Incels.
Entitled persons.
Immature persons.
This is a kind of trilogy of people who, while not actually mad, in the sense of what modern shrinks tend to call psychotic, though that too is used outside actual madness, are still people that "responsible people" may feel a duty to not give what they want, at least not in big issues (concerning these - shall we say - issues).
A duty made from prejudice. A prejudice made from pseudo-science. A pseudo-science called psychology.
And a vicious circle. If you as "responsible person" feel you should collaborate with this, that and sundry, this means, this, that and sundry has better chances of avoiding the social positions of InEnIms. If you already have the social position of being stamped as InEnIm, this means "responsible persons" are not just withdrawing that support, but also doing what they can to get other people - like immature of age, as opposed to immature as persons - to withdraw theirs. This is likely to land you in less desirable situations, in which you risk standing out as an InEnIm for not just accepting the situation as it is. Even if it is gruesome, and even if the "responsible person" telling you to simply accept it would never dream of sharing your situation.
Speaking of not dreaming of sharing a situation. Being a bully victim is a very rapid road into being an incel. I don't think many girls really enjoy the prospective of getting into couple with a bully victim. Theoretically - and this obviously is a bonus for the bully victim - getting into couple with a popular girl may very well decrease or eliminate totally bullying. Girls however not seeing themselves as protectors (of men they consider as potential partners) will not really intuitively see this.
Two things have become different the last century or so to make this evil situation lots more common:
- girls delaying marriage for longer
- girls and boys more often being in coeducation in their teens by actually legal or at least societal obligation or need to stay in school.
Feminists theorise, this is all for the best of the girls. They get more and more options to get the real best possible partners, as they have more and more time to pick them, right?
Wrong. 100 % of the girls cannot share 20 % of the men (we don't want Harems or mass elimination of girls). Girls taking their time to pick and chose get abused, and girls refusing to get abused, actually get bullied too. Girls of 35 making a bad pick when they realise the good ones are gone have a worse deal than girls of 25 doing so. Why? Because on top of getting a less good husband, they also have fewer children, and their social life will depend more on that not so good husband.
It's worse for everyone. Including those the system is meant to favour.
That also includes the paedagogic measures taken about InEnIms ... since paedagogy is an alibi for systematically giving someone something else than he asks for, which is a rather dysfunctional society for one to navigate./HGL
No comments:
Post a Comment