While I Disagree with Joey Oberlin On Who's the Pope Today, We Have a Common Group of Harrassers

I haven't seen the video yet:

What led me to CONVERT to the CATHOLIC faith?
Joey Oberlin | 2 March 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8r8lujU23M

But I actually have seen a comment under it:

Adam Villemaire

@AdamVillemaire

EX ROMAN CATHOLIC BORN CATHOLIC
YOU ARE CRAZY❗...IGNORANT
MARIAN DOCTRINES ARE FALSE
MARY 8S NOT QUEEN OF ANYTHING
HOW COULD A HUMAN WOMAN HEAR MILLIONS OF PRAYERS AT THE SAME TIME EVERYWHERE ❓❓❓
CATHOLICS FOLLOW MENS DOCTRINES INVENTIONS OF POPES
WE ARE SAVED ONLY THRU GRACE BY SACRIFICE '' ONE TIME'' ON CROSS NOT BY SACRAMENTS .....
I USE TO ADORE EUCHARIST HOURS LONG ...THIS IS IDOLATRY
BODY BLOOD COULD NOT BE LITERAL ... JESUS WAS ALIVE AT LAST SUPPER....HE DIDI NOT DIE YET❗❗❗
GO SEE WHAT N T TEACHES ABOUT REPEATING ENDLESSLY REPETITIVE '' PRAYERS'' LIKE ROSARIES
YOU NEVER KNEW THE LORD NEVER WAS TRULY BORN AGAIN .....
RC DO NOT KNOW BIBLE NOR HAVE INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS
YOU ARE A YOUNG FOOL PLAYING WITH HELL 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Let's unpack this.

EX ROMAN CATHOLIC BORN CATHOLIC

Possible.

YOU ARE CRAZY❗...IGNORANT

That's a kind of attitude I've come across.

MARIAN DOCTRINES ARE FALSE

Because you don't believe Genesis 3:15, Luke 1:28, Luke 1:42 and Judges 5:24 (with a parallel in Judith, but no parallels outside women killing enemies of Israel all over OT).*

MARY 8S NOT QUEEN OF ANYTHING

If Christ is KING, specifically of the JEWS, Mary is Queen.

HOW COULD A HUMAN WOMAN HEAR MILLIONS OF PRAYERS AT THE SAME TIME EVERYWHERE ❓❓❓

Narnian time, I suppose. Heaven up there has 1 million of seconds while we have only one second. Goes for the other saints too.

CATHOLICS FOLLOW MEN'S DOCTRINES INVENTIONS OF POPES

Protestants follow men's doctrines, inventions of Deformers. (Sometimes misspelled with an R).

WE ARE SAVED ONLY THRU GRACE BY SACRIFICE '' ONE TIME'' ON CROSS NOT BY SACRAMENTS .....

If you mean the sacrifice and the grace are all there is, we need not react in any way to receive that, obviously false. If we DO need to receive it, why not through sacraments? Elisha could have healed Naaman with a word from leprosy, but he preferred telling him to take a bath in the Jordan river. An obvious reference to the first sacrament, Baptism. In fact, Elisha said "seven times" which on the one hand helps to distinguish this image from the real baptism, but also indicates that Baptism isn't the sole sacrament, there are seven of them.

I USE TO ADORE EUCHARIST HOURS LONG ...THIS IS IDOLATRY

Not if the Mass was valid, like per the words of Matthew 26:26.

BODY BLOOD COULD NOT BE LITERAL ... JESUS WAS ALIVE AT LAST SUPPER....HE DIDI NOT DIE YET❗❗❗

They received the living body and the living blood. Actually no one received the Eucharist while He was dead in the grave, we now receive the living resurrected body and the living resurrected blood.

If you mean he was holding the bread in his hands, so it couldn't contain them, you forget that He is God, who "has the whole world, in his hands" and yet he stood as man inside that world. The paradox is just a repeat of the paradox of Incarnation. Ditching the Eucharist is like ditching the divinity of Christ.

GO SEE WHAT N T TEACHES ABOUT REPEATING ENDLESSLY REPETITIVE '' PRAYERS'' LIKE ROSARIES

You mean like Jesus repeating "Father, not my will but thine" in Gethsemane until the disciples went from alpha state to actual sleep?

Or did you refer to a MISTRANSLATION, a LIE AGAINST THE ACTUAL BIBLE of Matthew 6:7?

We know why Pagan prayers were compared to the speaking of someone stuttering and also considered as having many words. No, it was not Mantras, there weren't lots of Hindus in the Roman Empire. Get a paper copy or click an online version of Velleius Paterculus Roman history. Go to the end of book two. Go to the very end. It says "Let me end my volume with a prayer." ... the words that follow aren't a Rosary. Or any other kind of repetitive prayer. It's variations on a theme, because Velleius Paterculus was nervous about saying the right words among so many possibilities.

YOU NEVER KNEW THE LORD NEVER WAS TRULY BORN AGAIN .....

If so, you are not preventing an "apostasy" ... you aren't that anyway, but I mean, even from your own point of view.

RC DO NOT KNOW BIBLE

Was St. Thomas Aquinas RC? It's his feast today, by the way. Did he write commentaries on Psalms, Job, Jeremias, Isaias, Matthew, John, make a collage of older comments on all four Gospels, and on Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Hebrews, and according to some (including me) on Genesis?

NOR HAVE INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS

What did Jesus from the Cross ask St. Thomas? "what do you want as a reward?" and what did he answer? "only you, Lord" ... even if you are not a monk and don't restrict your priorities in this life to Jesus alone, if you are a layman, St. Francis of Sales gives lots of advice on how to keep an intimate relationship with Jesus. And do you know what? Luther and Calvin actually don't recommend it. This is where I think Evangelicals are less un-Catholic (if more acrimoniously anti-Catholic, different story) than classic Protestantism. I've tried both before I became a Catholic.

Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris
St. Thomas Aquinas
7.III.2025

In monasterio Fossae Novas, prope Tarracinam, in Campania, sancti Thomae Aquinatis, Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris, ex Ordine Praedicatorum, nobilitate generis, vitae sanctitate et Theologiae scientia illustrissimi; quem Leo Papa Decimus tertius caelestem Scholarum omnium catholicarum Patronum declaravit.

PS, above I attributed to Adam Villemaire a certain attitude from his words, which it seems he personally didn't mean. Others actually do seem to have meant them though, and someone else commenting under him took his words the same way I did:

Adam Villemaire

@AdamVillemaire

@hglundahl
FOOL IS LAUGHING AT SOMEONE ...MOCKING .... CONTEMPT
SAYING Someone IS '' CRAZY'' IS AN EXPRESSION OF SURPRISE ....NOT BELIEVING SOMETHING RIDICULOUS SOMEONE SAID OR DID

Hans Georg Lundahl

@hglundahl

@AdamVillemaire "FOOL IS LAUGHING AT SOMEONE ...MOCKING .... CONTEMPT"

I'd include non-laughing versions with the contempt of psychiatric diagnosis.

"SAYING Someone IS '' CRAZY'' IS AN EXPRESSION OF SURPRISE"

Thank you for the clarification.** Given the rest of the tone, I thought you were kind of playing amateur psychiatrist. Sorry. Probably goes for the other commenter too.

* Plus obviously the key understanding that the one victory a human being of any type could possibly have over the Devil is sinlessness, since 1 John 3:8.

** In the culture I have, a bit less Proletarian, I would clearly NOT use those words in this particular way. Hence my unawareness they could be so used. Obviously, once someone mentions this use, yes, I know it exists, but I don't habitually think about it, as I don't use it.