A Story of St. Patrick Says ...

... he prayed for Ireland to sink 7 years before Judgement Day. And he took God as having answered the prayer.

If it does, and Europe has to receive Irish refugees, let's learn Irish, as many of us who can!

Amhrán na nGael - Bláth na hÓige | TG4
TradTG4 | 21 Bealtaine, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek8e-OKm30E

Apt Warning

Maria Simma & St. Hippolytus REVEAL the TRUE ‘Mark Of the Beast’ (Millions are already Marked)
Uniquely Mary | 22 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj0cpwU8ip4

A Probably False Exegesis Behind Pre-Tribulation Rapture

Here are two verses, where there seems to be some tension:

And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it
[Matthew 16:18]

And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them. And power was given him over every tribe, and people, and tongue, and nation
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 13:7]

Now, Dispensationalists will claim, the tension is resolved by the "saints" of the latter verse not being in the Church, but being "Tribulation Saints" ...

I think it is excluded that there will be a clearly non-Church category of tribulation saints if the Church is still present on earth. The Church does not cease to be "the saints" whereever it is.

I also think it is excluded that the Church as a whole will be taken up before the Tribulation.

Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and behold I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the world
[Matthew 28:20]

So, people of the Church are clearly meant by "the saints" that the Beast will be overcoming. If there are any other saints, that will be people directed to the Church, that may not have time to get baptised before they get martyred, but they will not be opponents of the Catholic Church.

Therefore I hold that the key to harmony is on some other level.

The Gates of Hades will not ... the verb is a form of κατισχύω, which in the LXX often translates חָזַק

... while The Beast will ... the verb is a form of νικάω.

And also the object is different in an aspect. In Matthew, the non-defeated is the Church, as a single whole. In Apocalypse the defeated ones are the saints, as single members of her.

Here is a question:

If the Antichrist is already taking out the Church as a whole at the beginning of the 42 months, why is he still busy making war on and defeating saints when the 42 months are over?

He will presumably not be taking out the Church as a whole, ever. Even if the last member of the Church is the last Pope and he's rotting in Antichrist's prison, and only taken out and executed or brought to execution* a moment before Christ arrives, the Church would still be there.

Christ said, the gates of Hell, and Antichrist and False Prophet included, will never take over the Church as to make Her a museum piece with no life.** However, He did not promise safety from persecutions, and for 3 and 1/2 years She will be defeated in members in a purely physical, political, judicial sense: handed over to execution. But that will never be all of Her. Probably the reason why Knights of Columbus greet each other (as I have learned from Mark P. Shee's blog), with the greeting "Hail Hydra" ... even if the Antichrist will be the actual seven headed beast, it will be the Church that fatigues Hercules by growing heads after they are lopped off.

And yes, I think Hercules is a fairly apt model for the Antichrist. The last Pagan army of actual Romans that marched against the Chi-Rho, marched under a sign of Hercules. I also think it's Hercules that St. Paul names as the idol whose worship is punished by male homosexuality, as Hercules was the patron deity of exactly that, along with very machist physics. Was there someone in the MAGA camp who wanted to test the testosterone levels of his soldiers? Bad move.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IX LD after Pentecost
26.VII.2026

PS, this has been linked to in a comment, and if they take the challenge, their youtube will be named in the debate./HGL

* A scenario entertained by a Catholic novelist, I think Graham Greene.
** A Swedish poet, Atterbom, in a dystopia, considered the possibility of a state banning the Church but keeping the requiem Mass for so and so as a museum piece ... but as long as it's said by a real priest, it is a real Mass before God before being a museum piece before men. I think this was the Third or Fourth Adventure of Isle of Bliss (my tentative translation of Lyckslighetens Ö). It's a five act piece, but the acts are called Adventures, and not inappropriately.

Fr. Jason Charron on Apocalypse 13

The Final Deception Will Look Christian
Fr. Jason Charron | 14 July 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGk3AlcOKPE

Il semble que certains Musulmans sont contre des Chrétiens qui croient vraiment la Genèse ou l'Apocalypse

Il y a plusieurs années, un homme noir que je rencontrais à Georges Pompidou (à l'époque à Beaubourg, pas à Bercy), je ne pense pas qu'il était sécurité là-bas, mais qu'il était sécurité, m'a parlé de diverses choses à propos de mes blogs ou sujets de prédéliction. C'est aussi possible que je fasse conflation de deux ou trois personnes :

Notons, de ma mémoire comme dit et selon lui (pas forcément moi), voici :

• croire la Bible littéralement, c'était l'erreur de Martin Luther ;
• le schisme, y compris donc sédévacantisme ou orthopapisme, c'est dangéreux parce que, regardez le schisme de Martin Luther et les Guerres de Religion engendrées par là ;
• croire l'Apocalypse peut conduire à ce que les prophécies catastrophiques se réalisent.

Un autre, un Turc, je parlais du Créationnisme Jeune Terre, et il me disait, comme si ça devait regler la question pour moi, qu'Islam n'exigeait pas cette croyance.

Bien entendu, sur les quatre sujets je pense différemment, et aussi sur un cinquième, un non-dit :

• croire la Bible littéralement, c'est chose commune entre Luther et ceux qui l'ont condamné ;
• Luther était novateur, si un jour il y aura des guerres entre Novus Ordo et Tradis, la faite serait avec les novateurs ;
• l'Apocalypse ne vient pas d'Apollon de Delphes, mais de Dieu, y croire est en partie un moyen de différer les catastrophes, et s'il semble y avoir davantage de choses qui pointe vers une fin de temps proche, c'est entre autre parce que trop peu de gens y croient ;
• le Créationnisme Jeune Terre est logiquement et scientifiquement connexe à la Création directe d'Adam et Ève, et à leur chute comme primordiale dans l'histoire humaine, en plus d'être la lecture la plus évidente ;
• ce n'est pas parce que Littéralisme quranique fait des dégâts que Littéralisme biblique serait faux, ça n'est pas un problème du littéralisme vis-à-vis le livre sacré, mais du choix du livre.

Or, je viens récemment de maintenir que la Genèse a entièrement raison : Deen Academy Underlines that Biblical and Quranic Flood (As he sees it) are Not the Same et que l'Apocalypse est à lire de manière futuriste, par rapport à St. Jean, et possiblement déjà dans les débuts de l'accomplissement des prophéties sur les derniers temps : More on Apoc. 13:18.

Est-ce un pur hasard si le lectorat en Arabie Saoudite monte et dépasse celui en France ? (Stats en lite) Et que sur deux de mes blogs, les pages vues sont pareils, 102 pour les deux pays dans un blog et 7 dans un autre ? Je ne le pense pas.

Je ne pense pas non plus que ce soit mon devoir de me plier devant les hystéries sécuritaires des Musulmans ou de certains entre eux. Et encore moins de devenir Franc-Maçon pour calmer des gens hystériques dans la loge.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Sts Cyrille et Méthode
7.VII.2026

[14.II, Romae] Ibidem depositio sancti Cyrilli, Episcopi et Confessoris; qui, una cum sancto Methodio, similiter Episcopo et fratre suo, cujus dies natalis octavo Idus Aprilis recensetur, multas Slavicas gentes earumque Reges ad fidem Christi perduxit. Horum tamen Sanctorum festivitas Nonis Julii celebratur.
[6.IV] Velehradii, in Moravia, natalis sancti Methodii, Episcopi et Confessoris, qui, una cum sancto Cyrillo, item Episcopo et fratre suo, cujus natalis sextodecimo Kalendas Martii recensetur, multas Slavicas gentes earumque Reges ad fidem Christi perduxit. Horum autem Sanctorum festum Nonis Julii celebratur.
[7.VII] Sanctorum Episcoporum et Confessorum Cyrilli et Methodii fratrum, quorum natalis respective agitur sextodecimo Kalendas Martii et octavo Idus Aprilis.

St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

Spielberg Wants Me to Second Guess My Religion, or So I Have Been Told on FB · St. Augustine Taught, Even Sane Men View Delusions by Demons

When it comes to "aliens", for a long time, psychiatry has held the forefront. Hallucination plus delusion. Needs treatment.

Recently, there is a pushback. Doubly.

UFO-logists are saying "you weren't ill, you met a person from an exo-planet." Christians are saying "you weren't ill, you saw a demon having taken visible form."

Psychiatry obviously is not happy with either approach.

And it seems they have now support from McElroy.

How so? Here is an intro to a video by Anthony Stine:

And then the Cardinal McElroy* in Washington basically said he violated the church's teaching on exorcisms and demonic
0:54 possessions or anything, but then he didn't exactly explain how.

My hunch on how is the rule:

According to the Vatican's guidelines issued in 1999, "the person who claims to be possessed must be evaluated by doctors to rule out a mental or physical illness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism_in_the_Catholic_Church

In other words, McElroy wants people already bothered by (not possessed by) demonic "aliens" to be further bothered by shrinks before they can get an exorcist to pray for them even just for protection.

Washington Diocese would be again an example of "get out of her" ...
/HGL

* Had to restore the correct name, which AI didn't transscribe correctly.

Apoc. XIII,16—17 dans l'actu

Le texte :

Elle fit qu’à tous, petits et grands, riches et pauvres, libres et esclaves, on mit une marque sur la main droite ou sur le front, et que nul ne pût acheter ou vendre, s’il n’avait pas la marque du nom de la bête ou le nombre de son nom.

L'application :

Tout ce que je veux vous montrer c'est que ils essaient de nous tuer en fait socialement économiquement. C'est pas une persécution politique comment dire qui se qui se voit aux yeux de tous. C'est plus insidieux. Et en fait ça vous décourage quand même.

Source : Ils veulent m’envoyer en prison.
Thaïs d'Escufon | 15 juin 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDB9pdTczjU

En mon cas, on a prétendu impossible de recevoir de la monnaie sur mon livret A d'autrui, et que, pour avoir un autre compte sur La Banque Postale, il faudra accepter une carte bancaire. J'espère que ma mère avait tort, mais je ne suis pas rassuré, et elle pensait que les cartes de crédit pouvaient être la marque de la bête./HGL

Bonne nouvelle :

Justice a été rendue ?
Thaïs d'Escufon | 18 juin 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBblykEdF1o

Good News in Title, Bad News Later On

New blog on the kid: Good News in Title, Bad News Later On · Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Same Video, My Comments

HISTORIC! New Writings Of St Augustine Discovered!
Return To Tradition | 15.VI.2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_OJIhlBdZg

Given the role of bishops, like the successor of Chaput in Philadelphia, the Bergoglio nominee, there are members of the Harlot in Apocalypse 18 in that clergy.
/HGL

PS, it so happens I bring up some modernist "Catholic" clergy are very clearly Harlot of Babylon, Apoc. 18. Then someone jumps onto it and asks, whether from a Modernist Catholic pov or from that of a Protestant one, if I believe the Catholic Church is that harlot, no, She isn't.

Those Protestants believe in a very early apostasy which for long left no visible Church and only a very discrete and socially / historically unfindable remnant. That is theologically non-sense, it's blatantly against Matthew 28:16—20 as well as Matthew 5:14,15. The verse in St. John's revelation, 18:4, mirrors verses from Isaias and Jeremias, warning Jews to get out of Babylon city, before it was taken by Cyrus. And the Neo-Babylonian Empire had lasted only 90 years, and faithful people of the old covenant had been in it only 70. Not 700 or 1700 years. Hope this clears up the distinction, I'm a Trad, not a Prot.
/HGL

PPS, here are the links to Fr. Nix:

A Priest’s “Psych Unit:” Part 1.
By Father David Nix | June 9th, 2026 | Theology
https://www.padreperegrino.org/2026/06/ppu1/

A Priest’s “Psych Unit:” Part 2.
By Father David Nix | June 11th, 2026 | Theology
https://www.padreperegrino.org/2026/06/ppu2/

L'Église catholique, interdit-elle de dire qu'on vit dans les derniers temps ?

En Latran V, il y a un article disciplinaire.

Elle se veut basé sur les mots de Jésus "personne ne sait le jour ou l'heure" mais va au-delà en référence à une manque de permission.

Ce manque de permission ne peut pas être perpétuel. Autrement l'injonction en Apocalypse XIII,18 n'aurait pas de sens./HGL

Je viens de dire que l'on devrait sortir de communion avec Monseigneur Iceta de Burgos

... et avec d'autres qui malgré une apparence catholique font cause commune avec une bête rouge, essentiellement communiste, la psychiatrie.

Pour moi, je ne recommande pas de rester en communion avec le prétendu "pape" Prevost, surtout si sa "civilisation d'amour" se prête au désamour trop nette de la tradion, comme our les Sœurs de Belorado, mais en revanche d'entrer en communion avec pape Michel II.

Mais ce que je ne fais certainement pas, c'est d'appeler à cesser d'être Catholiques romains.

Il y a certains sur FB qui m'ont recommandé deux publication.

L'un cite Cranmer avec son refus de la papauté, des papes qui précédaient St. Pie V. Le commentaire du mème ajoutait que "Matth. XVI,18 ne prouve pas les origines de la papauté" et j'imagine que quelqu'un voulait impliquer que la roche, c'était Jésus. Ou la foi de Pierre en Jésus. Pas Pierre en personne. Nous croyons qu'il s'agit des trois à la fois. Jésus de base, Pierre par participation, la foi étant essentiel pour le mode de participation (d'où le fait qu'un hérétique ne peut pas être pape). Mais passons, je demandais "avez-vous consulté le verset juste après ?" Parce que c'est très clair que c'est St. Pierre qui reçoit comme c'est Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ qui donne les clefs.

L'autre prétendait que St. Pierre à Antioche soit beaucoup mieux prouvé que St. Pierre à Rome. En fait, on célèbre en janvier 18 sa chaire à Rome, en février 22 sa chaire à Antioche. On peut se disputer combien de temps il était à Rome. Juste qu'il mourait là-bas. Les deux fêtes sont de tradition romaine. Ni l'une, ni l'autre avait avant le IXe S. un rapport avec Antioche. Les deux chaires fêtées à ces dates étaient à Basilique Vieille St. Pierre et aux Catacombes de Priscilla. On rattachait les deux au janvier 18 pour avoir une date pour Antioche aussi, puisque personne n'a nié que St. Pierre avait des successeurs à Antioche avant d'en avoir à Rome. L'idée est justement, il gardait la papauté, puisqu'il n'était pas mort quand il quitta Antioche.

Uniquement à Rome est-il mort, et là il transmit la papauté.

Le schisme de Cranmer était, comme le décrit Tolkien dans un contexte non-fictionnel, lettres ou un essai sur l'anglais et le gallois, une forme de pute de Henri VIII (elle avait alors davantage de catholicisme et n'était pas purement une bête, genre, comme son "pape" Charles III lion de Babylone ...). Je ne vais pas appeler des gens à rejoindre une autre pute ou une bête. Ni léonine comme Anglicanisme et Luthéranisme, ni léopardine comme Judaïsme, Islam, Calvinisme et ... probablement pour la quatrième tête ... Franc-Maçonnerie théiste (écossaise ou de grande-loges). Et pas oursine non plus, comme schismatiques russes ou Musulmans Shia. Et pas non plus la quatrième bête, Communisme. Y compris psychiatrie.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Nanterre BU
Jeudi de Pentecôte
28.V.2026

Tovia Singer thinks Israel is the nation ruled from Knesset

I mean, he thinks this of the Israel in Ezechiel 38 and 39.

I'd like to warn him, this might not be the case.

The forgiveness after exile of which they speak may (38 verse 12) refer to the ones who returned from Babylon, more than 2000 years ago.

And from these descend, not just Jews and Samaritans, but also Christian Palestinians and even Muslim Palestinians.

The Magogian connection may cover Ashkenaz who are of Jewish confession. Because, while Y chromosomes are Abrahamic or at worst Canaanean, mitochondriae are European:

The origins of Ashkenazi Jews remain highly controversial. Like Judaism, mitochondrial DNA is passed along the maternal line. Its variation in the Ashkenazim is highly distinctive, with four major and numerous minor founders. However, due to their rarity in the general population, these founders have been difficult to trace to a source. Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe. These results point to a significant role for the conversion of women in the formation of Ashkenazi communities, and provide the foundation for a detailed reconstruction of Ashkenazi genealogical history.

Nature: A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
Published: 08 October 2013 | Marta D. Costa et al.
Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2543 (2013)
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3543

Just a thought./HGL

What did Netanyahu Say about Amalek?

Damien Mackey has a piece on Academia, you may need an account and logging in to it to read it:

Netanyahu likes to recall Amalek
By Damien Mackey
https://www.academia.edu/164842664/Netanyahu_likes_to_recall_Amalek

Citing:

Rabbi Jill Jacobs —the head of T’ruah, a rabbinical human rights organziation—said that rabbis generally agree that Amalek no longer exists, and that references to it do not provide a morally acceptable justification for attacking anyone. “The overwhelming history of Jewish interpretation is to interpret it metaphorically,” Jacobs said, explaining that one common approach is to see it as a call to stamp out evil inclinations within ourselves.

I am a Christian.

As such I do not need to deny the literal interpretation to stay clear of incitations to massacre.

You see, to a Christian, such massacres were accepted exceptions during the Old Testament era. Next acceptable exception (yes, there will be one) will not be carried out by men living in their flesh, but by angels or by saints who get an advance in Resurrection:

And the armies that are in heaven followed him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 19:14]

This seems to indicate they are angels, not just "armies that are in heaven" but the white linen:

But Mary stood at the sepulchre without, weeping. Now as she was weeping, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre And she saw two angels in white, sitting, one at the head, and one at the feet, where the body of Jesus had been laid
[John 20:11-12]

It could also be the martyrs, or both together:

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held And they cried with a loud voice, saying: How long, O Lord (holy and true) dost thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth And white robes were given to every one of them one; and it was said to them, that they should rest for a little time, till their fellow servants, and their brethren, who are to be slain, even as they, should be filled up
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 6:9-11]

There is a clear indication that no single nation will be licitly eradicated:

Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost
[Matthew 28:19]

The bronze age and early iron age were cruel times overall, so it makes sense that God made exceptional authorizations for cruelties during that time. Since God was born, died and rose, those times are gone, up to when Antichrist brings them back, and that time, it will be killed men or angels who take up the authorized cruelty, not men on earth.

If Netanyahu and the Israeli far right knew this, and you can add Fatah and Hamas to the bunch, the Holy Land might look less like Pharaonic Egypt.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ember Wednesday of Lent
25.II.2026

North of Jerusalem

You have Feodosia on Crimea, you have Sverdlikovo in the Kursk oblast, even closer to the meridian Sudzha.

Between Smolensk and Moscow, the Jerusalem meridian is between Gzhatsk and Uvarovka.

Ankara is just a bit East of Smolensk. Moscow is East of Jerusalem.

Anything in Ukraine (apart from Crimea)?

45°02′03″N 35°22′45″E Feodosia
51°11′29″N 35°16′14″E Sudzha
48°06'46"N 35°19'29"E ?

A point WNW of Slavhorod
And NNE of Zaporizhzhia

What Exactly Did My Brother Say?

The context is my refusal to take a bank card. Here is one thing he said, with my translation:

Det är svårt att leva i dagens samhälle om man ska avstå det som tillhör "vår tid".

It is hard to live in today's society if one is to renounce what belongs to "our time".

Can one hope he didn't mean it exactly like I will analyse it? I think some do.

Here is my position.

1) I do not renounce every thing that "belongs to our time";
2) I certainly try as best as I can to renounce anything that reminds too much of the mark of the beast;
3) I also renounce things I find unnecessary, which normally I can function and have pleasure without (not to the point of reducing pleasure after pleasure because I try to show I can find pleasure without it);
4) however some people like to make a parody of this:

1) They say I (inconsistently) try to renounce everything that belongs to our time;
2) That I see the mark of the beast everywhere and anywhere;
3) That I hamper myself to the point of handicap;
4) And that they are therefore entitled to make it even harder for me, just to give me a lesson. And, incidentally, to show me what consistency would look like.

I have had electricity cut and showers cancelled in a dayshelter for the homeless. Did it have anything to do with me expressing a preference for the Middle Ages on the internet? If so, it was not paedagogic "consistency" but simply harrassment. Electricity didn't exist as a commodity in the Middle Ages, but warm baths were made available by other means, like fire. The homeless shelter not being built for that means it needs electricity to give me a bath.

I have had high escalators cut and their stairs are not built for commodity in simply walking up.

I have had people cut occasions to access internet, on the theory it didn't exist in the Middle Ages. No, but I could perhaps have been more content with just a quill and ink when that was the fast way of producing reading.

In each case, cutting one corner of modernity simply means making the rest of it harder for me, and unasked for. One thing should be clear. I don't owe modernity loyalty in order to have a right to use it. Their loyalty to it is no excuse for bullying those who express not sharing this loyalty.

Now, how does this apply to bank cards?

1) It doesn't simply belong to our time, like sidewalks vs car lanes, it used to be quite optional less than a decade ago;
2) if it all of a sudden becomes non-optional in order to have an account that can receive money (the one I have so far without a card has been receiving money more than once in the past), that sounds a bit too much like "neither buy nor sell, unless one hath the mark of the beast" especially as paying by card has become heavily promoted a) first (openly) to combat contagion of Covid by "contactless payment" and b) second (at least underhand) as a way for people to avoid giving cash in alms;
3) when I received money from grandmother 2011 and 2012, I used no card to get it out and the account without a card was fine with receiving it, when I've received money from my brother, 2019 and quite a few times more, later, dito;
4) all of a sudden, this is made harder for me, since, a) that account can no longer take in money and b) the account I'm offered to open would have a card.

1) It's untrue that I renounce the card just because it is modern, I renounce it because I shouldn't need it;
2) It's untrue that I see the mark of the beast in anything and everything that's modern (though it may seem to them so if bank cards and cell phones are their favourite selection for modern things, like I might seem to "reject all science" to someone whose favourite items are methodological atheism, heliocentrism, big bang, evolution and not least psychology);
3) I am being hampered by these new measures and in other ways too;
4) and the guys who feel entitled to do that seem to insist I should avoid any and all "Apocalyptic thinking" ... which is obviously overkill. For whatever reasonable purpose (if any at all) they are perhaps against it.

Mother told me, cards were everywhere in Sweden (before she died). They shouldn't be everywhere in France, and I shouldn't get pushed around as if for a readaptation to Sweden as if I were going to return there. Nor should people who find what I write disgusting abuse their power positions to get me humbled.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
IV. LD of Advent
21.XII.2025

According to Some, We Have Now Entered the Left Behind Scenario

I didn't get raptured, so some may conclude I'm not yet a Christian.

Or not spiritual enough.

I don't think the Antichrist will look exactly like Nicolae Jetty Carpathia, there is lots of extra-Biblical and possibly even anti-Biblical assumptions in those book series, one of which would be the Rapture were supposed to happen before those 3, 1/2 years. Nope.
/HGL

In Response to Doug Wilson Who Responded to Caleb Campbell (pastor)

Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere: Defending Connor's Honour, So Far (And One Comment,15, Was Censored as I Corrected It) · Friendly Atheist Took On Connor (part I) · I Prefer Per Engdahl over Fridtjuv Bergh · New blog on the kid: In Response to Doug Wilson Who Responded to Caleb Campbell (pastor)

One video:

Response from a Christian Nationalist | Doug Wilson
Blog & Mablog | 31 July 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_JA1JvrIfQ

Five* comments by me:

Wait, Campbell** isn't the Curate of Ars or Padre Pio?

Who'd have thunk it!

---

Would you agree that a man like Connor*** who supports Franco can be rationally accounted for by Franco's penal code punishing abortion?

Btw, I've considered Mussolini as favourable over Trump from the fact that Codice Rocco stipulated:

• woman of sane mind over 14 aborting without medical assistance: 1 to 4 years
• with medical assistance: 2 to 5 for her and the provider
• below 14 or not of sane mind: her consent is considered invalid and whoever put her up to it incurs 6 to 12 years.

Both Franco and Mussolini were also much more into affordable housing and either less or less openly into chasing the homeless with "continuity of care".

---

Oh, there is something distinctly "scarlet beast" (communist) about Trump's attitude to the homeless and also to undocumented immigrants.

And if it joins hands with "leopard" (Rabbinic Judaism, Islam, Puritan Protestantism, probably Theistic Freemasonry for the fourth head) there actually start spark some Apoc. 13 sparks from the administration. OK, not yet at one with the "bear" (Russia or Iran, both having territory from ancient Persia), or with the "lion" (basically Northern Europe with Modernist Anglicanism as well as Colonial Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism, at least as remote influences), but that could still come.

Do you think Trump will turn back from there, before it's too late?

---

Disciple all nations ... thank you for standing up for Clovis and St. Volodymyr of Kyiv ... and the bishops that baptised them.

And Constantine too. I think some have stated it was Pope St. Sylvester who baptised him, but that could be inaccurate.

And I agree on the modern state being very abusive, hence the need to oppose it's abuses against the weak. Be they unborn or undocumented. Or, obviously, unhoused.

In all of which "un-" can be possibly exchanged for "pre-" by the way.

---

If the magistrate was already instructed in England (where killing babies either side of the birth canal was capital offence in 1500 AD), perhaps in some cases using the sword was a licit means to make some parts of its dominion after it entered error go to magistrates who were still a bit better instructed. Like in Ireland.

Notes:

* If Doug Wilson answers any, I'll gladly republish the dialogues here too. Right now at first publication, they haven't been answered.

** The man and book Doug Wilson is answering.

*** As I mentioned one debate opponent of Mehdi Hasan, to another one he said "there were more unemployed back then" ... I check, for some years he seems to be right, doesn't mean his overall point is correct, but also not that it isn't:

1960 5.5 1961 6.7 1962 5.6 1963 5.6 1964 5.2
1965 4.5 1966 3.8 1967 3.8 1968 3.6 1969 3.5
1970 5.0 1971 6.0 1972 5.6 1973 4.9 1974 5.6
1975 8.5 1976 7.7 1977 7.1 1978 6.1 1979 5.9
1980 7.2 1981 7.6 1982 9.7 1983 9.6 1984 7.5
1985 7.2 1986 7.0 1987 6.2 1988 5.5 1989 5.3
1990 5.6 1991 6.9 1992 7.5 1993 6.9 1994 6.1
1995 5.6 1996 5.4 1997 5.0 1998 4.5 1999 4.2
2000 4.0 2001 4.8

Evangelicals Also Take a Distance from Extreme Zionism

Facing Gaza as a Christian: I'm afraid I've been silent too long*
Culture, Faith, and Politics | 2 Aug. 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIFvPkC_7RY

Patrick Kahnke is indeed an Evangelical, as per the description on the channel:

Pat Kahnke was an evangelical church planter and pastor for twenty years before retiring from church ministry in 2016. Planted a church in the inner city of St. Paul, MN - part of the Baptist General Conference (Converge) and Alliance for Renewal Churches. A lifelong conservative Republican until the party left him in 2016. Now a political independent, he has written off the Republican party until it completes 40 years in the wilderness for its capitulation to the MAGA movement.

* Reconstructing the English title from the French translation, unfortunately provided to exclusion of the English one: Face à Gaza en tant que chrétien : j'ai peur d'être resté silencieux trop longtemps

"user anonymity is not desirable" (sharing)

the digital euro just dropped (you should be worried)
BTC Isla | 27 June 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewuVL1AAsSg

Le retour du Ciel aura commencé ?

Ce signe semble de dire que oui :

La porte scellée bouge à Jérusalem – Un signe divin du retour du Christ ?
Moment sacré | 12 juin 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPpyXuRCk-Y

"What If We Don't Come to Christ?" Charlie Kirk was asked — I answer

A woman who confronted Charlie Kirk asked "what are the consequences?"

If you want my answer, we live in the end times. No longer is any state going to persecute more or less normal religions inimical to Christianity, to Catholicism, over them not coming to Catholicism.

If such a thing is set up it will probably be a sham.

I lost hope of seeing the Spanish Inquisition restored as per historic version when on the Pilgrimage to Santiago I heard they were legalising Gay Marriage in Spain.

Even the Spanish Inquisition normally didn't get involved in forcing Jews to convert, that was a recurrent but marginal occurrence in the Middle Ages and it was a bigger one timer in 1492. The official view was "anyone who wants to remain Jewish can do so, he just has to leave Spain within a given time span" ... but some didn't have time, some feared the voyage, some couldn't afford it. In practise, it became a kind of forced conversion, precisely what the Church (on top levels and officially at least) didn't want.

Otherwise, I would hardly be considering the Spanish Inquisition as a moderately good thing.

So the answer is, on earth, you don't have to fear consequences, other than acts of God.

Other than ... that's the rub.

It seems Netanyahu and similar are not coming to Christ and not learning Christian ethics and well ... look up Apocalypse 11. A Jerusalem that's "spiritually Sodom and Egypt" and where 7000 people end up like the followers of Korah.

And their bodies shall lie in the streets of the great city, which is called spiritually, Sodom and Egypt, where their Lord also was crucified
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 11:8]

And at that hour there was made a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell: and there were slain in the earthquake names of men seven thousand: and the rest were cast into a fear, and gave glory to the God of heaven
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 11:13]

But if the Lord do a new thing, and the earth opening her mouth swallow them down, and all things that belong to them, and they go down alive into hell, you shall know that they have blasphemed the Lord
[Numbers 16:30]

Note, I'm not Henoch or Elias, or, according to others, Moses or Elias who are upcoming in Apocalypse 11. I'm not pronouncing anyone's going down swallowed by the earth. Two people killed for speaking the truth, for being faithful to Jesus and for opposing the spiritual identification of Jerusalem with Sodom and Egypt, will rise to heaven, and after that, 7000 will be swallowed by the Earth.

Well, I'd prefer you not going down that road. Or even Netanyahu doing so.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Ember Wednesday after Pentecost
11.VI.2025

PS, someone asked "if this is a genocide, why is their population growing" ... I suggest God's blessing could be the answer, if you look up Exodus 1./HGL