Don't Do It Again, Prevost!

John Paul II's Assisi Prayer Meeting - The Apocalyptic Sign & How It May Affect Your Salvation
vaticancatholic.com | 25 Sept. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ms366iNhUM

Ukraine May Convert Russia, If Hrushiv is Genuine They Will. Russia Needs It

From Moscow With Malice: Russia’s Christ Mask Exposed
Fr. Jason Charron | 12 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or_2PrvfpTM

Cheapest Method to do Black Magic

Obviously, any way of doing black magic, or for that matter even "white magic" will damage your soul.

In some cases, when those who make the distinction consider the task as black, it will probably be somewhat costly and painful as well.

Do Satanic warlocks, do Wiccan witches have an easier way to get such things done?

I think they do and have used it. It is making Catholic priests or "Catholic priests" do it for you.*

How so? Well, no, I don't mean priest totally that corrupt that they will take a bribe to pray for someone's damage.

I mean such people would try to convince the priest that the prayers would really be for someone's correction or benefit or keeping him out of harm or sth.

Why do I think this may have happened to me? Because things have been going wrong for quite a while, and if they are getting better, I'm bad at seeing it, and I don't think I gave that much of an opening to actual demons./HGL

---

* In case the ordination is invalid, the parishioners are likely to include people who can pray because they think their priest is Catholic and validly ordained and should be obeyed.

St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

Spielberg Wants Me to Second Guess My Religion, or So I Have Been Told on FB · St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

When it comes to "aliens", for a long time, psychiatry has held the forefront. Hallucination plus delusion. Needs treatment.

Recently, there is a pushback. Doubly.

UFO-logists are saying "you weren't ill, you met a person from an exo-planet." Christians are saying "you weren't ill, you saw a demon having taken visible form."

Psychiatry obviously is not happy with either approach.

And it seems they have now support from McElroy.

How so? Here is an intro to a video by Anthony Stine:

And then the Cardinal McElroy* in Washington basically said he violated the church's teaching on exorcisms and demonic
0:54 possessions or anything, but then he didn't exactly explain how.

My hunch on how is the rule:

According to the Vatican's guidelines issued in 1999, "the person who claims to be possessed must be evaluated by doctors to rule out a mental or physical illness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism_in_the_Catholic_Church

In other words, McElroy wants people already bothered by (not possessed by) demonic "aliens" to be further bothered by shrinks before they can get an exorcist to pray for them even just for protection.

Washington Diocese would be again an example of "get out of her" ...
/HGL

* Had to restore the correct name, which AI didn't transscribe correctly.

Does the Pretended Successor of St. Ambrose Belong in Italy?

Italy expelled a Muslim preacher residing in Brescia to Pakistan, where he is from · Was I Saying Islam Was Quite OK? No. · Does the Pretended Successor of St. Ambrose Belong in Italy?

Corpus Christi Procession BANNED Because It Might Offend Tourists
Return To Tradition | 17 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odbz_FY4O-8

Is there any way that Mario Delpini could be expelled to Abu Dhabi?

Faced with people like him, loads of Muslims are likely to conclude that actual Catholics are a violent rough bunch who can decently be treated roughly, and poopooed if they try to make criminal complaints.

Like how it apparently already is in France./HGL

PS, OK, I'm just halfway through, maybe I should have heard all of the video first, but above is my general impression./HGL

St. Robert Bellarmin vs FSSPX

Pour répondre à une question cette nuit : qu'est-ce que je reproche au "Vatican" ? · La thése sédévacantiste totaliste exige une élection d'urgence · St. Robert Bellarmin vs FSSPX

Objection contre le sédévacantisme : « saint Robert Bellarmin a dit qu’on ne peut pas déposer un pape »
8 novembre 2016 | vaticancatholique.com
https://www.vaticancatholique.com/bellarmin-resister-au-pape/

Ce qu'on cite en faveur de "reconnaître et résister" est :

St. Robert Bellarmin, De romano pontifice, L. II, ch. 29 : « De même qu'il est licite de résister au Pontife qui attaque le corps, de même il est licite de résister celui qui attaque les âmes ou détruit l'ordre civil ou, surtout, qui essaie de détruire l’Église. Je dis qu’il est licite de lui résister en ne faisant pas ce qu’il ordonne et en entravant l’exécution de sa volonté. Il n’est cependant pas licite de le juger, de le punir ou de le déposer. »

Pas juste que dans le chapitre suivant, St. Robert Bellarmin dit qu'un pape manifestement hérétique est auto-déposé et peut être jugé (comme le va argumenter l'un ou l'autre des frères Dimond).

St. Robert Bellarmin, De romano pontifice, II, 30 : « Car, en premier lieu, il est prouvé avec des arguments d'autorité et de raison que l'hérétique manifeste est ipso facto déposé. L'argument d'autorité se fonde sur saint Paul (Tite 3:10), qui stipule que l'hérétique doit être évité après deux avertissements, c’est-à-dire, après s'être montré manifestement obstiné — ce qui signifie avant toute excommunication ou sentence judiciaire. Et c'est ce qu’écrit saint Jérôme, ajoutant que les autres pécheurs sont exclus de l'Église par sentence d'excommunication, mais les hérétiques s'exilent et se séparent eux-mêmes, par leur propre acte, du corps du Christ. »

Mais aussi, en connection avec ceci, on ne précise pas de la part de la Fraternité de St. Pie X pour combien de temps qu'on peut considérer quelqu'un encore (probablement) pape et déjà (manifestement) à résister.

Parce que, juste en supposant qu'il s'agisse d'une question doctrinale, il y a une différence entre un dérapage par ignorance, pas répété après d'être critiqué, et une obstination en fausse doctrine.

Jean XXII se trouvait en erreur en niant la vision béatifique des saints dès le jugement de l'âme menant à la gloire, mais une fois qu'on avait dit "ceci est hérétique" il promettait d'étudier la question et dans l'article extrême, il abjurait son erreur et son successeur dogmatisa la vérité contraire. Et ici est à noter que la doctrine n'avait pas encore été érigé en dogme avant cette erreur du pape Jean XXII.

Par contraste, ça fait déjà 4 hommes qui, dès 1992, sont censés être papes et qui tiennent à ceci :

§283
La question des origines du monde et de l'homme fait l'objet de nombreuses recherches scientifiques qui ont magnifiquement enrichi nos connaissances sur l'âge et les dimensions du cosmos, le devenir des formes vivantes, l'apparition de l'homme. Ces découvertes nous invitent à admirer d'autant plus la grandeur du Créateur, de lui rendre grâce pour toutes ses oeuvres et pour l'intelligence et la sagesse qu'il donne aux savants et aux chercheurs. Avec Salomon, ceux-ci peuvent dire: «C'est Lui qui m'a donné la science vraie de ce qui est, qui m'a fait connaître la structure du monde et les propriétés des éléments (...) car c'est l'ouvrière de toutes choses qui m'a instruit, la Sagesse» (Sg 7:17-21).

https://inquisition.ca/fr/livre/cec/0200_0299.htm

Ce qui est contre l'existence individuelle d'Adam, selon les trois premiers canons du concile de Trente, session V, sur le péché originel :

1. Si quelqu’un ne confesse pas qu’Adam, le premier homme, par sa désobéissance au commandement de Dieu dans le paradis, perdit aussitôt la sainteté et la justice dans lesquelles il avait été établi, et encourut, par son injurieuse prévarication, la colère et l’indignation de Dieu, et par suite la mort, dont Dieu l’avait précédemment menacé, et avec la mort la captivité sous la puissance de celui qui eut ensuite l’empire de la mort, c’est-à-dire du diable [He 2, 14], et que tout Adam, selon le corps et l’âme, a été détérioré par cette coupable transgression, qu’il soit anathème :

2. Si quelqu’un soutient que la prévarication d’Adam a été préjudiciable à lui seul, et non à sa postérité ; que la sainteté et la justice dont Dieu l’avait doué, et qu’il a perdues, il les a perdues pour lui uniquement, et non pas aussi pour nous ; ou que, souillé par le péché de désobéissance, il n’a transmis à tout le genre humain que la mort et les peines du corps, sans lui transmettre le péché, qui est la mort de l’Ame, qu’il soit anathème, puisqu’il contredit ces paroles de l’Apôtre : Par un seul homme le péché est entré dans le monde, et par le péché la mort ; et ainsi la mort est passée dans tous les hommes, en celui dans lequel ils ont tous péché [Rm 5, 12].

3. Si quelqu’un soutient que le péché d’Adam, un à son origine, infus dans tous par la génération et non par imitation, intimement propre à chacun, peut être enlevé par les forces de la nature humaine, ou par un autre remède que les mérites de Notre-Seigneur Jésus-Christ, l’unique médiateur, qui nous a réconciliés avec Dieu par son sang [Rm 5, 9 s], s’étant fait notre justice, notre sanctification, notre rédemption [1 Co 1, 30] ; ou nie que les mérites de Jésus-Christ soient, par le sacrement de baptême dûment conféré selon la forme de l’Eglise, appliqués tant aux adultes qu’aux enfants, qu’il soit anathème, puisqu’il n’a pas été donné sous le ciel aux hommes d’autre nom, par lequel nous puissions être sauvés [Ac 4, 12] ; ce qui a donné lieu à cette parole : Voici l’Agneau de Dieu, voici Celui qui ôte les péchés du monde [Jn 1, 19] ; et à cette autre : tous, qui avez été baptisés, vous avez été revêtus de Jésus-Christ [Ga 3, 27].

https://laportelatine.org/formation/magistere/decret-sur-le-peche-originel

Il y a des méthodes à harmoniser l'origine évolutionniste de l'homme avec l'existence individuelle d'Adam, mais de très fumeuses et qui ne font pas justice à la prétendue science ou aux vrais propos évolutionnistes.

Pour un laïc mal instruit, on pourrait imaginer une erreur par inattention, mais pour 4 personnes successives, pendant 37 ans, non, pas vraiment.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
dim. Laetare
(premières vêpres)
14—15.III.2026

Pour répondre à une question cette nuit : qu'est-ce que je reproche au "Vatican" ?

Pour répondre à une question cette nuit : qu'est-ce que je reproche au "Vatican" ? · La thése sédévacantiste totaliste exige une élection d'urgence · St. Robert Bellarmin vs FSSPX

D'abord, aux au revoirs, je n'ai rien dit sur "marquis", j'ai dit que mon nom est marqué* sur le blog: Hans Georg Lundahl. En plus ou moins chaque post, sauf les très courts, puis-je ajouter.

Mais mon nouvel ami vient de me poser la question ce que je reproche au "Vatican" (au Vatican d'Eux, pas au Vatican en Exile auquel j'adhère).

Je viens de dire trois choses :

• la nouvelle messe
• l'écuménisme qui dit qu'on adore le même Dieu que les antitrinitaires Musulmans, Juifs, T d J
• l'évolutionnisme.

Pape Michel II vient de dire (sur FB, peut-être pas son dernier mot) que même si la Messe de Paul VI était valide, elle serait illicite, car faite par l'illégitime Paul VI. Voir le point 2, l'écuménisme.

Quand au point 3, l'évolutionnisme, voici le CEC § 283 :

§283
La question des origines du monde et de l'homme fait l'objet de nombreuses recherches scientifiques qui ont magnifiquement enrichi nos connaissances sur l'âge et les dimensions du cosmos, le devenir des formes vivantes, l'apparition de l'homme. Ces découvertes nous invitent à admirer d'autant plus la grandeur du Créateur, de lui rendre grâce pour toutes ses oeuvres et pour l'intelligence et la sagesse qu'il donne aux savants et aux chercheurs. Avec Salomon, ceux-ci peuvent dire: «C'est Lui qui m'a donné la science vraie de ce qui est, qui m'a fait connaître la structure du monde et les propriétés des éléments (...) car c'est l'ouvrière de toutes choses qui m'a instruit, la Sagesse» (Sg 7:17-21).

Non, ce n'est pas la Sagesse divine qui a infusé en Yves Coppens de prendre "Lucy" pour une nôtre ancêtre ou aux dicastères dont la congrégation pour la doctrine de la foi d'accepter, à côté d'un Adam et Ève individuelle réellement ancêtres premiers de tous les hommes (et tous les hommes qui paraissent tels anatomiquement vraiment hommes) les solutions qu'ils étaient représentants devant Dieu d'autres hommes déjà existents ou qu'ils étaient même une personification (si je ne me trompe pas) d'une chute collective. Ou encore, apparemment, que d'autres hommes n'avaient pas d'âme mais que leur postérité avec les Adamites en avait.**

Même si on voudrait prétendre que le texte de la Genèse soit épistémologiquement en doute, ce que je ne recommende pas***, les idées autres que le créationnisme et une jeune humanité, comprenant tout l'anthropocène dans les derniers 7000 et quelques ans, détruisent le sens du dogme du concile de Trente, session V les canons 1, 2 et 3, et encore font mal à la conception de la justice divine.°

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
dimanche Reminiscere
1.III.2026

---

* Les lettres i et é ne se chevauchent pas en français, et les lettres i et e non plus en suédois. Mais l'e suédois (prononcé é) chevauche l'i français. Quand un Arabe qui parle mal le français dirait "marquis" pour "marqué" le problème est inverse, son propre i chevauche la totalité de l'é français, et quand il dit "marquis" c'est parce qu'il veut dire les choses avec une bonne et nette articulation, n'ayant pas le concept phonologique de l'é. L'arabe n'a rien entre i et a, les prononciations intermédiaires passent pour l'un ou pour l'autre, mais si le français a la gradation "i, é, è, a" le suédois a une gradation en cinq (i, e, ä, ä(r), a). Le son ä a deux prononciations, l'un normal, comme un è, l'autre devant un r (parfois muet devant une dentale) un peu plus ouvert encore. La même espace divisé en 4 ou en 5, chaque partie en a une plus petite aire, et entre les extrêmes, il y a chevauchements.

** J'aurais aimé ne pas croire que cette ineptie existât même chez des Catholiques, mais regardez le Frère Paul-Adrien dans la vidéo d'où vient la femme de Caïn ? et ma réponse, sous sa vidéo ou sur le post J'aimerais un peu plus d'orthodoxie d'un Dominicain, même Vatican-II-iste !

*** Je suis en train de faire une petite série en espagnol dessus : Génesis 1—11: tipo de texto · Génesis — la epistemología · Génesis — más sobre la epistemología

° Voir Justice de Dieu pour un Adam il y a trop longtemps, et voir cette série en anglais pour les situations ou scénarios pas pleinement adamiques : "Adam was not an individual, the fall was collective" - Evil or Just Wrong? · What About "The Jimmy Akin Solution"? · 1909 vs § 390.

Le caté de nos jours ...

Dans une réponse (sur Quora) à une question sur "Thiéia", je me déclarais Créationniste Jeune Terre ET Géocentrique.

Quelqu'un m'accusais d'être Musulman.

Je citais le martyrologe de Noël (pour la partie chronologique de ma réponse et avec les précisions doctrinales que les Musulmans certainement ne partagent pas) et il répondit "Je suis Catholique et" (il remplaçait le texte pour les derniers mots avec un phylactère en image) "je t'em..."

Pour moi, il a davantage en commun avec les antifas qui font bruit quand les AfD proposent un débat poli, qu'avec les Scholastiques de l'Université de Paris. Pas juste dans la doctrine, mais en plus dans les manières./HGL

Sharing Against Donatists and Lollards

@BreakingInTheHabit
[50 Crazy, Weird, Unbelievable Facts About Catholicism]
Are sacraments by sinful priests still valid?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XpOUWt2SpZE

In Memoriam Fr. Minkler

"He knew he had to go"
Christine Niles | 2 April 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7ut_xTHDHU

Extract from:

The Priest who Knew Too Much
Christine Niles | 1 April 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnxrHXcE96o

I saw the longer video yesterday and waited to today before I shared, so as not to have anyone believe I were making an April Fools joke.

I played with the thought of making one or two posts about April Fools (like "Atheist awareness day" feat. Dixit insipiens, Psalm 13, spec. verse 1, or like qualifying in French the Evolutionist idea we descend from fish as a "poisson d'avril" ... I refrained), but I didn't want any serious stuff to be misinterpreted as related to the date of April 1st, so I waited with this and some other things./HGL

Progressive Christianity is Evangelicalism Melting Down

Here is a quote from Rev. Dr. Mark Sandlin, after his stating that the Bible contains contradictions:

I mean:

- The Gospels can’t even agree on Jesus’ last words.

- Paul (who never met Jesus) and James (his actual brother) disagree on faith versus works.

- The Old Testament presents radically different depictions of God, ranging from smiting people left and right to telling us to care for the orphan and the widow.

Here is the answer:

• The Gospels do not state that no further words at all were uttered between this or that and the actual final breath.
• Paul agrees that works are necessary, if you look at Ephesians 2:8 to 10 instead of stopping at verse 9.
• Caring for orphans and widows soemtimes involves smiting their oppressors.

So, Bible contradictions? Again, none./HGL

So, what is Evangelicalism upgrading instead? Well, it's converting to Catholicism./HGL

Genocide on Christians in Syria and more

Syrian Christians Crucified; Trans Violence Trending; DC Protest & more | CATHOLIC NEWS ROUNDUP
Christine Niles | 14.III.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6osxANQtusU

I have not read the book by "Cardinal" Brandmüller ...

I have not read the book by "Cardinal" Brandmüller ... · Where is Heaven Now?

... so, part of what Eric Sammons is talking about here is beyond me.

Crisis Magazine: A Truly Traditionalist Approach to Science Isn’t What You’ve Been Told
Eric Sammons | March 12, 2025
https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/a-truly-traditionalist-approach-to-science-isnt-what-youve-been-told

However, I am somewhat familiar with what happened in 1820. The names Settele and Anfossi are no Egyptian hieroglyphs to me (I wouldn't be using this simile if I were an even amateur Egyptologist, obviously).

Triviū, Quadriviū, 7 cætera: Father Filippo Anfossi was right against Giuseppe Settele
mercredi 20 février 2013 | Publié par Hans Georg Lundahl à 01:21
https://triv7quadriv.blogspot.com/2013/02/father-filippo-anfossi-was-right.html

That's twelve years ago.

Now, whather Eric Sammons understood Brandmüller correctly or not this passage by Eric Sammons contains a historical error about the events in 1820:

The main defender of Settele (and opponent of Fr. Anfossi) was Fr. Maurizio Benedetto Olivieri, the commissioner of the Holy Office. ....

...

The summary of Olivieri's argument can probably pass, apart from "forcefully refuted" .... but I'm more concerned with two more paragraphs:

Further, because the Church Fathers accepted Ptolemy’s cosmology like everyone else in their time, they had no reason to look for a different interpretation of those passages, but now that we understand that Ptolemy is wrong, we can adjust our interpretation. Olivieri noted that this is exactly the path that St. Robert Bellarmine suggested: if scientific proof is furnished, then the Church can adapt accordingly, since these were not matters of faith or morals. To be intransigent to change in this matter would actually be harmful for souls.

St. Robert Bellarmine actually used the hypothetic here, and added "but I think such a proof will not be possible" or words to that effect. So, while Olivieri probably presented things like this in 1820, this involves a historic falsehood about St. Robert Bellarmine.

By accepting Olivieri’s arguments and methodology, the Church, including Pope Pius VII, established a solid framework for Catholics in the scientific age. We do not reject scientific theories out of hand when they seem to contradict either our interpretation of Scripture or the consensus of the Fathers. We don’t blindly accept them without proof, either. Until they are proven, in fact, we can stick with what we’ve always believed, but we don’t make our interpretations “sacred doctrine.” If proof arises, then we don’t—like Anfossi and Owen and Sungenis—stick our heads in the sand and refuse to adapt to new information. What is found to be true in the natural sciences cannot contradict what we know to be true from Scripture. If there is an apparent discrepancy, then the issue is either that the scientific discovery is faulty in some way or that our interpretation of Scripture is faulty. As Fr. Olivieri and then Pope Pius VII made clear, we can’t deny that second possibility.

The judgement did not ask Anfossi to retract his words, it did not state that all Catholic publications henceforth need to be Heliocentric (and some very clearly weren't, like when a XXth C. priest, whose work was reissued by Pope Michael I, got nihil obstat for giving the nine papal condemnations of Heliocentrism).

We do not in fact know from the verdict that Pius VII accepted Olivieri's argument. We just know he found Heliocentrism sufficiently defensible to not get condemned.

There was never any corresponding condemnation of Geocentrism, or of Biblical Literalism, apart from "John Paul II's" speech in 1992 or from §283 in CCC. Events which I do not count as Catholic. But events which even Brandmüller and Sammons ought not to pretend were just a repetition of what Pius VII and the Church had already said in 1820. The content of the 1820 verdict was not:

You have to believe Heliocentrism now, it's proven.

It was also not even:

You can believe Heliocentrism now, condemnation of the doctrine is liften, if you think it's proven.

It actually was:

You may read and you may print that stuff now.

No less. But also no more.

Now, if Olivieri thought Heliocentrism was in the meantime proven, pray for his soul. He might still need it. I mean, Mussolini may have got out of Purgatory after perhaps 3 years or so, according to a mystic, but I have less confidence for Olivieri. And pray for Emmanuel Alzon too. He had Olivieri as a mentor, which given he founded Assumptionists in France may have indirectly contributed to the worse débacle of an "Assumptionist" giving readers a free pass to deny Adam and Eve lived individually rather than being symbolical literary figures.

But the gesture of Pius VII in its official wording does not involve and also in its legal application doesn't morally imply "Heliocentrism is proven" ... so, unless you have an extremely good biography of Pius VII that states that he was privately convinced of Heliocentrism, we can simply assume that it bears the moral meaning of "since this is generally accepted by nearly all of the world, we cannot stop it from spreading by refusing to print it and even those who would want to refute it would need to read it first" ....

I must admit I haven't read Giuseppe Settele's work. But I have read lots of other Heliocentric stuff. At age 8, after my grandfather died, I became the youngest registered member of M.A.R.S.* Obviously Heliocentric and Big Bang and all that. I was equally an Evolution believer at the time, and when I reverted on either question, it was not from obliviousness. It was a conscious rejection of what I had previously held. In both cases preceded by some time when I had no definite opinion one way or the other.

Now, Sammons and possibly Brandmüller (and certainly others) have stated a theological error and canonic nightmare. Let me repeat part of the last paragraph I quoted.

Until they are proven, in fact, we can stick with what we’ve always believed, but we don’t make our interpretations “sacred doctrine.” If proof arises, then we don’t—like Anfossi and Owen and Sungenis—stick our heads in the sand and refuse to adapt to new information.

Now, let's break down what's wrong with it:

1. It's a theological error to admit that doctrine to the level of dogma or Scripture can need to change because of scientific discovery. It was specifically condemned in the Syllabus.
2. It's a conundrum how a Pope or anyone else could infallibly consider a scientific doctrine not revealed in Scripture as proven, and especially if it contradicts quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus ... or even what used to be that.
3. It's a rhetoric pep talk point to say "we don't stick our heads into the sand" ... translated into canon law, such a decision is impossible to make unless it be by defining a new doctrine apart from the sources of Revelation. So, there is no possibility for the individual Catholic to know when "we" (that is the Catholic Church on Earth, the Church Militant) are supposed to bow down to such a supposed proof.

If you pretend to take a hint from Pius XII, Humani Generis, as a solution, the one logic way of reading "submit to the decision of the Church" is making Council of Trent Sessions IV and V those decisions. "John Paul II" mendaciously pretended that Pius XII by the fact of issuing Humani Generis already had defined that Evolutionary origin of Adam was OK, this is not the case, or if not mendaciously, confusedly.

Now, I submit, there are two places in Scripture which in and of themselves could be taken as "this was phenomenological language" ... Joshua 10:13 and possibly Psalm 18:6. There are others which as certainly cannot be so taken, like Joshua 10:12. Joshua did not order Earth to cease rotating. Even more, if, as I think is eminently probable, St. Paul in Romans 1 thought of the Aristotelic proof of God from Geocentric observations (generalised but not denied in Prima Via), taken as actual physical reality, you would contradict St. Paul's saying the ones who refuse to worship God are without excuse. If someone is turning the visible universe around Earth each day, that someone needs to have power over all the Earth. If we instead grant Seneca's** miserly point that "a god" could instead be turning Earth around its own axis each day, even apart from reducing things from the complexities of Tychonian orbits being above purely mechanic causes and conservation of angular momentum not being so, that "god" which Seneca could envisage would only have demonstrated power over Earth.

While the flagellum of the bacterium, the impossibility of Evolution at more than one point (Abiogenesis as starting point included) do, and Big Bang cosmology would if true, point to God, this cannot be what St. Paul is talking about. He specified "from the creation of the world" ... and these discoveries of modern science, as well as the pseudo-discovery, simply were NOT visible back then.

Let's just quickly add how Voyager 1 could have proven Geocentrism if the cameras hadn't been turned off, starting with a dialogue under the Anfossi-post some 12 years ago:

Anonyme

Hello Hans-George,

I must say that I very much enjoy reading your blogs.

If I may ask a question - is possible for Voyager 1 to prove Geocentrism?

Hans Georg Lundahl

I was wondering whether they stopped sending pictures because it was starting to prove Geocentrism rather than Heliocentric Modern Cosmology.

I may have thought of the possibility of the reverse I adumbrated in my letter to Nathan A. Unterman.

Correspondence of Hans Georg Lundahl: Asking an Erudite for Optical Proof
Wednesday, 3 September 2014 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 01:24
https://correspondentia-ioannis-georgii.blogspot.com/2014/09/asking-erudite-for-optical-proof.html

But foremost, if Geocentrism is true, and if Fix Stars are one light day up, the angle from which Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 came to see them would be radically different from the one we see them from Earth. Ophiuchus would be really big, while a constellation with Right Ascension 5h rather than 17h and a Declination of 8° instead of -8° would be twice as far from Voyager as it was when Voyager started or as it is from Earth.***

As it is, the cameras of Voyager 1 as well as of Voyager 2 have been turned off. If I am right that the Fix Stars are one light day up, we may soon know, since Voyager 1 has less than 45 light-minutes to that limit. But we do not know it from cameras.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ember Friday of Lent
14.III.2025
(or 2025.3.14 for some)

* Malmö Astronomiska och Rymdfärds-Sällskap. The Astronomical and Space Travel Society of Malmowe.
** Let's not forget that Seneca and Burrhus were counsellers to Emperor Nero.
*** No, I'm not good enough at astronomy to know what constellation that is, or even how and where to look it up.

Adrien Abauzit

New blog on the kid : Adrien Abauzit · Répliques Assorties : Adrien Abauzit — Abbé Pagès : 10 — 1 ou à peu près

🎙Adrien Abauzit | Comment les traditionalistes ont-ils perdu la Foi ?
Défense de la Foi | 15 févr. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS_D8jHcQeo

Adrien Abauzit se dit "non una cum".

Je me dis "una cum papa nostro Michael" ... Michel II. Mais pas avec "Pape François" alias l'Antipape Bergoglio./HGL

The Diocese in Brazil Has Apologised to the Nuncio

Here is from the chat feed:

Palermo Trapani

@jimmy jays johnny jibbers The Diocese in Brazil has already written to the Nuncio that they apologize and called it an inadvertent error and will stress Doctrinal orthodoxy and orthopraxis in future

Here is the video:

Female Priest Celebrates Mass with Catholic Bishop
The Michael Lofton Show | 16.II.2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfmwS_K8VW4

There are some Catholic clergy who don't know the Catholic faith. IF they are Catholic clergy. BIG IF. Who'd have thunk it? /HGL

Open Letter to Phil Friedl

I have heard of you back when you were a Seminarian under Pope Michael I.

I am now your friend on FB. Your statuses often enough read like quotes from books of devotion. There is a clear sense in which there is truth to them.

Prayer detaches the soul from this world. He who loves the world will never pray. He who hates this world prays and sees the world's true folly. Just as a mirage offers water where there only a desert, the world offers happiness, but it only give you sorrow.

Fidelity to prayer is the health of the soul.

When you are tired, learn to rest, and not to quit.

"They blessed with their mouth, but cursed with their heart" (Psalm 61:5)

The issue of this open letter is actually NOT to be blessing with my mouth.

You see, there are truths which it costs nothing to pay attention to, unless it's the wrong moment. Calculate the equivalence of 3 sqd and 4 sqd with 5 sqd anytime you like, unless it distracts you from prayer or from the steering wheel. Or a sharp farm tool ... you know what I mean.

There are other truths which are emotionally harrowing, but still necessary and cannot be put off to after one dies. If you have committed one clear mortal sin with no mitigating circumstances, after your baptism, you had better confess to a priest or do an act of Perfect Contrition. Or, if you have not admitted Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, if you have not admitted that He is also the promised Messiah, you had better do that too. Whatever the emotional cost. And to some it is high.

But there are also truths that are useful when you are attentive, but actually kind of optional. These are the truths in books of devotion. Like the things quoted that are not Psalm 61:5. Obviously any given one of them can cease to be optional if your father confessor imposes on you to attend to it, but apart from that, they are optional to attend to. Especially, being reminded of the necessity of prayer, when you are in a situation depriving you of the necessary peace for prayer is unnecessary harrowing.

The point is not to unfriend you. You are free to unfriend me. The point is, I'm asking, when you pray for me, as I am sure you do, WHAT THINGS are you praying for? Specifically, I would not want to be prayed for in the hope of me becoming a priest or monk.

You see, I had fidelity to prayer up to concluding someone else's prayer, stronger than mine, was abusing my prayer as a weapon against my preference for marriage. As a weapon against my efforts to get sufficiently known to earn my living from my writing, the day someone starts a publishing house in order to both spread the things I had to say, useful enough in apologetics (and therefore to get people to admit mortal sin leads to an eternity of fire, or Jesus is the promised Messiah), as a weapon against that too.

The Church is always praying. But every single member of the Church isn't praying 24/24, 365/365. The Church is not meant to consist exclusively of monks and nuns. It conceivably could do so for some time (Monseigneur Lefèbvre once mentioned, I think, the theory that the Church could be reduced to one single person if he was a bishop, Pope Michael I quoted the OT prophecy about a small child being able to count the remainder of the Church, and I think he thougfht that fulfilled the day he was elected, so, the Church could be so few that it contained no laymen ... though actually on that day, prior to election and acceptance, it contained only laymen ... unless the Church survived somewhere else, if obscured). But once it has a certain size, it is certain that it will contain people who are NOT monks or nuns or dedicate every day to prayer.

I prayed the Rosary every day when I was a parishioner in St. Nicolas du Chardonnet, as I recall, or there were few exceptions. But I quit that parish, because I was morally certain the priests were not praying for, but against my earthly happiness. There are some who, in order to pray, need a glass of water first. And there are some who, in order to pray, need some of the good things of this world. Wanting a young wife is not just wanting beauty, which is fleeting, it is also wanting fertility and proles primum bonum matrimonii. Wanting to be known as an author is not only, in fact not even, wanting to bask in the kind of fame that a Hollywood actor or a popular singer enjoys. It's also wanting to be sufficiently known to do some good with one's work, and to "do good" in the business sense so one's work also feeds oneself and one's family.

I would like to know that by "learn to rest, not to quit" is not sth you apply to me in the sense of YOUR project for me to be principally a prayer warrior. Let's go back to fidelity to prayer, a bit.

I have run the way of thy commandments, when thou didst enlarge my heart. Psalms 118:32

This was in fact the case, back when I was a parishioner in St. Nicolas du Chardonnet (apart from its basically Eastern Orthodox view on the Papacy's nature, but this was just after my return from these), I did hope to marry and to get an edition of my writings or a performance of my compositions within the year, and I did pray the rosary and I did forgive my enemies. It took me perhaps a quarter of an hour to forgive an especially mean thing. And to pray an our father or a rosary and include them.

What brought me away from that is, someone was praying for me to be basically a monk, which I did not want, and do not want. Monks can live in poverty and therefore also without the fame of authorship and they regularly live without wives and children. That was not what I wanted or want. It was not what I think God was calling me to. For some reason, God was momentarily hearing the prayers of someone else, against mine, I was looking for ways to arrange that. Including and up to quitting the rosary so that St. Nicolas priests couldn't be heard when praying I get the grace of perfect chastity through the rosary. Bad move? Probably. But their prayers for my worldly continued destitution drove me to it. Perhaps, my quitting the rosary was God hearing their prayers, with the rosary, I would have obtained what they didn't want me to obtain.

Anyway, if Pope Michael II wants to concentrate on prayer and devotionals, it is certainly, within limits his right. But 300 (or however many we are by now) true Catholics won't save all the other souls by prayer only and neglecting apologetics. If Pope Michael II wants to shoehorn all Conclavists into prayer and devotion only, no apologetics, no worldly success, it is probable, what he wants to be head of is not the Catholic Church. You can have a Catholic Church (apart from when it's very small, like five people) with thirty-fold, sixty-fold, hundred-fold fruit. You cannot have a Catholic Church even the size of 300 people that's hundred-fold, hundred-fold, hundred-fold only. A lay apologist (and there were such from Justin Martyr) is helping the Pope and the Bishops to these ends:

Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine
[2 Timothy 4:2]

Did you catch the nuance? Preaching the word is in season out of season, but rebuking and reproving is in patience.

For this they are wilfully ignorant of, that the heavens were before, and the earth out of water, and through water, consisting by the word of God Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of the ungodly men
[2 Peter 3:5-7]

One of the most principal things I've done since the very first I was on the internet, or maybe weeks only before starting, way before I had this blogger account, was to write in defense of this truth. It could have been used. Pope Michael I was not obliged to be the sole paper published author in the Conclavist community. 1684 + 1099 = 2783 words, directly from the first pope. The Greek NT has 138,150 words. The first Pope wrote 2 % of the New Testament. Or, if you add in St. Mark, 11,304 words, that makes 10 %. Even more, a Pope has no right to peevishly look at his own success in self publishing via Amazon and then imagine this is the measure above which no one of the Catholics subject to him may reach. I told Pope Michael I, he should have tried to start a publishing house, with a Vatican in Exile goes a Libreria Editrice Vaticana in Exile, he would have been able to secure a much better success for the booklet he republished with nine papal condemnations on Heliocentrism. And he would have been able to print lots of the devotional books you are quoting (unless TAN Books have exclusive rights under US Copyright, they shouldn't have, the authors are long since dead, new translations could be made). And he could incidentally also have secured me a beginning of the income I want. He was master of his time of course ... until God was. He was suspicious of alcohol, I believe, and got a stroke one month before he died. I think the day he died he had opportunity to see some things about me in another perspective, an abcess was healed the same day. Not miraculously, but I was using alcohol to rince and blue cheese as penicilline. He prayed one prayer he hadn't prayed for me when alive. May I suggest yourself and his successor, feliciter regnanti Michael II, not to repeat the delay?

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IVth Lord's Day after Epiphany
9.II.2025

At the Victory of Trump, Some Non-Christians Show Very Open Enmity for Christianity

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica: The Netherlands, a Few Years Later, Were Among the Reforming Episcopates at Vatican II · To Be Clear, I Am NOT Recommending Protestantism · New blog on the kid: At the Victory of Trump, Some Non-Christians Show Very Open Enmity for Christianity

On Spanish* Quora, someone was asking if isolating a group of religious people from all religious concepts for a year (however you'd go about doing that) could cure them of their delusion.

Equally on the Spanish Quora, the top best answer to "have scientists come to a conclusion on the Shroud of Turin?" was an answer that didn't deal with scientists studying the shroud at all, and after reperusing it, I mean at all. Sections of the Spanish section of Quora are very clearly safe spaces for Atheists, where they can indulge in fantasies of bullying Christians, and where Christians who are invited are NOT allowed to answer.** Given that demographic, I'm not suprised that this was the answer that got the most likes. I wrote another, in which I cited the top line of the "former amateur philosopher's" answer.***

I was getting to youtube, and into my feed came a short alleging that most Medieval nuns were pregnant, and sometimes got rid of their children by throwing them down into wells. A specific claim about the situation according to the rule portrayed their normal and ideal life as much more boring than it was. Not allowed to make conversations during meals? If you have ever been to a dining space in a big school or in the military, and I suppose a lot of other work places where you sit down around long tables, many at each, you may imagine why this is wise for those who chose a contemplative life. But the point that's missing is: it's not as if the refectory was a place of dour silence, no, one of the nuns, or in male monasteries, one of the monks, had already eaten. The lector was on a turning schedual (that obviously didn't involve the abbess or abbot, who needed to give sign when reading was ending), and first read a passage of instruction (the Rule of St. Benedict, or perhaps sth from the Bible) and after that allotted passage was finished, went on to sth a bit more fun, like reading from a saints' life, or perhaps a chronicle. Being silent while listening is like being silent at cinema, you are silent so you don't miss anything. A family requiring silence, while dining before the TV is basically doing the same thing.° Anyway, the allegation about pregnancies and abortions and child killing post partum is recycled in many Anti-Catholic media, from the Reformation to the Communists, and now today.

Speaking of nuns, like at the Reformation, like in Communism, it seems monasteries are being dissolved and monetary gain is involved, but this time, from the Vatican. When it comes to dissolving a Carmel with 6 old nuns, it could be done in a decent way, in placing them in monasteries, ideally Carmels, with younger nuns and more vocations. And those monasteries would get the receits from selling the property. However, very usually it's the diocese that splits with the Vatican, when the Vatican dissolves a monastery, and not always for lack of vocations. That's at least what I gather from Anthony Stine, who told us about the nuns of Belorado.°°

It is a very unpleasant feeling when what should be the Catholic Church seems nevertheless to do the works of the enemies of the Catholic faith. I have had that kind of impression more than once in my own life, in previous years. And in affairs which are not finished. Anthony Stine is now reporting on the Arlington Nuns.°°° And here a certain slant of psychiatric abuse may come into play.

If we go to the communiqué of the (Vatican II) Ordinary of Fort Worth, he states:

The actions of the former nuns have perpetrated a deep wound in the Body of Christ. I ask all of you to join me in praying for healing, reconciliation, and for the conversion of these women who have departed from the vowed religious life and notoriously defected from communion with the Catholic Church by their actions. With prayers for the former nuns and for all harmed by these events, I remain [signature]

Here it is not clear that he prays for the nuns to be "healed" it is in context at first probable he's praying for "healing" in the "Body of Christ" which apparently received a "deep wound" from this. However, "Bishop" Olsen somewhat fudges this by asking for prayers for the "former" nuns. In the reporting in The Pillar, however, we see a different story:

“They are neither nuns nor Carmelites despite their continued and public self-identification to the contrary,” Bishop Michael Olson wrote Dec. 2, in a communique asking that Catholics pray for healing, and for the women’s conversion.

It comes very close to asking to pray for the women's "healing and conversion" ... as if they first had to get well from something, before they could convert. As long as "Bishop" Olsen is not asking The Pillar to clarify~ one can assume he is colluding with this interpretation. Oh, obviously, they have some "plausible denial" which is not very plausible. They could claim, they were asking for prayers for healing in general, but as to prayers for the "former" nuns, simply prayers for conversion. But I think there is sufficient online evidence of not reading things correctly, even if you have the text in front of you. It is highly probable that people in that diocese and elsewhere, thinking they should obey "Bishop" Olsen, will pray for "the healing of these women" ...

Why is that bad? Well, for one, if someones are praying for someone's healing, and that someone isn't sufficiently protected against their prayers, it would seem such prayers can result in multiple corporeal ailings, I currently have a lice infestation to heal from, there has been a fractured bone, there has been shingles, there have been dental abcesses. I have healed every time, except so far from the lice, and excepting the fracture and the shingles, without medical intervention. But innocent souls who think they have done me a favour by praying for my healing, have caused (via my own sins, no doubt) that I got bodily ailments to actually heal from, so their prayers could be heard. They are more innocent than I, they have more grace, but they are also more misguided, even they could admit, if they cared to talk to me about it, misguided about my actual situation, they could be praying for the entirely wrong things even apart from the theological differences.

Since the Mother Superior of the Arlington nuns was under anaesthesia at an operation, and that's when she "confessed" to certain sins, according to Anthony Stine, I presume this could have happened to them too.

With the case of Henk Heithuis in the 1950's Netherlands, some might say how horrible it was that religious who taught at his boarding school abused him. Well, that's not the worst. The worst is, he was sent to a mental hospital. That's where he was, illegally, castrated. The worst was not the coverup of sexual abuse, the worst was the medical abuse, enabled by an open alliance between the diocese and a mental hospital that regarded homosexuality as a mental disease, which obviously reverses the burden of proof. If Henk had in court been accused of seducing the religious, one would have needed to prove it. He was not tried in court but examined by a mental hospital, so, he could be presumed to be homosexual based entirely on the subjective evaluation of the hospital personnel. This is a reason why individually medicalising the question of actions that are as to their general nature culpable, is a way of stamping someone as actually guilty, without due process. And obviously, a certain ideology would say "no, we are not blaming him, he was a victim of his homosexuality" and what not, and that doesn't make any difference as to the fact that the guilt of sodomy was transferred from the religious who had groomed him to him. This, not the grooming, not the abuse, but this, leading to the final medical abuse, the castration that ruined his life, happened because the diocese of 's-Hertogenbosch was in alliance with psychiatry.~~

With some Evangelical groups, praying for someone's healing is a coded way of calling him mentally ill, without any even medical "examination" ... it's very problematic if the diocese of Fort Worth takes up this practise against the Nuns. And of course, if anyone, Evangelical or "Catholic" does so with me. Why coded? Well, some of them do have some respect, nominally, for this part of the Gospel:

You have heard that it was said to them of old: Thou shalt not kill. And whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment 22 But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire
[Matthew 5:21-22]

Now, some will say, this is a prooftext for "total corruption" in the eyes of a God with very exacting standards. It's a prooftext for us needing a purely imputed righteousness, because experience shows accepting the sacrifice of Christ will not actually turn people this kind of righteous. They will say, "look, even a small thing like calling someone a fool" ... no, in that society, to those people, calling someone a fool would have been part of a procedure to officially stamp him as fool. And calling someone "raca" would have been part of a procedure to rank him as one of the less pious (their synagogues back then had a social credit ranking). If one doesn't respond, such people can pretend to assume this as an agreement. If one responds "no", they can go on and repeat until it's provocative, or until open anger is the only "correct" response from someone not in that position. If one responds by anger, that is however not automatically a sign that one isn't a fool or a "raca", the anger can be written off as a lack of self control.

In the Second World War, lots of Catholics and lots of Catholic clergy, helped to hide Jews from the Nazis. Lots and lots of people made friendships. I'm worried some of these friendships led to Catholics adopting Jewish practises, and that would perhaps foremost include in psychiatry.

And in "prayers for healing" ... because, yes, the correct interpretation is, Christ does not accept ruining someone's life by psychiatry (or what one would have called it back then), and some Evangelicals understand that. They understand that it is wrong to say, before a congregation which includes or excludes the person "he's mentally ill" or "you are mentally ill" ... but they think that if they reword it like "I'll be praying for his healing" or "I'll be praying for your healing" this doesn't count as the offense in question before God, because it is not the exact same wording as "thou fool" ...

So, while psychiatry~~ has for the last two decades been somewhat retreating, thank God, and God bless anyone who contributed to that, some dislike this, some would desire more social control, for instance against myself or against the Arlington Nuns. That's why I take "prayers for healing" as a possibly very serious attack against someone's or some peoples' freedoms and about their mental status. Not just when they come from the obvious Vatican II Sect. Remember what I said about the psychiatric ambitions of some Atheists? Here:

This is basically a kind of appeal for an Anti-Theistic Inquisition. It would, if it ever happened, certainly be in the hands of medical~~ professionals. It can be added, all the responses by Atheists are negative. The one qualified response seems to be by a JW, who says "depends on why they are religious" and proceeds to list criteria obviously from the Watchtower Sect, starting with "what is the name of God?".

Right now, this persecution against Christians is not targetting all believers of any sect in the free world. And when it targets individuals, it is usually in alliance with people who also claim to be Christians. The kind of people who would ask "what is the name of God?" or who would ask other people to pray for the healing of such and such. I'm not saying Atheists and other Anti-Christians are absent. I am however saying, they want, right now, support from pretended Christians. It still looks bad, in the free world, to openly persecute a Christian for being a Christian, doing so still needs a big dose of hypocrisy.

Michael Olsen, pretended bishop of Fort Worth, do not provide such an excuse for the doctors!

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Barbara, Virgin and Martyr
4.XII.2024

PS Reports on Arlington partly based on Anthony Stine:

Francis CRUSHES Traditional Nuns In Totally Pointless Attack On Tradition
Return To Tradition | 4.XII.2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRyq285MI2Q

* Quora comes in many languages, one account can be active in more than one, but you need to switch, for instance from English to Spanish or from Spanish to French. Just to clarify that Quora as such is not a purely Spanish site.
** "no al proselitismo" = proselitismo al no
*** ¿Y el Síndono?
° I've silently eaten dillkött while absorbed in a decent film or half decent sitcom, at Christmas it would typically be A Christmas Carol, though then Christmas foods would oust the dillkött, several hours per week during my childhood, except the time in Vienna, no TV, and I could actually talk to ma at every meal. I have also sat at the guest table of Sainte Madeleine du Barroux, in two retreats, 1991 and 1992, and in some one night visits between 2006 and 2009. The police doesn't allow the monks to receive homeless people in retreats.
°° Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Nuns of Belorado~Orduña, Poor Clares! · New blog on the kid: Yet Another Reason to Prefer Pope Michael II, the former linking to Anthony Stine's video.
°°° He's also misrepresenting the nuns of Belorado by speaking of them "leapfrogging all options between" diocesan obedience (to someone agressing their monastery) and Sedevacantism, despite SSPX having a decent presence in Europe. Sorry, crossing a frontier in Europe (either in travelling to a new place of resience or in registering property with someone residing in another country) is no small business. In Spain, the SSPX has a "grand total" of 13 chapels. Oh, sorry, that's Spain and Portugal together! It seems the closest of the chapels is 89~99 km away. Vitoria is in Álava, and Belorado is in Burgos, different "counties" (if not "states").
~ I may miss such a clarification, don't leave a grudge against him on this account if you know he already has clarified to the contrary, and kindly report to me if that happens, so I can update my own reporting.
~~ In connection with a wider system of medical dictatorship, I calculated the gematria of Apollo (the divinity of the Hippocratic Oath):

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica: Gematria of Apollyon / Apollon
Tuesday, May 19, 2020 | Posted by Hans Georg Lundahl at 2:48 AM
https://filolohika.blogspot.com/2020/05/gematria-of-apollyon-apollon.html

"Before Any Declaratory Sentence"

From:
Christian Wagner ("Scholastic Answers") Demolished On Loss Of Office & Heresy
vaticancatholic.com | 5 Nov. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbgkC7Ik9hE

Ce matin, je commentais sur une vidéo de Frère Paul-Adrien, OP

Tyrannique et odieux · Ce matin, je commentais sur une vidéo de Frère Paul-Adrien, OP

J'arrivais à mes bagages pour me coucher après ceci vers 7~8 h, et ça veut dire que s'il sort une vidéo à 10 h, il aura eu le temps de voir mes commentaires avant de sortir la vidéo (à moins qu'ils aient été censurés à son insu, hypothèse assez déconfortable).

À environ 10 h ou même 11, il sort une vidéo sur la manipulation, en citant Miviludes.

Je ne donne pas le lien vers sa vidéo assez longue, mais de sa description, je cite :

À travers une analyse détaillée des étapes de l'emprise — séduction, isolement, affaiblissement, endoctrinement et destruction — nous révélons une mécanique insidieuse qui rend difficile pour les victimes de prendre conscience de leur situation.

Bien, je suis victime d'une tentative d'emprise. Citons les étapes qui me concernent :

isolement, affaiblissement et destruction

et les étapes qui concernent d'autres :

séduction et endoctrinement

Je ne suis ni séduit par la Miviludes, ni par ses fans parmi les prétendus Catholiques. Mais ils arrivent ensemble à m'isoler, à m'affaiblir, et peut-être encore à me détruire.

D'autres n'ont rien de tout ça à craindre d'eux. Juste la séduction et l'endoctrinement visant à faire paraître qu'il me fassent grand service en m'isolant, en m'affaiblissant, et ceci jusqu'à ce que, sans s'en rendre compte peut-être ils finissent pas me détruire.

Je me profile en tant que créationniste jeune terre. Et en tant que géocentrique. Il y a des gens qui prennent ceci comme signale qu'il faut m'abattre.

Je pourrais l'éviter si je renonçais ? Sans doute ... je l'aurais pu, il y a quelque temps. Peut-être ... je le pourrais encore. J'ai une conscience. Je ne renonce pas à la vérité pour plaire à des gens ayant des tactiques néfastes. Les seuls "prêtres, gourous, sectes" dont je suis victime dans le contexte, ce sont les gens qui par leur programme de parti ou de parti pris s'acharnent à me peindre comme la victime d'emprises sectaires totalement dans leur imaginaire, sans aucune réalité ou dont la réalité est l'inverse du supposé.

Si Frère Paul-Adrien a vu mes commentaires (donc, pas censurés à son insu), il aurait pu y répondre et prendre un peu de débat. Il a peut-être pas eu l'occasion que je lui ai donné, ou peut-être préféré de cacher mes commentaires pour "défendre" quelqu'un d'autre contre la secte imaginaire qu'il prête comme existant derrière moi. Il me dédouble (et s'il n'a pas vu mes commentaires, quelqu'un autre me dédouble) en voix publique à rendre moins publique, car manipulé, d'un côté, et de l'autre le manipulateur derrière. Il n'est pas capable d'imaginer qu'un homme à la fois intelligent et honnête puisse par sa raison ni altérée, ni manipulée, arriver à créationnisme jeune terre ou à géocentrisme, malgré le fait d'avoir eu l'occasion de constater que j'existe, malgré le fait que la position historique, par exemple de St. Thomas d'Aquin, la même que la mienne, ne peut pas lui être inconnue.

En somme, il se comporte comme ayant les préjugés d'un Communiste, les préjugés d'un homme pour qui l'Académie scientifique de la soviétique n'est même pas suspecte de sectarisme quand il sort un manuel d'athéisme. Mais surtout, en tout sauf ce manuel, aurait raison, notamment en héliocentrisme, cosmologie Grand Boum, milliards d'années pour l'existence physique, vers 2 milliards d'années pour l'existence de la vie, plusieurs centaines de millions d'années pour biologie eucaryote et pluricellulaire, vers 4 millions d'années pour les ancêtres directs de nous-mêmes en excluant les autres êtres vivants ... humanisation graduelle, cannibalisme pendant des dizaines de milliers d'années avant Abraham, et celui-ci incapable d'avoir une tradition correcte d'Adam, pas juste pour la trop grande distance en générations, mais aussi parce qu'il serait "né dans une famille" [entièrement] "païenne."

Et il ne se sont pas du tout manipulé par le Communisme, le gars !

Il aime dire, à la fin de chaque vidéo, "l'amour vaincra" ... pour ce qui me concerne, il aurait été plus honnête en disant que sa haine vaincra.

Je lui ai envoyé un courriel. Si mes commentaires étaient disparus, il l'aurait au moins répéré. Je pense que celui qui m'a censoré, c'était lui. Car, dans ma boîte à mails, je ne trouve pas de réponse.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. François Borgia, SJ
10.X.2024

(30.IX) Romae natalis sancti Francisci Borgiae, Sacerdotis et Confessoris; qui Praepositus Generalis fuit Societatis Jesu, ac vitae asperitate, orationis dono, abdicatis saeculi et recusatis Ecclesiae dignitatibus, vir memorabilis exstitit. Ipsius autem festum sexto Idus Octobris celebratur.
(10.X) Sancti Francisci Borgiae, Sacerdotis e Societate Jesu et Confessoris, cujus dies natalis pridie Kalendas Octobris recensetur.

PS, obviement, si Miviludes et ses partenaires ont une hégémonie en France sur la perception institutionnelle de qui est victime d'une emprise sectaire, ça donne à Miviludes (et ses partenaires) une occasion qui vaut d'or d'en commettre ou tenter une telle. Si pour les lettres majuscules de Miviludes on combine les inversions Albam et Atbash, et les valeurs numériques d'ASCII, ça donne un chiffre assez déconcertant :

The Actual Words of "Francis" Show Him Non-Catholic

Sharing a video by Dimond Brothers:

Francis Denies Christianity! – Endorses “All Religions”
vaticancatholic.com | 22 sept. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouT4pSo47nM

And also sharing my comments under it:

2:05 As far as I can see, he has just confessed essential Freemasonry, that is, compared to his presumable Catholic Baptism, apostasy.

Wei äm ei nott sörpreist? [Why am I not surprised? spelled in German]

4:29 If he had just said "every religion is a road into the direction to God" it could have passed. False religions are roads with road blocks, and they point to God, since they point to Catholicism.

They also point away from God since they point away from Catholicism.

Catholicism is the road without a road block.

But no, he said "a road to arrive" ... not true at all.

"it would make it impossible 5:29 to consistently present the Catholic 5:31 faith to non-catholics you cannot 5:33 consistently present the Catholic faith 5:35 to Protestants or other non-catholics 5:37 while you regard Francis who preaches a 5:39 false gospel and rejects Catholic dogma 5:42 as a member of the Catholic Church"

I've tried to my loss in Sweden to keep consistence by saying "John Paul II" was Pope, but still not to be followed. As per the position of the SSPX.

There is a reason I left Sweden. No, it was not the police seeking for me suspecting they would have to put me in gaol again (I had defended myself and been acquitted for putative defense first trial, then recaught before leaving the country, then convicted second trial). It was not that psychiatry had grasped after me immediately again. It was that I came again in a position likely to depend on Social Services, which could again have pushed me to a country-side where Catholicism was little known and in practise, once seen, unpopular.

Typical Swede of the country-side:
"You are Catholic? Cool, we are tolerant ... you fast every year? You mean you are a Muslim?"

Another stay in that country-side might have ended with renewed efforts of psychiatry, therefore another occasion I would have needed to defend myself, or isolation, and eventually imposed apostasy. A very old Polish lady was eventually pushed to receive a Lutheran fake communion from a Lutheran female pastor before she died.

6:37 I think the two you have shown might be in the process of reconsidering.

[I hope for their sake they are.]

7:43 The video message may not belong here, he may have spoken of liturgic and devotional traditions within Catholicism.

8:10 On July 16th 1990, in the morning, when six people assembled and Pope Michael I was elected, obviously the see had been vacant for 11 + years since Redemptor Hominis.

The one advantage of diversity between the non-Catholic religions is that the enemies of truth are not united.

John Paul II as some call him seems to have considered the scarlet beast as the only enemy of truth.

In fact, that's just one of the seven heads, while four of the heads are probably parodies of the true Abrahamic religion, these four heads would be leopard heads, and the final beast has the form, not of a scarlet beast, though it is included, but of a leopard.

If you like this format:

Namely links to a video and my comments under it, that is one of the two most used formats on Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere which includes this format in English, as for the other one, quoran answers with or without debate ensuing, and a minor format is debate forum threads. But debate forums seem to be much less in use now than back in the years after 2000.

In languages other than English, you have the same set-up in French in Répliques Assorties and in German on Antworten nach Sorte. For Swedish and Spanish this happens on blogs mixed with normal essay format on the blogs: På Svenska og på Dansk på Antimodernism and En lengua romance en Antimodernism y de mis caminaciones (which also features narrative and poetry, partly in English or French).