Don't Do It Again, Prevost!

John Paul II's Assisi Prayer Meeting - The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
vaticancatholic.com | 25 Sept. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ms366iNhUM

This is not to exonerate Wojtyla, but ...

... on one item, it seems I was too dissatisfied with his lack of precise scholastic language, which is also not that of Dei Filius.

I spoke of "faith and reason is like saying blonde and hair" ... blonde being a certain quality of hair and faith being a certain quality of reason.

OK, I seem to have to eat my words:

Verum etsi fides sit supra rationem, nulla tamen umquam inter fidem et rationem vera dissensio esse potest: cum idem Deus, qui mysteria revelat et fidem infundit, animo humano rationis lumen indiderit; Deus autem negare seipsum non possit, nec verum vero umquam contradicere.*

Nope, speaking of faith and reason as two distinct things is not a modernist confusion. The usage already exists in clergy above any possible reproach of heresy.

One can still ask whether the simile of "two wings" is well chosen insofar as it might imply equality, but the simple fact of distinguishing like two quasi separate items is not per se reproachable./HGL

* https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/i-vatican-council/documents/vat-i_const_18700424_dei-filius_la.html

Ce jour d'Octave de Toussaint, je trouve un point en commun avec Christine Pedotti et Anne Soupa

Mais il est paradoxal.

Pour Le Comité de la Jupe, (les deux femmes mentionnées, peut-être d'autres), le problème avec "Jean-Paul II" (qu'elles voudraient décanoniser) est sa vision de la femme. Pour Le Comité de Quelque Chose dans la Tête (votre serviteur, pas eu de soitiens dans le groupe à FB), ça serait plutôt en sa faveur.

Pour moi, le problème avec Karol Wojtyła, prévisible pour Mme Pedotti, est qu'il n'est nullement d'accord avec le schéma préalable en 1962 (?) qui visait à dogmatiser ou doctrinaliser le créationnisme jeune terre.* Il a en effet autorisé le "Catéchisme de l'Église Catholique" (mal nommé !) dont le §283 est en flagrant contradiction avec la Bible prise à la lettre.

La solution est aussi divergente.

Pour les deux femmes, il s'agit de décanoniser le concerné :

TC : Décanonisez-le !!!
Publié le 11 mars 2019 par Christine Pedotti et Anne Soupa
https://www.temoignagechretien.fr/decanonisez-le/

Oui, il s'agit de Lolek.

Pour moi, il suffit de ne pas considérer "François" (Jorge Mario Bergoglio) comme ayant été pape, comme ayant eu l'autorité de canoniser qui que ce soit. Pape Michel II, comme son prédécesseur Michel I, est, en effet, créationniste jeune terre ou présumé tel par le fait de ne pas avoir contredit son prédécesseur. Quand à ce que Le Comité de la Jupe cite (en termes de positions, pas forcément leur description des telles) ... ça fait partie de ce que je trouvais bon quand je le prenais pour étant le pape. Mais bien entendu, en 1988, il n'y avait pas CEC §283, et j'étais encore désensibilisé (par Karl May) pour ce qui concerne Assise en 1986. Lui aussi, mais à l'âge de 66 ans ?

Hans Georg Lundahl
Bibliothèque Pompidolienne
Octave de Toussaint
8.XI.2025

* En cherchant de savoir si "JP-II" appréciait Karl May, je suis tombé sur "le Karl May suisse" ou le prêtre catholique Achermann, Franz Heinrich. Dont un des romans a un titre et un sous-titre assez édifiant pour ceux qui imagineraient que le Déluge de Noé ne serait que l'apanage des Protestants : / 1920. Kannibalen der Eiszeit. Prähistorischer Roman aus den Tagen der Sintflut. German. (Cannibals of the ice age). illustrated by Willy Planck. 200 pp. Olten. O. Walter. (1924, 1935). / Roman préhistorique des temps du ... oui, Déluge.

Hear Robert Sungenis

Steve Ray Criticized Pope Francis in Interview with Matt Fradd......here's a few thoughts on it
Robert Sungenis | 21 Sept. 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-ZD8ODeuEg

The Actual Words of "Francis" Show Him Non-Catholic

Sharing a video by Dimond Brothers:

Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
vaticancatholic.com | 22 sept. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouT4pSo47nM

And also sharing my comments under it:

2:05 As far as I can see, he has just confessed essential Freemasonry, that is, compared to his presumable Catholic Baptism, apostasy.

Wei äm ei nott sörpreist? [Why am I not surprised? spelled in German]

4:29 If he had just said "every religion is a road into the direction to God" it could have passed. False religions are roads with road blocks, and they point to God, since they point to Catholicism.

They also point away from God since they point away from Catholicism.

Catholicism is the road without a road block.

But no, he said "a road to arrive" ... not true at all.

"it would make it impossible 5:29 to consistently present the Catholic 5:31 faith to non-catholics you cannot 5:33 consistently present the Catholic faith 5:35 to Protestants or other non-catholics 5:37 while you regard Francis who preaches a 5:39 false gospel and rejects Catholic dogma 5:42 as a member of the Catholic Church"

I've tried to my loss in Sweden to keep consistence by saying "John Paul II" was Pope, but still not to be followed. As per the position of the SSPX.

There is a reason I left Sweden. No, it was not the police seeking for me suspecting they would have to put me in gaol again (I had defended myself and been acquitted for putative defense first trial, then recaught before leaving the country, then convicted second trial). It was not that psychiatry had grasped after me immediately again. It was that I came again in a position likely to depend on Social Services, which could again have pushed me to a country-side where Catholicism was little known and in practise, once seen, unpopular.

Typical Swede of the country-side:
"You are Catholic? Cool, we are tolerant ... you fast every year? You mean you are a Muslim?"

Another stay in that country-side might have ended with renewed efforts of psychiatry, therefore another occasion I would have needed to defend myself, or isolation, and eventually imposed apostasy. A very old Polish lady was eventually pushed to receive a Lutheran fake communion from a Lutheran female pastor before she died.

6:37 I think the two you have shown might be in the process of reconsidering.

[I hope for their sake they are.]

7:43 The video message may not belong here, he may have spoken of liturgic and devotional traditions within Catholicism.

8:10 On July 16th 1990, in the morning, when six people assembled and Pope Michael I was elected, obviously the see had been vacant for 11 + years since Redemptor Hominis.

The one advantage of diversity between the non-Catholic religions is that the enemies of truth are not united.

John Paul II as some call him seems to have considered the scarlet beast as the only enemy of truth.

In fact, that's just one of the seven heads, while four of the heads are probably parodies of the true Abrahamic religion, these four heads would be leopard heads, and the final beast has the form, not of a scarlet beast, though it is included, but of a leopard.

If you like this format:

Namely links to a video and my comments under it, that is one of the two most used formats on Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere which includes this format in English, as for the other one, quoran answers with or without debate ensuing, and a minor format is debate forum threads. But debate forums seem to be much less in use now than back in the years after 2000.

In languages other than English, you have the same set-up in French in Répliques Assorties and in German on Antworten nach Sorte. For Swedish and Spanish this happens on blogs mixed with normal essay format on the blogs: På Svenska og på Dansk på Antimodernism and En lengua romance en Antimodernism y de mis caminaciones (which also features narrative and poetry, partly in English or French).