"d'origine immigrée"
Most of these things aren't by people who are now entering France, but sons or grandsons who want to feel as adventurous, but don't have a Mediterranean (or a French administration) to cross before being allowed to stay.
A Victim Of Migrant Crime Tells Her Story. They Tried To Jail HER?
Amala Ekpunobi | 21 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcA6rsA6f9U
Obviously this commenter in the US, Amala Ekpunobi, isn't a white supremacist.
What exactly was Loi Pleven saying in 1972?
"Ceux qui, par l'un des moyens énoncés à l'article 23, auront provoqué à la discrimination, à la haine ou à la violence à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes à raison de leur origine ou de leur appartenance ou de leur non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée, seront punis ..."
They who, by one of the means enounced in article 23 will have provoked to the discrimination, to the hatred or to violence regarding a person or a group of persons by reason of their origin or their belonging or not belonging to a determined ethnicity, nation, race or religion, will be punished. Etc. The currency in the fines is outdated. Prison was between a month and a year.
I am a person. If you want to call out against me for my moral (not ancestral nor civic) belonging to Austro-Bavarian culture, that would qualify. Or me and ma, both very fond of Austria, back when we were a team. Like in my early teens. That would be a group of persons.
She didn't want the Tunisian to go to gaol because he was Tunisian. She wanted him in gaol for what he had done.
I think "discrimination" is a very broad term, and in some of its meanings over the top, but Dilcrah didn't even represent a North African or African claiming "we missed a housing opportunity because of what Thaïs said", Dilcrah just pretended the whole races or the whole of their representatives in France are "a group of persons" and claimed that an observation about the ethnic category's actual behaviour constitutes incitation to discrimination.
There may be jurisprudence for this approach, there is neither justice nor reasonable exegesis of the law text from 1972.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
V L. D. after Pentecost
28.VI.2026
No comments:
Post a Comment