Monday, 25 September 2023

Not So Far Away, Not So Big


New blog on the kid: Not So Far Away, Not So Big · "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...." · How do we know stellar distances? · But Angels Don't Move Planets, They Are Guardian Angels! · HGL'S F.B. WRITINGS: Cosmic "Banana" vs Distant Star Light Problem

Mysterious 'fossilized' bubble 10,000 times the size of the Milky Way could be a relic from the Big Bang
By Ben Turner published 3 days ago (22.IX.2023)
https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/mysterious-fossilized-bubble-10000-times-the-size-of-the-milky-way-could-be-a-relic-from-the-big-bang


A mysterious structure nearly 1 billion light-years across has been found in our cosmic neighborhood, and it could be a relic from the Big Bang.

The structure, consisting of a group of galaxies clustered around a gigantic spherical void just 820 million light years from the Milky Way, has been named Ho'oleilana, a name inspired by the Hawaiian creation chant, Kumulipo.


There was no Big Bang.

If the shell of fix stars is 1 light day up, this means that the thing is much closer, and given that the estimation of size is fro apparent size and distance, also much smaller.

820 000 000 * 365 = 299 300 000 000 light days instead of 1, this becomes the reduction factor
1 000 000 000 * 365 = 365 000 000 000 light days

365 000 000 000 / 299 300 000 000 = 1.219 512 195 122 light days

This means, an object "up in the sky" which is about as large as the radius of the universe ... a bit smaller if instead of being a disc tangential to the curvature of the sphere of the fix stars it "embraces" the sphere of the fix stars. Which would make sense.

However, it is not exacly an object - which explains why we haven't spotted it, if it is so big, earlier than now.

It is a void — "spotted" by "measuring" the supposed distances to objects around it. A k a a mirage.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Principius of Soissons
25.IX.2023

Eodem die sancti Principii, qui fuit Episcopus Suessionensis et frater beati Remigii Episcopi.

1 comment: