Some People Hate My P O V. One Subterfuge is Pretending I Overshare

Fame Doesn't Automatically Equal Fame · Some People Hate My P O V. One Subterfuge is Pretending I Overshare

Perhaps this is oversharing. If so, I'm so tired, I don't know the difference.

Or perhaps, I'm a bit less tired and do know the difference.

Some people want me to give up.

Just before I got to Christine Niles' latest video, which includes a section on digital oversharing, I'll watch the rest after this, when I get this off my chest, someone wanted me to give up my preference for a Christian Civilisation over an LGB+ based one, and bow down to the already no longer forecasted forecasts of Paul Ehrlich, who should have been called Unehrlich. What was the latest argument?

Aww, look at the little buddy trying to form a sentence. How cute

Before him, more than one had found my sentence legible and had responded, if not with intelligent arguments, at least with arguments showing my sentence was intelligible to them. I'll not dignify his channel with sourcing the quote. I find it a very safe bet that his pov was not pro-life, certainly not integrally pro-life as in against contraception and other perversions as well. So, one deflection when someone hates what I'm saying is, I'm a baby who doesn't know how to make a sentence.

I think anyone who are in the "HGL is oversharing" camp and is even somewhat of a Christian would agree that this is indeed a deflection, and it comes from a place of hating what I said.

Now, I would say, so does their view on what I'm doing.

Some guy who "cosplays as a Dominican priest" (if he wants to know how to become a real one, my pro-tip, without being either Dominican or priest, is, ditch heresy, submit to real Church authority, I'd say Pope Michael II, get a real and certainly valid ordination at least sub conditione), he compared the solitary vice (I'm not going in to what that is, wanting to keep this blog child friendly), to what? He compared it to solitary drinking of whisky. I stated, that's bad-mouthing solitary drinking of whisky. There are conditions where it has its place. I don't mean alcoholism, and not even primarily digestion. I gave examples related to the diuretic properties of alcohol.

Perhaps someone thinks that was oversharing on my part. But that would assume that I was stating I was stuck in those conditions. Far from it.*

Or that I was actually an alcoholic, just seeking excuses, again, far from it.

But the problem is, some guys really, truly do want me to overshare in another way, namely with a medical professionals, and if I mention some condition online without consulting for it, they will brand it as digital oversharing, because I refuse medical oversharing. They want me to share, share, share, as long as it's in private with them. Until they find sth that could nail me down in their power. AND if I happen to share online, they will pretend that this proves I really want my blogs to be read by a club of very discrete medical professionals, not by the public. Once. Again. Far from it.

Too many of my readers are people like that, I'm painfully aware that sharing with the public, I have in the process also shared with them, but I'm hoping this reaches some other readers, like honest people.

There is some other kind of guy too, who thinks I'm oversharing. More like an ecclesial type.

I state that Bergoglio wasn't, Prevost most likely isn't the Pope?

They will pretend I'm oversharing some kind of anxiety syndrome.

I state sth which shows calm assurance in my position, like a philosophical argument for Geocentrism?

They will pretend I'm oversharing some kind of consolation God gave me, not really meant on God's part for the public. They will pretend I'm a bad monk, oversharing the good time I have with God instead of enjoying it. Far from it. I'm not a monk. The argument for Geocentrism I give isn't a vision, it's a series of rational statements. In sharing the argument online, I'm doing what I do best, polemics against errors.

Or trying to do it. Some would really like to end my job, after first destroying its outward impact by pretending I'm oversharing and that this isn't good for me.

Now, the thing is, they might pretend that I'm doing my future children a disservice by sharing my Geocentric views online. What if ten years from now (supposing I have a child in a year) my son or daughter sees my blog and finds out I was Geocentric?

Well, why wouldn't I have told them already?

Or finds out I was Young Earth Creationist?

Again, why wouldn't I have told them already?

Well, don't you find it shameful to be a Science Denier?

I find it shameful to be a Science Believer. I don't intend to tell my children they must always trust the experts, no matter if it contradicts common sense or the Bible.**

Perhaps some people are intending to tell me, if I don't change that, people won't let me marry, won't allow some girl to marry me, or if I get married anyway, will take my children away? I'm sorry, this is supposed to be the free West, not the Soviet Union!

And if I say this, some people will call that oversharing too, because a bully thinks it's oversharing if he's called out or if his bullying is called out.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Pope St. Agathon
10.I.2026

Romae sancti Agathonis Papae, qui, sanctitate et doctrina conspicuus, quievit in pace.

PS, Christine Niles actually has a very good video, involving hauntings that are souls in purgatory and hauntings that are demons. Digital Exhibitionism | FORWARD BOLDLY/HGL

PPS, going over that part again, she uses the abbreviation TMI, meaning apparently "too much information" which in turn can indicate "information overload or excessively personal information" ... if you think a Young Earth Creationist is "excessively personal" by promoting Young Earth Creationism, you are not the kind of reader I'm looking for. If you find yourself with "information overload" you are probably using my blogs the wrong way. They are meant as innocent distraction couples with light hearted instruction and some measure of error detection into the modern culture. They are NOT meant to give shrinks a diagnostic tool or insiders some kind of underhanded orders or requests, neither of these groups being whom I write for./HGL

* At least if people continue to give less food than they did the last few years, I'm coming out of one of them. Yes, too much food can destroy health. Including in ways where alcohol in moderation is medical. ** Including the history some would call "mythology" and the cosmology some would call "pre-scientific" ... I've had a zero grade on an essay exam after doing great at each exercise, because the examiner probably didn't like my polemics against this concept, used to invalidate opinions of the past.