There are people around who, from the contradictions and condemnations I give their positions, conclude I'm a living weapon, wielded by some evil guy

It seems some people resume the failures in my situation to "he thought he could do anything he liked and it got no consequences" · There are people around who, from the contradictions and condemnations I give their positions, conclude I'm a living weapon, wielded by some evil guy

Some would like to say, well, look, Hans-Georg Lundahl is Austrian (thank you for the compliment, es war sehr schön es hat mich sehr gefreut, but my passport says otherwise), Catholic (indeed), and facing Protestant arguments behaves like Schwarzy in Terminator (meaning, they are not good at countering or I enjoy adding their bad arguments to my hitlist).

Given the toxicity I show their positions, by now sometimes persons, they conclude I act like a living weapon, I have lost my humanity and so on.

Here is part of the deal.

I am a person who was allowed some human dignity with adversaries of mine, only when I was debating them — or in totally humdrum circumstances. I have washed dishes with MB.* I have argued with MB. And I have seen MB along with MJ and some others put me to accusation, shame, and fear. I got good at arguing.

I have also discussed things we both enjoyed, but not with these two guys (above chocolate or toast with floating butter). That would be people like JH, and (other H) the Hbros. From another home, CT, and also ME. ME liked Franco. CT liked Emilio Mola better than Franco. The Hbros liked Mussolini better than Hitler. JH liked Churchill.

Hbros and JH moved to a home* where I met, for instance, DMcI. He liked Éamonn DeValera and the Pogues. He was no true Scotsman, and that's no fallacy, because he was Irish.

The people I enjoy discussing things with, gently, like sharing common tastes, are Catholics or maybe also Agnostics with social sympathies for Catholicism. They have political tastes ranging from Éamonn DeValera to Emilio Mola, over Mussolini and Franco. JH also became a tease, gentler than MB and MJ, and together with two people from ... shall we say Satanist and Anarchist leaning fans of "ground control to Major Tom" and "breaking the wall!" They would probably be interested that I found 666 in "d bowie"

68 + 66 + 79 + 87 + 73 + 69 = 442
7 * 32 = 224 (one for each lower case, one for the space).

May I add, quickly, I've never been in a seance with them or with similar guys (by the way, one man who did seances wanted to introduce me to kabbalah, I clearly felt "no thanks!").

The people I enjoy discussing things with aren't MJ and MB. Leftists. Hard core Nazi haters willing to see me as a Nazi ... which half and half I was when I arrived at that home. I left a man who should have remained a painter aside, for Franco, out of obedience. Obedience to a person who had some kind of maternal authority at that boarding school, but who wasn't my mother. Obviously, they weren't happy with a man endorsing Franco either. With these, the most enjoyable thing I had was debate. Putting hardness into arguments rather than direct confrontation of the persons.

Still think I'm a living weapon?

I am pretty cut off from the people I'd love to discuss things with, and pretty exposed to people like MJ and MB. Or to some religious people who think it is my prudential duty for eternal salvation to shred every ounce of my political loyalties and of my literary tastes, as well as tastes in certain drinks and on and off in hypnosis to have a chance to be right with God. I'm religious too, but not on their terms.

What if the people who are assessing me are themselves gone the way of living weapons, and have shed part of their humanities?

I don't think I shed mine in debating. But for a curious reason, a man who lost a round in a debate, when I said so, pretended "you Catholics are all about POWER" ... that's in part of my exchanges with "john irish" on this one: Catholic Exegesis Involves Some Eisegesis (as it Should). He also commented on me as Arnold the Schwartz. A few years earlier, way before the Covid, I engaged with one vhbb5, or rather he engaged with me, and who called me a Gesamtkunstwerk (reference to Wagner) and who also told me:

@Hans-Georg Lundahl Ich verwechsle gar nichts! Ich habe Sie als Antichrist (1) identifiziert!

He footnoted involving Antichrist being comparable to the Jewish figure Armilus and the Islamic figure Dajjal. He didn't footnote the relevant gematria for Apocalypse 13:18. That charming exchange was in 2019.

I answered, like I would still do, hope he's wrong. I have no desire to get thrown into the lake of fire. I also don't believe that adapting to people who think hypnosis for stress management or composition of secular music equals a deal with the devil. The road to avoid that is narrow, but more on items like avoiding and combatting abortion, contraception and things, and doing one's best to provide.

People like they do their best so that my writing won't provide. This involves radical Protestants, Muslims, at least part time Jews, Atheists like MJ and MB. This also involves people who think it their prerogative to decide who is and who isn't a living weapon programmed by someone. Like Swedish shrinks did on that occasion, saying my mother had "programmed me" to antipsychiatric positions. Yeah, sure. Shrinks are just innocent bystanders, don't destroy anyone's life or anything. If someone is against them, that someone is a "living weapon" ... but they aren't, even if they are as toxic (bypassing argument with multiple ad hominem, which I don't do at my most toxic, usually) as one NinjaMonkeyPrime.

If you are allergic to Young Earth Creationism, Geocentrism, Apostolic Succesion, Catholic Priesthood and Sacrifice replacing the Cohanic ones, Corporatismo or a non-state Syndicalism, but one that respects private property and doesn't want to make a revolution against factory owners by their employees, Pro-Life, perhaps I'm far from your cup of tea or of java. I found the argument with Chris Martin interesting here: Contemporary Evidence, Again (ranging from why is Matthew the only contemporary we have who mentions darkness, earthquake and risen saints to how does Geocentrism prove God, provided it isn't disproven which it isn't). I can take a man like john irish calling me Schwarz. But neither of them is comparable to hanging out with friends over a shared book.**

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
Sacred Heart of Jesus
12.VI.2026

* It was on a boarding school, I'm allergic to Harry Potter after that.
** Or film. I saw Mission, back then. And Crocodile Dundee. And a certain Cecilia actually was breaking my heart by taking my take on that song as creepy.