New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Pages
- Home
- Voyez la ligne pointillée / See the dotted line?
- Fatima - Bad News and Good News - the latter provi...
- Panthéisme ? Non. Trinité ? Oui.
- Do not support World Childhood Foundation!
- Hans-Georg Gadamer was of the "Frankfurter Schule"? - get Inklings for me please!
- A Relevant Quote from J. R. R. Tolkien
- Sur le concept de l'ésotérique et sur les sociétés secrètes
- In Case Someone Thinks I am Preaching ...
- Would Gay Marriage Allow them an Authentic Life?
- Malfaisance de "Sécurité"
- Have I Done Ill Speaking Against the Real Pope a F...
- Drodzy Polacy - i Rosjanie itd.
- Vatican in Exile : Calendar and Marian Anthems
- Distinguons
- Code ASCII et James Bond
- Presentation
Thursday, 16 May 2024
Wikipedia searches are not exactly relying on AI
Wikipedian articles are written by human input, and when bots are concerned, they are usually importing from the wikipedia in another language by computer translation, and human inputters are very likely to very quickly correct the mistakes in the translation. Or villages in Iran getting added per a bot, presumably from some database or lexicon.
But the thing with wikipedia is, you quickly reach out to new information, if you want to:
I Made a Graph of Wikipedia... This Is What I Found
adumb | 30 March 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JheGL6uSF-4
While there are bots that will link pages, the vast majority of links internal to the wiki and probably near totality of those to outside pages are added manually, by users of the wikipedia./HGL
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment