In Case Anyone Thinks I'm Deluded for Believing Pope Michael I Existed and that I Knew Him ...

Here is someone else reporting on his existence.

The story he gives is a bit twisted, like Pope Michael I being elected by "six votes" ... no, he didn't vote for himself, he was elected by five votes against one (that being his own) and here he is saying so:

The First American Pope
Skyleryaps | 17 Aug. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uRVD9xCo-ck

I didn't know there were overall eight people there, and that two minors weren't voting because minors.

He also did get the updates right.

I only accepted his papacy after learning he had been ordained priest and consecrated bishop, and I have, even after he died, seen comments saying "he wasn't even a bishop" .... well, he was.

And after nearly a year he got a successor.

Last sedevacancy was from 2nd Aug. 2022 to 29th July 2023.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Our Lady of the Rosary
7 October 2026

Festum sacratissimi Rosarii beatae Mariae Virginis; itemque sanctae Mariae de Victoria commemoratio, quam sanctus Pius Quintus, Pontifex Maximus, ob insignem victoriam a Christianis bello navali, ejusdem sanctissimae Dei Genitricis auxilio, hac ipsa die de Turcis reportatam, quotannis fieri instituit.

Pope Michael II, Interview

"I am the REAL Pope"
Scholastic Answers | Live, 28 Aug. 2024
https://www.youtube.com/live/IhJ_0BFpqsI

Pour répondre à une question cette nuit : qu'est-ce que je reproche au "Vatican" ?

Pour répondre à une question cette nuit : qu'est-ce que je reproche au "Vatican" ? · La thése sédévacantiste totaliste exige une élection d'urgence · St. Robert Bellarmin vs FSSPX

D'abord, aux au revoirs, je n'ai rien dit sur "marquis", j'ai dit que mon nom est marqué* sur le blog: Hans Georg Lundahl. En plus ou moins chaque post, sauf les très courts, puis-je ajouter.

Mais mon nouvel ami vient de me poser la question ce que je reproche au "Vatican" (au Vatican d'Eux, pas au Vatican en Exile auquel j'adhère).

Je viens de dire trois choses :

• la nouvelle messe
• l'écuménisme qui dit qu'on adore le même Dieu que les antitrinitaires Musulmans, Juifs, T d J
• l'évolutionnisme.

Pape Michel II vient de dire (sur FB, peut-être pas son dernier mot) que même si la Messe de Paul VI était valide, elle serait illicite, car faite par l'illégitime Paul VI. Voir le point 2, l'écuménisme.

Quand au point 3, l'évolutionnisme, voici le CEC § 283 :

§283
La question des origines du monde et de l'homme fait l'objet de nombreuses recherches scientifiques qui ont magnifiquement enrichi nos connaissances sur l'âge et les dimensions du cosmos, le devenir des formes vivantes, l'apparition de l'homme. Ces découvertes nous invitent à admirer d'autant plus la grandeur du Créateur, de lui rendre grâce pour toutes ses oeuvres et pour l'intelligence et la sagesse qu'il donne aux savants et aux chercheurs. Avec Salomon, ceux-ci peuvent dire: «C'est Lui qui m'a donné la science vraie de ce qui est, qui m'a fait connaître la structure du monde et les propriétés des éléments (...) car c'est l'ouvrière de toutes choses qui m'a instruit, la Sagesse» (Sg 7:17-21).

Non, ce n'est pas la Sagesse divine qui a infusé en Yves Coppens de prendre "Lucy" pour une nôtre ancêtre ou aux dicastères dont la congrégation pour la doctrine de la foi d'accepter, à côté d'un Adam et Ève individuelle réellement ancêtres premiers de tous les hommes (et tous les hommes qui paraissent tels anatomiquement vraiment hommes) les solutions qu'ils étaient représentants devant Dieu d'autres hommes déjà existents ou qu'ils étaient même une personification (si je ne me trompe pas) d'une chute collective. Ou encore, apparemment, que d'autres hommes n'avaient pas d'âme mais que leur postérité avec les Adamites en avait.**

Même si on voudrait prétendre que le texte de la Genèse soit épistémologiquement en doute, ce que je ne recommende pas***, les idées autres que le créationnisme et une jeune humanité, comprenant tout l'anthropocène dans les derniers 7000 et quelques ans, détruisent le sens du dogme du concile de Trente, session V les canons 1, 2 et 3, et encore font mal à la conception de la justice divine.°

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
dimanche Reminiscere
1.III.2026

---

* Les lettres i et é ne se chevauchent pas en français, et les lettres i et e non plus en suédois. Mais l'e suédois (prononcé é) chevauche l'i français. Quand un Arabe qui parle mal le français dirait "marquis" pour "marqué" le problème est inverse, son propre i chevauche la totalité de l'é français, et quand il dit "marquis" c'est parce qu'il veut dire les choses avec une bonne et nette articulation, n'ayant pas le concept phonologique de l'é. L'arabe n'a rien entre i et a, les prononciations intermédiaires passent pour l'un ou pour l'autre, mais si le français a la gradation "i, é, è, a" le suédois a une gradation en cinq (i, e, ä, ä(r), a). Le son ä a deux prononciations, l'un normal, comme un è, l'autre devant un r (parfois muet devant une dentale) un peu plus ouvert encore. La même espace divisé en 4 ou en 5, chaque partie en a une plus petite aire, et entre les extrêmes, il y a chevauchements.

** J'aurais aimé ne pas croire que cette ineptie existât même chez des Catholiques, mais regardez le Frère Paul-Adrien dans la vidéo d'où vient la femme de Caïn ? et ma réponse, sous sa vidéo ou sur le post J'aimerais un peu plus d'orthodoxie d'un Dominicain, même Vatican-II-iste !

*** Je suis en train de faire une petite série en espagnol dessus : Génesis 1—11: tipo de texto · Génesis — la epistemología · Génesis — más sobre la epistemología

° Voir Justice de Dieu pour un Adam il y a trop longtemps, et voir cette série en anglais pour les situations ou scénarios pas pleinement adamiques : "Adam was not an individual, the fall was collective" - Evil or Just Wrong? · What About "The Jimmy Akin Solution"? · 1909 vs § 390.

Leo XIV (if such) Refers to Leo XIII ... and Leo XII?

New blog on the kid: Leo XIV (if such) Refers to Leo XIII ... and Leo XII? · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Michael II Remains My Pope · An interview with Pope Michael by Christian Wagner .... Second Part of Video · Ulysses Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman, Theologians? · Dialogue Continued

I think specifically of Leo XII on 26 of July 1826.

He cracked down on The Little Church. In this case, there was some clarity that the opposition to Pius VII came over his policy in one specific country (accepting Napoleon as Emperor of France and condemning opposition to him), and they eventually lost Apostolic Succession, those remaining are "reading the mass" without the sacrament because they have no actual priests.

Those facing Leo XIV (if such) have a somewhat stronger case, about items around Vatican II and New Liturgy and CCC (my favourite is §283*). And Palmarians, Conclavists, Sedevacantists have Apostolic Succession.

So, one idea would be to treat at least Conclavists and possibly Palmarians as what happened in 1400 .../HGL

* For reference, while Rob Skiba II was wrong on Lake Michigan with Flat Earth views, this is not the case with all Geocentrics. Riccioli was not a Flat Earther, nor was Pope Michael I, nor am I. And Young Earth Creationism is not Megachurches.

Wonder Where Michael II and Vatican in Exile Are? Ah, the Olive Tree

Issue of April 2025 has both the Lenten message and the Easter Sunday message:

April 2025: Olive Tree
Olive Tree, Volume X/Issue 1/April 2025
https://www.vaticaninexile.com/april_2025_olive_tree.php

The messages of Pope Michael II are that for Lent and a shorter sermon for Easter Sunday./HGL

Two videos I saw while seeking:

He is risen. Reflections on the resurrection by Catholic Unscripted. Christ Is Risen—Even in a Church Betrayed | Bishop Strickland on LSNTV./HGL

J'ai reçu un panettone

Celui que les "Catholiques" (certains de bonne foi) à côté considèrent le pape va mieux.

Moi, j'ai mal à l'estomac.

Il y avait une coupure dedans, quelqu'un avait pris une tranche.

Ce n'est pas humain de forcer quelqu'un par tricherie d'entrer en communion (religieuse ou d'intérêts) avec un-même. Que ça vienne du pape*, de Musulmans, d'un autre. Désolé, mais il me semble que ma pauvreté est abusée pour que je sers à d'autres qui reclament ce genre de service par les choses qu'ils m'offrent.

Pour moi, un certain suivi a été orchéstré par trois "papes" à Rome et à mon avis pas de Rome. On m'oblige à servir à leurs :

• précautions et cordons sanitaires contre ce que j'ai à dire ;
• bienveillance où j'aurais préféré une autre qui est moins contraignante ;
• études si je suis un vrai ou un faux prophète (je suis essayiste, c'est tout !) ;
• sauvegardes contre ce qu'ils considèrent mes précipitations.

Je ne veux pas ce genre de traitement de mon propre père. Je ne veux pas ce genre de traitement du vrai pape (et j'espère que Pape Michel II ne participe pas). Et encore moins d'un faux pape. J'ai pas envie d'être ballotté entre bienfaiteurs qui reclament ceci ou cela autour de moi, je donne et j'aimerais receveoir en récompense, pas en pitié, ni en curiosité. Les gens qui me font ça sont des voleurs.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Dim. Septuagésima
16.II.2025

* du faux pape

Open Letter to Phil Friedl

I have heard of you back when you were a Seminarian under Pope Michael I.

I am now your friend on FB. Your statuses often enough read like quotes from books of devotion. There is a clear sense in which there is truth to them.

Prayer detaches the soul from this world. He who loves the world will never pray. He who hates this world prays and sees the world's true folly. Just as a mirage offers water where there only a desert, the world offers happiness, but it only give you sorrow.

Fidelity to prayer is the health of the soul.

When you are tired, learn to rest, and not to quit.

"They blessed with their mouth, but cursed with their heart" (Psalm 61:5)

The issue of this open letter is actually NOT to be blessing with my mouth.

You see, there are truths which it costs nothing to pay attention to, unless it's the wrong moment. Calculate the equivalence of 3 sqd and 4 sqd with 5 sqd anytime you like, unless it distracts you from prayer or from the steering wheel. Or a sharp farm tool ... you know what I mean.

There are other truths which are emotionally harrowing, but still necessary and cannot be put off to after one dies. If you have committed one clear mortal sin with no mitigating circumstances, after your baptism, you had better confess to a priest or do an act of Perfect Contrition. Or, if you have not admitted Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, if you have not admitted that He is also the promised Messiah, you had better do that too. Whatever the emotional cost. And to some it is high.

But there are also truths that are useful when you are attentive, but actually kind of optional. These are the truths in books of devotion. Like the things quoted that are not Psalm 61:5. Obviously any given one of them can cease to be optional if your father confessor imposes on you to attend to it, but apart from that, they are optional to attend to. Especially, being reminded of the necessity of prayer, when you are in a situation depriving you of the necessary peace for prayer is unnecessary harrowing.

The point is not to unfriend you. You are free to unfriend me. The point is, I'm asking, when you pray for me, as I am sure you do, WHAT THINGS are you praying for? Specifically, I would not want to be prayed for in the hope of me becoming a priest or monk.

You see, I had fidelity to prayer up to concluding someone else's prayer, stronger than mine, was abusing my prayer as a weapon against my preference for marriage. As a weapon against my efforts to get sufficiently known to earn my living from my writing, the day someone starts a publishing house in order to both spread the things I had to say, useful enough in apologetics (and therefore to get people to admit mortal sin leads to an eternity of fire, or Jesus is the promised Messiah), as a weapon against that too.

The Church is always praying. But every single member of the Church isn't praying 24/24, 365/365. The Church is not meant to consist exclusively of monks and nuns. It conceivably could do so for some time (Monseigneur Lefèbvre once mentioned, I think, the theory that the Church could be reduced to one single person if he was a bishop, Pope Michael I quoted the OT prophecy about a small child being able to count the remainder of the Church, and I think he thougfht that fulfilled the day he was elected, so, the Church could be so few that it contained no laymen ... though actually on that day, prior to election and acceptance, it contained only laymen ... unless the Church survived somewhere else, if obscured). But once it has a certain size, it is certain that it will contain people who are NOT monks or nuns or dedicate every day to prayer.

I prayed the Rosary every day when I was a parishioner in St. Nicolas du Chardonnet, as I recall, or there were few exceptions. But I quit that parish, because I was morally certain the priests were not praying for, but against my earthly happiness. There are some who, in order to pray, need a glass of water first. And there are some who, in order to pray, need some of the good things of this world. Wanting a young wife is not just wanting beauty, which is fleeting, it is also wanting fertility and proles primum bonum matrimonii. Wanting to be known as an author is not only, in fact not even, wanting to bask in the kind of fame that a Hollywood actor or a popular singer enjoys. It's also wanting to be sufficiently known to do some good with one's work, and to "do good" in the business sense so one's work also feeds oneself and one's family.

I would like to know that by "learn to rest, not to quit" is not sth you apply to me in the sense of YOUR project for me to be principally a prayer warrior. Let's go back to fidelity to prayer, a bit.

I have run the way of thy commandments, when thou didst enlarge my heart. Psalms 118:32

This was in fact the case, back when I was a parishioner in St. Nicolas du Chardonnet (apart from its basically Eastern Orthodox view on the Papacy's nature, but this was just after my return from these), I did hope to marry and to get an edition of my writings or a performance of my compositions within the year, and I did pray the rosary and I did forgive my enemies. It took me perhaps a quarter of an hour to forgive an especially mean thing. And to pray an our father or a rosary and include them.

What brought me away from that is, someone was praying for me to be basically a monk, which I did not want, and do not want. Monks can live in poverty and therefore also without the fame of authorship and they regularly live without wives and children. That was not what I wanted or want. It was not what I think God was calling me to. For some reason, God was momentarily hearing the prayers of someone else, against mine, I was looking for ways to arrange that. Including and up to quitting the rosary so that St. Nicolas priests couldn't be heard when praying I get the grace of perfect chastity through the rosary. Bad move? Probably. But their prayers for my worldly continued destitution drove me to it. Perhaps, my quitting the rosary was God hearing their prayers, with the rosary, I would have obtained what they didn't want me to obtain.

Anyway, if Pope Michael II wants to concentrate on prayer and devotionals, it is certainly, within limits his right. But 300 (or however many we are by now) true Catholics won't save all the other souls by prayer only and neglecting apologetics. If Pope Michael II wants to shoehorn all Conclavists into prayer and devotion only, no apologetics, no worldly success, it is probable, what he wants to be head of is not the Catholic Church. You can have a Catholic Church (apart from when it's very small, like five people) with thirty-fold, sixty-fold, hundred-fold fruit. You cannot have a Catholic Church even the size of 300 people that's hundred-fold, hundred-fold, hundred-fold only. A lay apologist (and there were such from Justin Martyr) is helping the Pope and the Bishops to these ends:

Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine
[2 Timothy 4:2]

Did you catch the nuance? Preaching the word is in season out of season, but rebuking and reproving is in patience.

For this they are wilfully ignorant of, that the heavens were before, and the earth out of water, and through water, consisting by the word of God Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished But the heavens and the earth which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of the ungodly men
[2 Peter 3:5-7]

One of the most principal things I've done since the very first I was on the internet, or maybe weeks only before starting, way before I had this blogger account, was to write in defense of this truth. It could have been used. Pope Michael I was not obliged to be the sole paper published author in the Conclavist community. 1684 + 1099 = 2783 words, directly from the first pope. The Greek NT has 138,150 words. The first Pope wrote 2 % of the New Testament. Or, if you add in St. Mark, 11,304 words, that makes 10 %. Even more, a Pope has no right to peevishly look at his own success in self publishing via Amazon and then imagine this is the measure above which no one of the Catholics subject to him may reach. I told Pope Michael I, he should have tried to start a publishing house, with a Vatican in Exile goes a Libreria Editrice Vaticana in Exile, he would have been able to secure a much better success for the booklet he republished with nine papal condemnations on Heliocentrism. And he would have been able to print lots of the devotional books you are quoting (unless TAN Books have exclusive rights under US Copyright, they shouldn't have, the authors are long since dead, new translations could be made). And he could incidentally also have secured me a beginning of the income I want. He was master of his time of course ... until God was. He was suspicious of alcohol, I believe, and got a stroke one month before he died. I think the day he died he had opportunity to see some things about me in another perspective, an abcess was healed the same day. Not miraculously, but I was using alcohol to rince and blue cheese as penicilline. He prayed one prayer he hadn't prayed for me when alive. May I suggest yourself and his successor, feliciter regnanti Michael II, not to repeat the delay?

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IVth Lord's Day after Epiphany
9.II.2025

Some Have Asked if I Went to Mass

No, I did not.

No priest celebrating Mass in Paris is in Communion with Pope Michael II. Most are in "full communion" with "Pope Francis" whom I consider as Antipope Bergoglio. Those that aren't are in partial communion (FSSPX), sth which doesn't make sense, if he's an antipope you shouldn't be in communion at all, if he's the Pope you should be in full communion. Or in communion with no pope, like the Sedevacantists, they are right about Bergoglio but wrong about Popes Michael I (died in 2022) and Michael II (elected last year). I have heard there might also be a place in Paris where someone celebrating Mass (if he's a priest) considers himself "Vicar of Christ, but not Pope" — but that could be old news, and I consider him wrong. Because of mysticalist "election" partly, Michael I rejected Palmar de Troya because of that. And also he was probably only around after Michael I was elected in 1990.

I'll tell you what I did. I fasted yesterday, up to First Vespers. At First Vespers, I broke the fast with ice cream, because it's a feast.

First Vespers = feast days and Lord's days begin 18:00 or 18:30 the day before.

And telling you this is not a question of breaking the commandment in Matthew 6:16. I was basically challenged (yes, someone was aksing me) on "are you really a Catholic" and I had to say "yes, I am" since that follows from the command in Matthew 10:32 which takes priority./HGL

Quoting the Olive Tree

A newsletter from The Vatican in Exile:

Vance’s astonishing break with the orthodoxy of “boomer conservatism,” as his speech was introduced, includes a revision of the meaning of the U.S.-Israel alliance: “We have to sort of ask ourselves, what do we want out of our Israeli allies?”

No one in this position has asked that question of Israel in living memory. The fact that this obvious question is shocking shows the fact that obvious questions are shockingly absent from the national conversation.

Vance is very likely aware of another shockingly obvious question. Israel – whose Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been a driving force behind all the preemptive wars of regime change – is itself no friend to Christianity in its birthplace.

What is the alliance with Israel delivering for Christianity in its most historic site of all?

For years, Church leaders in the Holy Land have warned that “Israel is persecuting Christianity to extinction.” In a systematic and state-sanctioned process of escalating hostility to Christianity, attacks on priests and the desecration of graves and holy sites have increased following the Israeli parliament’s 2018 passing of a nation-state law that insisted “Israel is a Jewish state.”

This removes legal privilege from all non-Jews – Muslims, Christians, and Druze alike. The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem called on Catholics and all Christians to protest the new legislation.

Given the enormous power of the neoconservative lobby and that of its allies, it is exceptional for anyone at the top of the U.S. political establishment to speak in defense of Christianity and against the doctrine of “forever wars” which extinguishes it.

It is extremely hopeful for the world, in a time of crisis almost entirely precipitated by the recklessness of the liberal-global order, that its unquestioned alliance with an increasingly unstable Israel faces a realistic reappraisal. The doctrine of permanent war which partners this is set to be abandoned at last.

Will be archived in The Olive Tree./HGL

One Year Ago

One Year Ago · Two Things for August 2nd

a Pope was elected in Vienna.

Rogelio Martinez took the name Michael II.

Ad multos annos, Your Holiness!
/HGL

If a Pope Makes a False Move, Can One Oppose Him?

Under duress, Pope Liberius signed the III Sirmian formula, and it is said (in the Liber Papalis) that as a result Felix II began to be Pope, while Liberius was still alive.*

When Pope John XXII misspoke about the Beatific Vision, a saint threatened to withdraw obedience, if he didn't change his mind, John XXII decided to look into it and on his deathbed recanted the error, while the saint continued to obey, as John XXII wasn't openly repeat offending.

1988 was 18 years after Marcel Lefebvre had founded the SSPX, and 12 years after its continuation involved defying a probably invalid suspension a divinis.

2024 is 36 years later.

How long can one consider the papacy as held by people who refuse to recant what one also considers as errors? Will the new bishops* also continue to say "una cum papa nostro Francisco"?

It's 53 years (the Hail Mary's of a third of the Rosary) that the FSSPX exists and this basically to resist a false move made by an actual Pope whom one is still hoping will recant his errors. And now it's the fourth man in that position.** Last year, a different man became second in a different position, that being Pope of the Vatican in Exile.

I think by now, whether you prefer Francis or Michael II, I think you should prefer either over saying "una cum" and making it mean "pro" ...
/Hans Georg Lundahl

* He stepped back when Liberius cleared himself, and after Liberius became St. Felix II, same source.
** Rorate Caeli: First Public Acknowledgement of the Consecration of New Bishops for the SSPX - Letter by SSPX France Superior: Get Ready
By New Catholic at 6/20/2024 03:08:00 PM
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/06/first-public-acknowledgement-of.html

*** Fifth, if you count "John Paul I".

Yet Another Reason to Prefer Pope Michael II

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Nuns of Belorado~Orduña, Poor Clares! · New blog on the kid: Yet Another Reason to Prefer Pope Michael II

Francis Is Purposefully Trying To Provoke Faithful Catholics By Insulting Mary
21.V.2024, Return To Tradition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlFi-gT1Ok8

As said, this is not a reason to be in communion with the so-called Pope Francis, but rather with Pope Michael II./HGL

Habemus Papam

Rogelio Martínez was elected in Vienna, and accepted on July 29, the day of St. Olaf of Norway.

He took the name Michael II.

Source:
Vatican in Exile : The Olive Tree : August 2023
https://www.vaticaninexile.com/august_2023_olive_tree.php