Blasphemy Laws Equally or for Muslims Only?

You Can Be JAILED For Burning A Quran!
GBNews | 6 Febr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIYGOqg1YqA

Finland has, Sweden had, a type of mitigated blasphemy law that forbade blasphemy with obviously provocative intent or expression as a crime against the peaceful exercise of religion.

In Russia, Pussy Riot was condemned for Huliganism, and could have been exactly equally condemned if they had been pro-lifers obstructing before an abortion clinic. Which they would have been right to do. In Finland, the specific paragraph for which they could have had 6 months very specifically refers to God and to religious services and places. If they actually obstructed anyone from getting into a service, they would get up to two years.

Now, in Sweden, as mentioned, a man has burned a Quran and been killed. If the paragraph in Finnish law had still been in place in Sweden (basically identical up to 1970, I presume), would he have taken another route to criticise Islam? And if so, would he have not been killed? I don't know. I do know he was killed before the relatively young Swede killed 10 people (at least including immigrants from Muslim countries) and then himself.

I also know that France has come dangerously close to what I asked. Charlie Hebdo got a killing from Muslims in 2015. I'd say it was probably for a blasphemy against Jesus, whom they also consider as "their prophet" which Charlie Hebdo had committed in the Christmas special for 2014. But since then, Charlie Hebdo has been very much more conciliating against Muslims, but hardly against the Christian faith ("crucifixion" of female reproductive organs?). They are the test of French freedom of speech on the side of the permitted. On the side of the not permitted you find people who have voiced their view of how many Jews died in the camps and from what. And penalties are longer than 6 months./HGL