New blog on the kid
Be my - local or otherwise - editor, if you like! : Soyez mon éditeur local ou plus large, si vous voulez!
Et pour tous ceux qui voient ceci sur les ordis - que Sainte Claire prie pour vous!
Saturday 31 August 2024
Prières pour Kamilya
Les mots de son père sont cités dans le Midi Libre :
"Kamilya ne reviendra pas parmi nous" : le message déchirant du père de la fillette renversée par un motard sur un passage piéton
Publié le 31/08/2024 à 08:24 , mis à jour à 08:46 (Midi Libre)
https://www.midilibre.fr/2024/08/31/kamilya-ne-reviendra-pas-parmi-nous-le-message-dechirant-du-pere-de-la-fillette-renversee-par-un-motard-sur-un-passage-pieton-12169146.php
Pour quelle soit sauvée malgré les apparences, si possible. Et pour qu'elle ne soit pas pillée d'organes après une déclaration de mort cérébrale.
Priez le Sacré-Cœur !
Mise à jour :
Vallauris : la fillette de 7 ans fauchée par une moto est décédée
Par Guillaume Poingt, 1.IX.2024, Figaro
https://www.lefigaro.fr/faits-divers/vallauris-la-fillette-fauchee-par-une-moto-est-decedee-20240901
Père Paul Poupard le secrétaire pour le discours de "Jean Paul II" devant la Commission Pontificale des Sciences ?
Je dis "père" en vérifiant à la wikipédie les dates pour son ordination (réelle, 1954 était avant le Nouveau Pontifical Romain) et sa consécration épiscopale (au moins dubieuse, 1979 étant après cette calamité).*
Au moins, c'est ce que suppose Levi J. Pingleton ou s'il est en train de lire l'analyse de Robert Sungenis.**
D'où mon intérêt de vérifier "qui ça ?"
Or, il se trouve qu'il est encore en vie. Et qu'il vient de la campagne, pour ainsi dire, Bouzillé (Maine-et-Loire), fils du cultivateur Joseph Poupard et son épouse Célestine née Guéry. Pas déshonorable. Mais un peu prône à être arriéré sur les discours sophistiqués, dont les sciences dits exacts, dont les controverses sur le cas Galilée, et aussi un peu prône à vouloir compenser en s'instruisant. Mon grand-père était un peu le type. Moi, non, je suis né dans une situation familiale déjà instruite (dans le cas de mes grand-parents, auto-instruite). Mais Bouzillé a aussi un autre intérêt.
L’époque préhistorique a laissé peu de traces à Bouzillé, 8 haches polies dont 7 en jade ont été découvertes au Fourneau près du fossé neuf, datant d’entre 4000 et 2000 avant Jésus Christ.
Comment fait-on pour dater une hache polie en jade ? On ne le fait pas, on contourne. Était-elle attachée à une manche encore existante ? Parce que, le bois, ça se date. Était-elle tâché de matière organique après usage, par exemple du sang ou fragments de bois ? Parce que l'arbre coupé comme le sang versé, ça se date.
Ou peut-être, une couche du sol a pu être daté par des fragments d'arbres, par exemple de racines, ou par des os parfaitement banaux, par exemple d'un sanglier qu'on avait mangé dans ce village pas encore gaulois ?
Dans ces cas, mais pas en d'autres (car le texte même exclut la trouvaille préhistorique d'un homme ou d'une maison en bois, ça aurait été plus important qu'une ou même que huit haches, même si sept en sont en jade), on dispose d'un échantillon datable par carbone 14 en connexion avec ces haches. Pour le cas que c'est le sol qui est daté, c'est possible que les huit haches ne constituent pas une panoplie à travers les deux millennaires, mais se limitent à une ou deux périodes plus courtes et impossibles à préciser entre les limites extrèmes.
Or, les datations carbone 14 de ces temps révolus, ça se télescope !
- 2039 av. J.-Chr.***
- 78,209 pcm, donc daté à 4089 av. J.-Chr.
- 2022 av. J.-Chr.
- 79,035 pcm, donc daté à 3972 av. J.-Chr.
- ...
- 1610 av. J.-Chr.
- 95,2011 pcm, donc daté à 2020 av. J.-Chr.
"4000 à 2000 avant Jésus-Christ", en réalité, donc, ça débute entre 2039 et 2022 avant Jésus-Christ (entre 7 et 22 ans avant la naissance d'Abraham) et ça finit en 1610 avant Jésus-Christ, après Joseph en Égypte, mais avant Moïse.
Mais retournons au discours que père Poupard avait écrit pour "Jean Paul II" ... pour un athée, c'est très facile de prouver l'Héliocentrisme. Le Géocentrisme Tychonien, qui colle le mieux avec les observations, est mécaniquement impossible si les causes de mouvements sont limités à l'intertie et la gravité des objets ayant des grandes masses, ce qui serait le cas si Dieu et les Anges n'existaient pas. Puisque l'athée nie Dieu et les Anges, il a une certitude absolu que le Géocentrisme Tychonien n'est que l'inverse observationnelle d'un Héliocentrisme pour l'échelle du "système solaire" ...
Pour un non-athée, Chrétien ou indécis, cette absence d'anges et d'un Dieu ne va pas de soi. Pour le Chrétien, cette prétendue absence est même d'une fausseté certifiée par la foi. Le Géocentrisme Tychonien, plus directement en relation avec les observations, reste donc préférable.
C'est trop tard pour s'occuper de l'antipape Wojtyla, mais Paul Poupard peut encore redevenir Catholique, se soumettre au vrai Pape, Michel II, regretter d'avoir aidé celui qu'il prenait pour pape de faire un faux pas dans les discours sur un sujet très connexe à la Foi, voire même, selon les termes de 1616 et 1633, intégral à celle-ci.
Je vais essayer de faire passer ce message à travers Jacques Arnould (oui, c'est bien un D à la fin, je ne me trompe pas) pour le faire passer, en mail ou en imprimé et posté en courrier normal, au père Paul Poupard.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Raymond Nonnat
31.VIII.2024
(26.VIII) Cardonae, in Hispania, transitus sancti Raymundi Nonnati, Cardinalis et Confessoris, ex Ordine beatae Mariae de Mercede redemptionis captivorum, vitae sanctitate et miraculis clari. Ipsius tamen festum recolitur pridie Kalendas Septembris.
(31.VIII) Sancti Raymundi Nonnati, ex Ordine beatae Mariae de Mercede redemptionis captivorum, Cardinalis et Confessoris; cujus dies natalis septimo Kalendas Septembris recolitur.
* Deux citations :
Il a été ordonné prêtre le 18 décembre 1954 pour le diocèse d'Angers.
Nommé évêque auxiliaire de Paris avec le titre d'évêque in partibus d'Usula le 2 février 1979, il est consacré le 6 avril suivant.
** J'écoute le pod sur ce post:
Analysis of 1992 John Paul II speech on the Galileo Myth
Levi Pingleton, Aug 24, 2024
https://levipingleton.substack.com/p/analysis-of-1992-john-paul-ii-speech
*** Mes plus récentes tables de carbone 14
New blog on the kid | Wednesday 1 May 2024 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 09:28
https://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2024/05/mes-plus-recentes-tables-de-carbone-14.html
Production August 2024
| Production August 2024 | |||
| Back to Previous | On to Next | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Production July, 2024 | Production September 2024 | ||
- 1.VIII.2024
- A Reminder to Kristian Kristiansen · Les villes de Genèse 10 (FR) · L'Abbé Puga sur le blasphème (FR) · Haniyeh · Sharing on Opening Ceremony (and evidence from Barbara Butch's twitter account) · Sharing on Abortion Pill Reversal · Since I'm Being Pestered by Tolkienophobes ...
- 2.VIII.2024
- Two Things for August 2nd · Überschlau um die Bibel (DE) · Pageard a raison dans sa comparaison (FR) · Tolkienophobes, Buzz Off!
- 3.VIII.2024
- Une Bible anglaise porte le nom de deux communes en France. (FR) · Nearly Ten Years Ago I Was Probably Wrong About Fatima · Melissa Dougherty Refutes Islam AND Protestantism · Can Radically Reduce, Partly Ban, Internet, But Not Abortion · Banning Social Media is an "Authoritarian" Measure
- 4.VIII.2024
- Why I am Not Capitalist or for Unrestricted Free Market · Para resumir y responder a una paradoja de Epicuro elargida. (ESP) · Delitto Matteotti - Le Parole del Duce e del Figlio del Diputato (Collegamenti, Citati) (ITAL) · Tolkienophobe Identified? · J D Vance-Phobes?
- 5.VIII.2024
- Hay diciplinas sin reservación para gente con título (ESP)
- 6.VIII.2024
- Bonum Festum Transfigurationis (LAT) · Was Noah's Flood and Ark Textually Possible? Interrupting Refutation of Robert A. Moore to Turn to Damien Mackey · Pharaon (FR)
- 7.VIII.2024
- Certains fourbes ne voudraient pas que je sois imprimé (ou que mes textes les soient) (FR) · Sigh. There Are People Who Consider Me a Conspiracy Theorist Already · Le Christianisme n'est pas Dualiste (FR) · What Does Vladimir Mean?
- 8.VIII.2024
- Je n'écris pas tous les jours sur ma propre histoire ... mais quand je le fais, c'est qu'il y a un intérêt au-delà de ma personne (FR)
- 9.VIII.2024
- Je ne pose pas mon espoir en Vladimir II (FR)
- 10.VIII.2024
- Bonum Festum Sancti Laurentii (LAT) · Première femme de Nemrod, ou sacrifice humain ? (FR) · Néanderthaliens et Dénisoviens, avant le Déluge (FR) · Me and Messianic Jews
- 11.VIII.2024
- Quoting the Olive Tree · Need Fanzines Start Fancy? · Pronatalism, yes, but not the Collins' Way
- 12.VIII.2024
- C'est quoi réalisme ? Est-il souhaitable ?
- 13.VIII.2024
- I'm not into The Passion Bible, but DEFINITELY Not Into King James · Once Again, the Truth of Tota Scriptura is not the Error of Sola Scriptura, Young Earth Creationism is NOT Protestantism · Anthony Stine on Georg Bätzing
- 14.VIII.2024
- Vigil of the Assumption
- I Recall Christiania in 2004 · CMI Seems to Have a Will to Hammer Away Geocentrism · St. Augustine vs Jimmy Akin (on one topic) · Elisabeth Tudor or Boleyn as Distributist and Luddite
- 15.VIII.2024
- Feast of Assumption
- Bonum Festum Assumptionis BMV · Some Have Asked if I Went to Mass · Index IL FR, Pentecôte à l'Assomption 2024 (FR) · Index IL, ENG, Pentecost to Assumption · Not One Vaxx Mandate or Mask Mandate More! · First Twenty Minutes of Dr. Craig and Dr. Ken Keathley · "L'invitation au voyage avec Corto Maltese" (FR) · Controversial claim somewhat debunked "Deus vult never said at Clermont" — or was it? · Catholic vs Orthodox · Catholic vs Jewish
- 16.VIII.2024
- —
- 17.VIII.2024
- I'm Annoyed When Some Call Pius XII "Hitler's Pope" ... ESPECIALLY If they are Jews · Edward Pleń (Sharing a Story) · Bishop Williamson Closed by Reminding of the Rosary (Even for Non-Catholics) · Who Was Berthier? · Is Armenia East of Babylonia?
- 18.VIII.2024
- Laissons les Delon en paix, à moins d'être invités. (FR) · A Good Defense of the Assumption, Plus My Comments
- 19.VIII.2024
- 2 Pierre 3:8 et l'âge du monde (FR) · Crooks' (or Yearick's?) Body Gone · Candace Owens-Farmer and Michael Lofton · "Benedict XVI" alias Antipope Ratzinger
- 20.VIII.2024
- Sister Agnes Sasagawa, Seer of Akita, dies on Feast of the Assumption · He asked why women religious are more often the target · Quick Question on Geocentrism · A "Dominican" Was Wrong · Neanderthals, Carter, Myself · A Beautiful Meeting (and Two Comments of Mine)
- 21.VIII.2024
- Mainly Sharing, but also Underlining · Some Muslims Around Where I Am Are Really Generous
- 22.VIII.2024
- "Psychologist" semble parfois se prendre pour un Chrétien (FR) · "Psychologist" est Kantien (ou quelque chose un peu comme ça) (FR) · "Psychologist" est de gauche (toxique) (FR) · Yes, Amateur Researchers Sometimes Do Defeat the Professional Sceptics
- 23.VIII.2024
- Il y a des connards (et connasses) qui n'ont pas leur place dans la culture occidentale (FR) · Next Question on Geocentrism
- 24.VIII.2024
- Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli (LAT) · Statistiques (FR) · For Those Who Still Attribute Göbekli Tepe to Noah
- 25.VIII.2024
- I Tried to Sign One Petition and Got Thanked for Signing Another — or maybe not (see PS) · First Forty Minutes where Scholastic Answers at least partly Misjudges the Case of Jake Brancatella · Ten More Minutes · Sharing · Levi Joshua Pingleton Nearly Right
- 26.VIII.2024
- Ensayos, estrategías (ESP) · Good Conversion Story · Second Half of Trent Horn's Video on "Political Christianity"
- 27.VIII.2024
- Seven Joys of Mary · Sectarian Harrassment · On Growing Up · The King Returns on the Feast of Trumpets?
- 28.VIII.2024
- Gaslighting Does Not Mean Simply Shifting the Blame · Tovia Singer Shifting the Blame · Le lectorat monte, à l'international et en Russie, mais pas en France (FR) · Accelerated Decay After All? · Trent Horn, an Online Influencer, Against Traddier Online Influencers, Answered by One · Sharing On The Shooting · Baronius is NOT Galileo
- 29.VIII.2024
- Bonam Diem Decollationis Sti Ioannis Baptistae (LAT) · Je ne suis pas Charlie Hebdo (FR) · Joe on Judas · What Does "Being in Babylon" Mean? Being Invisible Only Church? No. · A Protestant End Times Theologian (Good on End Times, at least moderately, Bad on Church History and Ecclesiology) · Moon Landing, Not TOTALLY Proven, and Even If Completely True, No Proof Against Geocentrism
- 30.VIII.2024
- Good News and Bad News · Amendment 4, Florida, Sharing a Message from Mgr. Pohlmeier
- 31.VIII.2024
- Prières pour Kamilya (FR) · Père Paul Poupard le secrétaire pour le discours de "Jean Paul II" devant la Commission Pontificale des Sciences ? (FR) · Bad Theology Pushed, Good Theology Rejected (Noah's Drunkenness) · LIII Commenting on Interview with an Ex-Witch (Crowley was no paedophile) (13+) · Otra vez, ensayos · Was the Drainage System of the Rhine There in the Preflood World? · Production August 2024
Friday 30 August 2024
Good News and Bad News
There is good news about the Shroud of Turin in this video:
Shroud of Turin is REAL! Unveiling the Burial Shroud of Jesus by Dr Taylor Marshall #1123
Dr Taylor Marshall | 23 Aug 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taDoPqI7vKM
There is bad news about some Protestant souls in this comment from the live chat:
My Protestant father says it can’t be real because there shouldn’t be any physical proof of the resurrection because it would nullify the need for faith and that it’s not m how God operates.
That Protestant father was a Fideist. Probably a Kantian as well.
Fundamentalists are not Fideists. We give proof, and even if we know some Atheists will reject it, we do consider the proof as proof and also as not taking away from the merit of faith.
Believing that God (exists, has created a few thousand years ago, has raised Jesus from the dead) is susceptible for proof. It is also not the faith that believes in God, putting one's trust and goal in Him. It's just a prolegomenon to it. And a useful one.
The idea of Fideists that God:
- wants the faithful to believe everything with no proof for anything
- and therefore provides no cogent proof
leads to ex-Fideist Atheists who conclude from there (supposedly) being no proof.
There is also sometimes an alliance between the two for combatting the Christians (Catholic and Protestant Fundamentalists) who do try to provide the proof we consider as readily available.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Rose of Lima
30.VIII.2024
(24.VIII) Lima, in Peruvia, natalis sanctae Rosae a sancta Maria, Virginis, e tertio Ordine sancti Dominici. Ejus vero festivitas tertio Kalendas Septembris celebratur.
(30.VIII) Sanctae Rosae a sancta Maria, e tertio Ordine sancti Dominici, Virginis; cujus dies natalis nono Kalendas Septembris recensetur.
Thursday 29 August 2024
Bonam Diem Decollationis Sti Ioannis Baptistae
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
Decollatio sancti Joannis Baptistae, quem Herodes circa festum Paschae decollari praecepit. Ipsius tamen memoria solemniter hac die colitur, qua venerandum ejus caput secundo inventum fuit; quod, postea Romam translatum, in Ecclesia sancti Silvestri, ad Campum Martium, summa populi devotione asservatur.
Je ne suis pas Charlie Hebdo
Je ne recommande pas des tueries, mais sabotages matériels ne sont pas trop./HGL
Wednesday 28 August 2024
Tovia Singer Shifting the Blame
Moreover, this exhaustive book illustrates how, over the course of many centuries, the Church systematically altered the Jewish Scriptures in its authorized translations of the Bible in order to persuade its adherents that Jesus is the promised Jewish messiah. To accomplish this task, Christian translators manipulated, misquoted, and mistranslated verses in the Hebrew Scriptures so that these texts appear to be speaking about Jesus.
Genesis 11 was manipulated in the time of Josephus in the Hebrew version.
Why do I say this?
I will now treat of the Hebrews. The son of Phaleg, whose father Was Heber, was Ragau; whose son was Serug, to whom was born Nahor; his son was Terah, who was the father of Abraham, who accordingly was the tenth from Noah, and was born in the two hundred and ninety-second year after the deluge; for Terah begat Abram in his seventieth year. Nahor begat Haran when he was one hundred and twenty years old; Nahor was born to Serug in his hundred and thirty-second year; Ragau had Serug at one hundred and thirty; at the same age also Phaleg had Ragau; Heber begat Phaleg in his hundred and thirty-fourth year; he himself being begotten by Sala when he was a hundred and thirty years old, whom Arphaxad had for his son at the hundred and thirty-fifth year of his age. Arphaxad was the son of Shem, and born twelve years after the deluge. Now Abram had two brethren, Nahor and Haran: of these Haran left a son, Lot; as also Sarai and Milcha his daughters; and died among the Chaldeans, in a city of the Chaldeans, called Ur; and his monument is shown to this day. These married their nieces. Nabor married Milcha, and Abram married Sarai. Now Terah hating Chaldea, on account of his mourning for Ilaran, they all removed to Haran of Mesopotamia, where Terah died, and was buried, when he had lived to be two hundred and five years old; for the life of man was already, by degrees, diminished, and became shorter than before, till the birth of Moses; after whom the term of human life was one hundred and twenty years, God determining it to the length that Moses happened to live. Now Nahor had eight sons by Milcha; Uz and Buz, Kemuel, Chesed, Azau, Pheldas, Jadelph, and Bethuel. These were all the genuine sons of Nahor; for Teba, and Gaam, and Tachas, and Maaca, were born of Reuma his concubine: but Bethuel had a daughter, Rebecca, and a son, Laban.
This is from
Josephus, Antiquities
BOOK I. Containing The Interval Of Three Thousand Eight Hundred And Thirty-Three Years. — From The Creation To The Death Of Isaac.
CHAPTER 6. How Every Nation Was Denominated From Their First Inhabitants.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2848/2848-h/2848-h.htm#link2HCH0006
Why do I think the text was manipulated in this time?
How long after the Flood is Abraham born? He gives a total:
who was the father of Abraham, who accordingly was the tenth from Noah, and was born in the two hundred and ninety-second year after the deluge
So, the total according to Josephus is 292 years.
He also gives a detailed account:
| for Terah begat Abram in his seventieth year. | 70 |
|---|---|
| Nahor begat Haran [Terah] when he was one hundred and twenty years old; | 120, 190 |
| Nahor was born to Serug in his hundred and thirty-second year; | 132, 322 |
| Ragau had Serug at one hundred and thirty; | 130, 452 |
| at the same age also Phaleg had Ragau; | 130, 582 |
| Heber begat Phaleg in his hundred and thirty-fourth year; | 134, 716 |
| he himself being begotten by Sala when he was a hundred and thirty years old, | 130, 846 |
| whom Arphaxad had for his son at the hundred and thirty-fifth year of his age. | 135, 981 |
| Arphaxad was the son of Shem, and born twelve years after the deluge. | 12, 993 |
The detailed account doesn't add up to 292, but to 993. Is there a specific reason?
Now, obviously Shem died 500 after the Flood. This means, he never met Abraham, in their earthly lives, if the detailed account is the original one or close to it.
Genesis 14:18—20 says:
But Melchisedech the king of Salem, bringing forth bread and wine, for he was the priest of the most high God, Blessed him, and said: Blessed be Abram by the most high God, who created heaven and earth. And blessed be the most high God, by whose protection the enemies are in thy hands. And he gave him the tithes of all.
This is generally taken as Abraham giving tithes to Melchisedech. If Abraham was born more like 993 than 292 after the Flood, obviously Melchisedech was not Shem. Why is this important?
Here is Hebrews chapter 7.
9 And (as it may be said) even Levi who received tithes, paid tithes in Abraham: 10 For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedech met him.
11 If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being translated, it is necessary that a translation also be made of the law. 13 For he, of whom these things are spoken, is of another tribe, of which no one attended on the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord sprung out of Juda: in which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priests. 15 And it is yet far more evident: if according to the similitude of Melchisedech there ariseth another priest,
16 Who is made not according to the law of a carnal commandment, but according to the power of an indissoluble life: 17 For he testifieth: Thou art a priest for ever, according to the order of Melchisedech.
The obvious Jewish answer, if Abraham was born 292 after the Flood, would be to take Melchisedech as being Shem. In that case, Levi or his descendant Aaron was less "still in the loins of Abraham when he gave tithes" than "still in the loins of Shem who received tithes" ...
Is there some other trace that the Jewish text of Genesis 11 was altered in the time of Josephus? Here are the comments of Haydock on Genesis 14:18, omitting some other comment collected by him in between:
Ver. 18. Melchisedech was not Sem: for his genealogy is given in Scripture. (Hebrews vii. 6.); nor God the Son, for they are compared together; nor the Holy Ghost, as some have asserted, but a virtuous Gentile who adored the true God, and was king of Salem, or Jerusalem, and Priest of an order different from that of Aaron, offering in sacrifice bread and wine, a figure of Christ's sacrifice in the Mass; as the fathers constantly affirm. (Haydock)
[...]
If Josephus take notice only of Melchisedech, offering Abram and his men corporal refreshment, we need not wonder; he was a Jewish priest, to whom the order of Melchisedech might not be agreeable. It is not indeed improbable, but Abram might partake of the meat, which had been offered in thanksgiving by Melchisedech; and in this sense his words are true. But there would be no need of observing, that he was a priest on this account; as this was a piece of civility expected from princes on similar occasions. (Deuteronomy xxiii. 4; 2 Kings xvii. 27.) (Haydock)
Well, is this true of what Josephus said:
2. So Abram, when he had saved the captive Sodomites, who had been taken by the Assyrians, and Lot also, his kinsman, returned home in peace. Now the king of Sodom met him at a certain place, which they called The King's Dale, where Melchisedec, king of the city Salem, received him. That name signifies, the righteous king: and such he was, without dispute, insomuch that, on this account, he was made the priest of God: however, they afterward called Salem Jerusalem. Now this Melchisedec supplied Abram's army in an hospitable manner, and gave them provisions in abundance; and as they were feasting, he began to praise him, and to bless God for subduing his enemies under him. And when Abram gave him the tenth part of his prey, he accepted of the gift: but the king of Sodom desired Abram to take the prey, but entreated that he might have those men restored to him whom Abram had saved from the Assyrians, because they belonged to him. But Abram would not do so; nor would make any other advantage of that prey than what his servants had eaten; but still insisted that he should afford a part to his friends that had assisted him in the battle. The first of them was called Eschol, and then Enner, and Mambre.
CHAPTER 10. How Abram Fought With The Assyrians, And Overcame Them, And Saved The Sodomite Prisoners, And Took From The Assyrians The Prey They Had Gotten.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2848/2848-h/2848-h.htm#link2HCH0010
- Josephus doesn't say the bread and wine were a sacrifice;
- Josephus mentioning the tithe mentions it as just a gift, a present, which Abraham wanted to offer, and which Melchisedech accepted;
- Josephus also doesn't say that Melchisedech was Shem.
So, when there is a change of tradition within the community commonly known as Jewish, Tovia Singer in Let's Get Biblical! shifts the blame and pretends that it was Christians who falsified the Old Testament tradition. No, it was Jews who did that.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Augustine of Hippo
28.VIII.2024
Hippone Regio, in Africa, natalis sancti Augustini Episcopi, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris eximii, qui, beati Ambrosii Episcopi opera ad catholicam fidem conversus et baptizatus, eam adversus Manichaeos aliosque haereticos acerrimus propugnator defendit, multisque aliis pro Ecclesia Dei perfunctus laboribus, ad praemia migravit in caelum. Ejus reliquiae, primo de sua civitate propter barbaros in Sardiniam advectae, et postea a Rege Longobardorum Luitprando Papiam translatae, ibi honorifice conditae sunt.
Le lectorat monte, à l'international et en Russie, mais pas en France
| Singapour
2 + 3 + 1 + 8 + 2 + 3 + 89 + 13 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 5 + 275 + 18 = 423 États-Unis 75 + 45 + 7 + 6 + 3 + 1 + 34 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 3 + 9 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 13 + 1 = 219 Russie 8 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 28 + 2 + 4 + 1 + 1 = 54 Israël 8 + 7 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 8 + 6 + 5 + 3 = 47 Hong Kong 1 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 2 = 31 | France
1 + 11 + 1 + 3 = 16 Norvège 13 + 1 = 14 Autriche = 7 Ukraine 5 + 1 + 1 = 7 Allemagne 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 Lettonie = 5 | |
| Pays de quatre vues
Inde = 4 Pays de trois vues Irlande, Royaume-Uni, Corée du Sud, Tchéquie = 12 Pays de deux vues Belgique, Mexique, Roumanie, Finlande = 8 | Pays d'une vue
Espagne, Turquie, Géorgie, Suisse, Portugal, Seychelles, Pays-Bas, Brésil = 8 Autre 30 + 3 + 1 + 31 + 2 + 16 + 14 + 5 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 108 Total 423 + 219 + 54 + 47 + 31 + 16 + 14 + 12 + 7 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 8 + 8 + 108 = 969 |
Deux blogs avec plus que 100 et plus que 300 vues les 24 heures avaient une coupure, certes pas complète, mais marquée, à 18 h hier:
Creation vs. Evolution
https://creavsevolu.blogspot.com/
Φιλολoγικά/Philologica
https://filolohika.blogspot.com/
Sur les deux, les statistiques pour les posts montraient pas de post vraiment viral pendant ce temps.
Pour les États-Unis, ce n'est pas la première fois que je vois 219 vues, ni que les vues sont dispersées sur plusieurs blogs.
Je pense que mon lectorat est assez bien organisé, et malheureusement pas dans ce que je considère mes intérêts./HGL
PS.
Les posts les plus lus sur trois blogs dépassant 2 vues par ce post sont Sectarian Harrassment, The King Returns on the Feast of Trumpets? et Longevity Charts as per LXX/HGL
Tuesday 27 August 2024
Seven Joys of Mary
Today is the feast of St. Narn of Bergamo, who was ordained by St. Barnabas.
This is noted in the martyrology, and the following isn't, but it is important enough anyway:
The Seven Joys of Our Lady
Mar 25, 2024 / Written by: Tonia Long / America Needs Fatima
https://americaneedsfatima.org/articles/the-seven-joys-of-our-lady
On Growing Up
The Breakfast Club, Claire Standish:
"when you grow up, your heart dies"
Tolkien (paraphrased)
"when you grow up, make sure your heart doesn't die"
I heartily hate people who seem to try to make sure I either get treated as a child because my heart isn't dead, or I kill my heart to not get treated as a child.
Such people deserve death./HGL
Sectarian Harrassment
Some kind of Jew seems to hope I'll ditch Catholic Christianity.
First, a video by Trent Horn, also Catholic, also of at least partially Jewish origin:
Surviving the "Bible Blitzkrieg"
The Counsel of Trent | 5 Aug. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtRBQLlNWqU
Here are two comments of mine. On two timestamps. I chose to interact with Trent Horn. That's my right. He did not so far chose to interact with me. That's his right.
0:20 Just happened to me, except instead of getting overwhelmed, I picked the counterexample.
The word "saints" may be used in the NT exclusively about people alive on earth, but Apocalypse certainly at least twices mentions people who have died as what we would call saints.
3:37 When a Protestant cites Ephesians 2:8,9, I cite Ephesians 2:8-10.
When a Protestant cites Matthew 16:18 and says "the rock was Christ", I cite Matthew 16:19 and say "thee" does not mean Christ.
Now, under the second one of them, someone choses to interact with me, and choses to do so in a finally very animosic way. Don't just take my word for it, here is the screenshots:
You saw the part where I said "I refuse to take you as any kind of master"?
I could kind of sense what type of interlocutor he was. But any way, given I have refused to acknowledge him as any kind of master, it is incorrect of him to try to "school" me, if he does. Watch what happens.
Apparently I was mistaken to take him for someone who wanted to make a Protestant talking point of "call no man father on earth", it was a Jew or Ebionite who pretended to understand Jesus better than we Catholics do.
Even C. S. Lewis in Miracles could have informed him that the last words he cited prove that Jesus was not simply along with the rest calling God "our God" ... He did not have the same relationship to God.
Now, I try to correct his misunderstanding of the Bible, by referring to a Church Father, without much interest:
Look at his screen name (or hers), here:
No, the quote does not make Jesus a Unitarian, see Matthew 28 verses 16 to 20. Or:
I and the Father are one.
[John 10:30]
It is true that Jews today are typically Unitarians, most reject Jesus, but some who kind of don't imagine they are accepting the "real Jesus", the pretended Unitarian, whom Christianity supposedly misunderstood. It is in fact they who misunderstand the Torah, including, as I mentioned about St. Athanasius, the Shema. And they misunderstand what Second Temple Judaism was.
Normally, that should be their problem. But some are bent on making it MY problem, and this guy (I hope it's not a gal, gal aren't supposed to behave this bad), opened a youtube account in 2023 in order to have sth to comment from on occasion. If I block this account, he certainly has some other empty account to mobilise, and another.
Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Narn of Bergamo
27.VIII.2024
Sunday 25 August 2024
Sharing
Did Ukraine Just Ban Orthodox Christianity?
Reason & Theology | 22.VIII.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO7v3ifOPiA
Both states banning parts of Christendom, that could be the beginning of hard times./HGL
I Tried to Sign One Petition and Got Thanked for Signing Another — or maybe not (see PS)
Here is the one I tried to sign:
Return to Order: PROTEST! Babylon Bee Mocks Blessed Virgin and Saint Joseph —
https://www.returntoorder.org/petition/protest-babylon-bee-mocks-marys-and-jospehs-purity/
Here is the one I got thanked for signing:
Your name has been added to the petition! Before you go...will you consider helping us oppose Satanism in America?
https://secure.returntoorder.org/amazon-ouija-board-ota/
While I'm willing to support a few of their campaigns against Satanism, it was the Protestants ridiculing the Perpetual Virginity I was trying to protest./HGL
PS, ah, wait, in the email I got a thanks for signing the right petition!
Thank you so much for signing our petition.
I would like to ask if you could please take the time now to spread the word to your family and friends.
You can simply copy and paste the message below, or send THIS LINK.
Thank you again for signing, and may God Bless you.
***Copy and Paste Message Below***
Hi! A "conservative" satire website recently published a work making fun of the purity of the Virgin Mary and Saint Jospeh! CLICK HERE to get more information and to sign the petition to have the article removed. Thank you!
Saturday 24 August 2024
Statistiques
Friday 23 August 2024
Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli
Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL
Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli, qui Christi Evangelium in India praedicavit; inde in majorem Armeniam profectus, ibi, cum plurimos ad fidem convertisset, vivus a barbaris decoriatus est, atque, Astyagis Regis jussu, capitis decollatione martyrium complevit. Ipsius sacrum corpus, primo ad Liparam insulam, deinde Beneventum, postremo Romam ad Tiberinam translatiun insulam, ibi pia fidelium veneratione honoratur.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)