Monday 8 August 2016

"When Science Solves the Mystery of Origin if Universe and of Life" ...


When going through youtube, sometimes you come across funny comments. I like that and I like commenting under them, but under this one someone else came first, and it would hardly be fair to make a debate without referring to his already extant work. So, instead I quote and answer here.

  • Quote from youtube comments:

    Grateful Apostate

    "What will you creationists do when science finally solves the mystery of the origin of the universe, and the origin of life on earth? Will you give up your magical, god beliefs, or will you just continue to deny science, and accuse science of conducting a global conspiracy against the dogma of your insignificant cult?"


  • My responses :

  • I

    "What will you creationists do when science finally solves the mystery of the origin of the universe, and the origin of life on earth?"


    Thank you for admitting:

    • a) it is a mystery
    • b) science as today conducted without reference to God has not solved it.


    I don't think it WILL solve them/it.

    Medieval version already has solved them. With a reference to God.

  • II

    "Will you give up your magical, god beliefs,"

    Not me.

  • III

    "or will you just continue to deny science, and accuse science of conducting a global conspiracy against the dogma of your insignificant cult?"


    You confuse "denying science" with refusing certain conclusions, presented as scientific, though clearly less directly verified than "2+2=4" or "doves are birds."

    When we sometimes do talk about global conspiracies, we do not consider "science" and active subject of conspiracies as being identical. Also, per se it is not needed to consider Evolution acceptance as being in itself a global conspiracy. It can be the result of a political one concerning teachers and schools. It can be a result of a conspiracy called UNESCO - which by its own definition is global and by our values a conspiracy. But a scientist accepting evolution need not himself be a conspirator, or not a very high grade one. His contribution to conspirational activity can be limited to, for instance, shut up the debate with a Geocentric or a YEC. When a superior in academic establishment so demands.

    In the main, such a person is not conspiring, unless he goes beyond the degree of conspirational activity I just outlined. In the main he is suffering a delusion of collective grandeur with other evolutionists, as a result of the global conspiracy of UNESCO after founding of UNO after WW-II. That is, because when he was young and impressionable, he spent years, counting more hours in total per year with evolutionists, than adult adepts of Sects or Cults spend with their recruiters.


Hans Georg Lundahl
Paris XV
St Sévère de Vienne
8.VIII.2016

No comments:

Post a Comment