[Forgot to entitle it as about Club 21]

Creation vs. Evolution

On Reading The Greatest Show by Dawkins - Parts of it! · Why Hate Creationism in Schools? · A Letter Arrived from AronRa · "How Science is Done" - "The Test for Credibility" · Mark Shea Basically Calls Creationists Protestants · I thought Hans G, Australia (also a reader of CMI site) was a spoof on me · Dr. Frank Press ... · Two Points on Asher’s Book – and a Third One · Literal Sense vs Literalistic Approach, Allegoric Sense vs Figurative Approach · How Smart Was Ancient Man? · Just Ask Anyone .... · Correcting CMI on Aristotle · "They even have little papers they sign that say they must fit everything into the Bible." · Graham Hancock had sth to Say on Göbekli Tepe · Pääbo and Habermehl · New Scan for Carbon Curves · "Pope Francis" is Not a Creationist · Can Genesis stand after chapter 11 if you accept uniformitarian dates? · Volunteering as Contributor Five ... · Chromosome Split After All? What Does it Take? · A difference of style · Syncellus A bis, the table

somewhere else

Laws of nature · Let's celebrate atheism! (guess what day of the year ...!)

Great Bishop of Geneva!

Deinippus in Corinth ... · Answering Bernard Ramm on Inerrancy · Reading some from a Mormon Church History · Tim Chaffey answers how Apostolic Succession can survive Sinful Bishops · Mark Shea's Understanding of Scripture · A Suspicious Testimony

(502 + 127 + 128) / 30 = 25 1/3
(502 + 127 + 128) / 21 = 36 1/21

Yes, if we restrict us to only multiples of 21, this is underrepresented, not overrepresented.

However, if we added near matches, like 20 and 22, 41 and 43, 62 and 64, 83 and 85, we might overall have an overrepresentation. At least if we interpret this as deliberately going around multiples of 21./HGL

PS, 26.II.2019, this post has a multiple of 21, namely 42 page views ..../HGL

PPS, 28.II.2019 its up in 63 page views .../HGL