J'espère que personne ne m'appelle Robin du Bois

En néerlandais, c'est normalement, selon l'orthographe anglaise, Robin Hood, mais on voit aussi l'orthographe Robin Hoed.

En particulier, Robin Dubois, BD comique, est régulièrement Robin Hoed* dans les albums néerlandophones, au moins deux références en dehors - un twitter tweet faisant référance au film de Walt Disney**, et plus d'une publicité pour vêtements de réconstitution médiévale***, donnent Robin Hoed. En plus, Robin Hood est parfois nommé "Robin with the Hood" et en néerlandais ce devient Robin-met-de-hoed°

Et pourquoi Robin Hoed serait-ce si grave?

R		82		080		02
O		79		150		11
B		66		210		17
I		73		280		20
N		78		350		28
H		72		420		30
O		79		490		39
E		69		550		48
D		68		610		56

Mais, c'est juste une coïncidence, non? Non, il y a deux autres, au moins.

And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon. Apocalypse 13:11, Douay Rheims

Puis je vis monter de la terre une autre bête, qui avait deux cornes semblables à celles d'un agneau, et qui portait comme un dragon. Apocalypse 13:11, Bible Crampon

Or, le renard est une bête de la terre. Les oreilles pointus ressemblent à des cornes d'un agneau (mais pas d'un bélier), et les poules certainement trouvent les renards plus proches des dragons que des agneaux.

Et chez Disney, Robin des Bois est un renard. Certes, il y a beaucoup d'autres films où, très normalement, Robin des Bois est un homme, mais si on veut n animal comme Robin des Bois, c'est, depuis Disney, le renard.

Et "du renard" en suédois? Orthographe correcte, ça donne 664:

R		82		080		02
Ä		196		270		08
F		70		340		08
V		86		420		14
E		69		480		23
N		78		550		31
S		83		630		34

Orthographe en lettres sans accent (lettres anglais, de fait), avec Ä dissolu en AE:

R		82		080		02
A		65		140		07
E		69		200		16
F		70		270		16
V		86		350		22
E		69		410		31
N		78		480		39
S		83		560		42

Et avec 602, il suffit de faire deux des lettres en minuscules, car chaque minuscule est 32 davantage que le majuscule (sauf certains des lettres à accent limité à des langues de l'Est, dont le suédois n'est pas).

Elle exerçait toute la puissance de la première bête en sa présence, et elle amenait la terre et ses habitants à adorer la première bête, dont la plaie mortelle avait été guérie.

Si la première bête est le Communisme alors une des voies par lesquelles sa plaie mortelle (1990) sera guérie, c'est le hype pour Robin des Bois. Et pour Zorro, mot mexicain voulant dire "renard".

Que Dieu m'en préserve!

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris XI
St. François Borgia
10.X.2019°°

* Robin Hoed (originele titel: "Robin Dubois") is een Belgische stripreeks, bedacht door Turk (tekenaar) en Bob de Groot (scenarioschrijver). Het is een gagstrip en parodie op de verhalen rond Robin Hood.

** Il semble que le compte de twitter lui-même avait cette figure, en précisant Robin Hoed.

*** échantillon A, échantillon B, sur échantillon C ça ce ne voit pas sur la page elle-même, mais elle porte dans les moteurs de recherche le nom Robin Hoed en monnik ...

° Robin-met-de-hoed en de Zwarte Ridder (Piraatjes),
Paperback – 12 Jan 2017
by Philip Ardagh (Author), Mike Philips (Illustrator), Charlotte Bakker (Translator)
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Robin-met-hoed-Zwarte-Ridder-Piraatjes/dp/9055297054

°° La date de publication a ici même été refait par l'ordinateur en "27 juillet 2019" ce qui est faux. Ah, le lendemain j'ai pu corriger.

The Bases of the Probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

If you have 26 letters, and if you add these to each other, how many possibilities do you have for numeric outcomes?

First combination of two is, A + A = 2 (in "gematria by 1") or 2+2*64 = 130 in ASCII. Next combination of two is value 3 or rather 131, you have two possibilities, either AB or BA. Midway you will have 26 possibilities for AZ, MN, NM, ZA and so on. At ZZ you are down to one sole possibility for 180, again.

1		130		180
2		131		179
3		132		178
4		133		177
5		134		176
6		135		175
7		136		174
8		137		173
9		138		172
10		139		171
11		140		170
12		141		169
13		142		168
14		143		167
15		144		166
16		145		165
17		146		164
18		147		163
19		148		162
20		149		161
21		150		160
22		151		159
23		152		158
24		153		157
25		154		156
26		155

First combination of three is, A+A+A = 3 or rather 3+3*64 = 195. It's one only. Next, 196, has three possibilities, AAB, ABA, BAA. One, then three, seems like triangle numbers? Well, yes, to a point.

You cannot get higher in triangle numbers than 1+2+3 ... +26, that is 351. Because next value will also only have 26 possibilities, like one for each letter of the third, and to the former two the diverse combinations, ranging from 2 to 26, which makes 25 of the letters, and then 25 only for Z. Next after that will have 3 to 26, then 25 for Y and 24 for Z. And so on.

Now, if triangle number of 26 is 351, next value will be 351 - 1 + 25, which is 375. Next value after that will be 375 - 2 + 24, which is 397. You may notice that if first after triangle numbers differs by - 1 + 25, it differs concretely by + 24. Next differs by - 2 + 24, concretely by + 22. This means, the values get higher and higher, but by decreasing increments, up to 501 + 4 = 505, 505 + 2 = 507. And after that, next one is also 507, then 505, 501 and back to 351 and the triangle numbers down to 1.

Here are he triangle numbers part, increasing from 1 for 195 and then decreasing to 1 for 270:

1		195		270
3		196		269
6		197		268
10		198		267
15		199		266
21		200		265
28		201		264
36		202		263
45		203		262
55		204		261
66		205		260
78		206		259
91		207		258
105		208		257
120		209		256
136		210		255
153		211		254
171		212		253
190		213		252
210		214		251
231		215		250
253		216		249
276		217		248
300		218		247
325		219		246
351		220		245

So far triangle numbers, and now for decreassing increments:

375		221		244
397		222		243
417		223		242
435		224		241
451		225		240
465		226		239
477		227		238
487		228		237
495		229		236
501		230		235
505		231		234
507		232		233

Any combination of three upper case letters of the normal English alphabet will be between 195 and 270, and its probability will be between 1 possibility for each of these two to 507 possibilities for each of 232 and 233.

Note, it is impossible to know how many of the letter combinations give meaning in any language and how many of those adding up to a particular number give meaning in any one. But the proportions in all combinations including gibberish will indicate something about the proportions in meaningful combinations.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Cergy
St. Nicolas of Tolentino
10.IX.2019

More Probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

How many possibilities are there overall to combine 6 upper case letters of the English alphabet?

26⁶ = 308 915 776

How many of these are 456, which with normal capitalisation becomes 616?

1*55*2=110		190*397*2=150860
3*66*2=396		210*417*2=175140
6*78*2=936		231*435*2=200970
10*91*2=1820		253*451*2=228206
15*105*2=3150		276*465*2=256680
21*120*2=5040		300*477*2=286200
28*136*2=7616		325*487*2=316550
36*153*2=11016		351*495*2=347490
45*171*2=15390		375*501*2=375750
55*190*2=20900		397*505*2=400970
66*210*2=27720		417*507*2=422838
78*231*2=36036		435*507*2=441090
91*253*2=46046		451*505*2=455510
105*276*2=57960		465*501*2=465930
120*300*2=72000		477*495*2=472230
136*325*2=88400
153*351*2=107406
171*375*2=128250		487*487=237169

110+396+936+1820+3150+5040+7616+11016+15390+20900+27720+36036+46046+57960+72000+88400+107406+128250+150860+175140+200970+228206+256680+286200+316550+347490+375750+400970+422838+441090+455510+465930+472230+237169=5863775

308 915 776 / 5 863 775 = 52.68206505195

In other words, scoring 616 as per six upper case adding up to 456 and adding 160 (5*32) for normal capitalisation, is theoretically nearly three times more common than scoring 666 in nine upper case.

And therefore less significant.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris XI
St. Nemorius and Companions
7.IX.2019

Trecis, in Gallia, sancti Nemorii Diaconi, et Sociorum Martyrum, quos Attila, Rex Hunnorum, interfecit.

I have calculated probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

And that's why I was absent from internet yesterday, spending up to late in the evening doing the calculations on paper, last of them (it has taken some weeks).*

Probabilities about what? About getting sum 666 for a nine letter sequence of letters purely English alphabet and purely upper case.

For any three block letters in sequence, English alphabet only, the added values range from 195 to 270, from AAA to ZZZ.

AAA is only one possibility for 195, AAB, ABA and BAA are three for 196, and the values continue rising as triangle numbers up to triangle number 26, 351. From then on, you add two less than previous time each time, up to 507 coming in 232 after 505 in 231. Now, How do you add two less than 2 to 507? You add nothing, so, 233 is also 507, then it turns down, mirroring the ascent in the descent.

Now, for each value of first three, I checked what values in second and third thirds would add up to 666.

239, with second third at 195, third third must be 232. The values sink for one and rise for other to complete reversal, but I only calculate probabilities (multiplying those for second with those of third) up to middle, like:

239	(465)	...	239	(465)
195	1	...	213	190
232	507	...	214	210
[leaving out]	(507)	...	[leaving out]	(39900)

Since the second half will mirror the first one. I add possibilities like (507) and (39900) up, then multiply by 2*(465).

If the number of combinations is uneven, which is always the case when first triplet has even value, since at mid point there must be equal value for second and third, I calculate the midpoint separately before multplying it with only 1*(probability value of first triplet's value), and then do as normally for the rest.

For 26⁹ I checked and double checked the multiplications, till I had twice got a value of:
5 429 503 678 976.

For final sum of possibilities with value of 666 among these, I had:
37 231 320 152.

Now 5 429 503 678 976 : 37 231 320 152 =
145.831 618 562 264 082 5.

Oops, my bad, I thought (must have miscalculated sth) that the result was 1/143, when it is 1/146 or very little less frequent.

However, this is not valid for all names. For Jim Huss, to take an example, he vlogs on youtube, so he's known, there are only seven letters, which are too few to get the number we are asking about. 7*90 = 630, and you can't get higher values for seven English alphabet blockletters than seven Z. In others, the known name is too big. Cham-ber-lain, to use a historic example, for instance, has 11 letters (4+3+4). Now, 11*65 = 715, and you can't get lower with 11 upper case or any letters of English alphabet than 11 A. So, with anyone named Chamberlain, no use asking either. Of 8, 9 and 10 letters, 9 is by far easier than 10 (example with ten, writing Kebab as in Welsh with Cebab : CEBABCEBAB would so add up, and as you can see, all letters are very near beginning of alphabet), and with 8 upper case, as with 6 letters, first upper case and then five lower case, it's far easier to get 616 than 666). Similarily, though less markedly, getting 8 letters adding up to 666 without any lower case or space, is closer to end of alphabet.

So, to calculating how many upper case 9 letter combinations give 666, as compared to the rest, the severe reduction of combinations from both words overall and words relating clearly to a person, will leave the remaining probabilities somewhere around 1/146, but then the ones having 9 letters applied to them are only a subset, and so the overall probabilities are probably less likely than the number of world wide known figures. Meaning, any one there is, is overrepresenting this probability.

Hans Georg Lundahl**
Bibl. Parmentier, Paris
St. Joseph Calasanzo***
27.VIII.2019

* Any blog I am still updating, which isn't opus finitum in its own right, like a test on cultural history of Lithuania, or broken off very severely, like my haikus, or a precursor to this blog, I will not be updating every day, so some who saw this one may have thought I was updating another blog, it can otherwise be checked on this blog, where widgets link to what I update:

Latest on Antimodernism
https://l-o-antimodernism.blogspot.com/

Before I'm posting this one, widget in top field under title features these as last five posts on this blog:

Bonam Vigiliam et Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli
Would the harrassment have sth to do with Putin's visit?
About the dubia
De Dacie decapsulatoribus
Le passé comme repoussoir

Update, now it features:

I have calculated probabilities
Bonam Vigiliam et Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli
Would the harrassment have sth to do with Putin's visit?
About the dubia
De Dacie decapsulatoribus

Same for other widgets, lower down on the blog. Do some scrolling, if you want to keep up with me.

** The name as a whole is more than 9 letters, but HANSGEORG is nine, giving 670, HGLUNDAHL is 9, giving 663.

*** Sancti Josephi Calasanctii, Presbyteri et Confessoris, qui Ordinis Clericorum Regularium Pauperum Matris Dei Scholarum Piarum exstitit Fundator, atque octavo Kalendas Septembris obdormivit in Domino.

ASCII Code and Gematria

I am not sure if you are one of the guys, either "initiate" or having met one, or simply having met one searching it on the internet, or having so yourself, who has heard of "gematria by 1" or "by 6" or "by 9".

I met one who, instead of ASCII, recommended me "gematria by 6". If A = 6, B = 12 etc, obviously, getting 666 in "gematria by 6" is like getting 111 in "gematria by 1". Then you multiply by six, if you apply this to each letter, you automatically apply it to the result.

In "gematria by 9" you multiply each letter by nine, and the result you ask in "gematria by 1" is 74.

Gematria by 6 or by 9 have in common with ASCII to get faster to 666 than gematria by one does. However, unlike gematria by 6 or 9, it does not skip values (you cannot get "665, neighbour of the beast" in gematria by 6 or 9, but you can in ASCII). So, how does the ASCII code speed it up?

By weighting. Since 64 = @, and since upper case letters begin after @, ASCII for upper case letters is 64+n for n=1 to n=26. So, you have "gematria by 1" included in ASCII, and you also have the weighting. Any letter that is lower case instead of upper case adds an extra 32. Signs outside the letters also add weighting, like 32 for space, 46 for full stop, also abbreviation dot, 78 (=N) for dot and space.

I'm here in next table and in two examples considering the simplest case, no lower case and no weighting outside letters, just upper case, comparing to "gematria by 1":

A		1		or 64+1		=65		N		14		or 64+14		=78
B		2		or 64+2		=66		O		15		or 64+15		=79
C		3		or 64+3		=67		P		16		or 64+16		=80
D		4		or 64+4		=68		Q		17		or 64+17		=81
E		5		or 64+5		=69		R		18		or 64+18		=82
F		6		or 64+6		=70		S		19		or 64+19		=83
G		7		or 64+7		=71		T		20		or 64+20		=84
H		8		or 64+8		=72		U		21		or 64+21		=85
I		9		or 64+9		=73		V		22		or 64+22		=86
J		10		or 64+10		=74		W		23		or 64+23		=87
K		11		or 64+11		=75		X		24		or 64+24		=88
L		12		or 64+12		=76		Y		25		or 64+25		=89
M		13		or 64+13		=77		Z		26		or 64+26		=90

Why is this weighting of any consequence? Because, with the weighting, how many letters there are affects the result. Take "gematria by 1", the Z can be divided into two M, each M can be divided into FG, GF or A and FF. Z=MM=MAFF. IA can be added to either, as IZA and as MAFFIA. Now, in gematria by 1, as explained, they are equivalent, in below tables, they are 36 each. Because you have IA in each (adds up to 10) and to that you add 26, whether as Z or as MAFF. However, IZA has only 3 letters, meaning the weighting is 3*64. MAFFIA has 6 letters, so the weighting is 6*64. Therefore, ASCII is more specific than gematria by 1:

I		9		9		or 73		070		3
Z		26		35		or 90		160
A		1		36		or 65		220		8

M		13		13		or 77		070		07
A		1		14		or 65		130		12
F		6		20		or 70		200
F		6		26		or 70		270
I		9		35		or 73		340		15
A		1		36		or 65		400		20

IZA and MAFFIA are 228 versus 420, very different sums.

In gematria by 1, the letter Z could be streched to four letters MAFF, the 3 letter word to a 6 letter word, but it is still 36. In ASCII, there are limits to the stretching. In upper case, you can get 666 only by 8, 9 or 10 letters. And in 10 letters, it is hard to get very specific words. CEBABCEBAB would be one example (Welsh spelling for Kebab, upper case, repeated without space).

This leaves basically 8 or 9 letters, plus combinations involving one or more 32's, normally either space, or normal capitalisation or lower case only or lower case only and space. For one space, you could have 8 or 9 letters giving 634. For the rest, it is normally 6 letters, but as they are lower case, it seems less significant.

Anyone who thinks I counted wrong is free to count for himself. Don't bother totally private persons about their letter sum, since "false prophet" is in the market of ideas and "beast" is in the market of politics. Had Nero stuck to the lyre, leaving politics alone, he would have been honorarily Neron Kaisar, but not a pre-figuring of the beast, since a musician isn't.

I have posted news on this or that person, real or fiction or historic, adding up to 666, but I have counted many more gematrias with ASCII than I posted. Most are immediately "declared innocent" (not of every anti-Christian crime, but of being, under that name, either false prophet or beast, supposing both entities have this sum). I did miscount on Tenzin Gyatso, and therefore posted, but then did not withdraw but correct the post when it added up to something else.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Bibl. Audoux
St. Severus of Vienne*
8.VIII.2019

Not first saint, but French and shorter: Sanctorum Martyrum Cyriaci Diaconi, Largi et Smaragdi, qui, cum aliis viginti Sociis, passi sunt decimo septimo Kalendas Aprilis. Eorum corpora, via Salaria a Joanne Presbytero sepulta, sanctus Marcellus Papa in praedium Lucinae, via Ostiensi, hoc die transtulit; quae postea, in Urbem delata, in Diaconia sanctae Mariae in via Lata fuerunt recondita. ... Viennae, in Gallia, sancti Severi, Presbyteri et Confessoris; qui ex India, Evangelii praedicandi causa, laboriosam peregrinationem suscepit, et, cum ad praefatam urbem devenisset, ingentem Paganorum multitudinem verbo et miraculis ad Christi fidem convertit.

How Relevant is ASCII?

When I read about "le roi cornu" in Lloyd Alexander a few months ago, first time I read the French translation, I recalled that in English that would be the horned king, and recalled that Wiccans call Satan "the horned god".

I few days ago, I wondered about Theseus, as son of Poseidon. I looked at THESEVS but also at THESEA (accusative of THESEVS).

Well, Poseidon can also be called "the sea".

And the difference between "THESEA" and "the sea" is, each upper case is exchanged to a lower case, add six times 32 and a space is added, add another 32.

Now, look at this:

H	72	070	02		H	72	070	02
O	79	140	11		O	79	140	11
R	82	220	13		R	82	220	13
N	78	290	21		N	78	290	21
E	69	350	30		E	69	350	30
D	68	410	38		D	68	410	38
	32	440	40		G	71	480	39
K	75	510	45		O	79	550	48
I	73	580	48		D	68	610	56
N	78	650	56
G	71	720	57		720
					+57
T	84	080	04		777
H	72	150	06
E	69	210	15		610
S	83	290	18		+56
E	69	350	27		666
A	65	410	32
					442
32*7					224
=224					666