Un de deux

1) Des administrateurs à Google France ont voulu prétendre "information sensible" que j'ai beaucoup de lecteurs.
2) Ou, ils ont mis en place un jugement par IA, qui bien entendu ne comprend rien, qui est comparable au filtre de la Bpi qui, il y a quelques années, prétendait que le blog "Red Cardigan" (pull rouge) par une amie, mère et femme catholique anglaise, était "catégorie pornographie" ...

Ceci est la seconde fois que ça m'arrive :

Semaine au 6 octobre 2026

La première était en Septembre :

Semaine au 2 sept. 2026

Je me souviens que Facebook France était géré par administrateurs du Qatar, selon Rivarol.

Serait-ce la même chose avec Google France ?/HGL

Sabotage de courriel

Dans la barre d'adresse :

https://login.mail.com/login#.[...*]-header-login1-1

Dans l'écran en dessous :

{"error":{"status-code":"429","message":"Too Many Requests","request-id":"2e4b49b6b2747a23b734372789aa8553"}}

Ceci ou encore erreu 500 (?) depuis** cette nuit./HGL

---

* J'omets les chiffres, ne sachant pas s'ils pourraient révéler mon compte.
** À l'heure, c'est 16:16, Paris.

12:45, je dormais, et on a pu me remarquer dormir

18:45 moins six heures, c'est 12:45, non ? Regardons quora :

Benachrichtigungen
Frage für Dich vor 6 Std.
oher kommt eigentlich das -r im Präsens der skandinavischen Verben, vgl. schwedisch ger, dänisch giver (ich gebe, Du...
Chuck Muller sucht nach einer Antwort.

Woher kommt eigentlich das -r im Präsens der skandinavischen Verben, vgl. schwedisch ger, dänisch giver (ich gebe, Du gibst, er gibt…)?
Hans-Georg, kannst Du diese Frage beantworten?
Es gibt Interesse an einer hilfreicheren Antwort.

1 Antwort
Stefan Speck
Dr. phil. I, von der Universität Zürich (UZH) (Abschluss: 1978) 6 Std.

C'est assez notable que la même heure que Chuck Muller me le demande, Stefan Speck y répond.

Je n'ignorais pas la réponse donné par M. Speck, que, dans l'indicatif du présent, le -r en deuxième et troisième personnes de l'islandais, voire de la première aussi en suédois, danois, norvégien, voire du pluriel aussi dans les versions strictement contemporaines de ces langues provenait de la deuxième, qui l'a d'un -s par rhotacisme, et je ne m'étonne pas que Chuck Muller lui ait posé la question aussi.

Si j'y répondais, Chuck Muller me reprocherait d'avoir copié M. Speck. Au moins, c'est ce que tel autre a fait assez systématiquement Robert Grandjean, tandis que Markus Kraft a voulu faire la même chose ...

L'idée est de donner l'impression que, entre moi et Stefan Speck, c'est à lui qu'on doit se fier. Ou encore d'imposer à moi des cours de rattrapage en linguistique que je n'avais pas cherchés. De toute manière, surtout pas tolérer que je me désigne comme "Amatörlinguist" sans me le faire payer.

Hier soir j'étais à Cergy. Levels of Stonehenge est signé là-bas. Après la Bibliothèque, j'ai fait des courses et j'ai fait un peu la manche avec un panneau, en fin de compte, j'ai lavé jusqu'à vers 21:00. Le train vers Paris était tout d'abord procrastiné par mouvement social, je me suis apprêté à attendre 41 minutes, et enfin il était supprimé, à cause d'un acte de malveillance. J'ai dû pernocter à Cergy. Le local de banque était bon, mais j'ai été évicté à minuit et quart. Ensuite j'ai constaté que les trains vers Paris n'avaient pas repris. Ensuite une demi-heure avant de trouver un coin abrité du vent. Ensuite la deuxième personne qui entra m'a permis d'entrer. Ensuite il y a eu un va et viens jusqu'à 3 h du matin ou quelque chose. Ensuite, quand je me réveille, c'est si tôt que j'arrive à la boulangerie à 6:20.

J'ai eu besoin de ce sommeil à 12:45. On l'a utilisé pour me décrédibiliser. Comme on m'épuise d'autres manières pour me décrédibiliser. Entretemps, à Cergy, j'ai trouvé hier un graffito disant "Si quieres vivir tu sueño, falta estar despier[to]" ... si tu veux vivre ton rêve, il faut être en éveil.

Il y a une intrigue pour ne pas me permettre de vivre de ma plume, pour me repousser dans la rue. Au moins tant que je ne cherche pas ce réseau, tant que je ne m'y plie pas. Ils semblent être quelque forme de Chrétiens, possiblement des rasta. Un autre graffito, avant, et le même artiste, avait dit "Andas con El qui(en) Es, y El qui(en) Es anda con los qui(enes) son." Probablement pas de Chrétiens qui aiment les Catholiques, par contre.

Stefan Speck, vu qu'il est de l'université de Zurich, peut être par exemple un Zwinglien.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ste Angela Merici
1.VI.2024

Sanctae Angelae Merici Virginis, ex tertio Ordine sancti Francisci; quae fuit Institutrix Societatis Virginum sanctae Ursulae, et ad accipiendam coronam immarcescibilem, sexto Kalendas Februarii a caelesti Sponso vocata est.

Olfeo de la Pompidolienne

Bonjour,

L'accès à l'URL http://www.dk-kogebogen.dk/opskrift2/visopskrift.p est restreint.

Catégorie : UT1 - Adult

Description de la catégorie : Catégorie appartenant à la liste de l'éducation nationale. Des sites adultes allant de l'érotique à la pornographie dure.

http://10.1.2.235:9123/block/?SessionID=1029270937

Il se trouve que "kogebogen" veut dire "le livre de cuisine", "opskrift" veut dire recette (de cuisine), et "koldskol" est un plat dessert danois à base de lait de barette.

Deux hypothèses : soit l'Olféo a une IA très peu I (intelligence artificielle très peu intelligente), soit quelqu'un a délibéremment marqué un des liens à partir de mon blog de recettes comme "adulte" pour me discréditer./HGL

Personal Attacks on youtube comment threads within a week - samples I to IV

New blog on the kid: Personal Attacks on youtube comment threads within a week - samples I to IV · Am I Targetted by Anti-Theists Trying to Destroy my Faith? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Comment on GMS' animosity against Matt Walsh

I and II are linking to specific posts containing the threads. I is later than II, which is more recent than III, which is more recent than IV. III and IV don't have separate posts, so I give the videos and dialogues right here too. Note that when the debate with L P ended is about when the three day coordinated much more views than usual, from US and Germany started.

I

This post

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : Continuing with Bill Garthright
https://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2022/11/continuing-with-bill-garthright.html

Earlier debate with Bill Garthright had been fairly on topic. That was months ago. Then this came:

added

early AM hours of 25.V.2023

P M Toner

@Hans-Georg Lundahl it's cute how you think you are Smarter than a biology professor, kind of like a kid who believes in the Easter bunny

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@P M Toner When did I say I was smarter?

Do you think any claim of oneself being right and the other being wrong on a given topic is a claim of being generally and overall smarter than the other guy?

That's tantamount to saying "he's smarter, hence, believe every word he says!"

Bill Garthright was not lecturing on biology. He was defending a specific ideology.

II

This post

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : I Still Advocate for a Lowering of Marriageable Age, Cases in Point, the Blessed Virgin and the mother of St. Francis of Sales
https://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2023/05/i-still-advocate-for-lowering-of.html

The debate with Tar-Elenion Maranwe

last comment added 13 hours before 3:45 Paris time
first, "1 day ago"

I had blocked him - or her. Before P M Toner came around. I had also told terminaj2 I did not want his (or her) company before Tar-Elenion came around.

III

ending "3 days ago" and beginning "4 days ago"

Video

Atlantis and the Nazis | The Link Between the Legend & the Third Reich | Debunking Atlantis Ep. 3
Lady of the Library, 24 Febr. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqkZp0OLaSs

Initial debate, 3 to 2 months ago

fairly polite:

breadpilled

So excited to watch this! Im constantly trying to explain the dangerous roots of these so called "harmless" conspiracy theories

RumRayven

Tbf, most of the time, in the modern era, when people talk about Atlantis, they are speculating what the original Plato allegory of it could have been alluding to. I've never really heard people ever really give credence to the Ignatius Donnelly stuff.

AlbertaGeek

@RumRayven Really? There are seemingly no end of videos pushing the idea that there was a real Atlantis. They almost always have much higher viewership than actual archaeology channels. The whole LAHT (Lost Ancient High Technology) thing is an industry unto itself.

Peter Windhorst

There is a saying - once you embrace one harmless conspiracy theory, it is not hard to open the doorway for others far less harmless and more dangerous.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

"Im constantly trying to explain the dangerous roots of these so called "harmless" conspiracy theories"

You mean you are a hysteric?

AlbertaGeek

@Hans-Georg Lundahl I personally don't understand how wanting to expose the rotten cores of a seemingly harmless fruit makes someone a "hysteric", but I can understand how a creationist like yourself would see such exposés as a bad thing.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@AlbertaGeek Because Albertasaurus is under no Uintatherium and above no Dimetrodon, meaning you don't have Tertiary or Permian / Triassic?

I personally don't understand how wanting to expose the rotten cores of a seemingly harmless fruit makes someone a "hysteric",

to inform you - the same kind of hysteric who think you are an alcoholic beause you drink a pint of beer each evening. The same hysteric who thinks he can expose Catholicism by the use of Hislop ....

Let's call National Socialism out for the evils it actually had, like Eugenicism!

But not everything that's just half connected with something half connected with something half connected to it.

The New Age type Atlantis myth has its evils - but they are slight in comparison to what I think one should really bother about, and they are excusable in non-Christians who don't really know better - a bit like believing "dinosaurs died 66 million years ago" is pretty innocuous in itself compared to "man evolved from apes" (which is connected to the Atlantis New Ageism and even more closely to the real evils of National Socialism, like, for instance, Eugenics.

Unfortunately for the millions of years, they do tend to make a Biblical time scale about Adam unattainable logically. I've just called out Alex Pismenny on that ... if you want to see his response, if any, watch Assorted retorts on Sunday March 5!

daviga1

@RumRayven affects a Jack Sparrow voice Clearly, you've never watched the 'History' channel

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@Ren Levy When, to whom, and what does that have to do with Atlantis?

Grrrr3(FKAGrrrrGrrrrGrrrr)

@RumRayven haven’t you heard of Graham Hancock? He is probably the most popular Atlantis proponent, he recently had a Netflix series and he goes on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Hancock’s version of the Lost Ancient Civilisation is just an updated version of Donnelly’s. Donnelly claimed that Plato was telling a true story, so there isn’t really a distinction there.

4 to 3 days ago

directed at me, and targetting the mental question, directly:

terminaj2

@Hans-Georg Lundahl what an amazing projection.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@terminaj2 calling "breadpilled" a hysteric?

Not remotely.

I am usually not hysteric about consequences ideas can have.

Except heretical ones, and the demonic ideas behind psychology.

If you had caught me being hysteric against anyone, rather than reacting to the hysteria of breadpilled, you would have had a point.

terminaj2

@Hans-Georg Lundahl riiiiight… your response is showing the opposite.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@terminaj2 have you heard of the term gaslighting?

terminaj2

@Hans-Georg Lundahl you used the term heretical seriously. Nobody should take your opinion on real things seriously.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@terminaj2 But the hysteria of breadpilled somehow should be taken seriously?

You are an enemy of the Catholic Church and of Christ, I do not want your company.

Other

comment of mine:

Hans-Georg Lundahl

6:13 "the first Indo-European language, known as Proto-Indo-European"

I thought you were against dubious science that was used by the NS?

IV

"6 days ago" from "8 days ago", L P, whom I confronted with possible discipleship of Jordan Peterson before terminaj2 came around.

Video

"I went BLIND from stress" w/ Ennie Hickman
Pints With Aquinas, 16 May 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUeUKqdN9dc

My initial comments

2:20 When some evil prayers separated me from the rosary, whether those of family members who are anti-Catholic, or SSPX-ers I didn't want to pray the rosary with (even in a remote spiritual communion) after it became apparent they prayed for my celibacy, not for my marriage, I probably escaped this blindness thanks to hypnosis videos and autohypnosis.

Evil Puritans (Evangelicals and Muslims + their collabos among Catholics, both Novus Ordo and SSPX) are trying to paint me as a man "relaxing too much, when I should work."

I do c. 2000 - 2500 words per day, but under lots more stress than most writers.

Some people consider my writing or my spreading of my writing an attack personally on them, even if I anonymise people who have been mean, or on their community, even if it is one I don't mention very much.

3:35 I think this guy would be a nicer husband and father if he slowed down a bit.

L P

Nicer husband? He seems like an ok guy. Not sure where you’re coming up with this judgement

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P I didn't say he wasn't nice.

I said he could be nicer.

Being able to just chill together seems not on the list for his close one's pleasures.

L P

@Hans-Georg Lundahl what? Why?

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P If he walks with his children, I bet he spends all of the way either running with them or carrying them quickly on his shoulders. Does he ever walk slowly through a park with them?

L P

@Hans-Georg Lundahl how do you know if he doesn’t? Bet??? Judgemental… Is that what Jesus would do? Did Jesus stay close to home, or did he not venture to spread the word.

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P Look, I first of all said I think meaning it was my personal impression.

Second, I didn't remotely say he was an actually bad husband and father, I said he could improve.

Third, I totally based it on his own words about not being able to slow down.

@L P "or did he not venture to spread the word."

He also slowed down very radically each night by praying.

Christian prayer would normally involve some degree of hypnotic state, at least prolonged prayer, which Jesus' prayers were.

L P

@Hans-Georg Lundahl fine. How is your commenting and making far away assumptions supposed to be beneficial to this person, who will likely never see it? Were these comments meant to be productive to him, or did they maybe serve a purpose for you own ego instead?

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P Those are not the only two options.

L P

@Hans-Georg Lundahl it sounds like you could be a nice commenter 🤷‍♂️

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P ha ha ha ...

L P

@Hans-Georg Lundahl are you saying if he slows down to pray, that’s enough? Are you assuming he doesn’t?

@Hans-Georg Lundahl just quick making up a story in your head about this guy just to feel better about whatever it is you’re hoping to feel better about

Hans-Georg Lundahl

@L P "your ego" - "your head" ... are you a disciple of the mainly despicable Jordan Peterson or sth?

Are the Stats Explained by Shadow Banning?

Funny stats ... · Are the Stats Explained by Shadow Banning? · Still down low · Three Month Stats and Six Month Stats Up to St. George's Day

I can imagine more than one reason people could have for shadow banning me.

Not reasonable or legal reasons, but still subjective reasons to them.

I have more than once seen FB blocking me from sharing certain links, then it has relented, then back again. They are not in actual conflict with their policies, as stated on the site, but as the supposed conflicts with policies are reviewed manually, it is easy to cheat if you are in a moderator position.

But after having 3000 / day the last months before Christmas, whereof 2000 from France, and having now around 300 per day, shadow banning, once it is explained, comes to mind:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banning

Let's suppose that Metin Arditi would hope to make me agree to be religious front man for some of the insanities in his latest novel (endorsed by heretical "theologians" from Lausanne and Geneva), he would be aware that, given my Catholic more like Rad Trad convictions, it would take some time to not just persuade me, but to brainwash me into being anywhere near useful.

But it would totally blight such a plan if it became widely known I had previous to that held what I now hold, Catholicism.

Hence, making it less known by shadow banning would be a temptation.

When I said "let's suppose" - I am not saying he actually is in such a plan. I don't know who is. But that kind of plan would be one option. Protestants and Jews concerned with me being the Antichrist (for being Catholic and against Protestantism and Judaism) and trying to give me just another chance would be another option. And Chinese Commies disliking what they see as unwanted and "unreasonable" (even mentally ill) disrespect of their dialectic materialist "wisdom" would be a third. Perhaps even Muslims willing to give me "another chance" would be a fourth.

It's in the nature of shadow banning that the person exposed to it cannot trace the source. I therefore cannot trace the motive in its exact determination, since it would depend on the moderator in question being a more or less liberal (but radically Antichristian) Jew like Metin Arditi or a Fundamentalist Muslim (I heard some of them were in FB France, but research engines = google, other company, other employees, other moderators) or a Chinese Communist. Plus, one of these might obviously use some other of these as front - several different motives could coincide.

An upcoming post (will be made today, probably, but appear for next week), will compare the stats for the last three months (with a total that is then divided by 91 for daily average) with those of last six months (with a total that is then divided by 182 for daily average).

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Epipodius of Lyons
22.IV.2023

Lugduni, in Gallia, sancti Epipodii, qui, in persecutione Antonini Veri, cum Alexandro collega tentus, ibidem, post dira tormenta, martyrium abscissione capitis complevit.

Did Hovind Get His Account Closed For Saying What He Thought About the Earthquake?

Did Hovind Get His Account Closed For Saying What He Thought About the Earthquake? · Youtube Deletes Links? · An enemy of Kent Hovind exposes youtube's evil dealing

I do not know exactly what he said, but I do know that some guys are eager to stamp him as guilty of hate crimes when he isn't (according to older and decent definitions)./HGL

I think I said something about how easy it was to hack a computer owned by Josh Duggar

On the Situation of Josh Duggar · I think I said something about how easy it was to hack a computer owned by Josh Duggar

Look up what Keren Elazari is saying about passwords in the scene analysed from "WARGAMES" (1983) in this video, starting at time signature 16:38 here:

Hacker Rates 12 Hacking Scenes In Movies And TV | How Real Is It?
16th of March 2021 | Insider
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BqpU4V0Ypk

Quora bloqué

J'ai déjà eu ceci dans un autre cyber, hier, seul différence étant quelle langue de quora:

Votre connexion n'est pas privée
Des individus malveillants tentent peut-être de subtiliser vos informations personnelles sur le site de.quora.com (mots de passe, messages ou numéros de carte de crédit, par exemple). En savoir plus
NET::ERR_CERT_DATE_INVALID

Un chiffrement est normalement utilisé sur le site de.quora.com pour protéger vos informations. Lors de la dernière tentative de connexion de Chrome au site de.quora.com, des identifiants inhabituels et incorrects ont été retournés. Il est possible qu'un individu malveillant tente de se faire passer pour de.quora.com ou qu'un écran de connexion Wi-Fi ait interrompu la connexion. Vos informations restent sécurisées, car nous avons arrêté la connexion avant l'échange des données.

Le site de.quora.com est actuellement inaccessible, car il utilise la technologie HSTS. Les erreurs réseau et les attaques sont généralement temporaires. Vous devriez donc pouvoir accéder à cette page plus tard.

Donc, pas de débats ou réponses sur quora, pour l'instant./HGL

PS, ça concerne la production sur mes blogs Antworten nach Sorte, Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere et Répliques Assorties./HGL

I am not into buying a bridge ...

I'll detail what is wrong with this message:

BANK ALERT ABOUT YOUR FUND//1

From: "HSBC London Office" <jmsbfrn@ownmail.net>2

[received] 11/18/2020 at 1:15 AM

[More information]

Reply to: henrybanko1970@yahoo.co.jp 3

To:4

HSBC BANK PLC LONDON.(REGISTERED NO.1026167). ADDRESS: 8 CANADA SQUARE, CANARY WHARF, LONDON E14 5HQ, UK. Attn: Beneficiary, We write to inform you that Series of meetings have been held with the Secretary General of United Nations,U.S Department of State, the meeting ended this week.5 During the meeting we discovered that you have not receive your long overdue part payment of US$21.5M due to past corrupt Government Officials who almost held the funds to themselves for their selfish reason and some individuals who have taken advantage in an attempt to defraud you, which has led to unnecessary delay in releasing the funds to you. The United Nations/ U.S. Department of State have successfully passed a payment mandate to our bank, to clear all over due Contract funds, Lottery winnings, Inheritance/Investment funds owed to you and other individuals/organizations who have been found not to have receive their long overdue payment. A woman by name (MRS: CINDY MAY A CITIZEN OF USA)6 submit an application to our bank stating that you gave her the power of attorney to be the beneficiary of your Outstanding fund. She made us to believe that you are dead and that she is your next of kin. We decided to send you email through this address hoping to find out if you are dead or alive and also to find out if you at any time gave her the power of attorney to represent you, we decided to contact you before we can take any action because of the sensitivity nature of the transaction and the amount of money that is involved: For immediate release of your $21.5M to you legally as the legal recipient if you are alive and did not authorize her at any time, you are required to reconfirm YOUR FULL NAME, CURRENT ADDRESS AND DIRECT CELL PHONE NUMBER7 for onward proceeding on how you are going to receive the said funds legally without any problem either now or in future. Treat as urgent. Yours Sincerely, Mr. Noel Quinn8 HSBC Chief Executive Officer .

Footnotes that show what was wrong:

¹ CAPS ALL OVER THE HEADLINE - real bankers don't do that. Not in the West, at least.
² ownmail.net is hardly the domain name one would use for writing officially from "HSBC London Office"
³ It is very suspicious that the "reply to" mail does another adress than the "from" mail.
⁴ It is equally very suspicious that I am an undisclosed recipient in a letter directed to only such ones.
⁵ It is highly improbable that both the Secretary General of UNO and the US Department of state should participate in one meeting about a bank account. Neither of them is in London, by the way. The grammar of the sequence doesn't quite make clear if it is "and" or if he intended both to be synonymous or if he considered the secretary general was part of the US Department of State, which is ridiculous.
⁶ Bad grammar again, CAPS AGAIN.
⁷ Cell phone numbers don't come - yet - as conditions for doing bank business. If it ever does, that may be part of the final beast system.
⁸ The reply to mail had "henrybanko" and the signature has "Noel Quinn".

Some kind of censorship?

Here is an example of what should not happen:



Not a trace of the fact I replied to that comment. I did. A public sinner not in mortal sin is either an oxymoron (if not fulfilling external criteria for mortal sin, he cannot be a real public sinner) or an act of divination (if not fulfilling the internal criterium of wilful assent, that cannot be known as long as he continues to fulfil the external criteria).

When it did not seem to go through first time, I reposted and it turned out "you seem to have already said that".

Can someone at Nanterre University Library have prevented the comment from going through?

Here is an example of what should happen, when no one here did such a thing:



So is this:



When Heresy pretends to be Tradition by Pedro Gabriel · Published April 3, 2019 · Updated April 3, 2019 https://wherepeteris.com/when-heresy-pretends-to-be-tradition/?unapproved=3934&moderation-hash=497b09f81f4c3631a8165eb289b0c7ac#comment-3934

Btw, here is a little dialogue between me and (among others) Pedro Gabriel:

I

Hans Georg Lundahl

April 3, 2019 at 4:14 pm

“He always sends errors into the world in pairs—pairs of opposites. And he always encourages us to spend a lot of time thinking which is the worse. You see why, of course? He relies on your extra dislike of the one error to draw you gradually into the opposite one. ”

This was noted by Chesterton as well.

A Classic would actually be Sabellius and after him Paul of Samosata with Arius.

“So, while it is true we should hold on to tradition in order to avoid falling prey of novelties which have nothing to do with Christian doctrine, it is also sadly true that clinging too much to tradition can result in a kind of idolatry. ”

It so happens, to Chesterton it was precisely tradition – certainly interpreted through the magisterium, but through a magisterium serving tradition, which helped us escape falling into either of twin opposite errors.

Pedro Gabriel

April 3, 2019 at 4:30 pm

Precisely. Tradition and Magisterium are two interconnected and inseparable entities. But I’m not the one claiming that they exist apart from each other so that you can pit one against the other. And neither is Chesterton.

Hans Georg Lundahl

[Your comment is awaiting moderation. This is a preview, your comment will be visible after it has been approved.]

April 4, 2019 at 8:17 am

Neither am I, I am no longer SSPX.

You are asking Catholics to reject SSPX (which is probably correct, as long as they retain a position no longer connected to a realistic hope one of modern “Popes” will say “my bad”) and instead chose obedience to “Pope Francis” or obedience to either of Pope Michael or the more realistics antipope Alexander IX.

II

Ashpenaz

April 3, 2019 at 3:52 pm

Doctrine doesn’t change, but as new information comes in, we see the deposit of faith more clearly. The Church used to teach that the earth was the center of the universe; as new information came in, She taught that the sun was the center. The doctrine didn’t change; the Church simply had information she didn’t have before.

I think the same will happen with contraception and same-sex relationships. I don’t think the current teachings are wrong, per se; they are poorly informed. We have a better scientific understanding of sexuality than did Paul, Augustine, Aquinas, and even Paul VI. The best peer-reviewed science tells us that homosexual orientation is inborn and irreversible. Social science has documented the quality of gay relationships and families led by same-sex parents. The laity, based on polls, is clearly hearing the Holy Spirit on this issue much faster than the hierarchy. Based on that, I believe that once the bishops take full consideration of all the relevant scientific data, they will find that the deposit of faith has always contained the teaching that homosexual acts are licit within a lifelong, monogamous same-sex relationship. It won’t be a new teaching–it will a development of our understanding which will be seen to be in continuity with tradition–similar to what we have seen with usury, slavery, and the death penalty.

Pedro Gabriel

April 3, 2019 at 4:24 pm

Science can’t pronounce itself on whether a certain behavior is sinful or not. Sinfulness is not a scientifically measurable attribute, but rather a moral and a spiritual one.

Hans Georg Lundahl

April 3, 2019 at 4:28 pm

“The best peer-reviewed science tells us that homosexual orientation is inborn and irreversible.”

Not even true.

The only orientation which is known to be stable is heterosexual.

Homos become bis and bis become exclusive heteros, for instance by marriage. And passing through bi is not necessary.

Pete Vickery

April 3, 2019 at 11:38 pm

Science used to teach that the earth was the center of the universe. The Ptolemaic model existed for over 1000 years and was the scientific consensus. It took an unknown Catholic cleric (Nicolaus Copernicus) to quietly state in his work De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the universe. This was decades before Galileo. We now know that neither the sun nor the earth are the center of the universe although Copernicus was closer to the truth since the sun is the center of our solar system. Copernicus sent a copy of his work to Pope Paul III. The Church was interested but also attentive to the scientific consensus that had not yet changed. Regardless of all this, the idea that science had proffered and the Church concurred with (Ptolemy’s Theory) had nothing to do with faith or morals. Pope Francis may be dead wrong about global warming yet this will have zero impact on doctrinal or dogmatic teachings of the church. Whatever science finds out about homosexuality may or may not be accepted by the Church. But whether the Church believes the scientific consensus or not does not imply that the Church accepts the licitness of the homosexual act.

Hans Georg Lundahl

"Science used to teach that the earth was the center of the universe."

Why would that be wrong?

"Whatever science finds out about homosexuality may or may not be accepted by the Church. But whether the Church believes the scientific consensus or not does not imply that the Church accepts the licitness of the homosexual act."

How many "in the Church" are already saying it is illicit for a homosexual to try to get married - to someone of the opposite sex?

I Tim 4:3

III

carn

April 3, 2019 at 10:17 pm

You asked a question, so you deserve an answer:

“Where does it say, in any authoritative document (emphasis on the word “authoritative”), that the faithful should prooftext Church documents against past magisterial teachings, and that if they find an alleged contradiction with the Magisterium of the current Pope, they can dismiss it and disobey him?”

https://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?id=55

” I am astonished that you are so promptly turning away from the one who called you in the grace of Christ and are going over to a different gospel-

7 not that it is another gospel; except that there are trouble-makers among you who are seeking to pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But even if we ourselves or an angel from heaven preaches to you a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let God’s curse be on him.

9 I repeat again what we declared before: anyone who preaches to you a gospel other than the one you were first given is to be under God’s curse.”

That Church document has been repeatedly confirmed to be authoritative since about 1600 years.

Accordingly, it is Catholic teaching that if catholics, priests, bishops, cardinals, popes, saints, apostels and/or angels or any other creature (besides maybe Christ himself) come along and preach a gospel different from the gospel taught before, the faithful should stick with the gospel taught before.

The only mean available for the faithful to determine whether some gospel taught now is different from the one before is their own mind, heart and prayer.

As furthermore the Church authoritatively teaches at least as long that “Let your ‘Yes’ mean ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No’ mean ‘No.'” one can presume that any new gospel wherein something formerly being “yes” is now a “no” – or in other words contradicts the old gospel – is candidate for rejection by the faithful.

Accordingly, the Church has authoritatively taught and still teaches that if any catholic, priest, bishop, cardinal, pope, saint, apostle or angel teaches something contradicting prior teaching, faithful are to reject it. Accordingly, the faithful have the duty to “prooftext Church documents against past magisterial teachings” if there is indication that such a thing might be going on, to determine whether there is some new gospel is preached in contradiction to the old one.

The only thing absolutely exempt from such prooftexting are ex cathedra items.

And that of course does not change that there is with such prooftexting the risk of falling oneself to a false gospel, e.g. when one gets the gospel preached so far wrong.

Declarations of the catholics, priests, bishops, cardinals, popes, saints, apostles and/or angels that although they preach a new gospel different from the old one that there is no contradiction between their new gospel and the old one are obviously null and void, as the respective catholic, priest, bishop, cardinal, pope, saint, apostle and/or angel is to be under God’s curse, which obviously implies that his/her declarations have no longer authority.

Pedro Gabriel

April 4, 2019 at 4:49 am

There is nothing in that quote saying that you should prooftext the Magisterium so that if you think you find an alleged contradiction with previous magisterial documents you can dismiss the teachings.

That is your personal spin on that biblical quote. Surpisingly, it is also incredibly similar to the spin from Protestants, who use that same quote repeatedly to resist the teachings of the Pope.

The difference is that they are consistent in applying it. They don’t say that ex cathedra documents are exempt from this like you do. Why should they? Why shouldn’t we prooftext past teaching (namely Scripture) to find alleged contradictions with ex cathedra pronouncements and reject them if we find them contradictory? Why not prooftext the Immaculate Conception dogma with the “everyone has sinned and fallen from grace from God” biblical quote?

In fact, what the Church has traditionally taught is that this St. Paul quote *can’t* be used to justify a faith based on personal interpretation apart from the Church. To claim otherwise is indeed a “new gospel” that should, per St. Paul’s quote, be rejected.

In the meantime I note with interest that you have gone from “I don’t really know what the Pope teaches since it is unclear, so I’m not dissenting” to “We can dissent if we prooftext past magisterial teachings and think we found a contradiction”. But the latter, besides having no magisterial backing (as you have not been able to provide apart from a Protestantized reading of a biblical quote taken out of context) is much more wrong and harmful to the faith than giving communion to divorced and remarried not in mortal sin, or than saying that the death penalty is not admissible today.

Hans Georg Lundahl

[Your comment is awaiting moderation. This is a preview, your comment will be visible after it has been approved.]

April 4, 2019 at 11:36 am

Session IV of Trent has “contra eum sensum, quem tenuit et tenet sancta mater Ecclesia, cuius est iudicare de vero sensu et interpretatione Scripturarum Sanctarum,” therefore the magisterium is bound to its past.

In the case you both admit a contradiction with the tenuit part and an actual magisterial tenet of that contradiction, one of your admissions needs to be wrong.

I can respect the stance “I remain wrong, because I don’t know which of two possible rights is the right one”, like a High Church Anglican not sure whether to become Catholic or Orthodox.

Just because your opponent needs to be wrong on one of two points, it need not be the one where he contradicts you, it can be the one where he agrees with you – as I think is the case with SSPX and yourself.

Should NZ Have Exiled the Christchurch Mosque and Attending Members?

New blog on the kid : Should NZ Have Exiled the Christchurch Mosque and Attending Members? · Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl : News Correspondence after Christchurch

I don't agree with the shooting.

But, I just found out, "the Mosque had radicalised" two men who became Jihadist terrorists.

A man basically radicalises himself whichever way he wants, and not always in bloody ways.

However, in this case, two men, "al-Qaida recruit Daryl Jones, killed by a drone, and Christopher Havard," became terrorists after attending Al Noor Mosque in Christchurch, the one where Tarrant committed a killing spree.

I have this news from United Nelsonia, a nationalist organisation promoting independence for Nelson Province, which seems to have been annexed to New Zealand during 19th Century. In other words, they are close neighbours to where this happened, they have ambitions which would normally keep them from flat out lying about things, so, presumably this is true.

Quoting the next words:

The boys were in Yemen with the guys who trained the Charlie Hebdo killers. A 2014 story at Stuff.co.nz (now scrubbed from the internet) quotes a mosque attendee who says, “A visiting speaker from Indonesia talked about violent jihad and plenty shared his views.” Three questions: How many news reports have you read these details in? If you’d known that this mosque was a terrorist factory, would it have changed your feelings about the news at all? Finally, how does it make you feel to learn that the media has been not just ignoring these facts but deleting stories to hide them over the past 24 hours?

I am glad I did not consider all the killed Mosque attendants as "innocent", except they are so in a normal penal procedure.

When it comes to immigrants of Muslim religion, I consider it possible and not over the top to expel a local community from which grave repeated misdemeanors or even felonies (of anti-majority hatred) have been perpetrated.

Now, to the three questions:

How many news reports have you read these details in?

It is now, as I write this line, 26.III.2019, 11 days after the shooting on Friday 15.III.2019. United Nelsonia, giving its FB presence some news stories, is the first medium which tells me this side of the story.

If you’d known that this mosque was a terrorist factory, would it have changed your feelings about the news at all?

I still feel bad about the shooting, but one could readily imagine a just government in Christchurch taking the attendants into custody, giving them choice of destinations in Muslim countries, giving them trustees for selling their property in Christchurch, and sending them away on planes quickly after the original news about Daryl Jones and Christopher Havard became known.

Finally, how does it make you feel to learn that the media has been not just ignoring these facts but deleting stories to hide them over the past 24 hours?

Supposing United Nelsonia is honest on this issue, this seems a major move to media dishonesty.

I don't "feel" much, I think modern media can on some levels be expected to do this.

But here is one media outlet which has not deleted its reference:

Al Qaeda video shows NZ drone victims
4:56 pm on 21 April 2016
https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/world/302047/al-qaeda-video-shows-nz-drone-victims
Copyright © 2016, Radio New Zealand

Now one detail.

The news on United Nelsonia's page is from March 18. It cites verbatim a note by Milo Yiannopoulos from March 16. But the image under Milo's comment is not of the two men, the image under United Nelsonia's post is, and so is the Radio New Zealand article's image.

Between Milo on March 16 and United Nelsonia on March 18, there is a news story from March 17:

Milo Yiannopoulos Claims Christchurch Mosque Had Links to Radical Islam
Sputniknews : Asia & Pacific
13:56 17.03.2019(updated 13:59 17.03.2019)
https://sputniknews.com/asia/201903171073315161-milo-yiannopoulos-al-noor-mosque-radicalism-report/

It does not feature the image of the two men. It does not quote Milo's three questions (which I started out answering before I knew they were Milo's). So, United Nelsonia has to have accessed Milo's post either directly or via Sputniknews (which did not, in its present shape, it was updated, quote all of it). But he has also to have accessed (and can easily have done so) the image on that article on Radio New Zealand.

This implies, he knew of at least one news medium which was not covering and deleting references to the fact.

And he is still accepting the story that :

the media has been not just ignoring these facts but deleting stories to hide them over the past 24 hours?

I was going to ask if he was robotically repeating what he had been told, despite evidence to the contrary. But there is another possibility. How many other stories have been deleted, if this one is still there? He said "deleting stories" - indefinite as to exactly how many - not deleting all of them.

I did notice trying to save a backup for the story of RNZ on webcitation, and failing:



I also got no webcite to my given mail, just checked that too.

Sputniknews has this comment:

He cited a 2014 story by news site Stuff.co.nz (now deleted, an archived copy is available here). It reported that two young Australian men, Daryl Jones and Christopher Havard, were radicalised by preachers at Al-Noor.

And the archived copy is this link:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140727140346/www.stuff.co.nz/world/middle-east/10310496/A-Kiwi-lads-death-by-drone

And - like webcite a bit - web archive is not showing anything but a white page:



So, there is at least some blacking that is being done on at least the level of internet.

I don't see eye to eye with United Nelsonia on all things, like their/his age limits (they are on the 18 years trip), but I think they have told some important things in regards to this affair. No, you can't shoot people just because some guys years ago became terrorists among them, but government can put such communities into planes away from New Zealand or whereever.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St Castulus, martyr
26.III.2019

Romae, via Lavicana, sancti Castuli Martyris, qui, cum esset zetarius Palatii et hospes Sanctorum, a persecutoribus tertio appensus, tertio auditus, et, in confessione Domini perseverans, missus est in foveam, ac, dimissa super eum massa arenaria, martyrio coronatus est.

Update: It seems, there were two Mosques in Christchurch, both Al Noor and the Linwood mosque.

The peace from RNZ does not state (as it is now) which mosque the two men went to. I have a vague memory of it saying Al Noor when I posted link, but just to make sure, I asked the people over at the Mosque which Mosque it was the two men had "converted" to Islam./HGL

Or, are. Both are still there./HGL

Si Russie et Ukraine manipulent le lectorat ailleurs?

Si Russie et Ukraine manipulent le lectorat ailleurs? · Italie aussi, peut-être? · C'est très embêtant avec les gens qui essaient d'évaluer si je suis pathologiquement crédule

27 janv. 2019 15:00 – 28 janv. 2019 14:00

1390 cinq posts (278 exactement par post)
1391 Russie + Ukraine pardon ... ça vient de changer:

915 0900 15
501 1400 16 1416

283 * 5 = 1415

États-Unis 14
France 4
Allemagne 3 (21 les trois)

21 janv. 2019 15:00 – 28 janv. 2019 14:00

États-Unis 2514
Allemagne 36
France 34 2584 les trois

Ukraine 1510
Russie 1040 2550 les deux

510 0500
509 1000 09
508 1500 17
503 2000 20
489 2490 29 2519 (autour de 500 par post)

2519 dernière semaine
1390 dernières 24 h
1129 avant dans la semaine (cinq messages)

Ou peut-être:

2519 dernière semaine
1415 dernières 24 h
1104 avant dans la semaine (cinq messages)

2550 dernière semaine
1416 dernières 24 h
1134 avant dans la semaine (Ukraine et Russie)

Fin d'analyse numérique des statistiques, pour l'instant.

C'est assez probable que la Russie et l'Ukraine ont dans la semaine passée vu 30 autres pages-vues et encore les plus que 2500 vues sur les cinq messages.

Ceux-ci n'ont pas beaucoup de contenu, donc, quelques milliers qui regardent ces messages là et pas d'autres peuvent après dire que je fais des blogs sans avoir rien à dire.

En plus, avec seulement 30 autres vues de Russie et d'Ukraine, c'est probable que de ces messages, ils sont sortis du blog, qu'ils ont donc augmenté le bounce rate - le taux de rebond, des internautes qui viennent au blog et aussitôt rebondissent dehors. Ce taux influence les logiciels de recherche et contribue donc à ce que mon blog ici-même soit moins souvent vu en top d'une recherche google. Ce qui a pu contribuer à la diminution des visiteurs des États-Unis, sauf que 2333 de ceux-ci se retrouvaient dans un seul jour - aussi un signe de lecture très concertée.

Qu'est-ce que c'est donc probablement passé?

• 1) un article intéresse le lectorat américain, surtout un certain lectorat
• 2) qui s'organise un jour pour lire et faire des constats
• 3) et ensuite signalent les choses à un lectorat russe qui utilise les cinq messages pour baisser la probabilité que des gens regardent mon blog principal.

Regardons ce qui se passait avant la dernière semaine, prenons le dernier mois.

30 déc. 2018 – 28 janv. 2019

742 0700 040 02 2900
644 1300 080 06 0280
625 1900 100 11 0023
594 2400 190 15 3203 (cinq messages)
578 2900 280 23

Russie Ukraine :

2406 2400 06
1730 4100 36 4136

Sauf la dernière semaine?

3203
2519
0684 (cinq messages)

4136
2550
1586 (Russie et Ukraine)

1586
0684
0902

Donc, pendant les premier 23 des dernier 30 jours, Russie et Ukraine ont regardé 902 autres pages du blog (page d'accueil, autres posts, messages). Alors, reconstruisons la séquence un peu.

• 1) un article intéresse le lectorat russe et ukrainien, surtout un certain lectorat qui alerte enfin les États-Unis
• 2) un article intéresse le lectorat américain, surtout un certain lectorat alerté par la Russie ou par l'Ukraine
• 3) qui s'organise un jour pour lire et faire des constats
• 4) et ensuite signalent les choses à un lectorat russe qui utilise les cinq messages pour baisser la probabilité que des gens regardent mon blog principal.

Par contre, notons, une semaine, c'est quand j'ai écrit sur l'ADN de la Reine martyr, et ça vient de hausser les statistiques de lecteurs./HGL

Mise à jour:

29 janv. 2019 11:00 – 30 janv. 2019 10:00

Top six	5 messages		Ru+Ukr
Ukraine 990	309	1500	990
Russie 546	308	+ 21	546
États-Unis 19	307	+ 17	1536
Allemagne 8	307	1538
Irlande 8	307
France 5

1538 pour les 5 messages est presque égal à 1536 de Russie et Ukraine ensemble. Soit, Russie et Ukraine comprennent des gens qui se sont mis ensemble pour regarder justement les cinq messages, soit il y a pas mal de gens là qui imaginent que ce soit une chose très étonnante que ça existe, ce que je ne crois pas, soit un autre pays ou d'autres pays ensemble s'organisent pour lire les 5 messages à peu près aussi souvent que les Russes et Ukrainiens consultent le blog. Une explication plus banale me frappe, peut-être des Russes et Ukrainiens arrivent au blog à travers ces cinq messages ... il a quand même un url plus court que les urls entiers de ces messages./HGL

Vérifions encore:

30 janv. 2019 09:06 – 30 janv. 2019 11:05
Blogs from Countries Where I have Readers, part II... 17
Guest Book Back Up / Livre d'Or de Réserve 17
Blogs from Countries Where I have Readers, part I,...17
Blogs from Countries Where I have Readers, part IV...17
Blogs from Countries Where I have Readers, part II...17
(les cinq messages, ensemble 85, car 5*17)
If the Quotes are Genuine, I am Glad I did NOT Dir... 1
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2017/10/if-quotes-are-genuine-i-am-glad-i-did.html

30 janv. 2019 09:08 – 30 janv. 2019 11:07

Ukraine 65
Russie 20 (65+20=85!)
États-Unis 1
Uruguay 1

Encore une mise à jour.

Regardons les statistiques pour une semaine:



Les cinq posts en total 6182 pages-vues. Russie et Ukraine ensemble 6178 pages-vues. Serait-ce ma faute, pour avoir un widget qui annonce les messages faisant mouche?



Enfin, les lecteurs de Russie et d'Ukraine pourraient simplement avoir voulu regarder les messages ayant fait mouche?

Bon, alors, pourquoi donc si peu sur St Augustin comme géocentrique et créationniste jeune terre? Pourquoi si peu sur CMI et sa prétendue réfutation du géocentrisme? Pourquoi si peu sur le problème si la terre pourrait orbiter le soleil après 4,5 milliards d'années? Pourquoi si peu sur ma réponse à Alec McAndrew? Là, on pourrait imaginer que les Russes et Ukrainiens sont très lavés de cerveaux avec le diamat et que, donc, ils évitent mes écrits géocentriques par "gentillesse" ... Et pourquoi si peu sur Il vous est arrivé de plier un papier? Ils pourraient être systématiquement mauvais en français (en plus, celle-ci arrive parfois en tête des statistiques aussi). Il serait donc possible que des lecteurs en Russie et Ukraine sont simplement nuls.

Mais il se peut aussi qu'ils calculent de tenir en tête les cinq messages pour empêcher que le widget sorte le message qui vient après la réponse à Alec MacAndrew en popularité. L'ours a l'air balourd, ça ne veut pas dire qu'il est trop balourd pour faire une bonne chasse .../HGL

Le résultat a été une popularité "cultivé" à très long terme.



Sur blogger, toute période veut dire toute période à partir de mai 2010. Or, ce blog n'existe pas si longtemps que ça.

Ça dit, les cinq messages ont chacun beaucoup plus de visiteurs que les "pages" qui ont été annoncés à partir d'onglets sur le blog et ceux-ci entourent environ les messages 6 et 7 sur la colonne des messages./HGL

Trying to Sign for Zodhiates and Failing

On the Holy Family as Refugees · Trying to Sign for Zodhiates and Failing · As Said - Will Trump do the Right Thing?

Click to enlarge this picture for full text:



Some may think it's imprudent on my part to show the email hgl@dr.com - but no, it's my so to speak public communications email.

But the really funny thing is, while it is the email the petition was sent to - it says in red:

Email is not accepting messages from us.

This is the first time this happens with this email (or others that I recall).

That said, I think YOU should sign for Zodhiates.

Here is the email to the petition:

https://lifepetitions.com/petition/zodhiates-scotus-vote

Please sign, since I can't! Not right now, at any rate!/HGL

Internet Problems

First look at this:



Then at this:



The five precise messages which have been seen more than other ones on this blog are ones that lead out.

Is Russia the one big reader of these five?

Is it to increase my "bounce rate" (if you are not too much into internet, this means how often a first view is followed by a "bounce" - no second page fromsame site)? Or is it bc they are astonished I actually know where I have readers?/HGL

Is Paul Joseph Watson Right?

Here is what he says:

Nationalism, patriotism, populism, and Christianity are all now being treated as “hateful” by Big Tech.

These companies then engage in a form of legalese where they assert they are not banning people for their personal or political opinions, but because of violations of terms of service.

But the truth is that merely holding and expressing nationalist, populist, patriotic or Christian opinions and beliefs is deemed a “violation” because such beliefs have been subjectively defined as “hateful”.

For example, PayPal announced it was banning Infowars last week because Infowars had “promoted hate and discriminatory intolerance”.

In real terms, this meant that we had opposed the teaching of transgenderism to young children in schools and criticized political Islam.

Here is where he says it:

Big Tech Has Defined Conservatism as “Hate Speech”
Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - September 24, 2018
https://www.infowars.com/big-tech-has-defined-conservatism-as-hate-speech/

And, H/T to Lisa Haven!

IT Lesson for Roger Buck

In pictures. I am sorry, I cannot add an invisible space or indivisible space to the html, but subtracting the final l will give a similar effect.*

Here I go to the url of one post, but taking away a final l:



(In case you try to open one with such an invisible space after, you will instead have a funny series of characters after the l, in which case, take them away, click again).

See to it that the post url now ends in html (with l and without anything after), click go to:



This is VERY, and I mean VERY simple. To get to any page on the web, you need the right signs, not one too many, nor one too few.

If you really can't learn it, ask your daughter or son or granddaughter or grandson for help. Communication on internet should not depend on the incompetence of you and your likes.

One could somewhat imagine, you keep young people out of it on purpose, then make yourself as awkward as possible on purpose, in order to tell me I fail to communicate./HGL

* This refers to part of our dialogue. I had been telling him, if he came to a "no such page" he should look at the url for adding of an invisible space (which would have in url in adress bar no longer have been invisible, but which would have needed fixing). Here this dialogue is published, with some comment on his video:

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : On Ireland with Roger Buck
http://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2018/07/on-ireland-with-roger-buck.html

There you also find the four links to blogs on Irish Referendum ...

Update: here are funny signs like "invisible space" or sth actually caught in action, on another site:



And here is same URL without the funny signs at the end:

Someone Else Has Difficulties : Life Site News

They asked for prayers : + JMJ

Here is the news in my mail:



I get one more "authentification demand" as I am preparing this:



Note, this is coming as there is an upcoming Referendum on Ireland./HGL

Deepfake - a Technology Open for Abuse

Deepfake Videos Are the Future of Porn Scandals
https://www.facebook.com/Vocativ/videos/1961281300550762/

There are other possible abuses than porn, I could have been victim of a faked footage.

Here is a real footage of me, I complained about it being shortened to cut out some parts of what I said to selectively support the written conclusion, but the parts where I speak are real:

Conversation with Hans-Georg Lundahl
Edoardo Rossi | Ajoutée le 20 oct. 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uDy8_qHpEc

Here are my comments:

HGL's F.B. writings : A Heavily Edited Video with me - and my Comments to Editor thereof.
https://hglsfbwritings.blogspot.com/2012/10/a-heavily-edited-video-with-me-and-my.html

But, apart from the complaints of the video being too short and cutting stuff out, it is the only video with me that I have authorised.

Other videos with me could be either deepfake's or taken without my approval. If deepfakes, it should be somewhat difficult - I hope! - to make them speak and move facial musculature like me, but that could come as well.

Internet is a great place for getting truths out. Some are bent on making it seem unreliable. But a deepfake video need not be on the web, it could be presented as a genuine non-web footage./HGL

PS, obviously a footage on which I show a blog of mine is as welcome to me as a photo of it. Like the footage in above around 19 seconds:



Unfortunately, the short link for the first link, by someone else (so as not to promote myself alone, I sometimes did and do that), has gone down. While o-x.fr exists, it has closed down my short links./HGL

Il y a des gens qui aiment véhiculer la mensonge qu'on ne peut pas maîtriser une langue couramment sens l'avoir comme la seule

Ou au moins comme une des langues d'enfance.

Alain Sanders pourrait dire que son arabe est aussi une langue d'enfance, et son français aussi.

Mais que dire alors du français de gens comme:

Jeanne Smits (Néerlandaise, née à Londres), Hugues Kéraly (Hongrois - à moins que le nom soit pris comme nom de plume), Serge de Beketch (RIP) (bon, il pourrait dire que les aristos russes sont bilingues en français ... ou que c'étaient ses parents qui émigraient), l'abbé Bryan Houghton (RIP / priez pour nous) (Anglais - bon, il a été en France comme enfant un peu).

Ou de l'anglais de certains Suédois ou Autrichiens avec lesquels je suis moins d'accord comme Nick Bostrom (de vrai nom Boström, probablement Niklas ou truc ou machin) ou peut-être davantage (je n'ai pas encore lu Walter Ullmann, tous les titres, d'ailleurs, en anglais).

Non, l'idée est farfelue, sauf pour un facteur : le citoyen lambda d'un grand pays d'une grande langue surtout (comme de l'anglais, du français et ainsi de suite) ne se met que rarement à apprendre les langues étrangères avec une vraie fougue. Donc, le résultat reste médiocre.

Ensuite, ils prêtent cette limitation aux autres, avec de la pseudo-empathie.

Ceci dit parce que par hasard (ou comme par hasard) je tombe sur des questions comme celle-ci.*

Et par hasard c'est la même journée que je tombe sur une question par Antoine Bourgois**

Et par hasard (ou comme si ...) je me trouve dans la position d'un écrivain surtout bilingue anglais et français qui n'ai aucune des deux langues comme langue d'enfance. Parfois, je ne crois pas vraiment au hasard dans ces trucs là.

Hans Georg Lundahl
BU de Nanterre
St. Timothée d'Éphèse
24.I.2018

Et, PS, si je fais une erreur, je suis capable de la corriger (des gens qui aime -> qui aiment)./HGL

* "Is it true that no matter how many languages you can speak, at the end of the day you can only be truly native, like fluent in one language?" ** "Recommandez-vous à tout le monde de se mettre à écrire ? Qu’est-ce que cela apporte ?"