En lisant le latin, ça vous est arrivé de penser que le paradigme est trop long ?

Pour les substantifs, coup de bol.

Au pluriel, chaque Vocatif coïncide avec le Nominatif, chaque Ablatif avec le Datif. Aucun substantif a douze formes, au maximum dix :

Declinatio substantivalis et pronominalis

Le conspectus en soi est peu lisible, mais il renvoie à cinq liens ... pas exactement un pour les cinq déclinaisons.

Car première et cinquième sont très apparentés, surtout si on tient compte des mobilia en première (filiabus, pour les filles, animabus, pour les âmes, pas à confondre avec filiis, pour les fils, animis, pour les esprits, les courages).

Item deuxième et quatrième. La troisième est son propre truc. Par contre, les deux groupes sont nettement différenciés entre non neutres et neutres. (Pour les substantifs, aucune déclinaison est en soi suffisante pour distinguer entre masculin et féminin : bonus nauta malam malum secat ... le bon marin coupe le mauvais pommier, en français les arbres sont devenus masculins).

Et les verbes.

En grec, on apprend les formes des temps qui sont d'une même forme de théma. Mais pour chaque verbe, au lieu d'apprendre la conjugaison "première, deuxième, troisième, quatrième" et ça suffit, on apprend toujours les formes de théma.

De cette manière, on se libère de répéter la même formation d'un temps pour les divers conjugaisons.

Amo, amas, amavi, amavisti. Frico, fricas, fricui, fricuisti.

Moneo, mones, monui, monuisti. Iubeo, iubes, iussi, iussisti. Deleo, deles, delevi, delevisti.

Et le perfait comme fricui, monui, aussi en volui, soit de volo, soit de volvo.

On apprend amo, amavi comme la déclinaison, frico, fricui comme exception. On apprend moneo, monui comme la déclinaison, mais iubeo, iussi, deleo, delevi, comme des exceptions. Et si on faisait comme en grec ? Alors, chaque temps hormis l'indicatif du présent se limite à trois versions à apprendre. L'indicatif du présent en a quatre, mais j'ai triché en faisant de "audeo, j'ose, adeo, je visite, audio, j'entends" une même version. En fait, le pluriel de la troisième (ou la sixième, comme on dit en français) est "-ent" pour "audent" mais un "unt" précédé de voyelle pour "adeunt, audiunt". En revanche, je donne la forme sans voyelle comme une seule variante (tous les verbes l'ayant comptent comme "irréguliers").

Index morphologiae uerbalis

Finalement, si ces simplification de l'apprentissage ne font pas saliver, je donne aussi des traductions de chants populaires (dont "au clair de la lune") en latin.

Exercitia simplicissima de casuum et temporum utilitate

Notons que j'ai nommé ce blog Latinitatis morphologia simplificata. Je ne rêve même pas de priver le latin de ses formes, juste de les présenter en manière plus brève, d'où le sous-titre vel potius simpliciter exposita.

Ioannes Georgius Lundahl
Lutetiae Parisiorum
die martyrorum Gorcumensium
9 Julii AD MMo XXo VIo.

Brilae, in Hollandia, passio novemdecim Martyrum, Gorcomiensium nuncupatorum; quorum ex numero novem Sacerdotes ac duo Laici erant Fratres Minores, quatuor Presbyteri saeculares, duo Praemonstratenses, unus Regularis Canonicus sancti Augustini, et unus Dominicanus. Hi omnes, ob tuendam Ecclesiae Romanae auctoritatem et realem Christi in Eucharistia praesentiam, a Calvinianis haereticis varia ludibria et tormenta perpessi, tandem, in trabem acti, agonem suum, adstrictis laqueo faucibus, consummarunt; et a Pio Nono, Pontifice Maximo, inter sanctos Martyres relati sunt.

"Birthright lottery"

It seems, some have argued I had a 20 % chance of being born in India.

My parents each had 2*23 chromosomes.

I also have 2*23 chromosomes.

For each gamete, the sperm and the ovum, the 23 chromosomes assembled in a chance that's 2^23, or 8 388 608. The combination of that is the square of this number, so : 70 368 744 177 664.

I had one chance in 70 368 744 177 664 to be born to my two parents. I had exactly zero chances in anything to be born to two Indian parents. If I had any chance of being born in India, it would have been the chance of mum and dad both being so fond of Bhagavadgita they had gone to India. I would still have been born to two Swedes.

I was in fact born in Vienna. Not far from Karl Lueger-Platz, 4 km with the roads bending. Because, each of them went to the Med school there.

Education is also part of my heritage. My dad neither stayed with that Med school nor with my mother. My mother stayed with the Med school each time she studied (up to ninth term, not sure if she completed a tenth in Sweden), and not with my dad.

I feel no regrets at the birthright lottery./HGL

Would Conservative Protestants Like a Protestant Civilisation?

HGL's F.B. writings: A Serb is Anti-Austrian (Who's Surprised?) · New blog on the kid: Would Conservative Protestants Like a Protestant Civilisation?

They want to persuade themselves they would.

Doug Wilson dreams of a hypothetic future Protestant Republic. In it, Catholic Churches would be denied the right to Marian processions. But apart from that, Catholics could remain openly Catholics, apparently?

His rationale for opposing the Marian procession is, it's "public idolatry" ... but part of the rationale for the Deformation (he would spell it with an R, not a D) is that Eucharistic adoration is idolatry and Sacrifice of the Mass either idolatry or at least blasphemy.

So, I have a hard time seeing how his future Protestant Republic would not also oppose what's going on inside a Catholic Church to which the doors are usually open, daytime. Perhaps he would change access to the Catholic Church, allowing the public access only for Mass hours, and showing a card to the ussher. Or perhaps he would pretend Catholic Mass is just a version of the Sunday service. The one road is restriction, the other misrepresentation.

Either way, early Protestant civilisation items like England in the days of Charles II (despite his being personally convinced of Catholicism at a time when his brother, the future James VII and II was still a convinced Protestant) would kill priests for celebrating mass and kill laymen for hosting a priest to celebrate Mass or for hiding a priest from detection.

Now, he is against female pastors, rightly so, against the theory of Evolution, rightly so, against full Church acceptance of, not same sex attracted persons, perhaps, but certainly homosexual couples, and rightly so (I'm for acceptance of a ssa person if he or she is into celibacy or into actual Christian marriage, ie makes an exception for one of the opposed sex).

But a late Protestant civilisation has produced, in order of appearance, some from earlier on but more important later:

• Proposals to push Antisemitism to destruction of Synagogues (Luther)
• Masonic type indifferentism, starting with early Rosicrucians (around the beginning of the Thirty Years War)
• Deep Space (Newton, Kant)
• Deep Time (Hutton, Lyell)
• Evolution, including human evolution (Wallace, Darwin)
• Neopagan attacks on "God of the gaps" (Nietzsche was from Röcken, near Lützen)
• acceptance of Evolution in the Church with "Christian" attacks on "God of the gaps" (Henry Drummond, Free Church of Scotland)
• National Socialism (Václav Klofáč and Rudolf Jung took inspiration from the Hussite commander John Zizka of Trocnov and the Chalice; c. 1360 – 11 October 1424)
• Female Pastors
• Persecution of Creationists in Church
• acceptance of gay couples in Church, with "blessings" of partnerships or downright gay weddings.

I suppose Doug Wilson is against all of these, and rightly so. Oh, perhaps excluding Deep Space, but if so he hasn't paid attention to the "Distant Starlight" argument against Young Earth Creationism.

Another item is lying. Doug Wilson might be in denial about this one.

It was a Serb who showed above photo as an exhibit of "Catholic clergy", all of above are in fact Protestant clergy. As he didn't answer my words, I couldn't correct his possible denial, but am doing so here. The two central figures are:

Von Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-H25547 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, Link

Ludwig Müller, here shown with Nazi salute at the National Synod of Wittenberg (he was federal bishop or Reichsbischoff) and ...

Friedrich Coch, "von 1933 bis 1945 Landesbischof der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Landeskirche Sachsens." (country bishop of Saxony) with the previous words designating him as a "leading proponent of the German Christians movement (Deutsche Christen in the German original term). He was from Eisenach, near Wartburg.

But this confusion has been entertained by Protestants as well, like his thesis, Stepinac being, on orders of the Vatican, complicit in Jasenovac atrocities of genocidal type against Serbs, has been promoted by Avro Manhattan at Chick Tracts.

I have also seen a photo of Hitler signing a cheque for a Protestant Deaconess presented as Hitler adulated by a "Catholic nun" which clearly she was not.

More often, National Socialism is presented as specially indebted to Catholicism in Austria and Bavaria, because it's clearly in the century leading up to it, Antisemitic. Right, it is Antisemitic on a religious level, and it has promoted what some would call "the Blood Libel" ... I'm not into calling it a libel, but I am against pushing it against all Jews, just as I'm against pushing National Socialism against all Catholic Antisemites. There was a tract about Sts Simon of Trent, Andrew of Rinn and two more child martyrs, I'd exonerate Jews on St. Andrew while leaving him martyrdom status (Chesterton would have probably surmised the "Jews" that that uncle met were actually witches and I'm suspicious of the uncle). It was pushing against "Orthodox" Jews because of similiarities between these and the Medieval Jews, perhaps superficial such. I'd hope those killers were as untypical of Medieval Jews as the Rotschilds are of modern ones.

But it never went beyond religious propaganda. Austro-Fascism, the pure expression of this Catholicism, the direct heir of Karl Lüeger, never persecuted Jews or any ethnic group as such. Oh, people from Czechoslovakia were expelled from factories and deported back over the border.

The huge difference between Austro-Fascism and NSDAP was that NSDAP was pro-medicine and pro-science, in a sense that divorced ethics from Catholicism or even from Protestant Christian ethics (Protestantism has an inherent tendency this direction, in the idea of "simul justus et peccator" and it was accentuated by Deutsche Christen). Austro-Fascism never divorced political ethics from Catholic ethics. That's why Jews, Roma, Sinti were safe, as far as the government was concerned, in Austria prior to 1938. And so were handicapped people. That's why they could face unjust hardships in Germany as early as 1933 (confiscated property, for Jews, socially motivated slave hunting, "tramp camps" for among others Gipsies, while handicapped people could be "mercy killed" from September 1939, including in former and future Austria, by then "Ostmark", and sterilised since February 1934, as in Protestant countries of Scandinavia up to the 1970's). But this, the Protestants prefer to gloss over, and Doug Wilson has unjustly gone after Nick Fuentes.

I may like some National Socialists today (notably Nordfront in Sweden). But I'm not into all of their politics, and this is partly because I'm Catholic and Fredrik and Paulina (I hope they become Catholics one day, they are currently Neo-Pagans) are indirect heirs to a Protestant culture, one which when it could no longer persecute Catholics after Gustaf III or converts to Catholicism after 1860, chose to obfuscate Catholicism. The other day, an article showed the difference. In England, there was a directive to make fewer forced hospitalisations of Black people for psychosis. To Nordfront redactors the prior state was not racist, but simply reflected these people having a higher degree of genetic fragility to psychosis. To me, I'm happy the directive points to racist or racist adjacent motivations (also known as hyper civilisation) in the diagnosis criteria. Obviously I'd hope it leads to fewer White Brits being hospitalised as well. Including, perhaps, if that's the case, the mother of Preston Davies.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
Martyrs of Gorkum
9.VII.2026

Brilae, in Hollandia, passio novemdecim Martyrum, Gorcomiensium nuncupatorum; quorum ex numero novem Sacerdotes ac duo Laici erant Fratres Minores, quatuor Presbyteri saeculares, duo Praemonstratenses, unus Regularis Canonicus sancti Augustini, et unus Dominicanus. Hi omnes, ob tuendam Ecclesiae Romanae auctoritatem et realem Christi in Eucharistia praesentiam, a Calvinianis haereticis varia ludibria et tormenta perpessi, tandem, in trabem acti, agonem suum, adstrictis laqueo faucibus, consummarunt; et a Pio Nono, Pontifice Maximo, inter sanctos Martyres relati sunt.

Bonum Festum Sanctae Elisabeth

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

4 Julii | Stremotii, in Lusitania, natalis sanctae Elisabeth Viduae, Lusitanorum Reginae, quam, virtutibus et miraculis claram, Urbanus Octavus, Pontifex Maximus, in Sanctorum numerum retulit. Ejus tamen celebritas octavo Idus mensis hujus recolitur, ex dispositione Innocentii Papae Duodecimi.
8 Julii | Sanctae Elisabeth Viduae, Lusitanorum Reginae, quae ad regnum caeleste quarto Nonas hujus mensis transivit.

Elle ne parle donc pas ?

Monaco, Ukraine, Cryptomonnaies : L’incroyable traque d’Anastasia Berezovska
RTL | 8 juil. 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9mkpe4DzT8

Pâques et jours entourants, 2022. Je suis en train de faire ce les commentaires sur ce post en cyber, mais pas 24 sur 24 :

Listes de Rois Pictes

Or, Vendredi saint, soir, j'ai pris une petite bière pour "le seul repas complet autorisé". Quand plus tard un homme m'offre un repas, délicieux, sans doute, je n'ai pas le droit d'en prendre et je dis non merci.

Le lendemain petit matin. J'avais dormis sur le parvis de Georges Pompidou. Je note un homme qui fait quelque chose avec mon bagage, je suis très fatigué et pas diplomatique.

Je me lève, je le pousse, il n'est pas l'homme un peu trop bourré de la veille. Il me terrasse, et commence à me donner des coups de pieds à ma tête. Pas le plus brutal possible, sinon je serais mort, mais quand même trop pénible. Quand les gens commencent à passer, il quitte.

Et quand je le décris devant la police, je pensais que ça pourrait être un proche de Zélenski. Le cas n'est jamais résolu.

Un peu plus tard, je retrouve Zélenski en personne sur une vidéo avec son soutien international Orlando Bloom. Les deux hommes sont de taille différente, je vois que Zélenski est autant court que mon aggresseur. Une autre vidéo, il crie en colère ... la même voix que j'avais entendu ce matin.

Je soutiens l'Ukraine, en principe, mais je ne suis pas un inconditionnel de son président actuel. Pour héro national qu'il soit./HGL

Marinella is Wrong

THE POPE'S NEWSPAPER Publishes a SHOCKING Statement: The FAITHFUL Are Left SPEECHLESS!
Faith and Tradition | 6 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gu4hqGlay-o

The author of the article.

West Bank Christians

SaveWestBankChristians.com
Christine Niles | 5 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVja0HX9rLY

Il semble que certains Musulmans sont contre des Chrétiens qui croient vraiment la Genèse ou l'Apocalypse

Il y a plusieurs années, un homme noir que je rencontrais à Georges Pompidou (à l'époque à Beaubourg, pas à Bercy), je ne pense pas qu'il était sécurité là-bas, mais qu'il était sécurité, m'a parlé de diverses choses à propos de mes blogs ou sujets de prédéliction. C'est aussi possible que je fasse conflation de deux ou trois personnes :

Notons, de ma mémoire comme dit et selon lui (pas forcément moi), voici :

• croire la Bible littéralement, c'était l'erreur de Martin Luther ;
• le schisme, y compris donc sédévacantisme ou orthopapisme, c'est dangéreux parce que, regardez le schisme de Martin Luther et les Guerres de Religion engendrées par là ;
• croire l'Apocalypse peut conduire à ce que les prophécies catastrophiques se réalisent.

Un autre, un Turc, je parlais du Créationnisme Jeune Terre, et il me disait, comme si ça devait regler la question pour moi, qu'Islam n'exigeait pas cette croyance.

Bien entendu, sur les quatre sujets je pense différemment, et aussi sur un cinquième, un non-dit :

• croire la Bible littéralement, c'est chose commune entre Luther et ceux qui l'ont condamné ;
• Luther était novateur, si un jour il y aura des guerres entre Novus Ordo et Tradis, la faite serait avec les novateurs ;
• l'Apocalypse ne vient pas d'Apollon de Delphes, mais de Dieu, y croire est en partie un moyen de différer les catastrophes, et s'il semble y avoir davantage de choses qui pointe vers une fin de temps proche, c'est entre autre parce que trop peu de gens y croient ;
• le Créationnisme Jeune Terre est logiquement et scientifiquement connexe à la Création directe d'Adam et Ève, et à leur chute comme primordiale dans l'histoire humaine, en plus d'être la lecture la plus évidente ;
• ce n'est pas parce que Littéralisme quranique fait des dégâts que Littéralisme biblique serait faux, ça n'est pas un problème du littéralisme vis-à-vis le livre sacré, mais du choix du livre.

Or, je viens récemment de maintenir que la Genèse a entièrement raison : Deen Academy Underlines that Biblical and Quranic Flood (As he sees it) are Not the Same et que l'Apocalypse est à lire de manière futuriste, par rapport à St. Jean, et possiblement déjà dans les débuts de l'accomplissement des prophéties sur les derniers temps : More on Apoc. 13:18.

Est-ce un pur hasard si le lectorat en Arabie Saoudite monte et dépasse celui en France ? (Stats en lite) Et que sur deux de mes blogs, les pages vues sont pareils, 102 pour les deux pays dans un blog et 7 dans un autre ? Je ne le pense pas.

Je ne pense pas non plus que ce soit mon devoir de me plier devant les hystéries sécuritaires des Musulmans ou de certains entre eux. Et encore moins de devenir Franc-Maçon pour calmer des gens hystériques dans la loge.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts Cyrille et Méthode
7.VII.2026

[14.II, Romae] Ibidem depositio sancti Cyrilli, Episcopi et Confessoris; qui, una cum sancto Methodio, similiter Episcopo et fratre suo, cujus dies natalis octavo Idus Aprilis recensetur, multas Slavicas gentes earumque Reges ad fidem Christi perduxit. Horum tamen Sanctorum festivitas Nonis Julii celebratur.
[6.IV] Velehradii, in Moravia, natalis sancti Methodii, Episcopi et Confessoris, qui, una cum sancto Cyrillo, item Episcopo et fratre suo, cujus natalis sextodecimo Kalendas Martii recensetur, multas Slavicas gentes earumque Reges ad fidem Christi perduxit. Horum autem Sanctorum festum Nonis Julii celebratur.
[7.VII] Sanctorum Episcoporum et Confessorum Cyrilli et Methodii fratrum, quorum natalis respective agitur sextodecimo Kalendas Martii et octavo Idus Aprilis.

Stats en lite

France
165 + 106 + 4 + 2 + 5 + 27 + 9 + 12 + 16 + 1 + 9 + 3 + 7 + 1 + 8 + 1 + 22 = 398 (12:59, 1.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Colombie
64 + 70 + 3 + 1 + 14 + 4 + 5 + 14 = 175 (16:37, 1.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Burkina Faso
3 + 1 = 4, dans une semaine (vers 15:40, 2.VII.2026, derniers 7 jours)

En chaque cas, il peut y avoir d'autres blogs que ceux dont les statistiques sont cités, où le pays se trouve parmi les "Autres".

France
11 + 120 + 24 + 3 + 111 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 6 + 15 + 1 + 2 + 10 + 2 + 12 + 21 = 348

Colombie
10 + 71 + 27 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 9 = 133

Burkina Faso = 2

(Les trois pays vers 16:07, 3.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

France
115 + 128 + 16 + 2 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 27 + 6 + 9 + 4 + 8 + 11 + 2 + 8 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 22 = 377

Colombie
77 + 5 + 17 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 2 = 104

Burkina Faso = 1

(Les trois pays vers 15:22, 4.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Portugal
25 + 75 + 140 + 5 + 66 + 72 + 80 + 1 + 156 + 50 + 1 + 2 + 51 + 6 + 12 = 742

Arabie saoudite
1 + 138 + 24 + 85 + 8 + 2 + 9 + 2 + 26 + 6 + 6 + 1 + 4 + 12 + 8 + 2 + 3 = 337

(Les deux pays, vers 15:50, 4.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Autre détail ... parmi les plus grands pays, se trouvent régulièrement les États-Unis et Brésil. Lequel a la plus grande population catholique?

Brésil, population : 203,080,756. Pourcent de Catholiques : 56.7%

États-Unis, population : 331,449,281. Pourcent de Catholiques : 20%

203,080,756 * 56.7 / 100 = 115,146,789 > 331,449,281 * 0.2 = 66,289,856

Portugal
125 + 10 + 11 + 134 + 2 + 114 + 2 + 8 + 7 + 4 + 32 + 1 + 30 + 23 + 1 + 6 + 2 + 20 + 43 + 340 + 3 + 481 + 5 + 470 = 1874 = 1,87 k
1,87 k + 1,54 k = 3,41 k

France
164 + 106 + 6 + 4 + 1 + 33 + 8 + 2 + 6 + 19 + 8 + 6 + 14 + 32 = 409

Arabie saoudite
17 + 4 + 175 + 8 + 3 + 6 + 1 + 23 + 11 + 8 + 23 + 2 + 5 + 26 = 312

Colombie
92 + 2 + 28 + 5 + 5 + 14 + 6 + 3 = 155

(Les quatres pays, vers 19:09, 5.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Portugal
11 + 93 + 3 + 8 + 150 + 434 + 135 + 2 + 3 + 94 + 147 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 6 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 10 + 4 + 2 + 651 + 10 + 127 + 10 + 332 = 2255

Arabie saoudite
1 + 24 + 3 + 207 + 91 + 12 + 6 + 9 + 7 + 2 + 8 + 18 + 13 + 2 + 12 + 28 = 443

France
3 + 6 + 165 + 111 + 9 + 8 + 6 + 25 + 3 + 11 + 3 + 14 + 6 + 1 + 8 + 27 = 406

Russie
6 + 11 + 4 + 94 + 68 + 5 + 2 + 1 + 11 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 8 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 16 = 235

Colombie
90 + 1 + 20 + 2 + 3 + 20 = 136

Burkina Faso = 2

(Les six pays, vers 16:14, 6.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Portugal
9 + 3 + 15 + 82 + 2 + 174 + 759 + 114 + 13 + 76 + 5 + 176 + 2 + 14 + 1 + 6 + 1 + 2 + 97 + 62 + 10 + 31 + 22 + 109 + 8 + 24 + 5 = 1822 = 1,82 k
1,82 k + 1,25 k = 3,07 k

Arabie saoudite
113 + 102 + 7 + 7 + 10 + 29 + 9 + 4 + 1 + 18 + 1 + 7 + 18 + 4 + 20 = 350

France
2 + 96 + 102 + 7 + 5 + 7 + 1 + 28 + 12 + 1 + 5 + 2 + 11 + 10 + 16 + 8 + 3 = 316

Russie
9 + 5 + 91 + 48 + 13 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 2 + 6 + 11 + 2 = 198

Colombie
79 + 1 + 8 + 15 + 15 = 118

(Les cinq pays vers 16:38, 7.VII.2026, dernières 24 h)

Some Guys Promote Israeli Settlers in Gaza

One argued, after 7 October and hostage atrocities, there have to be some land losses.

Now, Christian Palestinians were not part of this.

And they were between "collateral damage" and actually targetted by Israelis, depending on whom you ask.

Would these guys be OK with offering up land in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv area for Christian Palestinians?

A reminder.

They are not Arab immigrants:

Christian Palestinian Aramaic - What is CPA and how different is it from Syriac?
Professor Michael Wingert | 28 Aug. 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5E_eYjuqYE

They are the people of the area, those of Christian confession and Semitic background.

They are Hebrews.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
VI Lord's Day after Pentecost
5.VII.2026

I'm Glad Pétain Forbade the Lodge

Franco too, by the way.

Oh, I'm not happy with some of the things Pierre Laval did, to say the least, but forbidding the lodge was before 1942. And even earlier with El Caudillo.

Exorcist Fr Dan Reehil - The Dangers Of Masonic Oaths
thislisa | 8 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oxpsb8eOoBE

Independence Day or Traitor Day?

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica: Castelnuovo (Bosnia) and Lexington (Massachusetts) · Fort Mc Henry and Moscow, What's the Connection? · New blog on the kid: Independence Day or Traitor Day?

I have British FB friends who will tell their US friends today:

Happy Traitor Day!

In a few minutes on FB, I found two reels telling both sides of the story.

An Arab Lady probably married to a Brit recalled the abolition of slavery by Britain, 1830. Now, this abolition was already being planned and promoted in the time of George III.

Wilberforce was already on the move.

Some who signed the declaration did so to be sure to keep their slaves.

A Hispanic Lady told the story of Charles Carroll of Carrollton.* In the time before 1830 (also!), the United Kingdom was oppressing Catholics. Outside Maryland and Pennsylvania, I think, the Catholic worship was illegal, as in the UK.**

And Spain, and France were for the Independence. And so obviously were quite a few Irish.

I'll for my part say, Happy Independence Day!

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Bertha of Blangy
4.VII.2026

* Every Catholic Should Know This Before July 4th
AfterMass with Ana Munley | 3.VII.2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mQD6gEPzY8

** According to the video, even in Maryland, after 1704.

Je ne change pas d'URL sur mon blog

J'ai plusieurs blogs.

Voici une liste :

New blog on the kid : An Internet Production / Une production sur internet
http://nov9blogg9.blogspot.com/2017/12/an-internet-production-une-production.html

Voici un moyen de savoir sur lequel j'ai publié dernièrement :

Latest on Antimodernism
https://l-o-antimodernism.blogspot.com/

Voici des statistiques sur les blogs, repartis en des groupes :

Apologetics Blogs · Main Blogs · Debate blogs · Philological and Language Blogs · Artsy Blogs · Autobiographical Blogs (2 from 7 are 13 +) · Small blogs

Quand je change de panneau, c'est le plus souvent pour signaler sur quel blog j'ai mon dernier post./HGL

Bonum Festum Visitationis

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Visitatio beatae Mariae Virginis ad Elisabeth.

The hand that gives ...

There seems to be an African proverb.

"The hand that gives is always higher than the hand that receives"

I'm not going to Africa.

First, as Christians, we believe that even when alms are strictly alms, they are given to God.

We meet God in the actual needs of the one asking.

For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in
[Matthew 25:35]

Not, "I was thirsty and you gave me to eat so I got even thirstier" ... food can dehydrate even more than alcohol, which the prefecture of Paris forgot last Friday.

Second, we believe and feel, as Western Christians, that someone who's offering sth is not a simple beggar.

If I offered music, you could give, but you would be receiving first.

Since I offer sth to read, you can give, but even if you give first, I am still giving and not just receiving.

Third. We agree I have no right to complain if you can't give all I need.

But I also hold, if you give more than I need on some item, and it hurts me because I'm not in the right mood to say no thanks politely or you don't give me the time to do so, or sleep privations make me too exhausted to renounce it, you are actually robbing from me.

I'll never be an African.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Visitation of the Virgin Mary to Elisabeth
2.VII.2026

Bonum Festum pretiosissimi Sanguinis Domini nostri Jesu Christi

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Festum pretiosissimi Sanguinis Domini nostri Jesu Christi.

Pourquoi de Gaulle est-il ciblé en 1962 ? On le sait très bien

Pourquoi a-t-il survécu ?

Il y a certainement des prières d'Allemagne et de l'Autriche en gratitude parce que Staline n'a pris qu'un quart en territoire occupé. Et non un tiers, si la France n'avait pas été nominellement un pays vainqueur. Y compris de Konrad Adenauer, adepte du St. Rosaire.

Mais il y a encore une prière, peut-être encore plus décisive.

En 1948, une fille nommée Anne meurt en pneumonie. Il dit a sa femme, que maintenant Anne est comme les autres.

Bon, pas tout à fait. Ayant eu un chromosome de plus, elle n'a jamais pleinement eu l'usage de la raison. Elle a été incapable du péché mortel. Ayant lavé le péché originel dans le baptême, elle n'est pas retenue en dehors des portes du paradis. Y aller très vite n'est pas comme tous les autres.

C'est son portrait qui arrête la balle destinée au cœur de son père. Anne de Gaulle, priez pour nous.

Avoir engendré et nourri Anne a compensé des fautes commises envers les Pieds-Noirs. Au moins pour sa vie terrestre et au moins ce jour là.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Fête du Très Précieux Sang
1.VII.2026

Festum pretiosissimi Sanguinis Domini nostri Jesu Christi.

Production June 2026

Production June 2026
Back to Previous		On to Next
Production May 2026		Production July 2026

1.VI.2026

Answering Shaun Doyle on Geocentrism · Petroleum Based Ark Covering? That's what Joel Duff argues · Galileo proved Ptolemy wrong. · NinjaMonkeyPrime Goes Off a Tangent

2.VI.2026

J'ai fait de la pub dans le sens des quatre coins de la terre (FR) · Privatskolor, ja tack (SV) · Celebrations or Sth Else? Hear Isabel Brown

3.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Sanctae Clotildis Reginae (LAT) · Seal of Confession in France · Ancient Anatolian Farmers: Arrival, Preseli Blue Stones, Stone Henge, and End · Anhörigutvandring (SV) · Tyska National-Socialister intet alltid de värsta (SV) · FB censure contre la vérité / pardons, censurait (FR)

4.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Corporis Christi (LAT) · Guérard des Lauriers avait tort, ça n'empêche pas que Wojtyla n'était pas le pape (FR) · Ryssland skall sprida sina villoläror i verlden ... eller hvad nu den hl. Jungfrun sade i Fatima (SV) · Sharing · Recency of All Protestant / Anabaptist Type Churches · England didn't burn Tyndale and his translation was not the crime he burned for

5.VI.2026

Une étudiante qui pleurait, j'espère qu'elle n'allait pas avorter (FR) · Il a célébré les funérailles de Johnny Halliday (FR)

6.VI.2026

L'Église catholique, interdit-elle de dire qu'on vit dans les derniers temps ? (FR) · Code Civil, article 144 (FR)

7.VI.2026

Before Babel · Non, je ne suis toujours pas National-Socialiste (FR)

8.VI.2026

Two Videos to Share: Christine Niles on a Miracle, Graham Sheper and Professor George Russom on Old English Poetry

9.VI.2026

Italy expelled a Muslim preacher residing in Brescia to Pakistan, where he is from · Was I Saying Islam Was Quite OK? No.

10.VI.2026

It seems some people resume the failures in my situation to "he thought he could do anything he liked and it got no consequences" · After a Pogrom Near Lake Constance, a Monk Was Angry · Nabta Playa (FR) · L'Afrique n'a pas un des quatre coins, mais elle en a deux moyens (FR) · No, Pope Michael I Didn't Rewrite the Bible · "Unworthy of the Universe" — Does Dawkins Want It to be Worthy and to be Worshipped? Is That Where He Puts the Attributes of God? · Är hvita racen hotad? (SV) · Fort Mc Henry and Moscow, What's the Connection?

11.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Sancti Barnabae (LAT) · Biblio ou Caravanserail ? (FR) · Lucy Stemp, est-elle en sécurité ? (FR) · Spielberg Wants Me to Second Guess My Religion, or So I Have Been Told on FB · Catholic Exegesis Involves Some Eisegesis (as it Should)

12.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Cordis Sacratissimi Iesu (LAT) · SaveWestBankChristians.com · Que Dieu soit loué : Lucy Stemp retrouvée, saine et sauve (FR) · Antoine Bret imagine avoir réfuté la théorie de l'âge apparent (c'est un homme de paille) (FR) · Las lenguas en Hispania antes del latín (de las cuales el ibérico) ... (ESP) · Geocentrism · What is Acceptable as Bad but still Valid Pope? · Deacon Frederick Bartels Is Wrong (Except on Earth Being a Globe) · Righteous Indignation

13.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Sancti Antonii Lusitani (LAT) · I'm actually leaving some unfinished to Monday · Statistiques de semaines finissant en : 16 mai 2026 · 23 mai 2026 · 30.V.2026 · 8.VI.2026 · Sosa und Hitler (DE) · Was Mary "a Child"? No. With Child.

14.VI.2026

One bad item in following video, the first, otherwise it's pretty good · Meaning of the name Shiluva · C'est pas les Musulmans qui se prosternent la face à terre ? (FR) · Found Some on Nachmanides' Debate · An Actually Pious Protestant, Against Flat Earth, As He Should, Not For Heliocentrism, and He Shouldn't

15.VI.2026

Il y a des gens qui détestent le Christianisme (FR) · Good News in Title, Bad News Later On · Same Video, My Comments · Christine Niles · The "Jesuit" Spitzer Offers Fake Exegesis · What's Philanthropy?

16.VI.2026

Starmer and Blueskye? · Si on ajoute des "coins" que je ne compte pas ? (FR)

17.VI.2026

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra · Does the Pretended Successor of St. Ambrose Belong in Italy?

18.VI.2026

J'ai pris quelques jours pour les statistiques des derniers trois mois (FR) · Apoc. XIII,16—17 dans l'actu (FR) · Est-ce qu'une communauté peut librement inventer les faits de son passé ? (FR)

19.VI.2026

Stephen Jay Gould et Noma ... faux (FR)

20.VI.2026

—

21.VI.2026

Expected? · Stephen Hackett: 3 Myths on YEC [Young Earth Creationists] · Word peace and purely secular rule, the Messiah? No. (Part I)

22.VI.2026

Why Adam who fell was a single and living human person · Et Abbé Pagès ? (FR) · Sonatine pour Violon ε, Ut Majeur (musica) · Derniers trois mois aux 15—18.VI.2026 : Les Pays · 1—18 vues · 19—24 vues · 25—29 vues · 30—34 vues · 35—42 vues · 43—57 vues · 58—4310 vues · en général (FR)

23.VI.2026

Altercation houleuse (FR)

24.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Sancti Ioannis Baptistae (LAT) · "If you think you are that special, consider who could fool you?" · Je me pose la question qui voudra me tamponner comme complotiste ? (FR) · Fujimori (FR) · Vous connaissez Madame Brionne ? (FR)

25.VI.2026

St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons · Thanks to Nordfront, I Hear Preston's "adoptive dads" will do gaol · Does Russia Check Up on a Young Earth Creationist to Ask Others Not To? · Some People Mistrust the Rosary and All and Any Meditative Prayer

26.VI.2026

"On a tous le droit au bonheur" ... C. S. Lewis avait des choses à redire (FR)

27.VI.2026

Loi Pleven, peut-on l'invoquer en cas de racisme anti-bavaro-autrichien ? (FR) · Parens patriae (FR) · "Four" Criteria of the Messiah · Yes, you meant what?

28.VI.2026

Music of the Words, Tolkien (English) · Thaïs even said the correct thing · Devait-on mettre un toit sur les revenus ? Pas tous. Et pas en forme d'une somme spécifique (FR) · "Don't Worship a Person" (Said a Jew) · Kirill's and Vladimir's Russia Targets Protestants?

29.VI.2026

Bonum Festum Sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli (LAT) · Are Christians Grafted In? · And Suppose It's NOT a Gift on the Altar? · "and nobody knows that he assumes it." (Application, Galileo) · Crossdressing or dressing with a Cross ... NOT the same · Why Don't they Teach Gynaecology in These Schools? · Apocalypticae Considerationes · SSPX Profession of Faith, Some Comments

30.VI.2026

Production June 2026 · News from England

Bonum Festum Sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

And Suppose It's NOT a Gift on the Altar?

If therefore thou offer thy gift at the altar, and there thou remember that thy brother hath any thing against thee Leave there thy offering before the altar, and go first to be reconciled to thy brother: and then coming thou shalt offer thy gift
[Matthew 5:23-24]

I got this cited in an email. The main adressee was "undisclosed recipients" and then there was a BCC to myself. I don't know how many others.

I don't know how realistic or unrealistic it is to suspect I was a target of the remark.

Now, some would say, and this I'm statistically pretty certain of after a few years, that I would still be a very apt target for this.

He wants to offer up his blogs to God, but takes petty revenge on CPS? He wants to offer up his blogs to God and condones a racist remark? (Religious equivalent of WTF)

In a sense, I have certainly offered up my blogs to God and Mary, and for one it means the online content as online is for free. A printed version is an extra, welcome to me, as it would generate income for myself and for others.

But it is still not the kind of Korban where I say and look at only holy things. Or where the reverence takes away the curiosity or the social justice ambition.

Second, I'm not taking petty revenge on either CPS nor on Muslim second and third generation immigrants, as well as some non-Muslim Black Africans. I'm civically warning of an actual danger. This is not an unchristian thing, and if these instances have hurt myself, it is not a question of forgiving not to write what I write, but to be lame as a journalist and ignore first hand evidence of evil-doing. I don't have the right not to take sides against such people in some cases.

Third, lots of what I do is a very goodnatured revenge. I don't go after Science as a bunch of enemies I want to insult as deeply as possible by being Young Earth Creationist or Geocentric. I go after bad evidence as bad evidence. And anyone pretending the contrary is calumniating me. I'll cite one more thing from that letter:

The Baltimore Catechism backs this up plainly. The Fifth Commandment forbids not just murder, but fighting, quarreling, and injuring our neighbor. It commands us to live in peace and union with one another. And the teaching of the Council of Trent extends this even further — sins against the Fifth Commandment include the interior movements of unjust anger, hatred, and contempt. The commandment doesn't stop at your hands. It reaches into your chest.

Now, one form of quarrelling* is looking for occasions to correct someone. Not on theory.

I actually relish exchanges when people try to find a fault in my argument.

But on my actions and inactions.

So, I'm presumed to be neglecting my work. I'm working every day, including Lord's Days and today a feast day of Sts Peter and Paul in a non-menial or non-servile** work, of writing. This writing is supposed to be on my part intended as a "gift on the altar" or a korban. This "korban" is supposed to be impure because I'm not living in peace with my enemies. Hence it's worthless, and I'm not doing any work, etc.

What if my enemies are the people who have stopped me from living in peace? I was sewing on Friday evening, after dark. So, when the Jews have their Sabbath. When 7DA pretend all Christians should have theirs. And I lost the needle, whether someone's hypnosis or an actual supernatural act, I lost it. I had lost two miraculous medallions before, found one again, and then lost it again. Such events, however you explain them, are disruptive to my peace.

Someone was giving a bag of food, pretty fat and sugary such, and I found also a grasshopper. Like as if someone wanted to allude to La Fontaine's The Ant and the Grasshopper. And that someone was probably not*** French, because in the French, it's not a grasshopper (sauterelle) but a cigale (a true cicada). La cigale et la fourmi. I ate some, I left much uneaten to somewhere else where anyone could pick it up. Both having to stand up instead of resting after the return from my actual work and finding a reference to La cigale et la fourmi by this very famous poet of both poems and of jokes as is, not La Fontaine, but "Anon." (as usual) is obviously also disruptive to my peace.

Dito for people who are walking by loudly late in the evening, early in the morning (before 5 AM today), or sometimes even verifying I'm alive in the middle of the night.

Dito for people who make toilet lamps unusable, lest I should overdose. My wounds on the legs are from lice, not from syringes.

Dito for people who make it harder to get rid of lice in any way other than eating fat food, which has already provoked gout.

I don't pretend to be a monk, and I think I'm not the one to take a first step after all the steps I've already taken to resolve this peacefully, whether by writing or by trying the police. Some people seem to like saying I do nothing, and if my blog, at least my blog has no readers, and the morning after I published evidence to the contrary° I find the park where I go to the toilet (which is open) also visited by an Arab who is insulting an absent person ... or me, while not looking my way. The police have no problem with people going after me for Austro-Bavarian cultural traits°° but if I give an indication that such and such a community could be the one they should look into, hey, I'm told that I can't go after a community. If I don't know who did it, they refuse to look even into long term bullying.

Some rejoice at my gout, because it took away one of my uses of alcohol. Now, nycturia is an ally against gout ... but it's still not ideal for a good night's sleep. Before gout, I fought it with 3 + cl. pure alcohol, alias a pint of beer, one hour before bed, or so, as a diuretic.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts. Peter and Paul
29.VI.2026

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

* My correspondent uses US spelling, me more like British. The school book standard in both Sweden and Austria. ** Menial or servile works are forbidden on Lord's Days and Feasts of obligation, unless necessary. Writing isn't. *** The English language is not the only one that replaces the cicada with a grasshopper, consider Semut dan Belalang in Indonesian. Ukrainean nominally has a cicada (Мурашка і Цикада) but wiki illustrations on the fable show a grasshopper. Same ones as for Finnish, where heinäsirkka actually means grasshopper. As German Heuschrecke. Swedish "syrsa" refers to a related animal that's somewhat dissimilar in looks, a cricket. But illustrations would tend to be borrowed from German, Heuschrecke. Other possibility, that someone knew I was not French and didn't know if I would recognise a true cicada. I wouldn't have. ° Derniers trois mois aux 15—18.VI.2026 : Les Pays · 1—18 vues · 19—24 vues · 25—29 vues · 30—34 vues · 35—42 vues · 43—57 vues · 58—4310 vues · en général °° Not adding up to integral Austro-Bavarian culture, I presume, I left Vienna too early.

"and nobody knows that he assumes it." (Application, Galileo)

First, this may seem irrelevant, but this is statistics from yesterday:

France
131 + 20 + 151 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 39 + 6 + 4 + 6 + 22 + 1 + 23 + 10 + 39 = 459 (14:36, 27—28.VI)

Second, to the topic:

Galileo and the Bible
https://www.museumofthebible.org/book-minute/galileo-and-the-bible

The End of the Galileo Affair: Galileo's Theological Contributions
by Cory Hayes | February 15, 2024
https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/the-end-of-galileo-affair-galileos-theological-contributions/

Galileo and the Interpretation of the Bible
Published: March 1999 | William E. Carroll
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1008657104961

More than one of above cite the famed quote that Galileo put into the mouth of Eminence or Monsignor Anon. : "the Bible doesn't tell us how the heavens go, but how to go to heaven" ... that on Springer even repeats a usual misattribution to Cardinal Baronius. Now, this made me think somewhat of a certain essay collection by Chesterton: The Thing. Or rather, I thought of the connection when on FB I saw a part of below quote:

Curiously enough, I find this sort of thing rather specially widespread in our age, which claims to possess a popular culture or enlightenment. There is everywhere the habit of assuming certain things, in the sense of not even imagining the opposite things. For instance, as history is taught, nearly everybody assumes that in all important past conflicts, it was the right side that won. Everybody assumes it; and nobody knows that he assumes it.

For instance, everyone assumes that if scientists settled on the world being older than 6000 to 7500 years, as different Biblical chronologies would indicate, it's because it's "good science" ...

A curious and amusing instance comes from America; in connection with Mr. Clarence Darrow, the somewhat simple-minded sceptic of that land of simplicity. ... And one of his arguments for that is that if they did believe in certain happiness beyond the grave, they would all kill themselves. He says that nobody would endure the martyrdom of cancer, for instance, if he really believed (as he apparently assumes all Christians to believe) that in any case the mere fact of death would instantly introduce the soul to perfect felicity and the society of all its best friends. A Catholic will certainly know what answer he has to give. But Mr. Clarence Darrow does not really in the least know what question he has asked.

Mr. Darrow is the lawyer of Scopes, in the famous State of Tennessee v. Scopes trial. Note, Chesterton doesn't mention State of Tennessee as simpleminded. What Clarence Darrow seems to have recommended, Chesterton may have heard of as rumoured that Germany was going to apply it and later applied it to the "simple-minded" in T4.

But first mention of "assumes" in The Thing:

Every leader-writer who thunders "Galileo" at us assumes that we know even less about Galileo than he does. Every preacher of popular science who throws a long word at us thinks we shall have to look it up in the dictionary and hopes we shall not study it seriously even in the encyclopaedia. Their use of science is rather like the use made of it by the heroes of certain adventure stories, in which the white men terrify the savages by predicting an eclipse or producing an electric shock.

OK, Chesterton read Tintin adventure Prisoners of the Sun ... or Hergé imitated the topos from other adventure stories, earlier than this album. But anyway, he had read some people Gish Gallopping against Catholicism with Galileo as a probable third to fifth word in an early sentence. Maybe even the first one.

Yesterday also, I came across someone speaking on a certain patristic position arguing that Israel would have been impossible, but he also mentioned the opposite position, of Israel coming back right in the end times. Anyway, he said ... (beginning after 10:22 and ending before 10:48) this little thing:

... we have become ideologically captured rather than formed by the unbending sturdiness of reality. Okay? We used to believe that the earth was the center of the solar system. Then upon new data, we realized it was in fact the sun. So when our presuppositions toward reality are falsified, the least we can do is be honest enough to admit it.

I commented on it and the comment was taken away, not sure if by him or on the cyber.

Now, he assumes people before ... Copernicus? Galileo? Newton? ... believed that the Sun was the centre of ... the solar system. Not of the universe, as correctly representing their belief (on most issues also mine), but of the solar system. Because what goes around us each night from East to West is absolutely only the Moon and Jupiter and Venus and things, while Sirius and Orion totally stay in the same place? In fact, the position he, and presumably his history teacher attributed to pre-Copernicans would have been refuted by me simply when I measured that Orion had moved 30° (or twice the 15° of using my outstretched arm and dispersed thumb and fingers as measure) during the two hours I had been away from S. to D. in a certain city scarce and village dense part of Sweden.* Because 2 * 12 hours = 24 hours. And 30° * 12 = 360° Orion, which no one ever took as "part of the solar system" moves 360° (or full circle) in 24 hours (or actually a few minutes less than that). No, no one ever believed a theory which would be such easy to refute, if he was a learned man.

Also, he assumes that we got "new data" and that becoming Heliocentric was the honest and only adequate adjustment to new data.

He didn't say which ones, not sure if his history teacher or even science class ever taught him that. Or if he retained what they tried to teach him.

Like, for Earth being round we have Magellan and modern flight routes. Do you propose Luke Starwalker and the maps Han Solo uses for Heliocentrism? Will you be very, very, very disappointed if I tell you that shots "on Tatooine" are actually from North Africa, like Mos Eisley on Tatooine is Ajim, Tunisia for outdoor and Elstree Studios on Shenley Road, Borehamwood, Hertfordshire for indoor shots of the Cantina. The 1977 film no more proves Heliocentrism than the Ganges' East bank reminding someone of Gibraltar actually proved Round Earth, in Aristotle's time. Try again.

But those who won't try are the guys who assume that in every important armed or intellectual conflict "the right side won" ... and who assume it so hard, they don't even know they assume it.

Like pretty many of the 459 page views I had from France in 24 hours, and also the videast Christopher Kuehl. As to Church Fathers who very early on gave some kind of mitigated support for some kind of Zionism, that would also involve Jews converting to Christianity. I support Jeff Morgan, not Netanyahu. Also not a fan of Hamas reducing Christians in Gaza (with soft bullying involving alcohol band but not limited to them, no doubt).

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts. Peter and Paul
29.VI.2026

Romae natalis sanctorum Apostolorum Petri et Pauli, qui eodem anno eodemque die passi sunt, sub Nerone Imperatore. Horum prior, in eadem Urbe, capite ad terram verso cruci affixus, et in Vaticano juxta viam Triumphalem sepultus, totius Orbis veneratione celebratur; posterior autem, gladio animadversus, et via Ostiensi sepultus, pari honore habetur.

* Some old lady, who had helped the Norwegian resistance, back in her youth, may have taken my gesture as a NS salute, as Orion was c. 45° above the horizon ... it wasn't one. I'm pro-Franco and pro-Dollfuss. As to pro-Hitler, that's for art schools, not politics.

Music of the Words, Tolkien (English)

Ep 19: Tolkien’s Forgotten Song Cycle, “The Road Goes Ever On”
James B Partridge | 28 May 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD9x-FkKFCQ

Thaïs even said the correct thing

"d'origine immigrée"

Most of these things aren't by people who are now entering France, but sons or grandsons who want to feel as adventurous, but don't have a Mediterranean (or a French administration) to cross before being allowed to stay.

A Victim Of Migrant Crime Tells Her Story. They Tried To Jail HER?
Amala Ekpunobi | 21 June 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcA6rsA6f9U

Obviously this commenter in the US, Amala Ekpunobi, isn't a white supremacist.

What exactly was Loi Pleven saying in 1972?

"Ceux qui, par l'un des moyens énoncés à l'article 23, auront provoqué à la discrimination, à la haine ou à la violence à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes à raison de leur origine ou de leur appartenance ou de leur non-appartenance à une ethnie, une nation, une race ou une religion déterminée, seront punis ..."

They who, by one of the means enounced in article 23 will have provoked to the discrimination, to the hatred or to violence regarding a person or a group of persons by reason of their origin or their belonging or not belonging to a determined ethnicity, nation, race or religion, will be punished. Etc. The currency in the fines is outdated. Prison was between a month and a year.

I am a person. If you want to call out against me for my moral (not ancestral nor civic) belonging to Austro-Bavarian culture, that would qualify. Or me and ma, both very fond of Austria, back when we were a team. Like in my early teens. That would be a group of persons.

She didn't want the Tunisian to go to gaol because he was Tunisian. She wanted him in gaol for what he had done.

I think "discrimination" is a very broad term, and in some of its meanings over the top, but Dilcrah didn't even represent a North African or African claiming "we missed a housing opportunity because of what Thaïs said", Dilcrah just pretended the whole races or the whole of their representatives in France are "a group of persons" and claimed that an observation about the ethnic category's actual behaviour constitutes incitation to discrimination.

There may be jurisprudence for this approach, there is neither justice nor reasonable exegesis of the law text from 1972.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
V L. D. after Pentecost
28.VI.2026

Devait-on mettre un toit sur les revenus ? Pas tous. Et pas en forme d'une somme spécifique

Je pense qu'on peut très bien mettre un toit sur par exemple le "revenu de travail salarié" en tant que salaire par heure ou quelle que soit l'unité.

Et qu'il pourrait se situer entre 20 et 200 fois le SMIC.

Item, je pense que le mètre carré pourrait bien avoir un maximum, par exemple entre 20 et 200 fois le mètre carré dans un HML. Par ville ou par arrondissement. Mais même entre les arrondissements.

Et ainsi pour d'autres denrés.

Les plus grandes inégalités ne sont pas créées par prix exorbitants pour certains par rapport au même service ou la même marchandise. Elles sont créées par le type d'affaires.

Je suis par exemple contre la prise d'intérêt. Sauf un intérêt très modéré pour que le Mont de Piété communal puisse payer les gens qui nettoyent et les clercs qui enrégistrent, décemment, mais pas de manière exoprbitante. Et combien plus saint et juste si même ces dépenses ne relèvent pas de l'intérêt mais du fisc municipal, dont dépend le Mont de Piété.

Ou un intérêt qui suit la production comme la côte d'une action. Je prète 100 € à une entreprise, pour qu'elle puisse faire d'achats en vue de produire. L'entreprise double en valeur. Elle me doit 200 €. Elle fait faillite, elle me doit rien.

Je ne crois pas dans un toit sur les cadeaux ou les héritages. Bonté des hommes, bonté de Dieu. Et un toit sur l'exemplaire de livres vendus, serait inviter des abus contre la liberté d'expression. Celle-ci n'est pas un absolu, mais les censures doivent pas venir sur "il a déjà trop gagné, ce mec" ...

Par contre, si un homme hérite davantage d'entreprises qu'il peut gérer, il pourrait être cité de vendre une des entreprises qu'il ne gère pas au gérant, dans un délai qui ne le débile pas pendant le procès d'héritage. Par exemple dix ans.

Et donc, je crois qu'on peut aussi interdire les acquisition cumulatives sur cette mesure. Je ne vise pas Paul, il semble qu'il s'agit d'un franchise, mais si par contre Paul avait simplement acheté et donné à des gérants salariés, chaque boulangerie-café Paul, là on pourrait se faire des réflexions. J'ai une grande préférence pour les petites boulangeries, même sans place d'assise. Mais comme dit, les Paul ont des propriétaires réels. Ce n'est pas un homme qui achète et qui confie à des gérants salariés.

Obviement, la grandeur d'une entreprise pourrait être limité à un certain multiple du minimum qui est nécessaire pour qu'elle fonctionne. Notons, ce ne serait pas fonctionnel de diviser SNCF en plusieurs petites entreprises locales. Déjà, une ligne ferroviaire, pour relier deux points doit ne pas dépendre de l'un ou de l'autre. Et item pour la Poste.

Un certain Lyndon LaRouche parlait d'une forme d'affaires qui ne contribue en soi rien à l'économie physique (les industries ou ateliers, les fermes ou bateaux de pêche) mais qui, au contraire, la sape. Et Louis Even notait que, si tout se paie en argent, si chaque dette se paie uniquement en argent, si l'argent est produite par les banques en forme de dette, et si chaque dette a un taux d'intérêt, le système ne tourne pas rond, il va toujour clopiner quelque part.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ve dim. après Pentecôte
28.VI.2026

"Don't Worship a Person" (Said a Jew)

Not sure how the religion now called Judaism defines "person" or "God" if they think they can worship God without worshipping at least ONE person ...

I answer that, "Person" signifies what is most perfect in all nature—that is, a subsistent individual of a rational nature. Hence, since everything that is perfect must be attributed to God, forasmuch as His essence contains every perfection, this name "person" is fittingly applied to God; not, however, as it is applied to creatures, but in a more excellent way; as other names also, which, while giving them to creatures, we attribute to God; as we showed above when treating of the names of God (I:13:2.

Question 29. The divine persons | Article 3. Whether the word "person" should be said of God?
Summa Theologiae | First Part
https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1029.htm#article3

I'd answer, we are told several times not to worship a non-person ... like stone or wood. Like a passage in Jeremias that some misuse when they want to speak about Christmas trees.

I beheld till thrones were placed, and the Ancient of days sat: his garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like clean wool: his throne like flames of fire: the wheels of it like a burning fire
[Daniel 7:9]

If the Ancient of Days has a head, He's presumably a person. Here is another one:

I beheld therefore in the vision of the night, and lo, one like the son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and he came even to the Ancient of days: and they presented him before him And he gave him power, and glory, and a kingdom: and all peoples, tribes and tongues shall serve him: his power is an everlasting power that shall not be taken away: and his kingdom that shall not be destroyed
[Daniel 7:13-14]

Serve sounds quite a bit like worship, and receiving worships sounds quite a bit like power and glory.

It's the same thing in Aramaic. "Son of man" (Bar'nash) is how you say "human being" in Aramaic. That's all it means. It's just a way to say "person." The verse in Daniel is in reference to a series of visions of various allegorical beasts. The last vision is "one like a bar'nash, meaning "one like a human." It's just a way of saying the last vision looked like a man as opposed to a beast. This figure was interpreted Messianically, but "son of man" did not mean "Messiah." The normal usage was just for a person. It might denote the Messiah in a high context way (like calling him "the Man"), but the meaning of bar'nash is still "human being."

Quoting a reddit.

So, that second person clearly is even called "a person" ... but how is he spoken of back before the schism of AD 33? Here is another view:

In a branch of Jewish belief around the time of Jesus, called "apocalyptic" thought, thought that the world was ruled by wickedness and that God would soon send someone to sweep all of it away and establish a new kingdom of righteousness or whatnot. At the time, they believed the one who would bring this change was the "Son of Man" as foretold in Daniel. ... Jews who did believe in the coming of the Son of Man thought that this would be an impressive, divine figure of untold greatness, knowledge, and power.

An impressive divine figure ... who should perhaps even be worshipped?

Well, Caiaphas didn't see that, or didn't want to see that. However, it was soon upcoming at Resurrection, and will be upcoming in even more public display when He arrives at the battle of Armageddon and as judge in the Valley of Josaphat. The second quote is from someone calling Jesus "a bum" ... not sure about the exact connotation, dynastically Jesus would have had the qualifications and miracles He had worked. A week before, Caiaphas was worried because a crowd had shouted Hosanna, and within that week, Jesus was no more devoid of authority, no more unimpressive than to be able to make a second cleansing of the temple. I think that Jew was retroprojecting his own prejudices about Jesus, rather than dealing with what Caiaphas was facing.

Or what a more recent Jewish photographer faced, when examining a Shroud.

Barrie Schwortz’s FINAL INTERVIEW: Shroud of Turin SECRETS REVEALED
Adrian Milag TV | 6 April 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFyQVlSSo04

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
V L. D. after Pentecost
28.VI.2026

Loi Pleven, peut-on l'invoquer en cas de racisme anti-bavaro-autrichien ?

L'Heure Cinéma
https://shows.acast.com/heurecinema

J'écoute :

40. Loïc Corbery: la passion du métier*
18:45 | samedi 27 juin 2026 | Saison 4, Ep. 40

Je pense que ce soit un racisme anti-bavaro-autrichien d'évoquer Hitler (y compris contre un Autrichien de cœur et Austro-Fasciste, puisque Hitler a décoré posthumément les meurtriers de Dollfuss) quand on entend que quelqu'un soit d'origine ou d'éducation en partie de ce coin du monde.

Notons, le professeur d'histoire de l'homme qui aurait dû rester peintre admirait davantage les Hohenzollern que les Habsburg, et son disciple avec.

Notons, le national-socialisme n'était pas surtout une dictature austro-bavaroise, mais une dictature médicale. Les sympathies pour les médecins progressistes à l'époque, les adhérents de "solutions" comme stérilisation et euthanasie, d'un Saxe-Coburg-Gotha sont davantage derrière ce régime que les origines purement ethnique d'un ... bon peintre./HGL

* On évoque que de Gaulle a évité une occupation américaine, brittanique, soviétique. Plan A, France comme état vaincu : France, Autriche, Allemagne, Paris, Vienne, Berlin, occupés divisés en trois, entre les Américains, Britanniques et Russes. Plan B, retenu, France comme état vainqueur, deux pays et leurs capitales, divisés entre quatre : Français, Américains, Britanniques et Russes.

"On a tous le droit au bonheur" ... C. S. Lewis avait des choses à redire

J'y vais ajouter quelques réflexions personnelles aussi.

Tout d'abord, une certaine phrase de la constitution des États-Unis ne dit pas que les droits naturels et égaux comportent "le bonheur". Mais bien "la recherche du bonheur".

Ensuite, il explique pourquoi la distinction est importante, et pourquoi les Pères Fondateurs ayent mis la phrase dans leur constitution.

D'abord, ils ont voulu contredire les privilèges. En France royale, pas mal de chemins vers le bonheur n'étaient ouverts qu'à certains. Non, ils ont voulu dire, il ne doit pas y avoir d'obstacle légal avant que vous puissiez faire d'affaires, vous engager en politique et ainsi de suite. Si on voudrait défendre les privilèges, on pourrait dire que la carrière politique comme les affaires existent pour les autres, pas pour le bonheur personnel du concerné. Mais ceci ne change pas le propos. Il y a d'autres choses où la recherche du bonheur est ou doit être égale pour tout le monde, qui sont effectivement recherche du bonheur.

Revenons à C. S. Lewis qui n'était pas d'Action française et ne défendait pas les privilèges. Pourquoi a-t-on juste le droit à la recherche du bonheur, pas au bonheur lui-même ?

Parce que "j'ai le droit" implique "tu me dois" ... et on ne peut pas devoir quelque chose à quelqu'un qu'on n'a pas sous son contrôle.

Ce qu'on a certainement sous son contrôle par contre est de ne pas poser des obstacles abusives au bonheur d'autrui. Ou à ses démarches pas interdites pour l'avoir. On a le droit de m'empêcher de voler des vêtements, pas de m'empêcher de les coudre. Si une fille prétend que mon art de couture est trop mauvais, elle a le droit de me proposer de les coudre. Merci d'ailleurs à une fille de la paroisse St. Nicolas du Chardonnet qui avait cousu un sac de couchage dégradé par un passant (ou l'homme du nettoyage, un Musulman ?) quand on m'avait interdit d'entrer à Georges Pompidou avec.

Bon, alors quelques exemples pourquoi le bonheur lui-même d'autrui n'est pas sous votre contrôle.

Vous ne pouvez pas lui fournir des décimètres en plus (évidemment CSL n'avait pas prévu certaines opérations, et il n'en aurait pas approuvé), vous ne pouvez pas lui fournir la chance de gagner la loterie (l'écriture est un métier et non comparable à la loterie, bien entendu, et vous pouvez, certains d'entre vous, me fournir vous-même ou un pote comme début d'une maison d'édition). Un époux et une épouse peuvent avoir le devoir conjugal, mais pas de garantir la satisfaction de l'autre.

Bien entendu, certaines choses ne sont pas des droits, y compris dans la recherche du bonheur, parce que ça donne malheur à autrui ou à un-même en retard, ou au moins à la société. Mais notons, cette distinction est à prendre par voie de loi, pas sur mesure pour quelqu'un déterminé en des buts "curatives" envers un homme qui n'a pas mérité d'être soumis à des cures sans son consentiment.

En France, certains métiers sont soumis à une autorisation. Si je voudrais acheter une boulangerie, je n'aurais pas le droit, parce que je ne suis pas boulanger. Si je voudrais ouvrir une clinique, je n'aurais pas le droit, parce que je ne suis pas médecin. Je trouve ça très bien. Écrivain n'est pas de ces métiers, et bien entendu, je trouve ça très bien aussi.

Un Musulman pourra dire "t'es clochard, t'as pas le droit d'être écrivain" ... cette loi n'existe pas en France. Un Protestant d'un certain type pourrait dire "t'es pas mûr spitituellement, t'as pas le droit d'écrire sur Dieu" ... d'abord, là aussi, la loi n'existe pas en France, mais ensuite, ce que j'écris ne dépasse pas ce qu'un laïc a le droit d'écrire sans être prêtre. La loi n'existe pas dans l'Église catholique non plus. La Protestant a le droit de me taxer d'hérétique, dans la France (pas dans l'Église catholique). Le curé a le droit de me dire "nous n'allons pas donner nihil obstat" (et déjà pas mal de ce que j'écris ne tombe pas traditionnellement sous cette discipline, Chesterton publiait sans nihil obstat). Le Juif a le droit de me dire (mais pas de me faire croire ça en mon cas) "nous n'allons grand jamais lire ce qu'écrit un pauvre" (remonte à leurs idées sur les devoirs d'indépendance financière préalable des étudiants de la loi). L'Hindou a le droit de me dire "t'es pas en train d'aquerir moksha comme ça" ...

Même mon père, même s'il croyait que mon écriture me livre au diable, n'a pas le droit légal, ni devant mes yeux moral, de m'empêcher de mon écriture ou de mes efforts de trouver des gens pour une édition. Y compris micro-éditions et y compris des petites nouvelles maisons d'édition.

Sur les journaux d'Elsevier ou les livres du groupe Hachette, je ne compte pas. Avec les petits éditeurs proches de la droite nationale, j'ai déjà essayé. Peut-être qu'une certaine culture communiste ayant collé à Doriot même après la fondation de PPF rend la droite dite nationale trop proche des Russes sur certains thématiques.

Genre de prendre l'auteur de la Tactique du Diable pour "proche de Lewis Carroll" ou prétendre la suggestion que des adolescents et adolescentes devraient retrouver le droit de se marier qu'ils avaient eu serait un propos contre nature. Ou qu'un créationniste jeune terre devrait être soupçonné de Sionisme ou comparé au Platisme.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts Jean et Paul, frères, martyrs
26.VI.2026

Romae, in monte Caelio, sanctorum Martyrum Joannis et Pauli fratrum, quorum primus erat praepositus domus, secundus primicerius Constantiae Virginis, filiae Constantini Imperatoris, et ambo postea, sub Juliano Apostata, martyrii palmam, caedente gladio, perceperunt.

St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

Spielberg Wants Me to Second Guess My Religion, or So I Have Been Told on FB · St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

When it comes to "aliens", for a long time, psychiatry has held the forefront. Hallucination plus delusion. Needs treatment.

Recently, there is a pushback. Doubly.

UFO-logists are saying "you weren't ill, you met a person from an exo-planet." Christians are saying "you weren't ill, you saw a demon having taken visible form."

Psychiatry obviously is not happy with either approach.

And it seems they have now support from McElroy.

How so? Here is an intro to a video by Anthony Stine:

And then the Cardinal McElroy* in Washington basically said he violated the church's teaching on exorcisms and demonic
0:54 possessions or anything, but then he didn't exactly explain how.

My hunch on how is the rule:

According to the Vatican's guidelines issued in 1999, "the person who claims to be possessed must be evaluated by doctors to rule out a mental or physical illness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism_in_the_Catholic_Church

In other words, McElroy wants people already bothered by (not possessed by) demonic "aliens" to be further bothered by shrinks before they can get an exorcist to pray for them even just for protection.

Washington Diocese would be again an example of "get out of her" ...
/HGL

* Had to restore the correct name, which AI didn't transscribe correctly.

Thanks to Nordfront, I Hear Preston's "adoptive dads" will do gaol

New blog on the kid: Preston's Death · Should Amy Shepherdson Stand Trial? · Preston Davey Case · Thanks to Nordfront, I Hear Preston's "adoptive dads" will do gaol · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Quora Prevents Questions About the Mother of Preston Davey

Brittiska bögparet dömda för sexmordet på adoptivsonen
Redaktionen Nordfront | 2026-06-23 08:00
https://nordfront.se/brittiska-bogparet-domda-for-sexmordet-pa-adoptivsonen

Varley, till he dies. His boyfriend, 25 years.

That's good.

But what's even better is:

och man ska nu utreda alla myndigheter som var inblandade i adoptionen.

One will now investigate all the authorities that were involved in the adoption.

Just a question, will that include investigating the guys who took him from his actual mother? It should.

I'd love for more people than just these two to go to gaol. Not the least complaining that these go there, except a slight regret that death penalty was abolished.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre UL
St. William of Montevergine
25.VI.2026

In territorio Guleti, prope Nuscum, sancti Gulielmi Confessoris, Patris Eremitarum Montis Virginis.

Bonum Festum Sancti Ioannis Baptistae

Christifidelibus lectoribus exopto./HGL

Nativitas sancti Joannis Baptistae, Praecursoris Domini, ac sanctorum Zachariae et Elisabeth filii, qui Spiritu Sancto repletus est adhuc in utero matris suae.

"If you think you are that special, consider who could fool you?"

A video about Le corbeau et le renard by Lafontaine passed by my feed.

I don't consider "I'm that special", I consider I'm a writer, and it's starting to show.

Having more than half a million, maybe short of a million page views on the internet is fun. Not least if it took only three months.

But consider how many page turns there would have been if two or three books had been printed from my blogs?

That's when I'd be earning money of it./HGL

Je me pose la question qui voudra me tamponner comme complotiste ?

J'ai été ouvert à ce que les tours jumelles étaient une fabrication.

Certains des arguments ne m'ont pas convaincus.

Le feu Mgr Williamson argumentait que, certainement, personne n'aurait pu diriger l'opération depuis une cave en Afghanistan.

Et la cave avait-elle accès à l'internet ?

Osama, avait-il même dirigé l'opération avant de se rendre en Afghanistan ou après d'y avoir été ?

Cet argument technique, pourtant, m'avait échappé :

Ce que PERSONNE ne vous dit sur les pilotes du 11 septembre
Maax | 17 juin 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu0yRofR-rs

Alors, la même vidéo commence en citant une autre, qui donne la raison technique que je n'avais pas entendue, et ensuite, le vidéaste propre de la vidéo va répondre. Sa réponse sur le pilotage est identique à la mienne pour le dirigeant à partir d'une cave. Une perspective moderne a tendance à sous-estimer ce que l'on peut réellement faire avec beaucoup moins des ressources idéales pour le type de tâche.

Sur ces deux item, donc, pas de preuve de complot.

Par contre, imaginons que ce n'était pas une démolition contrôlée. Que l'impact d'un avion ou quelques assez haut aurait suffi pour démolir les deux tours.

Le complotisme sur les deux tours est peut-être due à un complot pour sauver l'honneur du constructeur.

Genre, Nemrod n'est pas allé à l'histoire comme le plus grand des architectes. Et certainement pas comme le plus responsable des architectes. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 1973.

David Rockefeller, president of Chase Manhattan Bank, envisioned a World Trade Center for lower Manhattan. Realizing that he needed public funding in order to construct the massive project, he approached Tobin. Although many questioned the Port Authority's entry into the real estate market, Tobin saw the project as a way to enhance the agency's power and prestige, and agreed to the project. The Port Authority was the overseer of the World Trade Center, hiring the architect Minoru Yamasaki and engineer Leslie Robertson.

David Rockefeller, président de la Chase Manhattan Bank, envisionna un Centre de Commerce du Monde pour le bas Manhattan. Vu qu'il avait besoin de fonds publics pour construire le projet massif, il s'approcha à Tobin. Malgré les questions de pas mal sur l'entrée de la Port Authority dans le marché immobilier, Tobin vit le projet comme une manière d'augmenter le pouvoir de l'agence ainsi que de son prestige et accorda le projet. La Port Authority surveilla World Trade Center, et embaucha l'architecte Minoru Yamasaki et l'ingénieur Leslie Robertson.

En d'autres mots, l'histoire officielle ne donne pas la meilleure lumière sur Tobin et Rockefeller. À différence de ce dernier, la famille d'Austin Tobin n'est pas faite d'homme d'affaires. Une évaluation préalable avait été faite, et celle-ci avait ignoré le cargo de carburant d'un Boeing 707.

In its final report on the collapses, the NIST stated that it could find no documentation examining the impact of a high-speed jet or of a large-scale fire fueled by aviation fuel.

Dans le rapport final sur les collapses, le National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, dit ne pas avoir pu trouver une documentation qui examine l'impact d'un jet à grande vitesse ou un feu à large échelle nourri pour le carburant d'avion.

C'était compliqué de prendre en compte, et si quelqu'un prétendait qu'on devrait le prendre en compte quand même, on le marginalisait, sous prétexte que ça serait un gaspillage de temps de rechercher encore un risque possible.

Contrairement à la question isolée du perpétreur, ici il y a certainement un problème interne de la culture du business, et sa dominance en certaines parties de la culture occidentale, dont celle de New York. Ce n'est pas du complotisme, c'est la question que les complotistes aident à cacher.

Depuis quand a-t-on des complotistes qui cherchent à cacher un méfait d'un Rockefeller ? Sans doute depuis le onze septembre.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre BU
St. Jean Baptiste
24.VI.2026

Fujimori

Le score très serré fragilise d’emblée le mandat de Keiko Fujimori ; sa vraie base électorale repose sur ses 17,2 % du premier tour ; ... Alberto Fujimori a connu des phases dictatoriales, ou quasiment, dans son règne de 10 ans ; la droite applaudit généralement celui qui a détruit les guérillas marxistes, dont le Sentier Lumineux, la gauche voit en lui un dangereux dictateur et un eugéniste anti-indiens — les Indiens avaient été particulièrement viséspar les campagnes de contraception, voire de stérilisations —.

Y a-t-il des Catholiques dans la droite Péruvienne ?

Mit brennender Sorge nomme pas directement l'eugénisme, parce que Pie XI l'avait déjà dénoncé en Casti Connubii* et parce que ce n'était pas le seul mal du régime NSDAP, voir les camps pour les clochards (internément obligatoire, dès 1933, et le père ou beau-père de Mme Goebbels n'est pas mort en tant que Juif, mais en tant qu'"asocial" et donc possible à mener dans un de ces camps, trop durs pour certaines santés.

Mais, vu que Casti Connubii condamne cette pratique, ceci clarifie que l'eugénisme est bel et bien une de ces pratiques que vise le § 8 de l'Encyclique germanophone.

Ceci reste applicable aussi aux Social-Démocrates suédois des années 30'—70' et bien entendu aussi à Alberto Fujimori. On peut discuter si Gasperi était mieux que le biennio fasciste. Probable. On peut discuter si Juan Carlos était mieux que Franco, à part l'exécution de 15 000 (une minorité des condamnés) moins probable. Mais on doit admettre qu'Adenauer n'a pas toléré l'eugénisme.

Notons, à propos ce méfait de Fujimori père, il avait une parfaite collaboration de médecins. À ses heures, Fujimori rejoignait donc Hitler, Per Albin Hansson, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. dans l'axe du mal. Et Lénine, sauf que Lénine n'avait pas cru les connaissances scientifiques suffisantes, il avait remporté pour plus tard et plus tard Staline et Lysenko (autrement pas les meilleurs enfants de chœur) avaient arrêté cette horreur comme "bourgeoise" ...

Je viens de citer l'article de Scipion de Salm, Rivarol N°3714 — 24 JUIN 2026, p. 6. Espérons que Keiko ne suive pas les mauvais pas de son père.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Torcy
St. Jean Baptiste
24.VI.2024

* Il n'est pas une invention de l'NSDAP, ni à son premier début en Allemagne février 1934. Date à laquelle je considérais ce régime pourri, à part de connaître qu'Oranienburg et Charlottenburg débutent encore plus tôt, en 1933. Donc, la condemnation de 1931 vise d'abord d'autres régimes, le plus souvent démocratiques ... c'est à dire dictatoriaux uniquement pour certains clientèles, celles-ci pas limitées à des criminels ou l'aspect dictatorial à une punition normale en prison de ceux-ci.