Did you see 91 under Omicron, Iota, Alpha?

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica: Gematria of Apollyon / Apollon · Apollo in Modern Greek? · New blog on the kid: Did you see 91 under Omicron, Iota, Alpha?

Here is how it looks 19:43, Paris time, 12.I.2025:

Here is how it should look, and looks again 19:45:

The reason being, Omicron is 70, Iota is 10, Alpha is 1. Makes 81.

But does it correctly add up, now that I've changed a part sum?

Let's check.

Α	Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ω	Ν
Α	Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	O	Σ
Α	Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	I
Α	Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	A
Α	Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν

Α * 5 = 5

Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ω	Ν
Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	O	Σ
Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	I
Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	A
Π	Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν

Π * 5 = 400

Ο	Λ Λ	Ω	Ν
Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	O	Σ
Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	I
Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	A
Ο	Λ Λ	Ο	Ν

O * 5 = 350

Λ Λ	Ω	Ν
Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	O	Σ
Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	I
Λ Λ	Ο	Ν	A
Λ Λ	Ο	Ν

Λ * 10 = 300

Ω	Ν
Ο	Ν	O	Σ
Ο	Ν	I
Ο	Ν	A
Ο	Ν

Ω * 1 = 800
O * 4 = 280

Ν
Ν	O	Σ
Ν	I
Ν	A
Ν

N * 5 = 250

O	Σ
I
A

O * 1 = 70
I * 1 = 10
A * 1 = 1

Σ

Σ * 1 = 200

Yes, it does add up to 2666. I did not count wrong.

Was the 91 me being stressed in 2020? Or was the 91 a hacking of my blog to make me look bad, possibly even to myself, in which case it would be gaslighting? Given that 389 page views have not given one comment, to the effect, seems to indicate that 91 was a recent hacking.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
I LD after Epiphany
12.I.2025

Gematrias for Donald John Trump

דאנאלד דזשאָן טראמפ (Jidysz / Hebrew)

Daleth Aleph Nun Aleph Lam Daleth 4 + 1 + 50 + 1 + 30 + 4 = 90
Daleth Zayin Shin Aleph Nun 4 + 7 + 300 + 1 + 50 = 362
Teth Resh Aleph Mem Peh 9 + 200 + 1 + 40 + 80 = 330

90 + 362 + 330 = 782

Ντόναλντ Τζον Τραμπ (Modern Greek)

Nu Tau Omicron Nu Alpha Lambda Nu Tau 50 + 300 + 70 + 50 + 1 + 30 + 50 + 300 = 851
Tau Zeta Omicron Nu 300 + 7 + 70 + 50 = 427
Tau Rho Alpha Mu Pi 300 + 100 + 1 + 40 + 80 = 521

851 + 427 + 521 = 1799

Δόναλδ Δζον Τραμπ / (Δόναλδ Zον Τραμπ) (Ancient Greek)

Delta Omicron Nu Alpha Lambda Delta 4 + 70 + 50 + 1 + 30 + 4 = 159
Delta Zeta Omicron Nu 4 + 7 + 70 + 50 = 131
Tau Rho Alpha Mu Pi 300 + 100 + 1 + 40 + 80 = 521

159 + 131 + 521 = 811 (807)

ASCII:

D 68 060 08		J 74 070 04		T 84 080 04
O 79 130 17		O 79 140 13		R 82 160 06
N 78 200 25		H 72 210 15		U 85 240 11
A 65 260 30		N 78 280 23		M 77 310 18
L 76 330 36				P 80 390 18
D 68 390 44
434		+ 303		+ 408 = 1145 (1209) (1593)

1209 = DONALD JOHN TRUMP

1593 = Donald John Trump.

He does not seem to have the gematria of Apocalypse 13:18.
/HGL

New Apocalypse 13:18 Gematria

It is not per se a personal name, but it is a nationality.

E 69 060 09
N 78 130 17
G 71 200 18
E 69 260 27
L 76 330 33
S 83 410 36
M 77 480 43
A 65 540 48
N 78 610 56

This is Swedish for Englishman. There is an Englishman who, a year ago, was still, technically at least, a Welshman. It could obviously be someone else who's meant, but this is conspicuous./HGL

PS, two more, the English and Swedish terms, first the English, which will only give 616, probably not the right reading:

S 83 080 03
C 67 140 10
O 79 210 19
T 84 290 23
S 83 370 26
M 77 440 33
A 65 500 38
N 78 570 46

Now for the Swedish, first in Block Letters:

S 83 080 03
K 75 150 08
O 79 220 17
T 84 300 21
T 84 380 25
E 69 440 34

It's just that normal capitalisation in SWedish involves no capitals or block letters for nations, so, all six letters are small. Each small letter of the English alphabet is 32 more. 474 + 6 * 32

It so happens, the Englishman I thought of is technically also a Scotsman ...

So, there are again four candidates for the worst "Highlander" competition ever. Bergoglio, Ratzinger's "papal" name, Putin, Sebastian Kurz. Exit Kurz. Enter Joe Biden. Exit Ratzinger. Enter ... Charles III, though more indirectly than by name./HGL

PPS, as he was a Welshman and is technically also an Ulsterman or an Ultonian, these do not so add up. ULSTERMAN = 699. ULTONIAN = 618. For Welshman, I have checked the English word, as well as Cymro, Gymro and Chymro./HGL

PPPS, Irishman, Ireannach, Ywerddon is also safe./HGL

Bad News?

New blog on the kid : Bad News? · Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : What's in ASCII?

Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.

Can be reasonably abbreviated JRBIDENJR.

Jrbidenjr in Simple Gematria equals: 90:
https://www.gematrix.org/?word=JRBIDENJR

j	r	b	i	d	e	n	j	r
10	18	2	9	4	5	14	10	18

ASCII gematria is "simple" + 64*(number of UPPER CASE letters), in this case 90 + 64*9

He is not alone. BERGOGLIO, PAPABENTO / BENEDETTO, WLADIMIRA (Russian genitive and accusative as it sounds to most Poles) / VLADIMIRB (Vladimir B = Vladimir II, both in Moscow and in Putin family), SEBASTIAN. Each can escape being one of those two in Apocalypse 19:20, because it could be one of the others .../HGL

On vient de dire, il y a eu tellement de tentatives de prouver un tel ou un tel l'Antichrist

Les plus connus en sont:

• Néron
• Napoléon
• Hitler

Déjà pas tellement du monde, et en plus un seul des trois a ou a eu une gématrie quelque part pas trop farfelue:

• Néron - gématrie hébraïque pour NEPΩN KAIΣAP donne 666, pour NERO CAESAR 616.
  
  
• Napoléon - un personnage de Guerre et Paix, Pierre, aurait trouvé une suite de lettres (sans doute avec nombres qui correspondent) dans un manuscrit maçonnique, qui permettrait de coller "L'Empereur Napoléon" à 666. J'ai essayé avec gématrie grecque, en supposant peut-être un ou deux mille + 666, non, j'ai essayé son image en alphabet Latin (I=9 mais J=10, parce que Θ manque, et ensuite un autre décalage parce que Ξ manque), j'ai essayé la "gématrie par 1" (A, a = 1, Z, z = 26). Que nenni. Tolstoï n'aurait pas voulu détailler* laquelle est cette gématrie, cette suite de chiffres et lettres ...
  
  
• Hitler - j'ai trouvé la solution farfelue "A = 100, B = 101". Elle a le mérite d'être une gématrie par 1 lestée (lesté de 99 par lettre), mais contrairement à la gématrie par ASCII, le choix du lestage est ad hoc - en ASCII, chaque majuscule est lestée de 64 et chaque minuscule de 64+32, soit 96. Et pour toute utilisation des ordinateurs - pas ad hoc juste pour faire une gématrie. (0 et 1, ainsi que jusqu'à 31 sont commandes, 32 est l'espace entre deux mots de la même phrase ou clause, 48 - 57 sont 0 à 9 en chiffres arabes).

C'est à dire, pour Hitler, la gématrie ASCII donne au moins 616, qui selon St. Irénée n'est pas le bon chiffre** : H = 72, i = 73 + 32, etc.

Comme Néron, aussi Domitien a été censé être la bête (il avait ce surnom, et c'est lui qui avait exilé St. Jean à Patmos), mais pour gématrie grecque, plus facile de trouver 666 en M.NEPOYA (vocatif, peut-être aussi génitif de M.NEPOYAΣ) qu'en ΔOMITIANOΣ ou un autre cas que je connaisse ... je vais essayer le vocatif, pourtant:

ΔOMITIANE
4, 74, 114, 124, 424, 434, 435, 505, 510 ... non.

ASCII pour DOMITIANE donne

D		68		60		8
O		79		130		17
M		77		200		24
I		73		270		27
T		84		350		31
I		73		420		34
A		65		480		39
N		78		550		47
E		69		610		56

tandis que M. Nerva est absous. Comme ça se devait avec ce gentilhomme, retenu comme Nerva l'honnête par des historiens de l'église.

D'où mon choix de prioriser le code ASCII, ainsi que pour le fait que plusieurs grands sont "accusés" (aucun n'est pointu à lui seul encore), et qu'on écarte Pierre Bézoukhov*** quand à moi ... l'idée d'assassiner l'Antichrist n'est pas trop bonne. S'il n'a pas encore fait le mal que la Bible lui attribue, et on réussit, on aura assassiné un innocent, et si on échoue on risque qu'il sera l'Antichrist et que l'assassinat tenté sera le déclencheur pour sa persécution des Chrétiens.

Par contre, j'ai essayé la gématrie grecque pour Apollon, et il se trouve, si on ajoute les cinq cas, ça donne 2666 (et 4666 pour Apolluon). Alors, les détails sont sur un post en anglais sur mon blog philologique:

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : Gematria of Apollyon / Apollon
https://filolohika.blogspot.com/2020/05/gematria-of-apollyon-apollon.html

Le temps qui coure me rappelle que le serment des médecins est un serment sur Apollon, Asklépios et Hygiée ... j'avais aussi déjà repéré Apollon de Delphes comme diabolique:

Φιλολoγικά/Philologica : What are Criteria of Accepting Divinity in a Revelation?
https://filolohika.blogspot.com/2014/07/what-are-criteria-of-accepting-divinity.html

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Maximin d'Aix
8.VI.2020

* Là, je devine, je n'ai pas lu Tolstoy. ** St. Caesaire d'Arles n'est pas d'accord, mais il est aussi quelque siècles plus tard et plus éloigné de St. Jean que St. Irénée. *** La wikipédie anglaise confirme en partie que c'est lui qui avait trouvé le chiffre maçonnique et qui imaginait qu'il devait assassiner Napoléon.

J'espère que personne ne m'appelle Robin du Bois

En néerlandais, c'est normalement, selon l'orthographe anglaise, Robin Hood, mais on voit aussi l'orthographe Robin Hoed.

En particulier, Robin Dubois, BD comique, est régulièrement Robin Hoed* dans les albums néerlandophones, au moins deux références en dehors - un twitter tweet faisant référance au film de Walt Disney**, et plus d'une publicité pour vêtements de réconstitution médiévale***, donnent Robin Hoed. En plus, Robin Hood est parfois nommé "Robin with the Hood" et en néerlandais ce devient Robin-met-de-hoed°

Et pourquoi Robin Hoed serait-ce si grave?

R		82		080		02
O		79		150		11
B		66		210		17
I		73		280		20
N		78		350		28
H		72		420		30
O		79		490		39
E		69		550		48
D		68		610		56

Mais, c'est juste une coïncidence, non? Non, il y a deux autres, au moins.

And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon. Apocalypse 13:11, Douay Rheims

Puis je vis monter de la terre une autre bête, qui avait deux cornes semblables à celles d'un agneau, et qui portait comme un dragon. Apocalypse 13:11, Bible Crampon

Or, le renard est une bête de la terre. Les oreilles pointus ressemblent à des cornes d'un agneau (mais pas d'un bélier), et les poules certainement trouvent les renards plus proches des dragons que des agneaux.

Et chez Disney, Robin des Bois est un renard. Certes, il y a beaucoup d'autres films où, très normalement, Robin des Bois est un homme, mais si on veut n animal comme Robin des Bois, c'est, depuis Disney, le renard.

Et "du renard" en suédois? Orthographe correcte, ça donne 664:

R		82		080		02
Ä		196		270		08
F		70		340		08
V		86		420		14
E		69		480		23
N		78		550		31
S		83		630		34

Orthographe en lettres sans accent (lettres anglais, de fait), avec Ä dissolu en AE:

R		82		080		02
A		65		140		07
E		69		200		16
F		70		270		16
V		86		350		22
E		69		410		31
N		78		480		39
S		83		560		42

Et avec 602, il suffit de faire deux des lettres en minuscules, car chaque minuscule est 32 davantage que le majuscule (sauf certains des lettres à accent limité à des langues de l'Est, dont le suédois n'est pas).

Elle exerçait toute la puissance de la première bête en sa présence, et elle amenait la terre et ses habitants à adorer la première bête, dont la plaie mortelle avait été guérie.

Si la première bête est le Communisme alors une des voies par lesquelles sa plaie mortelle (1990) sera guérie, c'est le hype pour Robin des Bois. Et pour Zorro, mot mexicain voulant dire "renard".

Que Dieu m'en préserve!

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris XI
St. François Borgia
10.X.2019°°

* Robin Hoed (originele titel: "Robin Dubois") is een Belgische stripreeks, bedacht door Turk (tekenaar) en Bob de Groot (scenarioschrijver). Het is een gagstrip en parodie op de verhalen rond Robin Hood.

** Il semble que le compte de twitter lui-même avait cette figure, en précisant Robin Hoed.

*** échantillon A, échantillon B, sur échantillon C ça ce ne voit pas sur la page elle-même, mais elle porte dans les moteurs de recherche le nom Robin Hoed en monnik ...

° Robin-met-de-hoed en de Zwarte Ridder (Piraatjes),
Paperback – 12 Jan 2017
by Philip Ardagh (Author), Mike Philips (Illustrator), Charlotte Bakker (Translator)
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Robin-met-hoed-Zwarte-Ridder-Piraatjes/dp/9055297054

°° La date de publication a ici même été refait par l'ordinateur en "27 juillet 2019" ce qui est faux. Ah, le lendemain j'ai pu corriger.

The Bases of the Probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

If you have 26 letters, and if you add these to each other, how many possibilities do you have for numeric outcomes?

First combination of two is, A + A = 2 (in "gematria by 1") or 2+2*64 = 130 in ASCII. Next combination of two is value 3 or rather 131, you have two possibilities, either AB or BA. Midway you will have 26 possibilities for AZ, MN, NM, ZA and so on. At ZZ you are down to one sole possibility for 180, again.

1		130		180
2		131		179
3		132		178
4		133		177
5		134		176
6		135		175
7		136		174
8		137		173
9		138		172
10		139		171
11		140		170
12		141		169
13		142		168
14		143		167
15		144		166
16		145		165
17		146		164
18		147		163
19		148		162
20		149		161
21		150		160
22		151		159
23		152		158
24		153		157
25		154		156
26		155

First combination of three is, A+A+A = 3 or rather 3+3*64 = 195. It's one only. Next, 196, has three possibilities, AAB, ABA, BAA. One, then three, seems like triangle numbers? Well, yes, to a point.

You cannot get higher in triangle numbers than 1+2+3 ... +26, that is 351. Because next value will also only have 26 possibilities, like one for each letter of the third, and to the former two the diverse combinations, ranging from 2 to 26, which makes 25 of the letters, and then 25 only for Z. Next after that will have 3 to 26, then 25 for Y and 24 for Z. And so on.

Now, if triangle number of 26 is 351, next value will be 351 - 1 + 25, which is 375. Next value after that will be 375 - 2 + 24, which is 397. You may notice that if first after triangle numbers differs by - 1 + 25, it differs concretely by + 24. Next differs by - 2 + 24, concretely by + 22. This means, the values get higher and higher, but by decreasing increments, up to 501 + 4 = 505, 505 + 2 = 507. And after that, next one is also 507, then 505, 501 and back to 351 and the triangle numbers down to 1.

Here are he triangle numbers part, increasing from 1 for 195 and then decreasing to 1 for 270:

1		195		270
3		196		269
6		197		268
10		198		267
15		199		266
21		200		265
28		201		264
36		202		263
45		203		262
55		204		261
66		205		260
78		206		259
91		207		258
105		208		257
120		209		256
136		210		255
153		211		254
171		212		253
190		213		252
210		214		251
231		215		250
253		216		249
276		217		248
300		218		247
325		219		246
351		220		245

So far triangle numbers, and now for decreassing increments:

375		221		244
397		222		243
417		223		242
435		224		241
451		225		240
465		226		239
477		227		238
487		228		237
495		229		236
501		230		235
505		231		234
507		232		233

Any combination of three upper case letters of the normal English alphabet will be between 195 and 270, and its probability will be between 1 possibility for each of these two to 507 possibilities for each of 232 and 233.

Note, it is impossible to know how many of the letter combinations give meaning in any language and how many of those adding up to a particular number give meaning in any one. But the proportions in all combinations including gibberish will indicate something about the proportions in meaningful combinations.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Cergy
St. Nicolas of Tolentino
10.IX.2019

More Probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

How many possibilities are there overall to combine 6 upper case letters of the English alphabet?

26⁶ = 308 915 776

How many of these are 456, which with normal capitalisation becomes 616?

1*55*2=110		190*397*2=150860
3*66*2=396		210*417*2=175140
6*78*2=936		231*435*2=200970
10*91*2=1820		253*451*2=228206
15*105*2=3150		276*465*2=256680
21*120*2=5040		300*477*2=286200
28*136*2=7616		325*487*2=316550
36*153*2=11016		351*495*2=347490
45*171*2=15390		375*501*2=375750
55*190*2=20900		397*505*2=400970
66*210*2=27720		417*507*2=422838
78*231*2=36036		435*507*2=441090
91*253*2=46046		451*505*2=455510
105*276*2=57960		465*501*2=465930
120*300*2=72000		477*495*2=472230
136*325*2=88400
153*351*2=107406
171*375*2=128250		487*487=237169

110+396+936+1820+3150+5040+7616+11016+15390+20900+27720+36036+46046+57960+72000+88400+107406+128250+150860+175140+200970+228206+256680+286200+316550+347490+375750+400970+422838+441090+455510+465930+472230+237169=5863775

308 915 776 / 5 863 775 = 52.68206505195

In other words, scoring 616 as per six upper case adding up to 456 and adding 160 (5*32) for normal capitalisation, is theoretically nearly three times more common than scoring 666 in nine upper case.

And therefore less significant.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris XI
St. Nemorius and Companions
7.IX.2019

Trecis, in Gallia, sancti Nemorii Diaconi, et Sociorum Martyrum, quos Attila, Rex Hunnorum, interfecit.

I have calculated probabilities

I have calculated probabilities · More Probabilities · The Bases of the Probabilities

And that's why I was absent from internet yesterday, spending up to late in the evening doing the calculations on paper, last of them (it has taken some weeks).*

Probabilities about what? About getting sum 666 for a nine letter sequence of letters purely English alphabet and purely upper case.

For any three block letters in sequence, English alphabet only, the added values range from 195 to 270, from AAA to ZZZ.

AAA is only one possibility for 195, AAB, ABA and BAA are three for 196, and the values continue rising as triangle numbers up to triangle number 26, 351. From then on, you add two less than previous time each time, up to 507 coming in 232 after 505 in 231. Now, How do you add two less than 2 to 507? You add nothing, so, 233 is also 507, then it turns down, mirroring the ascent in the descent.

Now, for each value of first three, I checked what values in second and third thirds would add up to 666.

239, with second third at 195, third third must be 232. The values sink for one and rise for other to complete reversal, but I only calculate probabilities (multiplying those for second with those of third) up to middle, like:

239	(465)	...	239	(465)
195	1	...	213	190
232	507	...	214	210
[leaving out]	(507)	...	[leaving out]	(39900)

Since the second half will mirror the first one. I add possibilities like (507) and (39900) up, then multiply by 2*(465).

If the number of combinations is uneven, which is always the case when first triplet has even value, since at mid point there must be equal value for second and third, I calculate the midpoint separately before multplying it with only 1*(probability value of first triplet's value), and then do as normally for the rest.

For 26⁹ I checked and double checked the multiplications, till I had twice got a value of:
5 429 503 678 976.

For final sum of possibilities with value of 666 among these, I had:
37 231 320 152.

Now 5 429 503 678 976 : 37 231 320 152 =
145.831 618 562 264 082 5.

Oops, my bad, I thought (must have miscalculated sth) that the result was 1/143, when it is 1/146 or very little less frequent.

However, this is not valid for all names. For Jim Huss, to take an example, he vlogs on youtube, so he's known, there are only seven letters, which are too few to get the number we are asking about. 7*90 = 630, and you can't get higher values for seven English alphabet blockletters than seven Z. In others, the known name is too big. Cham-ber-lain, to use a historic example, for instance, has 11 letters (4+3+4). Now, 11*65 = 715, and you can't get lower with 11 upper case or any letters of English alphabet than 11 A. So, with anyone named Chamberlain, no use asking either. Of 8, 9 and 10 letters, 9 is by far easier than 10 (example with ten, writing Kebab as in Welsh with Cebab : CEBABCEBAB would so add up, and as you can see, all letters are very near beginning of alphabet), and with 8 upper case, as with 6 letters, first upper case and then five lower case, it's far easier to get 616 than 666). Similarily, though less markedly, getting 8 letters adding up to 666 without any lower case or space, is closer to end of alphabet.

So, to calculating how many upper case 9 letter combinations give 666, as compared to the rest, the severe reduction of combinations from both words overall and words relating clearly to a person, will leave the remaining probabilities somewhere around 1/146, but then the ones having 9 letters applied to them are only a subset, and so the overall probabilities are probably less likely than the number of world wide known figures. Meaning, any one there is, is overrepresenting this probability.

Hans Georg Lundahl**
Bibl. Parmentier, Paris
St. Joseph Calasanzo***
27.VIII.2019

* Any blog I am still updating, which isn't opus finitum in its own right, like a test on cultural history of Lithuania, or broken off very severely, like my haikus, or a precursor to this blog, I will not be updating every day, so some who saw this one may have thought I was updating another blog, it can otherwise be checked on this blog, where widgets link to what I update:

Latest on Antimodernism
https://l-o-antimodernism.blogspot.com/

Before I'm posting this one, widget in top field under title features these as last five posts on this blog:

Bonam Vigiliam et Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli
Would the harrassment have sth to do with Putin's visit?
About the dubia
De Dacie decapsulatoribus
Le passé comme repoussoir

Update, now it features:

I have calculated probabilities
Bonam Vigiliam et Bonum Festum Sancti Bartholomaei Apostoli
Would the harrassment have sth to do with Putin's visit?
About the dubia
De Dacie decapsulatoribus

Same for other widgets, lower down on the blog. Do some scrolling, if you want to keep up with me.

** The name as a whole is more than 9 letters, but HANSGEORG is nine, giving 670, HGLUNDAHL is 9, giving 663.

*** Sancti Josephi Calasanctii, Presbyteri et Confessoris, qui Ordinis Clericorum Regularium Pauperum Matris Dei Scholarum Piarum exstitit Fundator, atque octavo Kalendas Septembris obdormivit in Domino.

ASCII Code and Gematria

I am not sure if you are one of the guys, either "initiate" or having met one, or simply having met one searching it on the internet, or having so yourself, who has heard of "gematria by 1" or "by 6" or "by 9".

I met one who, instead of ASCII, recommended me "gematria by 6". If A = 6, B = 12 etc, obviously, getting 666 in "gematria by 6" is like getting 111 in "gematria by 1". Then you multiply by six, if you apply this to each letter, you automatically apply it to the result.

In "gematria by 9" you multiply each letter by nine, and the result you ask in "gematria by 1" is 74.

Gematria by 6 or by 9 have in common with ASCII to get faster to 666 than gematria by one does. However, unlike gematria by 6 or 9, it does not skip values (you cannot get "665, neighbour of the beast" in gematria by 6 or 9, but you can in ASCII). So, how does the ASCII code speed it up?

By weighting. Since 64 = @, and since upper case letters begin after @, ASCII for upper case letters is 64+n for n=1 to n=26. So, you have "gematria by 1" included in ASCII, and you also have the weighting. Any letter that is lower case instead of upper case adds an extra 32. Signs outside the letters also add weighting, like 32 for space, 46 for full stop, also abbreviation dot, 78 (=N) for dot and space.

I'm here in next table and in two examples considering the simplest case, no lower case and no weighting outside letters, just upper case, comparing to "gematria by 1":

A		1		or 64+1		=65		N		14		or 64+14		=78
B		2		or 64+2		=66		O		15		or 64+15		=79
C		3		or 64+3		=67		P		16		or 64+16		=80
D		4		or 64+4		=68		Q		17		or 64+17		=81
E		5		or 64+5		=69		R		18		or 64+18		=82
F		6		or 64+6		=70		S		19		or 64+19		=83
G		7		or 64+7		=71		T		20		or 64+20		=84
H		8		or 64+8		=72		U		21		or 64+21		=85
I		9		or 64+9		=73		V		22		or 64+22		=86
J		10		or 64+10		=74		W		23		or 64+23		=87
K		11		or 64+11		=75		X		24		or 64+24		=88
L		12		or 64+12		=76		Y		25		or 64+25		=89
M		13		or 64+13		=77		Z		26		or 64+26		=90

Why is this weighting of any consequence? Because, with the weighting, how many letters there are affects the result. Take "gematria by 1", the Z can be divided into two M, each M can be divided into FG, GF or A and FF. Z=MM=MAFF. IA can be added to either, as IZA and as MAFFIA. Now, in gematria by 1, as explained, they are equivalent, in below tables, they are 36 each. Because you have IA in each (adds up to 10) and to that you add 26, whether as Z or as MAFF. However, IZA has only 3 letters, meaning the weighting is 3*64. MAFFIA has 6 letters, so the weighting is 6*64. Therefore, ASCII is more specific than gematria by 1:

I		9		9		or 73		070		3
Z		26		35		or 90		160
A		1		36		or 65		220		8

M		13		13		or 77		070		07
A		1		14		or 65		130		12
F		6		20		or 70		200
F		6		26		or 70		270
I		9		35		or 73		340		15
A		1		36		or 65		400		20

IZA and MAFFIA are 228 versus 420, very different sums.

In gematria by 1, the letter Z could be streched to four letters MAFF, the 3 letter word to a 6 letter word, but it is still 36. In ASCII, there are limits to the stretching. In upper case, you can get 666 only by 8, 9 or 10 letters. And in 10 letters, it is hard to get very specific words. CEBABCEBAB would be one example (Welsh spelling for Kebab, upper case, repeated without space).

This leaves basically 8 or 9 letters, plus combinations involving one or more 32's, normally either space, or normal capitalisation or lower case only or lower case only and space. For one space, you could have 8 or 9 letters giving 634. For the rest, it is normally 6 letters, but as they are lower case, it seems less significant.

Anyone who thinks I counted wrong is free to count for himself. Don't bother totally private persons about their letter sum, since "false prophet" is in the market of ideas and "beast" is in the market of politics. Had Nero stuck to the lyre, leaving politics alone, he would have been honorarily Neron Kaisar, but not a pre-figuring of the beast, since a musician isn't.

I have posted news on this or that person, real or fiction or historic, adding up to 666, but I have counted many more gematrias with ASCII than I posted. Most are immediately "declared innocent" (not of every anti-Christian crime, but of being, under that name, either false prophet or beast, supposing both entities have this sum). I did miscount on Tenzin Gyatso, and therefore posted, but then did not withdraw but correct the post when it added up to something else.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Bibl. Audoux
St. Severus of Vienne*
8.VIII.2019

Not first saint, but French and shorter: Sanctorum Martyrum Cyriaci Diaconi, Largi et Smaragdi, qui, cum aliis viginti Sociis, passi sunt decimo septimo Kalendas Aprilis. Eorum corpora, via Salaria a Joanne Presbytero sepulta, sanctus Marcellus Papa in praedium Lucinae, via Ostiensi, hoc die transtulit; quae postea, in Urbem delata, in Diaconia sanctae Mariae in via Lata fuerunt recondita. ... Viennae, in Gallia, sancti Severi, Presbyteri et Confessoris; qui ex India, Evangelii praedicandi causa, laboriosam peregrinationem suscepit, et, cum ad praefatam urbem devenisset, ingentem Paganorum multitudinem verbo et miraculis ad Christi fidem convertit.

New Suspect : Dalai Lama - Update : No

I was counting something wrong, will check what. Bc "tenzin" seems to be "664" and "gyatso" to be "663"

Why? Tenzin Gyatso

On what count? Because "tenzin" adds up to "666" and "gyatso" to 665.

A bit of a stretch, since lower case only is not normal capitalisation (could be used in internet sites or email adresses, though), and one of the values is not "beast" but "neighbour of the beast."

Here is why, given that each upper case adds 32 when going lower case, and that 6*32=192, see addition to the right:

T		84		080				G		71		070				474 473
E		69		140		13		Y		89		150		10		192 192
N		78		210		21		A		65		210		15		666 665
Z		90		300				T		84		290		19
I		73		370		26		S		83		370		24
N		78		440		34=474		O		79		440		33=473

However, that in his case it's lower case, and one of the values is 665 suggests he is an upcoming possible accessory. Again, the more suspects, the less one of them could claim an excuse in predestination - God predestines no one to evil, and this is brought out by two evil foreseen "posts" in a Satanic hiererchy opening to several more than two people having a gematric qualification as it is for one or for both of them.

Let's not forget the more Classic gematria of Hebrew (Prince Harry as, inter alia, "Hari Spenser") and "Benedict" (XVI).

Prince Harry seems in Vogue to have promoted "max two children" heresy and Ratzinger antipope has promoted evolution./HGL

PS: correct maths:

T		84		080		04		G		71		070		01		472 471
E		69		140		13		Y		89		150		10		192 192
N		78		210		21		A		65		210		15		664 663
Z		90		300		21		T		84		290		19
I		73		370		24		S		83		370		22
N		78		440		32=472		O		79		440		31=471

Do you like Ground Control to Major Tom?

I don't.

D		68		060		08		442
B		66		120		14		224
O		79		190		23
W		87		270		30		32*7=224
I		73		340		33		One 32 per lower case
E		69		400		42		One 32 for the space

Now, David Bowie was just his artist's name. He died as David Robert Jones.

If you add 442 to 224, it arguably says more of Ground Control to Major Tom than about his own eternal fate. That said, some issues look a bit bleak.

But arguably God wouldn't have wasted a coincidence like that just because Ground Control to Major Tom is bad music. There would need to be sth worse either in the text or in the overall phenomenon the text refers to. Notes being uncomfortable is an added warning signal, not the basic issue.

And Ground Control to Major Tom is about rocketry, and I think it has a bad side.

How would you spell Star Trek in Welsh? Star Trec ... STARTREC if we use no spaces or lower case:

S		83		080		03		580
T		84		160		07		+36
A		65		220		12
R		82		300		14
T		84		380		18
R		82		460		20
E		69		520		29
C		67		580		36

Basically, in Roddenberry's vision, once space was colonised, Christianity, Islam and arguably Orthodox Rabbinic Judaism would be things of the past. "Archaic modes of thought" as some say. Watching Star Trek (the original franchise) was living this vision of the future in advance. Now add 580 to 36.

How do we know this is his view? Because he insisted that Starship Enterprise should have no chaplain.

Those who have already read my story Year 10 950 ARC (After Rocket Crash) will know I don't believe in colonising space any more than in radiation plus spider bite in a lab giving you spider powers. I have more credulity about Dracula (and not that much either) than about Spidey, and more credulity about Orcs than about Warp Drive.

I also think - as some readers may also know - that the tower Nimrod was trying to build was a rocket - it would have had three steps and above them a top meant to reach deep space.

In other words, Nimrod was trying to reach heaven by rocketry. And that's not like getting there by a humble Christian life or a glorious martyr's death, like that of St. Thomas More.

The problem isn't he thought heaven is a place - it is, the risen body of Christ is there, our risen bodies will be there if we are saved, but that he thought a body still mortal, not yet resurrected, could live there.

Plus it was absolutely not needed as a refuge against a second Flood, God already promised there wasn't coming one.

The scene in Ground Control to Major Tom* seems to have as a backstory the colonisation of space as in the belief Earth "won't be enough for mankind" - but it will.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Vert-Galant
St Job of Hus**
10.V.2019

* I had a schoolmate who thought it genius. I didn't.

** In terra Hus sancti Job Prophetae, admirandae patientiae viri.

Stan Lee probably neither Free Mason nor Satanist

Stan Lee probably neither Free Mason nor Satanist · Kudrowophobe? Phoebephobes? You should have a talk about the term ...

Not all Jews are bad. Even if that is a surprise to some.

I saw a reference to Jack Kirby being Bohemian Grove, but this might be from a quick search on a page on Bohemian Grove that features a Jack and also a Kirby. Nothing like that on Stan Lee.



Also, it was Marvel Comics Tomb of Dracula that taught me vampires are repelled by garlic, cruficixes and prayers in Latin.

The Importance of Relying on One's Geekiness Rather than on Expertise

1) New blog on the kid : King James and Mary Tudor, the cat, the dog, the cog, 2) Some of the Main Suspects, 3) So, am I a suspect, before I go on citing others?, 4) Assorted retorts from yahoo boards and elsewhere : ... on Hebrew Gematria for Harry - retort given and withdrawn · 5) New blog on the kid : The Importance of Relying on One's Geekiness Rather than on Expertise

Some while ago, I came across a video, which is now taken down.

It consisted of several ways in which diverse combinations of names and titles of Prince Harry (including King Harry, should he become King) are supposed to add up to 666 or 616.

I was a bit sceptic about transliterating Harry as Hari (I actually missed the aleph part, when later checking), but I trusted whoever had made the video on the gematric values of each suite of Hebrew letters. I shouldn't have. Btw, here is the Hebrew article on him, linking through the name the article has in Hebrew:

הנסיך הארי, דוכס סאסקס

Now, I had got it, that Melek Hari was going to give a gematric value that is one of the two readings of Apocalypse 13:18.

It does not.

I just recently was a bit bored, and when I am, I often do a bit of gematria. Some people claim "you can get 666 from any name" - no, you can't if the gematric system you stick to is straight conventional numeric values of a letter (Hebrew, Greek, Slavonic traditional, or ASCII for English and extended ASCII / Unicode for "accented letters") and no coding, or even if you extend it by coding into atbash or albam codes.

Case in point : Melek Hari does not give 616 or 666. In Hebrew.

I had said to myself this day when I was bored ... "wait, I basically know the number values of so many Hebrew letters, perhaps of all, let's check ..."

Name		Shown		Number		Name		Shown		Number
Aleph		(vowel)		1		Lamed		L		30
Beth		B		2		Mem		M		40
Gimel		G		3		Nun		N		50
Daleth		D		4		Samech		S		60
He		H !		5		Ayin		(not)		70
Vav		V		6		Peh		P		80
Zayin		Z		7		Qoph		Q		90
Heth		H !		8		Tsade		Ts		100
Theth		Th		9		Resh		R		200
Iod		I		10		Shin		Sh / S		300
Kaph		K		20		Tav		T		400

Now, Melek Hari is ... (leaving out the Aleph)

M	L	K		H	R	I
40	30	20		8	200	10

However, 40, 30, 20, 10 = 100. Add 200 for Resh and 8 for Heth. Makes 308. This is not 616, it is only half of it. You check with HRI MVNTBTN, with HRI VNDSVR, with HRI SPNSR.

In Harry Windsor, using Shin/Sin for S, I got 684, but replace it with Samech, you get ... 684 - 300 + 60 = 444.

According to the reading of William Tapley, "Third Eagle of the Apocalypse" this means "King of the South" (Antichrist himself being King of the North), who will be beaten by Antichrist.

Same value as MARINE and as SALMAN in ASCII - also 444 (and Salman of Saudi Arabia has some claim to be considered King of the South).

While Prince Harry, at least at present is not, at least not overtly, King of the South (wait ... he's Duke of Sussex - would Duke be Melek or Shopheth in Hebrew? - Sussex is the SOUTH of Saxon parts of England, which are the SOUTH of England as a whole (along with Jutish Kent), he has an affinity to Islam, in an ecumenical way, and therefore to Salman of Saudi Arabia.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
Hl. Mart. Abdon and Sennen
30.VII.2018

Romae sanctorum Martyrum Abdon et Sennen Persarum, qui, sub Decio, catenis alligati et Romam adducti, pro Christi fide prius plumbatis caesi sunt, deinde gladio interfecti. Assisii, in Umbria, sancti Rufini Martyris. ... (Can't leave out the patron Saint of Padre Rufino Niccacci ... can I?)