New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Pages
- Home
- Voyez la ligne pointillée / See the dotted line?
- Fatima - Bad News and Good News - the latter provi...
- Panthéisme ? Non. Trinité ? Oui.
- Do not support World Childhood Foundation!
- Hans-Georg Gadamer was of the "Frankfurter Schule"? - get Inklings for me please!
- A Relevant Quote from J. R. R. Tolkien
- Sur le concept de l'ésotérique et sur les sociétés secrètes
- In Case Someone Thinks I am Preaching ...
- Would Gay Marriage Allow them an Authentic Life?
- Malfaisance de "Sécurité"
- Have I Done Ill Speaking Against the Real Pope a F...
- Drodzy Polacy - i Rosjanie itd.
- Vatican in Exile : Calendar and Marian Anthems
- Distinguons
- Code ASCII et James Bond
- Presentation
Sunday 3 February 2019
A threat to my "one light day up" view?
A threat to my "one light day up" view? · Apparent Size depends on Tangent, Right?
If fix stars are no longer one light day up, they can have been so in Creation week.
Indeed, a stretching of the universe could have occurred during the Flood after the 40 days' rain to thin out the hydrogen ("waters above the firmament" / "in upper part of the firmament").
This would mean Adam can still have seen starlight that shone on day five from the star, and birds on day five starlight that shone on day four, but on the other hand, I would get my view of them now still being one light day up refuted, when Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 in nine or 18 years' time get up to a one way distance of 24 light hours from us.
I was not exactly aware that they were still transmitting some kind of images to earth, apart from retransmitting radio signals that are marked so as to make possible identification of which signal and how long ago it was sent. These latter I already knew of.
However, I was not aware of the images taken from one of the stars in Lyra (I think it was) with some x-ray imagery, visible light being turned off.
Now, the reason why this could be a problem for the view of fixed stars still being one light day up is this fact, by now more than half, for Voyager 1 even three quarters, of this distance is covered.
This means, the angles should be visibly greater if one light day were the correct distance.
Let's take two triangles, one of them the classical 3 - 4 - 5 triangle, the other one having the distance 4 shortened to 1.
Where 4 and 5 meet, the sine is 3/5 or 0.6. Angle should be* nearly 37°
Where 1 and ... sqrt(10) meet, the sine is 3/3.1622776601683793 or 0.9486832980505138092, and angle should be 71° to 72° (71.56 sth)
So, the distances between any two stars (if Voyager 1 is even observing that much) or even visible magnitude of a single star should look twice as great in the direction Voyager 1 is heading.
If it doesn't and it can be known, then fix stars should be more than one light day away now. They still could have been one light day away at creation, by a stretching out of the universe.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sunday after Candlemass
3.II.2019
Update next day:
I saw that with distance reduced to 1/4 of original, the angle would be about 2 times. I wanted to check, if it were reduced to 1/9, would angle be three times greater? No.
3 - 4 - 5 = 27 - 36 - 45.
3/5=27/45=0.6.
27*27 + 16 = n
sqrt(n) replaces 45.
27/sqrt(n)= ...
n=745
sqrt(n)=27.2946881279123613
27/27.2946881279123613=0.989203462353870809
sin(x)=0.6, x=36.87°
sin(x)=0.989203462353870809, 81.57°
81.57° / 36.87°= 2.2123677786818552°
* I used https://web2.0calc.com/ and entered sin(x)=0.6, sin(x)=0.9486832980505138092, then clicked on = button and then saw the "whole calculation" above the slot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment