que Spider-Man existe pour de vrai, donc, on ne devrait pas croire en Dieu non plus.

Plus en détail. La Bible raconte des miracles, comme quand Jésus marcha sur l'eau. La BD de Marvel raconte des exploits assez fantastiques de Peter Parker alias l'homme-araignée (avec des pouvoirs comme le "sens d'araignée" — grosso modo sixième sense — ou de pouvoir expulser des fils d'araignée gigantesques, avec une viscosité proportionnelle, et se lancer entre les maisons dessus, comme Tarzan sur les lianes). Si Peter Parker n'a pas expulsé une toile d'araignée, pourquoi Jésus aurait-Il marché sur l'eau ?

La Bible ne contredit pas l'histoire et la géographie connues (malgré certaines controverses sur ce point), mais Spider-Man ne contredit pas la géographie connue de Nouveau York non plus. Justement, si. Peter Parker est journaliste au Daily Bugle. Or, si Daily Bugle est censé être comparable à New York Post et a New York Daily News, pour ne pas évoquer New York Times, chacun de ces publications ont un bâtiment, The New York Times Building est 620 Eighth Avenue, New York Evening Post Building était jusqu'en 1970 à 75 West Street et Daily News Building est 220 East 42nd Street. Un journal de cette taille est une institution, et la BD décrit la rédaction comme dans un bâtiment à plusieurs étages, du style skyscraper. En 1977, j'ai mis mes pieds sur le sol de Nouveau York, avec ma mère. Elle savait très bien que j'étais fan de Spider-Man. Si Daily Bugle avait existé, elle m'aurait montré ce bâtiment. Après tout, ayant vu La Belle et le Clochard, elle m'a prévu mon premier repas chaud dans un restaurant italien américain qui servait ce plat (en Italie, on préfère la Bolognèse). Et on est resté une semaine ou deux a NY avant le voyage à l'intérieur et vers la Pacifique et encore une semaine en attendant le vol de retour. On aurait eu le temps.

Il y a pas mal d'autres qui auraient eu l'opportunité de voir le bâtiment de Daily Bugle et qui ne l'ont pas vu. Donc, la BD et le comic-book de Stan Lee et Steve Ditko contredit bel et bien la géographie de NY. Et pour cause. Je ne pense pas que New York Times, New York Post ou Daily News auraient permi que certaines frasques à propos du rédacteur auraient été débité à leur compte directement. Comme on peut dire certaines choses sur le gouvernement de la Présipauté du Groland, qu'on ne peut pas dire sur celui de la France.

Mais un test est encore plus distincteur. Il y a deux milliards (non, ils ne font pas tous semblant, il y en a qui sont égorgés en Nigéria pour ça) dans ce monde qui croient que le contenu des Évangiles est réalité historique. Comment expliquer la transition entre fiction avouée et croyance au degré primaire ? Car, personne (au-dessus de 5 ou 7, si les parents parfois remplacent le Père Noël avec Spider-Man) qui croit que Peter Parker fait du journalisme en combattant le crime en se lançant dans les toiles-araignée comme dans les lianes. Il n'y a personne qui croit que Frodon Sacquet ait sauvé le monde de Sauron. Il n'y a personne qui cherchera Duckville dans le Calisota dans les États-Unis.

Une transition entre une fiction assumée et une croyance au degré primaire est un phénomène inexpliqué, probablement inexplicable, pas ayant eu lieu. Il est plus commun d'insérer des fictions dans le marge d'un panorama grosso modo historique ou de mêler deux histoires distinctes.* Mais mettre au centre de son histoire réelle tout court quelque chose que tout le monde ait compris avant comme une fiction, non, ça n'existe pas.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre, la BU
St. Agnès de Rome
21.I.2026

Romae passio sanctae Agnetis, Virginis et Martyris; quae, sub Praefecto Urbis Symphronio, ignibus injecta, sed iis per orationem ejus exstinctis, gladio percussa est. De ea beatus Hieronymus haec scribit: "Omnium gentium litteris atque linguis, praecipue in Ecclesiis, Agnetis vita laudata est; quae et aetatem vicit et tyrannum, et titulum castitatis martyrio consecravit."

* Mon exemple favori de la mythologie ou saga héroïque germanique est, "die Rabenschlacht" où Théodéric vainc Ermanéric. Or, Théodéric vit à peu près un siècle après Ermanéric, il y a réellement deux batailles à Ravenna, et les deux vainqueurs sont, en ordre chronologique, Ermanéric et Théodéric.

Monday, 19 January 2026

May and November Also Counted

Production May 2025
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2025/05/production-may-2025.html

56 692 words, 1829 or 1890 per day (with one day off, the division can be made by 31 or 30)

Production November 2025
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2025/11/production-november-2025.html

85 064 words, 2835 (3272) per day (with four days off, the division can be made by 30 or 26)

The rest of past year's production is already mentioned on this post, in French:

Il y a des gens qui évaluent la capacité de certains à la discipline
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2026/01/il-y-des-gens-qui-evaluent-la-capacite.html

En décembre 2025, j'ai écrit et publié 61 132 mots, donc 1972 par jour. Novembre, pas encore compté. Octobre, 80 146 mots, 2585 par jour. Septembre, à partir du 3 (car le premier et le deux, j'étais en voyage), 50 968 mots, 1820 par jour. Août, 79 355 mots, 2560 par jour. Juillet, 83 708 mots, 2700 par jour. Juin, 90 477 mots, 3016 par jour. Mai, pas encore compté. Avril, deux jours sans écriture, 80 639 mots, 2880 par jour restant. Mars, 93 116 mots, 3004 par jour. Février, 120 738 mots, 4312 par jour. Janvier, 129 238 mots, 4169 par jour.

January to March: 129 238 + 120 738 + 93 116 = 343 092 words; 90 days, no days off, so 3812 words per day
April to June: 80 639 + 56 692 + 90 477 = 227 808 words; 91 days, 4 "days off", so 2503 words per day or 2618 if nothing done on days off
July to September: 83 708 + 79 355 + 50 968 = 214 031 words; 92 days, minus 2 certainly off, 90 days, 4 other "days off" so 2378 words per day or 2489 if nothing done on the other days off
October to December: 80 146 + 85 064 + 61 132 = 226 342 words; 92 days, 7 "days off" so 2460 words per day or 2663 if nothing done on days off
All the year: 343 092 + 227 808 + 214 031 + 226 342 = 1 011 273 words; 365 days minus 2 days certainly off, 363, and 15 other "days off", so, 2786 words per day or 2906 if nothing done on other days off.

And this is what I have published. Words written but not chosen for publishing not counted. I'm not sure all of you love Neil Gaiman or Stephen King, but 1500 and 2000 words are their raw output before editing and discarding things.

Was anyone saying I am a lazy slop? Hope not.
/Hans Georg Lundahl

PS, oh, perhaps some are saying it, not because their real assessment of my assiduity, but because to them, work as a Christian propagandist doesn't count:

Christian YouTuber Faces Years of Hard Labor in Egypt
CBN News | 16 Jan. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gzR-YIxnno

Newsflash, I live in France, not in Egypt. In France there is freedom of expression and free choice of line of work./HGL

Sunday, 18 January 2026

Prayers for the March for Life / Prières pour la Marche pour la Vie

The March for Life takes place in Paris today.

La Marche pour la Vie a lieu à Paris aujourd'hui.

Mise à jour :

En direct: 19 ème marche pour la vie
Reservoir Apps | Dimanche 18 janvier 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZNK08bD3bo

Thursday, 15 January 2026

Première cause de mort en 2025 : l'avortement

New blog on the kid : Première cause de mort en 2025 : l'avortement · Prayers for the March for Life / Prières pour la Marche pour la Vie · Répliques Assorties : Fin de vie, ça vient par elle-même

2025, 45,2 millions d'avortements.

La deuxième cause de mort pour 2025, les maladies infectieuses, fit mourir presque 13 millions. Moins qu'un tiers.

Wordometer, Christian Post, traduit en suédois par Charlotta Sewerinson. Je viens de faire un petit résumé du début de son article.

För sjunde året i rad var abort den vanligaste dödsorsaken i världen 2025. Det visar statistik från Worldometer, som undersöker hälsan bland den globala befolkningen i realtid, rapporterar Christian Post.
Charlotta Sewerinson | Publicerad 15 januari 2026 - 07:10 Senast uppdaterad 15 januari 2026 - 13:48
https://www.varldenidag.se/nyheter/foer-sjunde-aret-abort-vanligaste-doedsorsaken-i-vaerlden/901090

Le titre veut dire que c'est la septième année d'affilée que ceci se passe./HGL

PS, la source en Christian Post :

Abortion is leading cause of death worldwide 7th consecutive year
By Ryan Foley, Christian Post Reporter Monday, January 12, 2026
https://www.christianpost.com/news/abortion-is-leading-cause-of-death-worldwide-for-7th-year.html

La publication que je citais est "Världen idag" / (le monde aujourd'hui) / en suédois./HGL

Wednesday, 14 January 2026

Josephus on Numbers 5:12—31

Antiquities of the Jews — Book III
Containing the Interval of 2 Years.
From the Exodus out of Egypt, to the rejection of that generation
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-3.html

Chapter 11. Of the Purifications.

6. But if any one suspect that his wife has been guilty of adultery, he was to bring a tenth deal of barley flour. They then cast one handful to God, and gave the rest of it to the Priests, for food. One of the Priests set the woman at the gates that are turned towards the temple, and took the veil from her head, and wrote the name of God in parchment, and enjoined her to swear, that she had not at all injured her husband; and to wish that if she had violated her chastity, her right thigh might be put out of joint; that her belly might swell; and that she might die thus: but that if her husband, by the violence of his affection, and of the jealousy which arose from it, had been rashly moved to this suspicion, that she might bear a male child on the tenth month. Now when these oaths were over, the Priest wiped the name of God out of the parchment, and wrung the water into a vial. He also took some dust out of the temple, if any happened to be there, and put a little of it into the vial, and gave it her to drink. Whereupon the woman, if she were unjustly accused, conceived with child, and brought it to perfection in her womb. But if she had broken her faith of wedlock to her husband, and had sworn falsly before God, she died in a reproachful manner: her thigh fell off from her, and her belly swelled with a dropsy. And these are the ceremonies about sacrifices, and about the purifications thereto belonging, which Moses provided for his countreymen. He also prescribed the following laws to them.

A Self Proclaimed Poet?

It seems as if one Fox News anchor described the deceased Renee Nicole Good as a "self proclaimed poet" ...

What is that even supposed to mean?

Obviously, he didn't think real poets include her, but what, on his view, distinguishes real poets from her?

One could mention metre. After looking up her prize winning poem from 2020, she's mentioning metric units, but not using them.

But if so, is Walt Whitman no poet?

One could mention being mentioned, supposing the anchor may have ignored she won a prize in 2020, so, the fact is, she did win a prize and was mentioned.

But I think it is a lot vaguer than either of these. Renee Nicole Good may not have been God's greatest gift to poetry, but people who use "self proclaimed" this way are probably the Devil's gift to the Antichrist.

Now, one could speak of "self proclaimed Pope" (like Clemente Vincente, whom I once followed as believing him to be truly "Gregorio XVII", seeing that the Evolution endorser Wojtyla couldn't be Pope). One could speak of "self proclaimed prophet" (I already mentioned Clemente Vincente, right?). Equally, one could speak of "self proclaimed Emperor" (to be somewhat varied, Joshua Abraham Norton, a k a Norton I). These phrases make sense, because Pope, by definition, there is only one true at a time, and either that one or any reasonable claimant needs to be elected by someone else (which Pope Michael I was, by the way). Emperor, those only exist in countries that qualify as Empires, typically with some historic connection to Imperial Rome, Caesar and Constantine somewhere in the background, and any of the ways in which those countries work would involve some process other than self proclamation to verify who is Emperor. Like getting elected by Seven Princes Elector and getting crowned in Frankfurt.

And prophet, there is only one God in Three Persons Who can send true prophets, and He usually gives them miracles to make others proclaim them such. However, sometimes, before doing a miracle (like a miraculous prediction actually getting fulfilled), they may appear self proclaimed. So, already in this context, where self proclaimed per se would be a fault, appearing self proclaimed isn't. However, in such cases, the prophet is recognised after the fact.

But, apart from Pope, prophet, Emperor, and in some other contexts Messiah or Mahdi, self proclaimed is pretty much the norm for any non-employee in a free market.

That news anchor wasn't a self proclaimed news anchor, because he was hired by Fox News. But Fox News is a self proclaimed News Outlet. And essayists, authors, poets and so on and so forth actually do follow the same rule on a free market. One doesn't single out someone as "self proclaimed" because everyone is self proclaimed.

One limit case is when a Danish news outlet considered an Evangelical pastor (who got in trouble in Denmark) as a "self proclaimed reformer" ... all the Reformers of the Protestant Reformation were self proclaimed. Not one of them proved by miracles that God had named him, and one of them (John Calvin) specifically went out of his way to state that the time of miracles was over, to cover that up. Not one of them has been by actual Catholic authority recognised after the fact, namely as a Reformer.

Some of them had some kind of mission from the Catholic Church, like Luther being a parson in Wittenberg or Cranmer being an archbishop of Canterbury. However, the things they did as Reformers went outside this mission. This is why a Catholic will inevitably find that Danish headline ironic. The Protestant Reformers were all Self Proclaimed in the bad sense.

Unless the Dane was so set on Church of Denmark, that he focussed on the Reformers eventually getting Royal authorisation. That of course still leaves Zwingli and Calvin in the position of the self proclaimed ones, but then again, neither Zwingli nor Calvin are counted among the Reformers of Lutheran Churches. Luther is, and Melanchthon is, and outside Germany some non-German is, like Tausen in Denmark or the Petri brothers in Sweden or Agricola in Finland. And, of course, Tyndale never got approval from Henry VIII, so, he was, despite being (self proclaimed) Lutheran, self proclaimed too. And since Caspar Tauber didn't get approval from the Emperor Charles V or from the Mayor of Vienna, but actually got killed for heresy, he was self proclaimed, like Tyndale was. On that Caesareo-Papistic view, it's inconsistent to recognise Tyndale and Tauber as Reformers or even just as martyrs. Luther's theory was, princes have the jus reformandi, not Popes, not bishops of a country, not anyone who happens to disagree even if he bases the disagreement on the Bible. Hus at least had the support of Wenceslaus IV of Bohemia. But Tauber and Tyndale didn't. So, they were self proclaimed.

The fact is, the Catholic Church does recognise some saints as precisely reformers, like Sts. Teresa of Avila or John of the Cross reformed the Carmelite order or Sts. Robert of Molesme and Bernard of Clairvaux reformed a branch of the Benedictines, now known as Cistercians. Indeed, before that, St. Benedict of Aniane had reformed Benedictines and Benedictines as such were the reform of monasticism by one St. Benedict of Nursia. In many of these cases, the people started out self proclaimed, but actually were recognised posthumously. None of them set out to take a distance from the traditional doctrine or liturgy of Catholicism, though.

But essayist, poet, writer, author ... these are normally self proclaimed per se. So are news outlets outside Public Service TVs and Radios. You don't single someone out for taking up such job descriptions or doing such jobs without having been specifically invited by someone else.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Hilary of Poitiers
14.I.2025

13.I: Pictavis, in Gallia, natalis sancti Hilarii, Episcopi et Confessoris; qui, ob catholicam fidem, quam strenue propugnavit, quadriennio apud Phrygiam relegatus, ibi, inter alia miracula, mortuum suscitavit. Eum Pius Nonus, Pontifex Maximus, universalis Ecclesiae Doctorem declaravit et confirmavit. Ipsius autem festum sequenti die celebratur.
14.I: Sancti Hilarii, Episcopi Pictaviensis, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris; qui pridie hujus diei evolavit in caelum.

Clarification:

The mentioned saints were (apart from St. Benedict of Nursia) self proclaimed only in relation to monasteries and convents outside their own, they were abbots and a prior and a prioress with due authority already granted. St. Benedict was however a hermit before being an abbot./HGL

Deux semaines

*4.I.2026* derniers 7 jours

Creationism and Geocentrism are sometimes used as metaphors for "outdated because disproven inexact science" 46 · Bible in a Year Plan (73 Books) 29 · Language Origin: a Complete Mystery to Non-Christians (Excursus on Babel, a Different Story) 24 · 23: Debate on credibility, as with tradition and revelation, of Genesis and Gospels · What was the Potato Famine? 22: "La Bible ne précise pas que la Création était il y a 7200 ans" (FR) · "Mais Babel est Babel ! Et en plus, les généalogies avaient des lacunes" (FR) · Le caté de nos jours ... (FR) · 21: What Does a Mafia Look Like? · Carlos Hugo, not without remarks abt Tito, Nestor Makhnov, Mussolini 17: Old Top Posts · Karl Keating had a Status, the Status a Debate · Gâteau sandwich en seigle, j'apprécie ! (FR) · 16: Bonum Festum Circumcisionis Domini (LAT) · She's So Eager to Laugh at Jesus, She Destroys the OT and Second Temple Judaism 15: Production December 2025 · 14: Oui, j'ai vu les deux poulets et les clémentines (FR) · "Deux mineurs, une Française et un Suisse, ont été accueillis à l'hôpital Edouard Herriot de Lyon." (FR) · Could a Bolzmann Brain Understand Logic?		13: Non, la Ste Jehanne d'Arc n'est pas une manif raciste ... (FR) · GP tries it again - after attacking Alveda King · Missing Distinctions? · Oscar Wilde and Perry Lorenzo · So, Greta Was Arrested for Supporting Terrorist ... Prisoners? 13: 134th Birthday of Tolkien · Who Started the Flat Earth Nonsense (I Have My Theory) · 12: Bonum Festum Sanctae Genovefae (LAT) · L'histoire un peu trop halal de Pantin est triste. (FR) · Why do Oil Companies Drill For Oil and Find it, when Using Millions of Years? 12: My Writings are NOT Outflows from My Innermost Devotion and are NOT Meant to be Seen and Read by God Alone · Heliocentrism, No Thanks! · Debates on "Gospel of Barnabas" and Fifth Sourate, at the end with a Muslim · 11: Came to Defeat Modernism FB Page · Geocentric Assault on Atheism 11: JL admits he's no physicist, MC gets a reductio ad absurdum when asking "for info" (and I am asked to leave fifth grade behind) · Explaining Holy Roman Empire in terms of comparing to US. - Pt I · Blockade Over After All? · 10: Nope, the Divine Name is Not Tahreef · If Toba and Campi Flegrei were both in the Flood, why is Campi Flegrei my carbon date?

1) Singapour 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 10 + 23 + 76 + 23 + 5 + 607 + 9 + 3 + 1 + 5 + 66 + 614 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 786 + 438 + 1 + 91 + 41 + 230 + 2 + 60 = 3113, soit 445 par jour 4) États-Unis 2 + 4 + 6 + 6 + 15 + 3 + 7 + 46 + 4 + 6 + 38 + 2 + 5 + 8 + 15 + 15 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 8 + 19 + 5 + 13 + 3 + 2 + 11 + 473 + 5 + 2 + 76 + 125 + 436 + 4 + 8 + 4 + 9 + 23 + 34 + 4 + 5 + 182 = 1651, soit 236 par jour 5) Allemagne 1 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 34 + 3 + 1 + 36 + 3 + 9 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 39 + 3 + 2 + 24 + 208 + 10 + 35 + 8 = 431, soit 62 par jour 6) Inde 4 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 12 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 5 + 3 + 10 + 5 + 3 + 23 + 1 + 2 + 80 + 12 + 5 + 1 + 2 + 44 + 165 + 29 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 428, soit 61 par jour 7) Mexique 1 + 16 + 37 + 67 + 4 + 4 + 3 + 179 + 16 + 1 + 1 = 329, soit 47 par jour 8) Argentine 2 + 1 + 4 + 5 + 2 + 4 + 30 + 9 + 13 + 5 + 3 + 37 + 111 + 34 + 2 + 5 = 267, soit 38 par jour 10) France 1 + 1 + 20 + 156 + 30 + 1 + 5 + 2 + 2 + 12 + 6 + 3 + 3 = 242, soit 35 par jour 11) Afrique du Sud 2 + 13 + 2 + 2 + 120 + 36 = 175, soit 25 par jour		12) Finlande 132 + 14 = 146, soit 21 par jour 13) Chine 16 + 1 + 7 + 1 + 22 + 33 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 10 + 1 + 44 = 141, soit 20 par jour 14) Turquie 4 + 79 + 10 + 16 + 7 + 14 + 4 + 2 = 136, soit 19 par jour 15) Royaume-Uni 4 + 9 + 56 + 1 + 5 + 4 + 8 + 1 + 2 + 5 + 3 + 26 = 124, soit 18 par jour 16) Viêt Nam 1 + 25 + 53 + 23 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 6 + 2 + 2 = 118, soit 17 par jour 17) Bangladesh 12 + 58 + 15 + 1 + 9 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 6 + 4 = 113, soit 16 par jour 18) Philippines 6 + 3 + 2 + 9 + 66 + 13 = 99, soit 14 par jour 19) Arabie saoudite 1 + 59 + 12 + 5 + 1 + 3 + 11 = 92, soit 13 par jour 20) Venezuela 53 + 12 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 4 = 75, soit 11 par jour

21) Suède 48 + 4 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 66 22) Kenya 1 + 33 + 4 + 5 + 1 + 3 = 47 23) Ouzbékistan 1 + 36 + 1 + 2 + 4 = 44 24) Canada 10 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 1 = 41 25) Indonésie 1 + 1 + 32 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 38 26) Russie 10 + 1 + 6 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 23 27) Corée du Sud 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 6 = 22 28) Pakistan 9 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 15		29) Paraguay 6 + 3 + 3 = 12 30 ex æquo Jordanie 1 + 8 + 1 + 1 = 11 Japon 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 11 32 ex æquo Colombie 1 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 10 Suisse 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 10 34 ex æquo Australie = 7 Syrie 2 + 5 = 7 36) Tunisie 3 + 3 = 6 37 ex æquo Uruguay 2 + 3 = 5 Israël 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5

Pays de quatre vues Maroc, Espagne, Irak = 12 Pays de trois vues Angola, Oman, Irlande, Libye, Équateur = 15 Pays de deux vues Malaisie, Slovénie, Chili, Italie, Koweït = 10		Pays d'une vue Jamaïque, Pays-Bas, Azerbaïdjan, Barbade, Costa Rica, Congo-Brazzaville, Serbie, Kosovo, Népal, Côte d’Ivoire, Panama, Honduras, Liban, Pologne = 14

Autre 45 + 46 + 1 + 12 + 4 + 2 + 1 + 73 + 39 + 32 + 2 + 31 + 234 + 652 + 221 = 1395

Sous-total 3113 + 1651 + 431 + 428 + 329 + 267 + 242 + 175 + 146 + 141 + 136 + 124 + 118 + 113 + 99 + 92 + 75 + 66 + 47 + 44 + 41 + 38 + 23 + 22 + 15 + 12 + 11 + 11 + 10 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 10 + 14 + 7 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 5 + 1395 = 9506 = 9,51 k 2) Hong Kong 1 + 1 + 5 + 16 + 6 + 37 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 38 + 52 + 38 + 2 + 86 + 5 + 3 + 366 + 1 + 138 + 1 + 1 = 806 = 0,81 k 0,81 k + 1,81 k = 2,62 k, soit 374 par jour		3) Brésil 1 + 7 + 5 + 2 + 9 + 1 + 14 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 71 + 180 + 70 + 4 + 2 + 11 + 1 + 15 = 400 = 0,4 k 0,4 k + 1,98 k = 2,38 k, soit 340 par jour Total 9,51 k + 2,62 k + 2,38 k = 14,51 k, soit 2,07 k par jour



Aujourd'hui, lun. 5.I.2026 vers 18:12 124 + 627 + 125 + 45 + 5 + 5 + 10 + 40 + 8 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 16 + 195 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 58 + 7 + 9 + 23 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 165 = 1501 1501 / 0,75 = 2001 par jour		Hier, dim. 4.I.2026 les 24 h 41 + 3 + 5 + 58 + 3 + 8 + 25 + 26 + 1 + 4 + 13 + 2 + 3 + 20 + 2 + 3 + 6 + 5 + 6 + 8 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 380 + 100 + 3 + 6 + 15 + 2 + 5 + 117 + 24 + 10 + 4 + 1 + 17 + 207 + 762 + 186 = 2091

Ce mois-ci, janv. 2026 jusqu'au 5, 18:30 908 + 2588 + 802 + 76 + 16 + 2 + 57 + 202 + 270 + 32 + 62 + 85 + 7 + 27 + 206 + 7 + 1692 + 10 + 24 + 8 + 3 + 11 + 5 + 12 + 6 + 10 + 26 + 16 + 42 + 2 + 119 + 9 + 39 + 54 + 48 + 122 + 4 + 21 + 18 + 1 + 12 + 963 = 8624 8624 / 4,7625 = 1811 par jour		Le mois dernier, déc. 2025 les 31 jours 14 375 + 73 + 99 + 118 + 2248 + 105 + 2590 + 2628 + 2256 + 1855 + 120 + 902 + 16 + 1531 + 450 + 170 + 231 + 9 + 94 + 118 + 107 + 126 + 123 + 196 + 102 + 60 + 23 876 + 191 + 4146 + 2361 + 46 + 2867 + 438 + 292 + 5164 + 2338 + 763 + 199 + 677 + 700 + 11 829 + 20 405 + 9808 = 116 802 116 802 / 31 = 3768 par jour

Aujourd'hui, ven. 9.I.2026 15:55 824 + 11 + 609 + 4 + 3 + 6 + 18 + 1039 + 131 + 3 + 6 + 158 + 4 + 58 + 2 + 255 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 4 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 18 + 28 + 2 + 205 + 26 + 33 + 1 + 37 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1122 = 4628 4628 / 0.64791 = 7143 par jour		Hier, jeu. 8.I.2026 les 24 h 614 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 64 + 4 + 35 + 24 + 70 + 1 + 37 + 28 + 7 + 2 + 5 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 506 + 8 + 57 + 7 + 150 + 8 + 494 + 533 + 19 + 14 + 2 + 1145 + 2 + 12 + 1182 = 5051



11.I.2026 derniers sept jours

Dialog om hemskolning ... (SV) 56 · Creationism and Geocentrism are sometimes used as metaphors for "outdated because disproven inexact science" 37 · Did Henry Drummond Have Any Other Hunch on Language? 25 · Michael Lofton Just Got Ugly. 24 · Further faults of fact in the Mystagogy post 23 22: Did Everyone Catch What I Said? · 21: Can People Know What Good Is, Without Being Christian? · How did Henry Drummond Explain Human Language? · Does Catholicism Have Secret Doctrines? · 20: Durupınar Pottery is Arguably Post-Babel 19: "Moontruth"? Why? · L'abbé Pierre était pire que je ne croyais ... (citation, lien) (FR) · 18: Bonum Festum Epiphaniae (LAT) · It would seem, my views on things seem to be relevant to some · Geocentric Assault on Atheism 18: Explaining Holy Roman Empire in terms of comparing to US. - Pt I · 17: What are fractions? · 16: Sharing Levi J. Pingleton / Robert Sungenis · Renee Nicole Good · 15: Aïeule ? (FR) 15 15: Christmas Explained with Apocalypse 12 · Crucifix and the Swiss Nightclub Crans-Montana · Predictions of YEC, One from CMI, One from Me · 14: Bible in a Year Plan (73 Books) · If Toba and Campi Flegrei were both in the Flood, why is Campi Flegrei my carbon date? · Both Videos (Except the Guy's Own)		14: A Muslim Perhaps Made a Mistake in Quoting St. Thomas Aquinas via a Modern Work, the Summa is However Available (in Translation) · Bonum Festum Sanctae Theresiae · Fame Doesn't Automatically Equal Fame · Missing the Primary Questions. · [An Author's Aside] 14: Carter's Tactics · Treason of the SSPX? I Think So. · 13: Non, la Ste Jehanne d'Arc n'est pas une manif raciste ... (FR) · Someone posted a link to Fr. Corapi today · Spelling English is a great feat 13: Oui, j'ai vu les deux poulets et les clémentines (FR) · What is a Miracle? What Does it Take? · Inaccurate Reasoning in CMI · 12: St. Thomas Aquinas wasn't heretical last time I checked · Oscar Wilde and Perry Lorenzo 12: Sharing Lila Rose · Mark Shea's Post and My Comments + Debate · Brenda Weltner Considers the Apocalypse Has More Story-Lines than One · 11: On the "Reformed Egyptian" of the "Nephites" · The Beowulf Poet Knew Homer 11: Hvordan er det nu der arkæologer updager hvordan de levet under stenalderen? (DA) · Over 500 views, excluding mere index pages: · Mark Shea : For Kaepernick AND For Tebow · Än mer Censur (SV/DE) · Comparing with Gerardus D. Bouw Ph. D., Debating with Roger M Pearlman on Chronology 11: "et lux non loqui" (ENG/LAT) · Galatians 4:4 · Revisiting the Karst Argument for "Post-Flood" Neanderthals · ... on a Few Items where "Simon Whistler" Needs Better Fact Check · 10: Focussed Attention, Rosary, Hrushiv 10: Un blog a été donné à vos étudiants. (FR) · My Carreer Shouldn't Depend on Merriam Webster Spelling · Some People Hate My P O V. One Subterfuge is Pretending I Overshare · Why is teaching evolution so IMPORTANT? · Continuing with Tom Dorsey · What's a Docent in Sweden?

5) Inde 95 + 1 + 2 + 151 + 275 + 43 + 25 + 14 + 45 + 2 + 4 + 1 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 10 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 1 + 5 = 709, soit 101 par jour 6) France 45 + 183 + 11 + 1 + 2 + 56 + 2 + 3 + 10 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 134 + 12 = 465, soit 66 par jour 7) Allemagne 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 + 7 + 2 + 11 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 20 + 113 + 1 + 82 + 24 + 2 + 4 + 32 + 142 = 454, soit 65 par jour 8) Chine 33 + 154 + 6 + 24 + 2 + 194 + 10 + 9 + 1 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 445, soit 64 par jour 9) Argentine 47 + 9 + 22 + 3 + 16 + 13 + 1 + 12 + 218 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 4 + 51 + 1 + 14 = 418, soit 60 par jour 10) Viêt Nam 42 + 81 + 4 + 1 + 3 + 4 + 1 + 64 + 2 + 143 + 8 = 353, soit 50 par jour 11) Philippines 18 + 114 + 2 + 93 + 2 + 13 + 8 + 15 + 6 + 10 + 67 = 348, soit 50 par jour 12) Royaume-Uni 12 + 71 + 7 + 6 + 2 + 1 + 6 + 4 + 13 + 19 + 113 + 4 + 2 = 260, soit 37 par jour 13) Turquie 1 + 6 + 132 + 4 + 2 + 19 + 3 + 34 + 6 + 10 = 217, 31 par jour		14) Mexique 6 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 22 + 2 + 25 + 98 + 12 = 174, soit 25 par jour 15) Arabie saoudite 1 + 1 + 3 + 5 + 14 + 4 + 7 + 27 + 1 + 97 + 11 = 171, soit 24 par jour 16) Bangladesh 5 + 5 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 7 + 1 + 3 + 26 + 1 + 95 + 12 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 165, soit 24 par jour 17) Japon 85 + 1 + 1 + 49 = 136, soit 19 par jour 18) Venezuela 19 + 84 + 4 + 15 + 2 + 3 + 1 = 128, soit 18 par jour 19) Australie = 125, soit 18 par jour 20) Ouzbékistan 69 + 1 + 1 + 18 + 4 + 13 + 2 + 4 = 112, soit 16 par jour 21) Jordanie 1 + 1 + 16 + 6 + 1 + 49 + 12 + 1 = 87, soit 12 par jour 22) Afrique du Sud 62 + 9 = 71, soit 10 par jour

23) Italie 47 + 2 + 2 + 4 = 55 24) Indonésie 16 + 7 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 = 30 25) Russie 23 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 29 26) Pakistan 7 + 6 + 3 + 8 + 1 = 25 27) Colombie 12 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 20 28) Espagne 2 + 3 + 9 + 4 = 18 29 ex æquo Maroc 11 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 15 Suède 2 + 1 + 1 + 3 + 8 = 15 31 ex æquo Paraguay 1 + 4 + 5 = 10 Équateur 1 + 7 + 2 = 10		33 ex æquo Syrie 2 + 1 + 4 + 1 + 1 = 9 Népal 1 + 1 + 4 + 3 = 9 35 ex æquo Corée du Sud 7 + 1 = 8 Kenya 3 + 5 = 8 37 ex æquo Canada 3 + 2 + 1 = 6 Taïwan = 6 Émirats arabes unis 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 6 Suisse 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 6 Israël 1 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 6 42 ex æquo Libye 1 + 1 + 3 = 5 Irak 3 + 2 = 5 Bolivie 4 + 1 = 5

Pays de quatre vues Égypte = 4 Pays de trois vues Pays-Bas, Algérie, Nigeria, Finlande, Kirghizstan, Chili = 18		Pays de deux vues Uruguay, Angola, Jamaïque, Liban, Azerbaïdjan, Oman= 12 Pays d'une vue Nicaragua, Pologne, Éthiopie, Sri Lanka, Albanie, Géorgie, Bulgarie, Estonie, Palestine, Guatemala, Kazakhstan, Trinité-et-Tobago = 12

Sous-total 709 + 465 + 454 + 445 + 418 + 353 + 348 + 260 + 217 + 174 + 171 + 165 + 136 + 128 + 125 + 112 + 87 + 71 + 55 + 30 + 29 + 25 + 20 + 18 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 9 + 9 + 8 + 8 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 18 + 12 + 12 = 5190 = 5,19 k Autre 83 + 169 + 61 + 27 + 7 + 6 + 3 + 1 + 112 + 52 + 8 + 527 + 377 + 11 + 2 + 1 + 5 + 2 + 238 = 1692 = 1,69 k 1,69 k + 1,09 k = 2,78 k 1) Singapour 4 + 3 + 3 + 7 + 1 + 1 + 153 + 1 + 233 + 111 + 105 + 9 + 127 + 7 + 7 + 5 + 1 + 3 + 36 + 106 + 2 + 28 + 324 + 164 + 5 + 29 + 270 + 2 + 292 + 54 + 1 + 3 + 38 + 67 + 8 + 663 + 973 = 3846 = 3,85 k 3,85 k + 2,76 k + 5,11 k = 11,72 k, soit 1674 par jour		2) Hong Kong 1 + 1 + 22 + 9 + 1 + 1 + 8 + 32 + 2 + 1 + 7 + 24 + 87 + 22 + 5 + 16 = 239 = 0,24 k 0,24 k + 1,54 k + 1,51 k + 1,55 k + 1,01 k = 5,85 k, soit 836 par jour 3) États-Unis 16 + 4 + 5 + 14 + 6 + 9 + 682 + 80 + 42 + 5 + 4 + 4 + 23 + 81 + 15 + 2 + 5 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 13 + 56 + 21 + 16 + 15 + 4 + 6 + 6 + 5 + 7 + 25 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 5 + 44 + 3 + 6 + 4 + 138 = 1402 = 1,4 k 1,4 k + 1,53 k + 1,76 k = 4,69 k, soit 670 par jour 4) Brésil 105 + 86 + 1 + 15 + 1 + 12 + 3 + 11 + 13 + 1 + 37 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 24 + 261 + 1 + 4 + 2 = 593 = 0,59 k 0,59 k + 2,35 k = 2,94 k, soit 420 par jour

Total 5,19 k + 2,78 k + 11,72 k + 5,85 k + 4,69 k + 2,94 k = 33,17 k, soit 4739 par jour

Pages